Which still implies one counting each one of them.
yesterday was
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
One's self, eh?
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
never met him
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
the present moment
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
if the mailman were to show up now, with his self, then I'd almost certainly shoot him dead.
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
look out for number one
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
if'n you squeeze 'em in a press
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Entrances is just the back-end of exits.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
I could probably blanket six or seven whole californias, with my caltrops.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
a square peg being forced into a round hole, the hole is exerting a back-pressure on the peg, and value is the friction that keeps the whole system from breaking loose
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
It's all pork barrels and so you open the barrels and eat...
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
What'd they say; those words: "Now you just let those fellas go or else I'm gonna sit down."
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis."
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
They won't stop unless they're stopped
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
So what do you do?
Adapt to being done by.
interlopers
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
I would never have ended up anywhere other than there
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
And pointed sticks!
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
Remember when that one guy painted that photograph of the soup cans?
If it's being done; then that implies it to be partial within whole, hence not counted together; but being set apart into "integral units". Even simpler...how could one count without being able to differentiated between other ones? What then differentiates these partials to allow ones discernment of them?
Is a "two" a "set of ones such that the total thereof is equal to the value of one and one again"
a) what represents ones setting? Partial within whole, hence total (motion) generating equal (momentum) for partials (resisting life) within.
b) value (motion) to perceivable flow of value aka inspiration (momentum) to perceiving evaluation within perceivable value (resisting life).
c) AGAIN, adverb (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...that's why consent to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason. Try to apply "again" to oneness (energy)...is there a second time of energy, or does time represent the perceivable moment(um) for those temporary existing within ongoing energy?
or is a unique monad of "two", with a twoness that is all of its own, and probably terrible besides.
a) monad implies "indivisible"; being implies divided (partial) within sole (whole).
b) TWO (one and one) NESS (quality of)...once again use energy and question "and"...energy and what else? Having discerned oneness; wholeness; soleness of energy allows one to comprehend that energy represents value; and that ones discernment implies the evaluation within value.
c) if energy differentiates itself and thereby shares whole with each partial, then does a system based on sharing represent one based on "owning; possessing; holding onto"? Does ones evaluation of moving value sound like holding onto (want) or letting go (need)?
Do hands have fingers, or are hands fingers?
Each digit represents a unit (Latin unus; one), hence oneself being able to express a thumbs up; pointing at stuff; giving the finger; using a guitar-slide or flashing the pinky when taking a sip. Each unit represents another partial (difference) within whole (sameness)...others suggest labels to make singular appear plural, by distracting from moving whole with the labels as an immovable partial.
Take a post-it; write "wind" on it and then go out into a storm and try to affix that label...guess what? It's much easier to suggest one to "affix" that label within ones consenting mind/memory and you can also keep the post-it.
BEFORE! (before!(aah-haaa!)) And there I was, run over by that same train for a second time, but at the same time, only it was going the other direction.
Tricked by suggested rhetoric...BE (being within) FORE (advanced by). No counting (before and after) required, just implication (if/then) within motion utilized by oneself...unless ignored.
I tried to calculate the total
a) one
b) counting together tempts one to ignore being set apart by, hence in need to resist being dissolved back into.
the monad with the title of "one"...
a) that's the catch-22 of using suggested labels (words) to express a perceivable system (sound) which doesn't label itself. I can utilize "one; whole; all; sole; energy (internal/inherent power etc.) to describe that which can only be comprehended (not perceived) by those within...yet; comprehension can only be grown by oneself for oneself. Resisting suggested (want) while adapting to perceivable (need) represents ones effort to grow (living) within loss (inception towards death).
b) TI'TLE, noun - "an inscription (suggested information) put over any thing (perceivable inspiration) as a name by which it is known"...that's the name of the game.
"claim self for oneself"...Better hope that self has a flag prepared.
Which implies the issue with claiming...showing off to others what one claims. Meanwhile in reality...nature shows off everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) by giving "free" (will of choice) access to it.
comprehensiō, from ghed (take/hold/find).
Add self discernment (temporary within ongoing), then consider COMPRE (compress) while being temporary (resistance) within ongoing (velocity)? Notice that breathing in and out allows for a moment of compression if ones chooses to make that effort? How about CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) by chest compression?
I suppose it's like when putting a puzzle together; it's a very careful process.
The process of consenting to a suggested partial (puzzle pieces); while ignoring the perceivable whole (picture on the box)...a careful deception or blunt ignorance?
Read the punch-cards...
...he said after sanitation of classified information and I'm like: "lots of transparent kikes in this story"
At this moment...
...implies within momentum of ongoing motion.
in accordance with all statutes and ordinances?
