Even the stolen election feels like it was layers of total bullshit.
a) Thinking that political sides at odds with one another can be even...that's a con.
b) Thinking that what nature gives to being for free can be stolen from one another...that's a con.
c) Thinking elect (choice) can be shared by voting representatives...that's a con.
d) Thinking that diverse (life) within equal (inception towards death) can be made alike one another...that's a con.
e) Thinking that what nature delineates apart from one another can be layered upon one another...that's a con.
f) Thinking that whatever amount of bullshit can be layered into a totality...that's a con.
g) Thought shaped by the articulation of words within natural sound...that's a con.
long con
Length implies a measurement taken into possession, which tempts one to ignore process (inception towards death) giving potential (life).
We (created beings) are the ones, singular
WE and BEINGS implies plurality. WE aka plural of I, first person plural pronoun, "I and another or others".
unwhole
Un- "not" implies the negation of whole. Using the word "unwhole" blasphemes holiness. How could a partial negate whole other than by denial? Does a partial in denial negate whole or only self?
without wholeness
Whole implies out (outer cause) for partial within (inner effect). The synthetic word "without" tempts one to ignore analyzing out > with > in aka singular procession.
Nothing can't create something.
A sum of things can tempt one to denial being set apart within whole.
trying to be Holy means
Meaning implies holding onto aka defining as affixed to build a consensus among beings...that's a synthesis. Whole (holy) dividing (divining) partial implies an analysis.
Synthesis implies comfort (want); analysis implies trial (need)...there's a choice to be made in-between.
to be set apart as God
God remains whole (motion) while setting (momentum) apart (matter)...viewing God as apart implies God lacking parts.
Only within wholeness can apartheid come into being.
our Creator
How was "our" created? By partials choosing to join together. Our implies a sum of partials ignoring whole setting partials apart from one another.
Whole cannot create for whole implies the whole of what could be created. Whole can only transform (transfer form) partial. Creationism was implanted into partial to build sums aka to permit few the summoning together of many.
Creationism implies speculative masonry permitting few to shape the imagination of many by free will of choice.
God...is set apart
God WAS whole before partials within; set apart from one another, can suggest what IS.
sets us apart
US (uniting states together) contradicts apartheid (setting states apart).
we were made that way
Way implies singular motion...we implies plural of matter. If a singular being joins a plurality; then one loses ones way.
to be His
His implies possession...Him implies procession towards division (him/her) of being.
not to become Him
To become aka "coming towards being" implies His work...not aka "nihilo; nihilism" implies ones denial of His work.
to be within Him Who CREATED us and to be His, NOT to become Him.
It's ones consent to suggested creationism (creatio ex nihilo) which establishes nihilism (not).
If one lets go of creation, then nothing seizes to exist. Why? Because without creation there can be only transformation of everything into each thing.
Better to try to be Holy then, I think.
The trial implies ones struggle to sustain particularity among commonality...within whole.
Trying to be Holy implies trying to be God...that's satanism. Trying to make holy implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which establishes a commonality (gentiles) under a particularity (jew) aka slavery.
try to be
TO implies God; BE implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within God, which establishes the trial of sustenance.
Better...I think.
That implies circular confinement (better vs worse)...not a free mind thinking straight.
The other way...from holy (whole) towards partial aka cause setting effect into position.
They gave us first
First implies God given..."us" implies a synthesis inverting the God given analysis into a conflict aka thesis (us) vs antithesis (them).
See what happens when you go to the other extreme
Only choice can operate in-between extremes (balance)...choosing either puts both into conflict (imbalance) while corrupting ones sight.
What game are they playing there?
There can be only one...tempting given choice (reward) to take a chance (risk).
sound far fetched
Sound doesn't fetch...it releases. It's each instrument (mind structured within) which gets tempted to play fetch with one another.
Nature sets being free...a jew suggests artificial prices to tempt gentiles to sell self out by buying into anything, which shapes a gentile from alive into debt/dead.
