- Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=israel
- A People Apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815
The nature of israel and each jew implies "apartheid" which therefore cannot be torn apart by gentiles who are ruled by "unity". Nature sets each unit of being apart from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that.
I honestly tried. I did.
I didn't put you on trial. You did.
You're an idiot
Idiot/idios - "one's own; private"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/idiot
Commenting on something makes it public...free will of choice cannot be owned.
baphomet statue they can haul around with 4 guys
Six...as above (3) so below (3).
Life being moved from inception towards death implies the bending of temporal growth within ongoing loss aka the band of each ray within the visible spectrum of light.
It's putting them together which represents bondage into a bundle.
Example: the general jewish labour bund aka "The Bund" during the Bolshevik revolution and the Völkerbund aka League of Nations aka United Nations...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Jewish_Labour_Bund
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B6lkerbund
The difference between bend and bund...bending implies within a line; bundling implies within a circle.
a) Notice the BI in bind implies "two-folded"...those are the sides which conflict with each "ones" free will of choice.
b) If inception (side) > life (sight) > death (side), then one can only see in-between sides. Notice then that one cannot see ones sides...both inception and death remain out of ones living sight.
a) God presents being as presence, hence pre (before) > sent (sending) > sence (sense)...
b) Treatment implies negotiations among being, hence negating one another by trading as traitors to God given "free" will of choice.
There cannot be any mutual agreement between "free" will of choice without binding both sides in conflict with one another.
Why are Democrats opposing voter ID?
So that Republicans can advance voter ID!
voter ID
a) To vote any representative implies one's choice selecting a chosen one...
b) Being implies different from one another...few suggest ID to shape many identical to one another mentally (consensus) and physically (uniformity).
the same reason
Reasoning implies differences against one another while ignoring that only during sameness (inception towards death) can difference (life) come into being.
all manner
All implies motion; each one within implies matter...manner implies the behavior of matter within motion; which can be modified.
The driving is fully autonomous
Auto (self) nomos (law) aka playing the devils advocate, while treating God as absentee.
the main objective of this war has always been
Always implies the way of all (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...that's natures main objective subjecting each being within.
War implies being vs being...an artificial circular conflict distracting from natural linear procession.
central...not being fond
Fond vs not fond implies imbalance; central implies balance...a bank sustains balance by imbalancing depositors with currency.
a big one on the way
The way can only be bigger than anyone wandering within.
Jesus psyop?
Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies holding onto self, while ignoring that the way of animation (psyche) diminishes anything held onto...others operate Jesus (I am) onto Christ (to anoint) to diminish anointment by causing friction between I AM (jesus) and YOU ARE (judah).
waiting for some blue beam
Blue implies the clear sky; beam/baum implies the living tree...it's the waiting which tempts one to ignore that.
Joy becomes sorrow if held onto...reason implies holding onto a side while fighting the other like good vs evil + joy vs sorrow.
somehow "They" steer discussion and analysis around an area
Around as in circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason)...a circle implies the beginning and end of a line put together aka a synthesis...not an analysis.
it just so happens no one talks about
It's talking (articulation of natural sound into words) which confines thinking into circles.
They" =/= "jews". It extends far beyond them.
Extension implies singularity aka cause extending into effect inwardly. A chosen one (singular) shapes they/jews/them (plural) to restrict the extension of ones choice outwardly.
being enveloped in a haze and trying to fight it
Aka outwardly fighting (reasoning) the inward haze (logic). That's circular confinement aka kike/kikel (circle) con (together) trol (to roll).
Notice that an envelope is used to conceal a letter, and that ones choice LETS a chosen one artificially conceal what nature reveals.
There is nothing to throw a punch at.
If God implies everything, then throwing a punch at one another implies ones denial of God...that de-nial/nihilo represents "nothing".
Nature throws being apart from one another...beings tempt each other to turn against one another within artificial conflict.
I believe it's based on the fundamental human reaction of... reacting.
Believing implies choosing to hold onto what another suggests, while ignoring to react (perception) to what nature enacts (perceivable).
There is a flow of data
If it's flow, then why is it called inFORMation?
And what people do is...react
Plural (people) restricts singular (person) reaction...nature implies singularity internally separating each unit of being from one another.
