And the twos, and the threes
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
yesterday was
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
One's self, eh?
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
never met him
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
the present moment
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
if the mailman were to show up now, with his self, then I'd almost certainly shoot him dead.
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
look out for number one
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
if'n you squeeze 'em in a press
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Entrances is just the back-end of exits.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
I could probably blanket six or seven whole californias, with my caltrops.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
a square peg being forced into a round hole, the hole is exerting a back-pressure on the peg, and value is the friction that keeps the whole system from breaking loose
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
It's all pork barrels and so you open the barrels and eat...
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
What'd they say; those words: "Now you just let those fellas go or else I'm gonna sit down."
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTp-dGNwSEk Worth the price of admission.
It's real easy to be a peaceful man
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
They won't stop unless they're stopped
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
So what do you do?
Adapt to being done by.
interlopers
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
I would never have ended up anywhere other than there
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
And pointed sticks!
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
Remember when that one guy painted that photograph of the soup cans?
I wouldn't call Andrew a guy, but his "mother" sure looked like one... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#/media/File:Julia_Warhola.jpg
No, no it's all quite too much. Can you imagine? I'd go mad with power!
Then you back out of your driveway and pfffffffffffffffft...
no marketing
NO (zero) MARKETING (HP Lovecraft)...
wrote book about self help; want help from others to publish it.
Have you read the book?
a) how can one set into motion (acting), while being set (life) into motion (inception towards death)?
b) how could one "do", while being (living) done by (process of dying)?
c) choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (momentum) of motion (action).
d) what comes first..."reacting" to a director or being branded "actor" for doing so?
e) a picture implies a "captured moment", while the few suggest "motion pictures" aka moving a captured moment to tempt others to ignore ongoing momentum.
f) if nature directs (inception towards death) and those within react (life), then one could grow comprehension about being reactor (temporary growth) within generator (ongoing loss)...what if others could exploit ones ignorance thereof?
g) suggested trying (discover by evaluation) tempts one to ignore that value (perceivable) is offered for evaluation (perceiving). Nature doesn't need to be discovered, it reveals itself so that each one within can express self...others suggest "natural discovery" to distract from expressing, while tempting one to consent to repressing.
actor
Being directed by implies being a "reactor" to...others suggest "actor" as the inversion thereof.
there are only two interactions
a) INTER (internal reaction of oneself) ACTION (external oneness acting upon oneself)...other ones suggest oneself to count aka to collect units together, instead of being the partial unit (unus; one).
b) ONLY (single; one along) TWO (one and one together)...it's only oneself who chooses to count other "ones" together as "two", and doing so tempts one to ignore self.
to extract value from another
a) what can life extract from other life, that the process of dying won't take from both?
b) what if one exits (life) in-between insert (inception) and extract (death)?
c) what if suggested values tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable)?
d) what if value (process of dying) inserts and extracts evaluation (living)?
seeks weapons against one another
a) what if choosing want (seeking outcome) tempts one to ignore need (adapting to origin)?
b) what if being (growth within loss) implies being "for" sustenance of self; not "against" others?
c) what if the few suggest "weapon of choice" to tempt one to ignore that ones free will of choice represents the only weapon (instrument of offense) within sound?
In other words...reasoning (conflict) about weapons (offense) OF choice tempts one to ignore being choice (defense) within balance (offense), hence in need to defend self from offending wants.
instantly
IN'STANT, adjective [Latin instans, insto.] - "pressing"...what if perceivable inspiration is pressing upon oneself, while suggested information is pulling one from resisting the impressing?
inmates should be released back into their communities as a punishment
a) release aka response to LEASE; noun - "demise or letting of lands, tenements or hereditaments to another for life, for a term of years, or at will, for a rent or compensation reserved; also, the contract for such letting".
The few suggest prisons to tempt each one of the many to confine self by shirking response-ability within surrounding onto others. In short...if there's a problem, then others take it away.
b) confining ones mind (confinement) within ones surrounding represents a punished mind (punishment), and since one chooses to do this to oneself, it represents solitary confinement.
c) inmate aka being within + MATE ( associate for propagation)
d) suggested communities aka commune-ism tempts the singular ones to consent to a collectivism (togetherness) suggested by other ones, hence by the chosen ones.
Sleight of hand: "being part (partial) of a community (togetherness)"...a contradiction in terms. One exists as partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...others suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
low level of consciousness
Low/High represents the level (balance) for ones conscious choice within...others suggest low vs high (imbalance) to tempt one to ignore that.
I personally don't think we're ready for that at this point
a) being by sound (per sonos; person) implies being ready for everything sound has to offer.