Pay/pax - "peace; to pacify"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pay A gentile selling self out into dead (war) has to pay (peace) those alive.
The accumulating debt of dying gentiles gives peace to each living jew...that's how nature works balance upon choice.
There's a word that has gone out of fashion over time and that's "charlatan"
Charlatan/ciarlare - "to prate; babble" aka Mystery Babylon. Few tempt many to physically prate/babble as to fashion (make-up) a mental prison of their own design. Any suggested information held onto by consent...enslaves ones mind to prate and babble about it.
Sleight of hand...Charlemagne (charlatan); the king of the Franks (free, liberal, generous, outspoken).
there are always layers
Layer/lay - "cause to rest" tempts one to ignore that cause generates effect without rest. Few suggest affectation to distract many from cause, which lures effect to rest.
Effect implies being within cause; affect implies effect ignoring cause for one another...the latter establishes the layers under which ones resting mind slumbers. Few shape layers to tuck many into arrested development.
Artemis/arktos (to bear) + moon/me (to measure) aka bearing the burden of measurement taken, which in return tempts one to ignore mission/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw).
Nature releases being...others suggest measurements to bind a burden onto a being.
our country
a) Counting (country) permits another to hold one accountable. Nature sets each being free...not accountable to one another.
b) Possession (our) prevents potential from expressing oneself. Nature generating being implies procession generating potential.
Finance both sides
Finance/finis/fin (end) implies one side...it's ones consent to suggested finance which establishes the other side, while ending self by drowning in debt/dead.
The opposite of finance implies defund aka the division (life) of foundation (inception towards death) aka nature giving being "free" will of choice aka the beginning of each ones sight.
repeat forever
RE implies reaction; forever aka ever forwards implies action aka ever forwarding action (inception towards death) generating temporary reaction (life).
Living implies A GAIN...not repetition (again); but diversification (a gain).
Banking is about keeping...
-ing denotes action, which cannot be kept without shaping inaction. If being (life) implies within action (inception towards death); then keeping anything makes ones reaction inactive.
keeping people in debt
A person (singular) drowns if keeping a people (plural) together by joining.
debt
Debt implies dead...being alive implies rising (life) within a current (inception towards death). Keeping a currency in possession, while trying to rise within a current makes not drowning in debt/death exponentially harder.
War creates a lot of debt.
Few suggest creationism (something out of nothing) to sum many into a lot aka into a consensus called reason (peace vs war).
Few cast many into lots to make war.
Bankers love to finance wars.
a) Love versus hate implies the banks aka both sides of a moving currency, and it requires ones trust to enter a bank aka ones choice to incline towards a side.
b) Finance/finer - "to end, settle a dispute or debt" implies few tempting many to settle the end of their lives in disputes against each other while drowning in debt/dead.
c) Love vs hate implies rich vs poor...no matter which side of any suggested currency one chooses to keep.
VS aka verto (to turn) represents the bank keeping ones trust, while ignoring that nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life). The turning against one another represents an artificial decease of the mind called willing ignorance.
What if...were right all along?
All along implies all moving forwards while moving each one within along...there's no left vs right conflict (war) unless one chooses to ignore all along.
How quickly all that bullshit disappeared...
All (perceivable) moves each one (perception) within steadily along...few suggest bullshit to tempt many into an unsteady war (quickly vs slowly).
Within nature...quick and slow aren't in conflict against each other, but represent each beings choice to physically measure or to mentally hold onto a measurement. That which can be physically measured is based on nature moving it apart, while measurements held onto represent ones artificial ignorance of nature.
nature doesn't have banks
Nature implies a current (inception towards death) which tempts each being (life) within to incline towards a side.
fair...doesn't...either
These represent you the being choosing to bank one side over another aka fair vs unfair + does vs doesn't + either vs both. Others suggest the words "fair + doesn't + either" to tempt you to invest trust into banks by inclining your free will of choice towards a binding side.