The "mode" is the matter.
Only within motion can matter be modified...
to reach outside that information sphere
Aka adapt to perceivable inspiration from within the confines of suggested information...the latter confining ones mind to think circular (logic) while turning against others (reason).
what is going on is Israel
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" aka he (matter) that strives (momentum) with God (motion). Israel implies each ones struggle to live within the process of dying...not the jewish home within the levant/levare (to rise).
Gotta be something, right?
Right/reg (to move in a straight line)...everything (motion) moves each thing (matter) within a straight line (momentum)...a jew suggests a sum of things (something) to tempt gentiles together.
One (singular) cannot be a some/sum (plural)...only join together with one another, while pretending to be a sum like consensus; groups; bands; assemblies; collections; families; friends; nations; societies; civilizations etc.
there is probably something someone wants to hide
Some hides all from one. How? All sets one apart from one another; some tempts one together with one another. The closer together; the less space to discern self as a part within whole.
both mainstream and alternative outlets
Not both...singularity. Mainstream (inception towards death) lets in alternation (life). Life alternates in-between perceivable origin and suggested outcome, while in the process of dying.
A jew suggests dualism (both); progressivism (mainstream); alternativism (alternative) and escapism (outlet) to distract gentiles from singularity.
Singularity implies sound...a jew articulates natural sound into words to bind gentiles with spells. Any word is shaped by LETTERS aka by a gentile LETTING a jew shape...letting another contradicts singularity by establishing a dual bond.
to keep them from discussing
Discussing together keeps one from discerning dis (apart) cuss (to shake)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/discuss
The word discuss implies analysis; a jew suggesting it to gentiles establishes consensual discussions aka a synthesis.
Before there can be a war of two sides against one another...one has to choose a side. That's the origin of war.
Agree vs disagree implies a circular conflict aka turning against one another...that's a conspiracy to distract one from thinking straight. Why a conspiracy? Because two sides together are conspiring to corrupt ones sight in-between...
has obviously been replaced
Replacement aka to respond (re) to position (place) of mind (ment)...acting is used to make ones mind oblivious to obvious (within the way). Nature moves through a being; artifice is held within a being.
Are celebrities and politicians being replaced on a regular basis?
Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/regular
Being (life) moved in a straight line (inception towards death) represents the basis...celebrities and politicians are used to shape a superficial layer upon that basis.
What are some of the most obvious replacements you know of?
Perception for suggestion.
is this really how the system operates
System implies a synthesis aka things put together...being implies analysis aka being set apart from one another. Few utilize suggestion to operate synthetic systems (consensus) into the mind of each analytical being.
Is there even such a thing as real Jim Carrey?
Reality does not add names to being...names represent fictitious idols held mentally as ideals.
Name/noun/nomen aka NO MEN...
played by actors?
Nature acts (cause); being reacts (effect)...few suggest acting as the inversion of reacting to manipulate many into play-acting.
If an actor has a director, then that implies REACTING (life) to DIRECTION (inception towards death)...
A lot of...fall into some specific
Fall (inception towards death) specifies rise (life)...few cast many into a lot to prevent each from rising above one another.
a movie and so on, and so on...
Movie implies "moving picture"; picture implies "captured moment"...a movie doesn't go on and on and on, it tempts one to mentally remember and physically rewatch captured moments, while ignoring the ongoing momentum of nature.
It's like they are not even real people.
a) Being implies apart from one another aka different...few suggest likeness to tempt many together.
b) Being implies singularity (person)...few suggest plurality (people) to tempt many together.
c) Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) of nature...not to one another's fictitious suggestions.
characters composed of two or three specific
Specific implies special aka different aka set apart from one another...few use character compositions to shape a common consensus among many, as to distract each specific being.
Each specific "chosen one" casts "ones choice" into common lots called consensus...character compositions are used to sell this inversion.
a question of purpose
Few suggest questions to tempt many to seek answers...being implies each ones response to origin. If one seeks, then one ignores perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
Purpose aka pur (forth) pose (to put)...being implies the purpose of nature; not quests towards outcome or answers reflecting fiction among one another.
Why do they do it?
Because a replaced mind does not respond to perception, but to suggestion.
What exactly is the purpose of replacing
Exact implies ones expression (life) during action (inception towards death)...a replaced mind represses expression.