Perceivable ordinance (inception towards death) inspires perceiving resistance (life), while others use suggestion (graven image; statues) to tempt ones consent (accordance) to ignore resisting.
mailmen are of course the veritable middle-toe of government.
Which is hard to discern while the feet of tyranny are dancing the horah on ones face to hava nagila.
the masses do reproduce rather quickly
RE (respond to) PRODUCE (being produced by) hence representing product placement aka a mind placed within production.
"coming in or going out"...and ordering a literal infinity of pints in the interim.
Interim implies within eternal, hence having to take a leak while drinking those pints. Pissing oneself doesn't represent infinite drinking and if the interim represents a bar, then they gonna drag you out when you try to go on.
"living in a bubble"...And inside of those bubbles?
"in" a bubble implies "inside" a bubble, hence being able to mimic ongoing whole (bubble) as temporary partials (bubbles)...yet always bursting.
What they call "atoms"
Latin atomos - "indivisible partial" (a contradiction in terms, since partial implies division within whole) + Greek atomos; tomos - "uncut" aka UN (reversal) CUT (division), hence the sleigh of hand "live (living division) and uncut (reversal of division)". Also; "taking a cut"; "cut to the chase"; "circumcision"; "ready; set; action...and cut"; "cutting oneself"; "cut my life into pieces; this is my last resort" etc.
I suppose? Do I suppose? Supponere? No, I probably don't, do I, or do I? Or not?
Foundation goes on; those within have the free will of choice to stutter along while learning from the consequences thereof...or not...I suppose.
if'n you land in THE CONFLICT ZONE, then the only way out is to leave...
...by comprehending to be within (life) way (inception towards death); hence not within conflict/imbalance (want vs not want); but as self sustenance (choice) within balance (need/want). ZONE, noun - "circuit"...hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law closing the circuit, while tempting one within perceivable to "zone out" with suggested.
Don't sound healthy.
If sound represents health; then instrument within represents the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want), hence experiencing sickness while struggling within health to sustain self.
When setting minds, remember that despite their apparent volume, their centers of gravity can be deceptive.
Volume (one); center (choice within balance); gravity (growth within loss); deception (remembering suggested instead of using memory to adapt to perceivable)...despite tempts one to ignore apparent.
I don't know if Nature "represents"
To know (perceiving perceivable) implies RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by)...
Nature is, as always, natural.
Artificial represents one choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for what others are up to (suggested), which tempts one into opposition to natural.
If it's being...That's one of the larger ifs I've seen
And yet each being represents the free will of choice to ignore being for wanting to be. As for the foundation of if/then (implication)...motion. If set into motion; then being within motion.
Unit is a top-tier word. It can be used for anything!
ONES (partials) within ONEness (whole)...for all represents one in energy. Motion represents the only perceivable sequence (tier), while suggested words tempt one to slap (mentally) affixed label upon it. Before a unit can be used it's being divided into units.
lest the action become something else entirely without the state-change
Action implies constant change (inception towards death), while reaction (life) needs to resist being change, hence having the choice to react to being enacted upon.
The set of elements not in the element of "set".
How to explain "everything" by using "nothing" (not) to explain it without contradicting self?
"flow of value"...Is that the "pipeline" I keep hearing people talk about?
a) within line (inception towards death) one has the free will of choice to change position (left/right; up/down; forward/backwards) within balance (momentum of motion). The suggested progressivism by others tempts one to consent to confine ones point of view into a pipe; focusing on suggested outcomes, hence narrowing ones field of awareness within everything perceivable.
b) try comparing holding onto suggested values with being within an ongoing flow of perceivable value? Want to hold onto or need to let go...a choice with consequences. What happens if one wants to hold onto that which one needs to let go?
seconds are already times of energy
Seconds represent temporary counting ongoing, while suggesting labels for internal communication of energy. Notice the difference in perceiving time when getting older or among different life-forms. The few suggest seconds (tick; tick; tick...boom) to tempt the many to count down their lifetime, while aiming for the next thing in line.
what an absolute flood of them has gone by already!
It's oneself trying to accumulate those numbers which tempts one to view surrounding as going by; while ignoring to be center growing within the ongoing inspiration of loss. If one looks at loss, then one sees "an absolute flood going by"...
going back to the beginning of when seconds began
Seconds; minutes; hours represent the same motion aka the ongoing generation for the temporary EONS (Greek aion) - "vital force; period of existence"; perceiving it differently from within. Beginning/end represents the momentum (balance) within the same motion for each living difference (choice) within.
line of descent
Line of descent (inception towards death) generates parts of ascend (life)...and accent (ya know wha'm sayin?)
