a) INTER (internal reaction of oneself) ACTION (external oneness acting upon oneself)...other ones suggest oneself to count aka to collect units together, instead of being the partial unit (unus; one).
b) ONLY (single; one along) TWO (one and one together)...it's only oneself who chooses to count other "ones" together as "two", and doing so tempts one to ignore self.
to extract value from another
a) what can life extract from other life, that the process of dying won't take from both?
b) what if one exits (life) in-between insert (inception) and extract (death)?
c) what if suggested values tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable)?
d) what if value (process of dying) inserts and extracts evaluation (living)?
seeks weapons against one another
a) what if choosing want (seeking outcome) tempts one to ignore need (adapting to origin)?
b) what if being (growth within loss) implies being "for" sustenance of self; not "against" others?
c) what if the few suggest "weapon of choice" to tempt one to ignore that ones free will of choice represents the only weapon (instrument of offense) within sound?
In other words...reasoning (conflict) about weapons (offense) OF choice tempts one to ignore being choice (defense) within balance (offense), hence in need to defend self from offending wants.
instantly
IN'STANT, adjective [Latin instans, insto.] - "pressing"...what if perceivable inspiration is pressing upon oneself, while suggested information is pulling one from resisting the impressing?
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
yesterday was
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
One's self, eh?
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
never met him
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
the present moment
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
if the mailman were to show up now, with his self, then I'd almost certainly shoot him dead.
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
look out for number one
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
if'n you squeeze 'em in a press
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Entrances is just the back-end of exits.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
I could probably blanket six or seven whole californias, with my caltrops.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
a square peg being forced into a round hole, the hole is exerting a back-pressure on the peg, and value is the friction that keeps the whole system from breaking loose
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
It's all pork barrels and so you open the barrels and eat...
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
What'd they say; those words: "Now you just let those fellas go or else I'm gonna sit down."
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis."
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
They won't stop unless they're stopped
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
So what do you do?
Adapt to being done by.
interlopers
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
I would never have ended up anywhere other than there
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
And pointed sticks!
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
Remember when that one guy painted that photograph of the soup cans?
If it's being done; then that implies it to be partial within whole, hence not counted together; but being set apart into "integral units". Even simpler...how could one count without being able to differentiated between other ones? What then differentiates these partials to allow ones discernment of them?
Is a "two" a "set of ones such that the total thereof is equal to the value of one and one again"
a) what represents ones setting? Partial within whole, hence total (motion) generating equal (momentum) for partials (resisting life) within.
b) value (motion) to perceivable flow of value aka inspiration (momentum) to perceiving evaluation within perceivable value (resisting life).
c) AGAIN, adverb (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...that's why consent to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason. Try to apply "again" to oneness (energy)...is there a second time of energy, or does time represent the perceivable moment(um) for those temporary existing within ongoing energy?
or is a unique monad of "two", with a twoness that is all of its own, and probably terrible besides.
a) monad implies "indivisible"; being implies divided (partial) within sole (whole).
b) TWO (one and one) NESS (quality of)...once again use energy and question "and"...energy and what else? Having discerned oneness; wholeness; soleness of energy allows one to comprehend that energy represents value; and that ones discernment implies the evaluation within value.
c) if energy differentiates itself and thereby shares whole with each partial, then does a system based on sharing represent one based on "owning; possessing; holding onto"? Does ones evaluation of moving value sound like holding onto (want) or letting go (need)?
Do hands have fingers, or are hands fingers?
Each digit represents a unit (Latin unus; one), hence oneself being able to express a thumbs up; pointing at stuff; giving the finger; using a guitar-slide or flashing the pinky when taking a sip. Each unit represents another partial (difference) within whole (sameness)...others suggest labels to make singular appear plural, by distracting from moving whole with the labels as an immovable partial.
Take a post-it; write "wind" on it and then go out into a storm and try to affix that label...guess what? It's much easier to suggest one to "affix" that label within ones consenting mind/memory and you can also keep the post-it.
BEFORE! (before!(aah-haaa!)) And there I was, run over by that same train for a second time, but at the same time, only it was going the other direction.
