a) Hidden (suggested information) Knowledge (perceivable inspiration)...resisting the former reveals the latter.
b) nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving); those within nature utilize suggested information to conceal the minds/memories of those who consent.
c) the door between perceivable (enacting) and perceiving (reaction) is open unless locked by ones free will of choice, when choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested....ignorance represents the door to conceal comprehension and free will of choice represents the key to lock or unlock it.
d) nature directs (inception towards death) everyone within (life). Each one represents the resistance (growth) within direction (loss), unless willingly submitting (slave) to follow the suggested order by others (master).
e) slavery represents ones free will of choice to submit to the suggested choices of others, hence shaping others by ones consenting choice into the "chosen ones".
In short...master suggests; slave consents.
They have made clear
Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...the few conceal perceivable with suggested narratives.
in their language
Nature communicates perceivable sound, those within tempt each other with suggested words to ignore that.
their plan
Nature represents ongoing motion, those within represent temporary resistance. The few utilize the ongoing by tempting the temporary within to ignore the ongoing, hence by suggesting them to hold onto temporary instead of resisting ongoing.
It's not about the few planing to rule the world; it's about them managing the many, who willingly ignore that only nature sets the rules.
For example...suggesting a new world order tempts the many to ignore that there's only one natural order (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within. The trick is that the old world order; the present world order and the new world order represent suggested narratives to distract the many from the perceivable natural order.
from the beginning
Beginning (inception) towards end (death) represents the momentum for the temporary life within. What each one alive has to discern for oneself is a) ones position within momentum (choice at the center of surrounding balance) and b) that momentum (balance of motion) implies being generated by ongoing motion.
Notice that while alive; one cannot perceive ones inception and death. Why? Because life exists "in-between", hence being transmuted from surrounding (whole) into and out of center (partial) momentarily.
tl; dr...the few cannot conceal without revealing what they're concealing. The foundation (perceivable) exists no matter what others build upon it (suggested)...those with eyes to see don't view the world through the lens of suggested information; but within perceivable inspiration.
The norm represents the curtain for the mainstream narrative on the world stage, and the few can use it to reveal or conceal their production.
have taken control of our systems
The few suggest SYSTEM (Greek systema; from syn) - "to place together" as the inversion of nature setting itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + equality (same) through diversity (difference) + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; unilever; universal pictures + compound interest + mass migration + collectivism + melting pot + world wide web and so on...all representing "to place together".
To be implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying)...
reincarnation
a) RE (response to) IN (being within) CARNAL (pertaining to flesh) -ATION (through action)...that represents ones status quo while living within the process of dying aka flesh responding to, while being within motion.
b) rebirth aka response to NATURE, noun [Latin born, produced]
c) transmigration aka motion (male) to momentum (female) for trans-form (life's migration from inception towards death).
d) metempsychosis aka META (change) EN (within) PSCHYE (spirit: spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of form within to change outside).
how they hijack the language (using "anti" and "dis" to cause a negative emotion so people don't want to be labeled those things and avoid investigating).
Reason (want versus not want) implies ANTI (against, versus) DIS (lack of), hence lacking perceivable (need) when consenting to reason (want vs not want) over suggested.
As for hijacking language...suggested words over perceivable sound represents spell-craft. Nature doesn't label; it designates units (ones) through self division (whole into partial).
a) consent to suggested terrror-ism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] Ones consent gives others the power to shape fears through suggestion.
b) consenting to suggested implies BOTH want and not want, in this case, both hope (want) and fear (not want).
c) wanting or not wanting suggested outcomes; tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
d) ones (life) origin implies motion (inception towards death)...ignoring to resist being moved by motion represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.], hence from ones position as the resistance (living) within motion (process of dying).
e) lack of resistance within perceivable implies opportunity for exploitation through suggestion.
submissive state
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for submission by free will of choice.
childlike
Childhood innocence implies adulthood guilt...guilty of ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) when one consents to submit to the suggestions of the "chosen ones".
behavior can then be controlled
Behave aka "being + having" can be controlled by suggesting others to want to have what one suggests, which in return tempts the perceiving one to ignore being within and having access to everything perceivable.
his powers of reason are clouded
Consenting to suggested (want or not want) implies ignorance of perceivable (need)...ignorance represents the cloud, reasoning (want versus not want) among others about suggested represents the storm.
The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, while sustaining the conflicts of reason as the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb) within the minds/memories of the many, which gives the few control over both sides of every conflict, plus the power of mass consent to be able to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Reasoning for the many represents a) reactionary conflicts about suggestions by the few; b) conflicts among the many with the few out of reach and c) an imbalanced; conflict oriented; versus mindset.
a) living within the process of dying implies "concave at the top and convex at bottom" (CYMA; from Greek; little wave) aka temporary growth coming in (inception) and out (death) of ongoing loss.
b) SYMBOL (representation of) or CYMBAL (instrument within)...