Natural current implies linear progress; banking implies circular conflict.
- Loan/lehn/loikw - "to leave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/loan
Taking a loan implies taking a leave of absence aka denial of presence. Nature doesn't give loans...it advances "free" will of choice.
ot god and nt god are different entities
a) Entity implies each being within God. Only within God (motion) can flowing abstract (momentum) form entity (matter).
b) Old Testament versus New Testament implies a circular conflict among differences turning against one another, hence making them ALIKE one another. Old vs new implies the mutual destruction of different entities, and it's based on a test/teks (to weave) of ment (mind) aka few weaving the minds of many together into a conflict.
c) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
New implies the inversion of now, within which one old/al (to grow; nourish) aka God nourishing growth now....not before (old) or after (new). If one chooses new or old, then one ignores now aka living within k-NOW-ledge.
The Father of Jesus likes to sacrifice animals
a) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Putting a THE (theos; god) before FATHER implies an imposter...
b) Sacrifice implies "offering"; animal implies "all animation" aka all offering animation through each animated one within. It's putting the labels "animal" and "sacrifice" upon one another which distracts from God.
c) Same (animation) generating difference (animated) implies sacrifice...LIKE implies a self sacrifice of being differentiated from one another by choosing to behave like one another.
God divines aka makes private (apart)...not common (alike).
It needs no cabal.
Cabal aka cab (cube) al (all) aka all giving cue to being. This gives being the choice in-between needing to adapt to cue or wanting a clue from one another.
Being implies in-between cue (perceivable) and clue (suggested).
Why not the opposite?
Because how could "not" have an opposite?
All things
All implies whole; thing implies partial...things implies a sum of partials within whole. A sum of partials cannot made whole again...a jew suggests tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into believing that it can.
constant vibration
Constant implies "standing together"...applying vibration to anything standing together would shake each stance apart from one another.
different types
If it's different from one another, then why type it together? Few suggest typecasting to tempt many together, which distracts from differences.
all is counciousness
Con (together) scious (to perceive)...all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, thereby making differences perceivable. Few are conning (con) perception (scious) by suggesting many to join a consensus.
Likeness obscures difference.
speculate that every physical object
a) Spec implies special aka apart from one another...every implies a collection of each held together. One cannot speculate about every (plural) without ignoring each (singular).
b) Physical aka phsy (to be) i (within) al (all) implies as partial within whole aka as essence (perception) within abstract (perceivable).
But there's a C in physi(c)al...because it's based on each being to SEE (c) or not to SEE (c). Those with eyes to see (c)...didn't fell for phonetic tricks.
oscillate
Only within a current (inception towards death) can oscillation come into being (life).
The more synchronized these vibes are...
...the less stable each VI(brating)BE(ing) becomes. Vibration implies holding onto one side while turning against the other; adaptation implies resisting the temptation of both sides (inception/death) from in-between (life).
Few suggest vibration to distract many from adaptation... https://genius.com/The-beach-boys-good-vibrations-lyrics
complex
Com (together) plex (to weave) implies bondage for each ones free will of choice if joined like for example the world wide web.
our
Our implies holding in possession...being implies procession (inception towards death) letting go potential (life). Possession restricts potential if held onto.
around
Being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death)...few shape an inward circle (logic); which turns into an outward circle (reason) to tempt the minds of many into circular confinement aka the mythological ouroboros.
US
To be implies a different state from one another, hence within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unisex; universality aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (a game of puzzle) aka "there's comes a time when we need to heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one" aka globalism aka multiculturalism aka miscegenation aka melting pot etc. to artificially put together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).
It's ones consent to any suggestion by another which establishes the connection between slave (ones choice) and master (chosen one).
resonance
Re (to respond) son (sound)...sound/sanus (whole; entire; all) generates each instrument (mind structured within) by internal division aka motion (sound) > momentum (spectrum) > matter (instrument).