"discerned oneness"...It's not an easy skill to do, since there are so many of them out there
Self discernment would filter the suggested noise of all the other ones out.
For sale: small horse with limited trick repertoire
A one-trick pony...
that's remedial
Sleight of hand from "The Prodigy"...
"I got the poison" (dissonance)..."I got the remedy (resonance)"..."the rhythmical remedy (frequent adaptation to sound)"..."I got the pressure; the pressure (choice)".
Isn't that just the worst? Tryin'a count, bein' all twenty seven, twenty seven, twenty seven...
One counting each one of the suggestible "twenty seven"...does one need to count to sustain oneself?
accumulation of sediment
Consenting to the suggested information by others, which accumulates it as sediment within ones mind/memory, hence ignoring the flow state of perceivable inspiration. Gotta shake it up to loosen up. Compression (internal comprehension of externally perceivable) requires momentum, hence representing a process within motion.
those greek-army words, now those really do have two hundred little attachments on 'em!
Military aka MIL-LIT (mill to produce litter aka baby-making); booby-trap; fox-hole; foot-soldier aka sole of the foot; private (ones privates); privates at attention (erection); lance-corporal (flesh spear); arrows (eros); shaft of an arrow + fletcher + quiver; axe (ass); cutlass (cuddle-ass); rapier; artillery (tilling with the heart); ass-ault; am-bush; combat (cum-bat); surr-ender (bringing an end to above; beyond; over); seamen (semen); navy (nave; navel; native aka to be born, hence from flow into form); phalanx (phallus); sergeant (sir donating genes aka surrogate); officer (offering); lieutenant (tending the loo); battle of the bulge; trench warfare; captain (copulate); admiral (admire) rear-admiral (admiring the rear); vice-admiral (as if sodomy wasn't worse enough); pistol (piss-hole); win-chester; mag-num (magazine numb); to chamber a round etc.
Once set in motion, there's no stopping it. The only way to stop is to not continue.
That represents you describing reactions set into motion; while ignoring to be reaction (choice) set within enacting motion (balance aka momentum of motion). Neither can motion be stopped; nor can those within motion stop reacting, hence the need to adapt. Others suggest "no; stop; it" to distract one from comprehending that.
I breathe in, down, up, and out.
In (nose); down (belly); up (chest); out (mouth)...after chest is where the opportunity to compress is offered.
no energy input
How to put without energy; how to be without energy; how to sustain a within without energy; how to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing without energy?
Well that doesn't sound like much of a puzzle. More of an... assembly experience?
Impressing disassemble (loss) generates expressing assemble (growth)...resisting the temptation to hold onto represents the expression of growth within loss. The few suggest the many to puzzle together fiction in hope of assembling reality, while the many ignore whole reality dissembling itself into each one of them.
to know they keep the plaintext copies
The few don't require keeping copies of suggested information; they comprehend the ongoing origin of perceivable inspiration, out of which they can shape as many copies as the many consent to put up with. The trick of keeping is to suggest others to believe that one can keep anything...ones consent given is what the ones suggesting are holding for as long as one gives it willingly.
it's a sentence of words, not some manner of instructional guideline. In fact it's just for decoration.
Suggestion tempts one to let oneself be instructed by others; consent allows others to guide by suggestion. Suggestion decorates perception with willing ignorance.
I should get an endorsement deal. It'd be great.
Face value (perceivable) doesn't require endorsing (suggestion)...taking such a deal will get one stabbed in the back.
I can already see the advertisement
Turning aside (advert) from perceivable towards suggested clouds ones view.
Don't they mostly just try to take photographs of it these days?
Captured moments (pictures) tempting one to hold onto suggested moments within perceivable momentum.
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTp-dGNwSEk Worth the price of admission.
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
Adapt to being done by.
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
I wouldn't call Andrew a guy, but his "mother" sure looked like one... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#/media/File:Julia_Warhola.jpg
Then you back out of your driveway and pfffffffffffffffft...
If it's being done; then that implies it to be partial within whole, hence not counted together; but being set apart into "integral units". Even simpler...how could one count without being able to differentiated between other ones? What then differentiates these partials to allow ones discernment of them?
a) what represents ones setting? Partial within whole, hence total (motion) generating equal (momentum) for partials (resisting life) within.
b) value (motion) to perceivable flow of value aka inspiration (momentum) to perceiving evaluation within perceivable value (resisting life).
c) AGAIN, adverb (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...that's why consent to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason. Try to apply "again" to oneness (energy)...is there a second time of energy, or does time represent the perceivable moment(um) for those temporary existing within ongoing energy?
a) monad implies "indivisible"; being implies divided (partial) within sole (whole).
b) TWO (one and one) NESS (quality of)...once again use energy and question "and"...energy and what else? Having discerned oneness; wholeness; soleness of energy allows one to comprehend that energy represents value; and that ones discernment implies the evaluation within value.
c) if energy differentiates itself and thereby shares whole with each partial, then does a system based on sharing represent one based on "owning; possessing; holding onto"? Does ones evaluation of moving value sound like holding onto (want) or letting go (need)?