This cannot be temporary unless you can fashion the existence into a measurable unit with valid comparison...
a) the measurable unit represents itself aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unity; unus) - "one". Nature designates itself from whole (oneness) into each partial (ones).
b) suggested MEASURE, noun (Latin metior) - "the whole dimension of a thing" tempts one to ignore self aka being being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), hence having the ability of measure (whole) ment (mind/memory of partial within whole).
c) to measure implies ones free will of choice to count other ones within whole, and other ones (chosen ones) tempt one to count units (ones) as "two; three, four etc.), which when consented to, tempts one to ignore self discernment (being one, surrounded by other ones within oneness).
d) consider if suggestion (fiction) represents the "fashioning" of perceivable existence (reality) for those who consent? Could one fashion perceivable sound with suggested words? How about perceivable symmetry with suggested symbolism?
e) suggested "cannot" aka "can nothing" tempts one to combine being able (can) with nothingness (not). Nothing (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of everything (perceivable inspiration). Those who ignore perceivable are tempted to view the world through the lens of suggested, like for example suggested numbers over perceivable units.
f) nature doesn't require the units within to count anything, it offers the opportunity to each unit to discern self among other units and within whole, hence to discern the who; where; what and why of everyone within everything...unless ignored for the suggestions by one another.
g) what if VALID (whole) generates IN (being within) VALID (whole), hence partials (living) validated by whole (process of dying)?
h) what if others tempt you to consent (want or not want) to suggested information, which would then allow them to rebrand want vs not want into valid vs invalid or true vs false or agreement vs disagreement or belief vs disbelief, and what if these conflicts (versus) are suggested to you as "reasoning"?
i) suggested comparison tempts one to put together; which ignores that nature sets itself apart; hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving). What each one perceives represents moving differences aka communicated inspiration from whole towards each partial to inspire adaptation.
life continues and will continue
a) life implies in-between inception towards death; hence temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying). Hold your breath and wait until the ongoing will force the temporary to adapt or perish.
b) being in-between inception and death implies within the momentum (balance) of motion, hence representing the free will of choice required to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
c) FREE implies within dominance; WILL (aka want) implies within need; OF implies out of and CHOICE implies within balance.
"free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom represents FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying).
Both ongoing (loss) and temporary (growth) are in balance with each other and represent the internal/inherent power of ENERGY (work). All represents one in energy. Each one represents center (choice) surrounded (balance) by whole (motion).
until it does not
a) "until" ( towards) implies within motion, while "it" implies those within motion being able to discern "it".
b) the few suggested creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...basic alchemy (transmutation of ingredient out of base).
this one is missed
Suggested "miss" (without) tempts perceiving one to ignore being "within" perceivable. Partial cannot "miss" whole, yet has the free will of choice to ignore it for whatever other partials are suggesting.
living units of the life system in action are constantly generating their own based on the inputs available
a) "input" implies put in through action, hence allowing those within to react to be enacted upon.
b) to be implies within, out of and in response to, hence reactor (living) within generator (process of dying), and choosing to react to being generated implies RE-GENERATE aka response to being generated by.
Sleight of hand: the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act; only react. One cannot generate; only re-generate.
c) everything (perceivable) is available to everyone (perceiving)...even when ignored for suggested nothing.
the world around you forgets even faster
a) temporary growth (life) can only exist within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
b) the world doesn't forget, it moves, and those within are tempted to hold onto; to memorize, while the world moves on. Resisting the temptation to hold onto; while learning to let go represents the struggle of those within motion, and it represents balancing.
c) consider if the motion from inception towards death represents sameness aka steady velocity aka natural order, while each life within represents difference aka unsteady resistance aka temporary chaos within ongoing natural order?
In other words...is it the world that moves faster or is it ones resistance which diminishes through lack of resisting?
Would either answer get you to consider the implications of the aforementioned questions?
Look around you...does normal human behavior seem to work out for humans? What if utilizing free will of choice would express behavior outside the "norm"? Would that confuse those who consented to follow suggested norms?
Remember Cheers..."where everybody knows your name"? What was the name that everyone within Cheers knows? NORM. That's a sleight of hand about what's going on in this world...fat jew makes a suggestion (what's up everybody); goyim consent to suggested (NORM; NORM; NORM...)
"Making your way (inception towards death) in the world today takes everything you've got (life)"..."Taking a break (ignorance) from all your worries (response-ability), sure would help a lot"..."Wouldn't you like to get away?"
Those who behave outside the norm have to be dehumanized (bots) as to keep those within the norm believing to be humans instead of domesticated cattle...
prejudice
a) PRE (before) JUS (law) DICO (to pronounce) implies perceivable natural order before ones pronunciation of suggested laws.
b) the few suggest "prejudice" to mean against others, while perceivable "pre jus dico" implies ones self discernment of being within.
into a whole new and violent direction
a) what "new" direction can there be for life being moved from inception towards death?
b) could suggested directions tempt one to ignore that perceiving partial (life) is being directed by perceivable whole (inception toward death)?
c) what is more VIOLENT (driven with force) than life being moved from inception towards death?
movement is plagued by
Ignoring that ones mind (ment) is being moved puts one at dis-ease (plague)...choosing to resist (life) being moved (inception towards death) eases ones mind.
trans
a) motion (male) generates momentum (female), which establishes trans-formation (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
b) FE (minine) MALE aka WO (mb) MAN aka S (split) HE aka trans-formed SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...