Sleight of hand: READY (inception) SET (life) GO (death)
b) a point implies a suggested outcome; being implies reacting center of enacting surrounding, hence still within motion aka in-between (life) entrance (inception) and outcome (death).
why--in principle--he could be said to be wrong.
a) principle (cause) of reasoning (right vs wrong) represents ones consent to the suggestions of another.
b) principle (cause) of being (effect) implies inherent/internal power of energy aka partial effects within whole cause.
c) perceivable sound represents the principle for each suggested word said within.
d) principle of "could be" represents ones ignorance about that everything "was" before anyone within "came to be".
e) ignoring to be (choice) within need/want (balance), while reasoning (want vs not want) over the suggestions of others, gives those others the power of ones consent to rebrand want vs not want into right vs wrong...hence a suggested rebrand tempting the consenting one deeper into ignorance.
The rebranding of reason (want vs not want) into true vs false; right vs wrong; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; pro-life vs pro-choice; left-wing vs right-wing; poor vs rich; black vs white; cola vs pepsi; blue vs red; ukraine vs russia; vaxxed vs unvaxxed etc. represents layers upon layers of suggested distractions upon ones willing ignorance of perceivable.
Nature doesn't need to be peeled away in layers; each one within nature can express growth outwards from center, which would establish layers of resistance around the seed of living (growth) within the soil of dying (loss).
Look at the growing layers of an onion and notice that peeling them off without damaging the center, allows center to regrow layers. The few suggest the inversion thereof...piling layers upon the center to repress growth.
a) where is his story recorded?
b) re-cord aka "responding to cord"...
"the cords of the wicked are the snares with which they catch the unwary" (Psalms 129:4).
People say jews are at the top but it’s actually the Babylonians
What if ones consent to suggested labels (jews; babylonians) implies "standing under" those suggesting, hence putting others at the top by willingly putting self at the bottom?
claim to be
a) what if one first has to be before being able to suggest a claim to others?
b) what if the few aren't claiming (seek to obtain), but simply gain whatever the many lose by wanting to hold onto?
are lying
a) without the many holding onto truth; how could the lies of the few reach them?
b) are the few inside the true vs false conflict of reason or are they defining; redefining and contradicting what the many are reasoning about, while controlling both sides of every conflict?
They are also Satanists
a) if an -IST (satanist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (satanism); then who suggests the few to consent?
b) does the behavior of the few represent order following or do the few suggest the many to follow orders, which in return allows the few to direct the many?
The wailing wall is the Roman Wall
What if the few WAIL (lament; regret) the WALL (ignorance of perceivable for suggested) within the minds/memory of the many?
Sleight of hand:
- "Pretentious attention...Dismissive apprehension"
- "Don't waste your time..."
- "When we decline...From the confines of our mind"
- "I want you to be left behind those empty walls"
- "Taunt you to see from behind those empty walls"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGWQqRyO8gA (Serj Tankian was born in Beirut; Lebanon; grandparents were survivors of the Armenian genocide...)
subjecting whole to sole...disintegration from within
Whole (inception towards death) subjects each partial (life)...ignoring this for suggested inversion, disintegrates partials within whole.
acquisition of knowledge
a) if knowledge represents perceivable inspiration, then everyone (perceiving partials) within everything (perceivable whole) already has access to it.
b) the few suggest gain (acquisition) of function (discharge) to tempt the many to ignore being (life) discharged (inception towards death) within a fully functioning system.
tried to show that essential cause...was disintegration
a) what if cause integrates (inception) and disintegrates (death) effects (life)?
b) what if showing causes (suggestion) tempts one to ignore being (perceiving) within essence (perceivable)?
c) what if INTEGER (whole) causes FRACTION (partials) within itself?
false arguments
a) true vs false reasoning represents ones mind arguing over the suggestions of others.
b) the versus in-between the suggested (true or false) represents the FAL'LACY, noun - "that which misleads the mind".
c) consenting to suggested soph-ism tempts one into this fallacy, hence into true vs false; want vs not want; belief vs disbelief reasoning.
use
What comes first...ones mind or input for ones mind? If enacting input comes before reacting mind, then a mind can only reuse while being used.
but
BUT (except; besides; unless)...what exists except; besides or unless reality? Why would those within perceivable reality suggest "but" to one another?
generates random
RAN'DOM, noun - "motion without direction"...how could motion generate without direction?
guided random
How could anything within motion not be guided by motion?
consciousness...hear its own thoughts
What's the difference in conscious-awareness between hearing ones own thoughts and being within everything audible?
how many Reddit accounts are real
a) what if others suggest one to count as to distract from perceivable reality?
b) if one "read it", then one consented to the suggestion of it.
AI
a) artificial (suggested) or natural (perceivable)...free will of choice.
b) what if perceivable (knowledge) can be ignored when consenting to "stand under" suggested (intelligence)?
c) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...what if the few utilize "intelligence" agencies to tempt the many to react by "standing under" suggestions?
d) what's the difference between understanding and comprehending?
to demoralize
a) what if the many first have to consent to suggested moralism, as for the few to be able to utilize demoralization?
b) MOR'AL, adjective [Latin moralis, from mos, moris, manner or conduct] + CONDUCT, noun - "leading; guidance"...what if life is being led/guided from inception towards death before others can tempt one to follow leaders/guidance counselors?
looking
What if consenting to suggested information distorts ones perspective of perceivable inspiration? Could others shape looks to distract one from seeing?
meaning of words
Perceivable sound represents the signal; suggested words represent the distortion thereof.
free-will bot
What's more offensive...dehumanizing others (bot) or ignoring the crucial aspect of free will...choice?