Each digit represents a unit (Latin unus; one), hence oneself being able to express a thumbs up; pointing at stuff; giving the finger; using a guitar-slide or flashing the pinky when taking a sip. Each unit represents another partial (difference) within whole (sameness)...others suggest labels to make singular appear plural, by distracting from moving whole with the labels as an immovable partial.
Take a post-it; write "wind" on it and then go out into a storm and try to affix that label...guess what? It's much easier to suggest one to "affix" that label within ones consenting mind/memory and you can also keep the post-it.
Tricked by suggested rhetoric...BE (being within) FORE (advanced by). No counting (before and after) required, just implication (if/then) within motion utilized by oneself...unless ignored.
a) one
b) counting together tempts one to ignore being set apart by, hence in need to resist being dissolved back into.
a) that's the catch-22 of using suggested labels (words) to express a perceivable system (sound) which doesn't label itself. I can utilize "one; whole; all; sole; energy (internal/inherent power etc.) to describe that which can only be comprehended (not perceived) by those within...yet; comprehension can only be grown by oneself for oneself. Resisting suggested (want) while adapting to perceivable (need) represents ones effort to grow (living) within loss (inception towards death).
b) TI'TLE, noun - "an inscription (suggested information) put over any thing (perceivable inspiration) as a name by which it is known"...that's the name of the game.
Which implies the issue with claiming...showing off to others what one claims. Meanwhile in reality...nature shows off everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) by giving "free" (will of choice) access to it.
Add self discernment (temporary within ongoing), then consider COMPRE (compress) while being temporary (resistance) within ongoing (velocity)? Notice that breathing in and out allows for a moment of compression if ones chooses to make that effort? How about CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) by chest compression?
The process of consenting to a suggested partial (puzzle pieces); while ignoring the perceivable whole (picture on the box)...a careful deception or blunt ignorance?
...he said after sanitation of classified information and I'm like: "lots of transparent kikes in this story"
...implies within momentum of ongoing motion.
Perceivable ordinance (inception towards death) inspires perceiving resistance (life), while others use suggestion (graven image; statues) to tempt ones consent (accordance) to ignore resisting.
Which is hard to discern while the feet of tyranny are dancing the horah on ones face to hava nagila.
RE (respond to) PRODUCE (being produced by) hence representing product placement aka a mind placed within production.
Interim implies within eternal, hence having to take a leak while drinking those pints. Pissing oneself doesn't represent infinite drinking and if the interim represents a bar, then they gonna drag you out when you try to go on.
"in" a bubble implies "inside" a bubble, hence being able to mimic ongoing whole (bubble) as temporary partials (bubbles)...yet always bursting.
Latin atomos - "indivisible partial" (a contradiction in terms, since partial implies division within whole) + Greek atomos; tomos - "uncut" aka UN (reversal) CUT (division), hence the sleigh of hand "live (living division) and uncut (reversal of division)". Also; "taking a cut"; "cut to the chase"; "circumcision"; "ready; set; action...and cut"; "cutting oneself"; "cut my life into pieces; this is my last resort" etc.
Foundation goes on; those within have the free will of choice to stutter along while learning from the consequences thereof...or not...I suppose.
...by comprehending to be within (life) way (inception towards death); hence not within conflict/imbalance (want vs not want); but as self sustenance (choice) within balance (need/want). ZONE, noun - "circuit"...hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law closing the circuit, while tempting one within perceivable to "zone out" with suggested.
If sound represents health; then instrument within represents the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want), hence experiencing sickness while struggling within health to sustain self.
Volume (one); center (choice within balance); gravity (growth within loss); deception (remembering suggested instead of using memory to adapt to perceivable)...despite tempts one to ignore apparent.
To know (perceiving perceivable) implies RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by)...
Artificial represents one choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for what others are up to (suggested), which tempts one into opposition to natural.
And yet each being represents the free will of choice to ignore being for wanting to be. As for the foundation of if/then (implication)...motion. If set into motion; then being within motion.
