a) consent to suggested terrror-ism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] Ones consent gives others the power to shape fears through suggestion.
b) consenting to suggested implies BOTH want and not want, in this case, both hope (want) and fear (not want).
c) wanting or not wanting suggested outcomes; tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
d) ones (life) origin implies motion (inception towards death)...ignoring to resist being moved by motion represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.], hence from ones position as the resistance (living) within motion (process of dying).
e) lack of resistance within perceivable implies opportunity for exploitation through suggestion.
submissive state
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for submission by free will of choice.
childlike
Childhood innocence implies adulthood guilt...guilty of ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) when one consents to submit to the suggestions of the "chosen ones".
behavior can then be controlled
Behave aka "being + having" can be controlled by suggesting others to want to have what one suggests, which in return tempts the perceiving one to ignore being within and having access to everything perceivable.
his powers of reason are clouded
Consenting to suggested (want or not want) implies ignorance of perceivable (need)...ignorance represents the cloud, reasoning (want versus not want) among others about suggested represents the storm.
The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, while sustaining the conflicts of reason as the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb) within the minds/memories of the many, which gives the few control over both sides of every conflict, plus the power of mass consent to be able to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Reasoning for the many represents a) reactionary conflicts about suggestions by the few; b) conflicts among the many with the few out of reach and c) an imbalanced; conflict oriented; versus mindset.
a) consent to suggested terrror-ism gives those suggesting the power of consent to define, redefine and contradict TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] Ones consent gives others the power to shape fears through suggestion.
b) consenting to suggested implies BOTH want and not want, in this case, both hope (want) and fear (not want).
c) wanting or not wanting suggested outcomes; tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
d) ones (life) origin implies motion (inception towards death)...ignoring to resist being moved by motion represents EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.], hence from ones position as the resistance (living) within motion (process of dying).
e) lack of resistance within perceivable implies opportunity for exploitation through suggestion.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the foundation for submission by free will of choice.
Childhood innocence implies adulthood guilt...guilty of ignoring response-ability (free will of choice) when one consents to submit to the suggestions of the "chosen ones".
Behave aka "being + having" can be controlled by suggesting others to want to have what one suggests, which in return tempts the perceiving one to ignore being within and having access to everything perceivable.
Consenting to suggested (want or not want) implies ignorance of perceivable (need)...ignorance represents the cloud, reasoning (want versus not want) among others about suggested represents the storm.
The few utilize suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, while sustaining the conflicts of reason as the state of WAR, noun (Greek, to perplex, embroil, disturb) within the minds/memories of the many, which gives the few control over both sides of every conflict, plus the power of mass consent to be able to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
Reasoning for the many represents a) reactionary conflicts about suggestions by the few; b) conflicts among the many with the few out of reach and c) an imbalanced; conflict oriented; versus mindset.