Few trick many with the articulation (word) of natural sound into an echo-chamber aka ones mind resounding the words suggested by another.
A word is shaped by putting letters together which implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape LETTERS together. Oneself represents the letter of each word shaped by another.
The letters are then shaped through an alphabet aka abecedary (abracadabra) into crafted spells to establish definitions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those who are deaf to phonics (sound).
Furthermore...it's the word (logos) which shapes the inward circle (logic) which turns into outward conflict (reason) among instruments.
some people refer to this as a simulation?
ATION (action) generating reaction implies singularity. Reacting to pluralism (some; people) SIMULATES action. If you view others as a sum and yourself as part of a people, then your mind is running an artificial simulation of natural differentiation.
Being implies person (per sonos; by sound) aka a singular instrument within the singularity of sound. It's the mind of each instruMENT which can be instructed with pluralism (people) to deny singularity.
systems needed to sustain life
Sys (together) sta (to stand)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/system Only apart can life choose to stand together, and standing implies balancing as choice within motion, which togetherness shapes into a progressively increasing burden.
The opposite of system implies disorder aka division (life) of order (inception towards death) aka the process of dying providing the necessities for living. A system represents a wanted or not wanted arrangement within the mind of a living being, which few shape into a consensus among many to systematically enslave each divided/divined being.
An Ultimate Creator makes the most sense to me
a) Ultimate implies coming to an end...it's origin which brings into being by moving forwards. Few suggest ultimism and progressivism to turn the mind of many from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.
b) One cannot sense "most"...artificially summoning together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis) distorts ones sense.
Most implies "more"...being implies one within all. There cannot be more than all for each one within. More God contradicts almighty all-father, yet a contradiction can be shaped within a mind who ignores God.
God cannot create because that would imply creating more than God. All transforming into each one implies loss (inception towards death) generating growth (life)...more vs less implies a contradiction based on measurements taken.
A being can always shape more (want) or less (not want) out of all given (need)...
If non...
...then nothing else.
non-living matter
Living implies within animation...the "mat" within aniMATion implies matter living within motion. There's no such thing as non-living matter; only matter in de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of motion.
higher being
Being implies in-between inception and death aka rising during loss. High and low represent measurements taken by a being who ignores in-between for inclining towards a side.
created life
Creation implies out of nothing... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo which represents a jewish deception tempting gentiles into denial.
Life implies effect within cause aka reaction within action aka growth within loss aka one within all aka each thing within everything aka form within flow.
Life implies transformation (action forming transfer)...not creation.
chance
Nature gives being choice...beings tempt one another to ignore given choice by taking chance aka gambling.
common sense
Sense implies being send apart from one another...few suggest common (together) as the inversion of private (apart) to invade ones privacy by tempting one to join others willingly.
logically makes sense
Being send aka becoming sensible implies within linear motion...logic implies circular thinking. Only within a line can a circle be shaped, and few shape circles inwards (logic) and outwards (reason) to confine the minds of many.
Alien Hybrid
Each being represents a native to nature and an alien to one another. Hybridization aka mongrelization aka miscegenation represents the mixing together of alien beings set apart within nature. Today it's called "globalism"...
I don't believe in neutrality or coincidence
a) Believing in "I" + "YOU" neutralizes "ONE". Neuter (neither of two) implies singularity. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto either side without neutralizing self.
b) Coincidence aka co (together) incidere (to fall). The rise of being implies falling (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another. Choosing to hold onto a side (i or you; do or don't; belief or disbelief) inverts apartheid into coincidence.
Writing: "I don't believe" coincides with "You do disbelieve"...either of which neutralizes the state of being if held onto.
Real implies "response to all"; historical implies "storing within all"...storage burdens response.
Notice that history is shared from being to being...not delivered from nature to being. Few use the label "history" to describe BEFORE to many, which tricks many to ignore nature FORE(warding) BE(ing).
Before (fake) represents the inversion of forebe (real).