ONES (partials) within ONEness (whole)...for all represents one in energy. Motion represents the only perceivable sequence (tier), while suggested words tempt one to slap (mentally) affixed label upon it. Before a unit can be used it's being divided into units.
Action implies constant change (inception towards death), while reaction (life) needs to resist being change, hence having the choice to react to being enacted upon.
How to explain "everything" by using "nothing" (not) to explain it without contradicting self?
a) within line (inception towards death) one has the free will of choice to change position (left/right; up/down; forward/backwards) within balance (momentum of motion). The suggested progressivism by others tempts one to consent to confine ones point of view into a pipe; focusing on suggested outcomes, hence narrowing ones field of awareness within everything perceivable.
b) try comparing holding onto suggested values with being within an ongoing flow of perceivable value? Want to hold onto or need to let go...a choice with consequences. What happens if one wants to hold onto that which one needs to let go?
Seconds represent temporary counting ongoing, while suggesting labels for internal communication of energy. Notice the difference in perceiving time when getting older or among different life-forms. The few suggest seconds (tick; tick; tick...boom) to tempt the many to count down their lifetime, while aiming for the next thing in line.
It's oneself trying to accumulate those numbers which tempts one to view surrounding as going by; while ignoring to be center growing within the ongoing inspiration of loss. If one looks at loss, then one sees "an absolute flood going by"...
Seconds; minutes; hours represent the same motion aka the ongoing generation for the temporary EONS (Greek aion) - "vital force; period of existence"; perceiving it differently from within. Beginning/end represents the momentum (balance) within the same motion for each living difference (choice) within.
Line of descent (inception towards death) generates parts of ascend (life)...and accent (ya know wha'm sayin?)
Self discernment would filter the suggested noise of all the other ones out.
A one-trick pony...
Sleight of hand from "The Prodigy"...
"I got the poison" (dissonance)..."I got the remedy (resonance)"..."the rhythmical remedy (frequent adaptation to sound)"..."I got the pressure; the pressure (choice)".
One counting each one of the suggestible "twenty seven"...does one need to count to sustain oneself?
Consenting to the suggested information by others, which accumulates it as sediment within ones mind/memory, hence ignoring the flow state of perceivable inspiration. Gotta shake it up to loosen up. Compression (internal comprehension of externally perceivable) requires momentum, hence representing a process within motion.
Military aka MIL-LIT (mill to produce litter aka baby-making); booby-trap; fox-hole; foot-soldier aka sole of the foot; private (ones privates); privates at attention (erection); lance-corporal (flesh spear); arrows (eros); shaft of an arrow + fletcher + quiver; axe (ass); cutlass (cuddle-ass); rapier; artillery (tilling with the heart); ass-ault; am-bush; combat (cum-bat); surr-ender (bringing an end to above; beyond; over); seamen (semen); navy (nave; navel; native aka to be born, hence from flow into form); phalanx (phallus); sergeant (sir donating genes aka surrogate); officer (offering); lieutenant (tending the loo); battle of the bulge; trench warfare; captain (copulate); admiral (admire) rear-admiral (admiring the rear); vice-admiral (as if sodomy wasn't worse enough); pistol (piss-hole); win-chester; mag-num (magazine numb); to chamber a round etc.
It's pretty fucked up...
Hence; claim (greed) generating counter-claim (envy).
That represents you describing reactions set into motion; while ignoring to be reaction (choice) set within enacting motion (balance aka momentum of motion). Neither can motion be stopped; nor can those within motion stop reacting, hence the need to adapt. Others suggest "no; stop; it" to distract one from comprehending that.
In (nose); down (belly); up (chest); out (mouth)...after chest is where the opportunity to compress is offered.
How to put without energy; how to be without energy; how to sustain a within without energy; how to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing without energy?
Impressing disassemble (loss) generates expressing assemble (growth)...resisting the temptation to hold onto represents the expression of growth within loss. The few suggest the many to puzzle together fiction in hope of assembling reality, while the many ignore whole reality dissembling itself into each one of them.
The few don't require keeping copies of suggested information; they comprehend the ongoing origin of perceivable inspiration, out of which they can shape as many copies as the many consent to put up with. The trick of keeping is to suggest others to believe that one can keep anything...ones consent given is what the ones suggesting are holding for as long as one gives it willingly.
Suggestion tempts one to let oneself be instructed by others; consent allows others to guide by suggestion. Suggestion decorates perception with willing ignorance.
Face value (perceivable) doesn't require endorsing (suggestion)...taking such a deal will get one stabbed in the back.
Turning aside (advert) from perceivable towards suggested clouds ones view.
Captured moments (pictures) tempting one to hold onto suggested moments within perceivable momentum.