What if libertarians were right all along? War = racket of Rothschild's petrodollar/banana
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
-ing denotes action, which cannot be kept without shaping inaction. If being (life) implies within action (inception towards death); then keeping anything makes ones reaction inactive.
A person (singular) drowns if keeping a people (plural) together by joining.
Debt implies dead...being alive implies rising (life) within a current (inception towards death). Keeping a currency in possession, while trying to rise within a current makes not drowning in debt/death exponentially harder.
Few suggest creationism (something out of nothing) to sum many into a lot aka into a consensus called reason (peace vs war).
Few cast many into lots to make war.
a) Love versus hate implies the banks aka both sides of a moving currency, and it requires ones trust to enter a bank aka ones choice to incline towards a side.
b) Finance/finer - "to end, settle a dispute or debt" implies few tempting many to settle the end of their lives in disputes against each other while drowning in debt/dead.
c) Love vs hate implies rich vs poor...no matter which side of any suggested currency one chooses to keep.
VS aka verto (to turn) represents the bank keeping ones trust, while ignoring that nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life). The turning against one another represents an artificial decease of the mind called willing ignorance.