It's posters like...
free-will-of choice...Post-Score (0) - Comment Score (9641)
compulsive liar
Lies have to be sold, hence given away, while truths are held onto, hence being compiled.
certificate
CERTIFY, verb - "to testify to in writing; to make a declaration in writing; to give certain information to; to declare a charge against one".
What are the implications of consenting to such a charge against oneself?
Shhh it's a secret
a) want to hold onto vs not want to let go.
b) suggesting restrictions upon FREE (perceiving) DOM (perceivable).
can be summed up
Is being summed up (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one), while ignoring apartheid aka being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death).
In short...SUM (process of dying) generates DIFFERENCES (living).
a) insert (inception) + delete (death) are predefined through motion for the life within.
b) ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...ones consent to another ones suggestion tempts one into debt (contract) by credit (creed; belief; consent).
c) browsing the web represents ones consent (account) to world wide suggested information (data).
- Line in the middle of perceivable spectrum...resonance.
- Meetings among suggesting partials...dissonance.
Resisting want within need or spending resistance for want vs not want....free will of choice.
Edit: steady (inception towards death) generates vibrant (life).
the jew segregates
DIA (direct) SPORA (separate) aka directed (inception towards death) separation (life).
the jew segregates...the same jews
Segregation implies into perceivable differences...sameness is being suggested by others.
transexuals
TRANS (transmutation of partial out of whole) implies SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...suggested "transsexuals" tempt one to ignore that.
universal monetary unit to transform
a) UNIVERSAL (whole aka all)...UNIT (partial aka one)
b) form (life) trans-muted out of flow (inception towards death).
c) M_ONE_Y aka MY ONE (a suggested claim over other ones).
unicoin
UNI (one) COIN (a jutting point, as of a wall) aka masons of free will utilizing suggestion as a jutting point (projected outcome) for access to consenting one.
diversified equity
DIVERSE (different) EQUITY (equal) aka different choice within equal balance.
a) -ATIVE (of or related to) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (doctrine).
b) consenting (conservative) to suggested (conservatism) allows those suggesting to manipulate those consenting.
c) "are you conservative or liberal?"...it's that easy to tempt ones consent with a suggested doctrine, yet always ones free will of choice to give consent.
They killed pretty much everyone who tried to warn
WARNING - "cautioning against danger"...living within the process of dying implies sustenance (growth) within danger (loss).
Sleight of hand: "danger is my middle name"
they created an inverted system
Creationism (out of nothing) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
redemption through sin
a) REDEEM (Latin redimo) - "to repurchase what has been sold" aka suggestion as the price-tag upon perceivable, and one consent to the suggestion of others as the repurchase.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent"
Being regent (life) within agent (inception towards death) implies involuntary departure, hence being partial choice (reaction) within whole balance of motion (action) .
Suggested moralism (consent to follow rules of behavior) represents the inversion of being perceiving choice; bound to perceivable balance (resistance within temptation).
The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to follow along, while ignoring to be resistance (life) within progression (inception towards death)...this setup inspires the jewish revolutionary spirit aka REVOLU'TION, noun (Latin revolutus, revolvo.) - "motion of any thing which brings it to the same point or state".
While the so called gentiles are running headlong towards death; the so called jews revolve "back to life; back to reality; back to the here and now"
...which will inspire the few to react as diametrical (directed) sporadic (separated) aka DIA-SPORA aka being separated (life) while directed (inception towards death).
In other words...nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial), while those within nature tempt each other to come together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; unicoin; universal basic income; universal pictures etc.
Consider if being represents apartheid (living) struggling within wholeness (process of dying) to sustain self momentarily?
Love vs hate represents a) ones consent to want (love) or not want (hate) the suggestions of others, and b) the many being divided into reasoning (love vs hate) against one another over the suggestions of the few.
Wanting vs not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore being choice within balance (need/want). Choosing want over need tempts one to ignore need for want....others exploit ones ignorance of perceivable through suggestions.
The few suggest values to tempt the many to evaluate them as disgusting, which in return prevents them from comprehending to be evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
Every suggested value by others tempts one to ignore perceivable value, and thereby ones evaluation thereof. If one consent to others suggesting values; then others gain the power of consent to define (money); redefine (interest) and contradict (deflation vs inflation) suggested values to first devalue ones evaluation and then out-value ones access to perceivable value by burying one underneath suggested values (debt).
The so called jews suggest claims by continuously throwing shit (suggested information) at the wall (ones ignorance of perceivable when consenting to suggested) until it sticks...both agreeing or disagreeing represents ones consent to their suggested claims, hence giving them ones consent to obtain the previously suggested claim.
For example...suggesting antisemitism until enough consented to agree or disagree with it, allowed them to obtain the claim from those accused of it; blamed for it.