Sleight of hand from Madonna: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature".
maybe it's all a psyop from the very start
Psyop aka psycho (animating power) logical (circular thinking) operation (influence)...nature animating being implies psycho; beings influencing one another into circular thinking represents the logical operation to distract from psycho.
All of it.
All cannot be OF (which would imply more than all)...all implies the cause for each effect within. Few suggest "all of" as the sum of things aka mosaic law to tempt many into fixing all by putting as many ones together as possible.
Few tempt many to play "puzzle" within a moving nature, which sets each being apart from one another.
Engage goys
Goyim/gollum/golem - "an animated anthropomorphic being in jewish folklore that is created entirely from inanimate matter"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Ones mind consenting to any suggestion by another represents en-gage-ment, which fills ones mind with inanimate matter, which permits another to animate it from outside.
really matter
Real implies each matter (life) responding to all motion (inception towards death). Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Metallica-nothing-else-matters-lyrics
a) FLAG, verb (Latin flacceo; flaccid) - "to bend, recede, lag"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Flag
Reality is about erecting aka growing...not hanging loose. The flag represents gentile impotence; the obelisk represents jewish fertility.
b) Money doesn't have to be washed, because its foundation implies currency aka a moving current (inception towards death) for any form (life) converted into money. It's allowing oneself to be converted by another which represents a dirty deed/debt.
A jew cleans up gentile debt by transforming debt into dead, while using nature as the current and logic (circular thinking) and reason (circular conflict) as the washing machine to launder gentile thoughts.
spooky ellipsis
a) Only during ellipsis can there be a deviation (life) from a straight path (inception towards) aka rising during fall.
b) Viewing the fall as spooky (specter; ghost) implies ones ignorance of being animated to rise. Breath entering being implies animation; breath exiting being implies ghost leaving.
being an edgy
Only during the edge of knowing (knowledge) can each being transfer from infancy > adult > elderly...that's what living on the edge implies.
I think the AI
Artifice (circular logic) prevents ones mind from thinking natural (straight implication)...
hitting puberty...
...implies one maturing towards inter-course with another aka male/female rise having a fall-in with one another for off-spring aka a further setting apart from one another.
In short...together (fall) apart (rise) aka falling flow/rising form.
That was four years after Huey Long was killed, who challenged the Rockefeller/Morgan puppet Franklin D. Roosevelt on wealth distribution. It's part to Long's assassination that Coughlin turned on the heat on jewish bankers until being forced to quit during WW2.
2 paths to
a) To (towards) implies the only and only passage for any matter shaped within motion.
b) Others suggest duality (2) to tempt one (1) to ignore singularity.
c) Path implies passageway (life being moved from inception towards death) and thereby pathos (suffering) aka the process of dying carrying the living across.
You cant go back from real knowledge without consequences
Con (together) sequence (to follow)...knowledge separates each one within from one another, hence each living being put one the edge of knowing, which one needs to resist by balancing as choice. Ignoring that establishes the consequence aka many together following few apart.
natural...mystical
In-between natural (perception) and artificial (suggestion) there's mystical/myst/myein (to close; shut; mute)...unless one articulates sound aka speaking up.
The mystic represents the one initiated into the use of artifice to distract from nature. Nature only reveals; a mystic knows how to shape artifice to conceal all natural revelation.
a gnostic
Gnostic/gno - "to know"...that's the status quo of being unless willingly ignored. A mystic shapes a natural gnostic into artificial gnosticism aka ones singular perception into a plural consensus together with others.
no different from
Being a gnostic implies discerning differences from one another aka analysis. Few suggest gnosticism and communism to tempt many into a synthesis...Steiner and Marx represent different figureheads used to lure follower into the same -ism (consensus of thought).
Anything formed within flow dissolves aka flows back...
how did you come to the conclusion that truth is out of style?
Style implies "way of life"...holding onto any truth moves it out of style. A way doesn't conclude; it dissolves.
bringing in "world peace"...
...piece by piece.
A jew is disgusting in the mind of a gentile but not disgusted by itself, hence manipulating the minds of gentiles by disguising disgust for example etymologically aka dis (to oppose; set apart) geus (to taste; choose)...the opposition to ones choice implies chosen one.