a) GEN (generated) CIDE (murder)
b) what if generation (process of dying) generates re-generation (living)?
c) what if the generator gives to (inception) and takes from (death) each reactor (life) within?
d) if inception predefines death; then is life being murdered or given the opportunity to live?
e) could those alive being tricked to ignore perceivable generator for suggested genocide?
disagreeing with them is “genocide,”
a) agreement vs disagreement implies ones choice to want vs not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) ignoring perceivable need for suggested want represents suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion. Why? Cause ignoring need destroys self; while being tempted by want destroys ones surrounding.
c) everything "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is". If one consents to what "is", then one ignores what "was", while giving those who suggest what is the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict it at will.
mentally ill
Mind/memory cannot be ill, for it represents momentum (momentary) of motion (health) for everyone's choice within. Choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested represents the illness of ignoring ongoing momentum (inspiration) for captured moments (information).
Inspiration goes through ones mind/memory; information is being held by ones free will of choice within mind/memory. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto, it needs to resist the want to hold onto, while adapting to what goes through oneself.
Those who learn to let go, can draw gain from the flow of inspiration at any moment (um) of being moved, while those who hold onto information are drowning within loss, hence overburdening themselves. The few exploit this by keep suggesting information to fill the minds of the many, and like a vampire, each suggested piece of information requires ones consent to enter ones mind/memory.
a) what if resisting suggested "we" (pluralism) would allow one to regain control (govern) of ones mind/memory (ment)?
b) what if suggested "need to be" tempts one to ignore perceivable need for being?
c) to be implies "towards being", yet while alive one is being moved from inception towards death, so not towards being, but within loss of being...unless resisted.
we the people
a) who wrote the "we the people" as the preamble of the constitution...the people or those writing in the name of the people?
b) can a few represent a many without each one of the many ignoring to respond to presented as oneself?
c) why do the few remain "apart" while suggesting the many to come "together"?
become corrupted
What if consenting to suggested "be-come" corrupts one from comprehending perceivable "came-to-be"? Become tempts towards outcome; came to be implies out of origin.
shadow government
a) consent to suggested information gives those suggesting the power to control (govern) the minds (ment) of those consenting.
b) ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents the shadow over ones comprehension, while others control (govern) ones mind (ment).
to push the idea
What if suggested idealism tempts one to ignore being (life) pushed (inception towards death), hence having response-ability (choice) to resist perceivable origin instead of following along towards suggested outcomes.
a) suggested "school shooting" instead of murder represents a false flag.
b) suggested "tell-a-vison" over what your vision is telling you represents a false flag.
c) suggested information over perceivable inspiration represents a false flag.
Imagine working for an entity that is trying to murder you
"for" implies going forward while following orders...not looking back. An image represents a captured moment; while moving forward implies being within ongoing momentum. Those who imaging ignore perceivable momentum for captured moments suggested to them.
Furthermore; "murder" implies imagining the intent of others; while order followers hide self among others while following directions...why would one isolated among followers imagine intent of others? What could a follower see but other followers?
Because they wait outside until someone let's them in to investigate how to tempt one behind gates.
From the point of view of average
AV'ERAGE, noun - "contribution to a general loss"...ones point of view represents growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
The few tempt the many to contribute consent to the suggested average; to the norm; to the mainstream; to the party-line etc.
a) what if form (choice) can only exist within level (balance) of current (motion)?
b) does "free" will of choice require allowances by the suggested choices of others?
c) what grants; gives; yields choice...perceivable balance or suggested choices?
they want
Can one choose want (suggested) without ignoring need (perceivable)?
allow all
How can one allow all if one (perceiving) exits within all (perceivable)?
NWO takeover in process
a) the perceivable natural order (inception towards death) processes those (life) within; others suggest "world" aka VAULT - "repository for the dead" to contain life within.
Those who ignore being (living) processed by (process of dying) will be taken over, hence drowning with-in process.
b) suggested "new" (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable "new, néwos, now" (within everything).
a) to be implies temporary ascent (life) within ongoing atrophy (inception towards death) aka growth within loss.
b) to be implies different walks (life) within same way (inception towards death).
c) mind/memory "needs" to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting to "want" to hold onto suggested information.
d) to remember represents RE (response to) MEMORY (memorized), which implies ignorance of perceivable input for suggested accumulation.
Example...hold your child. Remembering the birthday of your child implies your ignorance of the child you hold, hence ignoring that which is (perceivable) for that which you hold onto (suggested) about what was.
numbers
NUMBER - "the designation of a unit"; from UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) - "one". Others tempt ONE to ignore self by counting other ONEs.
Sleight of hand: Count Dracula who requires your consent to his suggestion and The Count from Sesame Street suggesting you to consent to counting...both depicting so called jews aka the "chosen ones".
a) who suggested the "no" (nothing) and who consented to it?
b) perceiving problem (life) within perceivable solution (inception towards death) can be tempted by suggested questions and answers.
c) what is easier...waking up to the jewish question or waking others up to it?
d) could it be that resisting ignorance as free will of choice represents the struggle within each one to resist want (suggested) within need (perceivable)?