Tricked by suggested rhetoric...BE (being within) FORE (advanced by). No counting (before and after) required, just implication (if/then) within motion utilized by oneself...unless ignored.
I tried to calculate the total
a) one
b) counting together tempts one to ignore being set apart by, hence in need to resist being dissolved back into.
the monad with the title of "one"...
a) that's the catch-22 of using suggested labels (words) to express a perceivable system (sound) which doesn't label itself. I can utilize "one; whole; all; sole; energy (internal/inherent power etc.) to describe that which can only be comprehended (not perceived) by those within...yet; comprehension can only be grown by oneself for oneself. Resisting suggested (want) while adapting to perceivable (need) represents ones effort to grow (living) within loss (inception towards death).
b) TI'TLE, noun - "an inscription (suggested information) put over any thing (perceivable inspiration) as a name by which it is known"...that's the name of the game.
"claim self for oneself"...Better hope that self has a flag prepared.
Which implies the issue with claiming...showing off to others what one claims. Meanwhile in reality...nature shows off everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) by giving "free" (will of choice) access to it.
comprehensiō, from ghed (take/hold/find).
Add self discernment (temporary within ongoing), then consider COMPRE (compress) while being temporary (resistance) within ongoing (velocity)? Notice that breathing in and out allows for a moment of compression if ones chooses to make that effort? How about CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) by chest compression?
I suppose it's like when putting a puzzle together; it's a very careful process.
The process of consenting to a suggested partial (puzzle pieces); while ignoring the perceivable whole (picture on the box)...a careful deception or blunt ignorance?
Read the punch-cards...
...he said after sanitation of classified information and I'm like: "lots of transparent kikes in this story"
At this moment...
...implies within momentum of ongoing motion.
in accordance with all statutes and ordinances?
Perceivable ordinance (inception towards death) inspires perceiving resistance (life), while others use suggestion (graven image; statues) to tempt ones consent (accordance) to ignore resisting.
mailmen are of course the veritable middle-toe of government.
Which is hard to discern while the feet of tyranny are dancing the horah on ones face to hava nagila.
the masses do reproduce rather quickly
RE (respond to) PRODUCE (being produced by) hence representing product placement aka a mind placed within production.
"coming in or going out"...and ordering a literal infinity of pints in the interim.
Interim implies within eternal, hence having to take a leak while drinking those pints. Pissing oneself doesn't represent infinite drinking and if the interim represents a bar, then they gonna drag you out when you try to go on.
"living in a bubble"...And inside of those bubbles?
"in" a bubble implies "inside" a bubble, hence being able to mimic ongoing whole (bubble) as temporary partials (bubbles)...yet always bursting.
What they call "atoms"
Latin atomos - "indivisible partial" (a contradiction in terms, since partial implies division within whole) + Greek atomos; tomos - "uncut" aka UN (reversal) CUT (division), hence the sleigh of hand "live (living division) and uncut (reversal of division)". Also; "taking a cut"; "cut to the chase"; "circumcision"; "ready; set; action...and cut"; "cutting oneself"; "cut my life into pieces; this is my last resort" etc.
I suppose? Do I suppose? Supponere? No, I probably don't, do I, or do I? Or not?
Foundation goes on; those within have the free will of choice to stutter along while learning from the consequences thereof...or not...I suppose.
if'n you land in THE CONFLICT ZONE, then the only way out is to leave...
...by comprehending to be within (life) way (inception towards death); hence not within conflict/imbalance (want vs not want); but as self sustenance (choice) within balance (need/want). ZONE, noun - "circuit"...hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law closing the circuit, while tempting one within perceivable to "zone out" with suggested.
Don't sound healthy.
If sound represents health; then instrument within represents the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want), hence experiencing sickness while struggling within health to sustain self.
When setting minds, remember that despite their apparent volume, their centers of gravity can be deceptive.
Volume (one); center (choice within balance); gravity (growth within loss); deception (remembering suggested instead of using memory to adapt to perceivable)...despite tempts one to ignore apparent.
I don't know if Nature "represents"
To know (perceiving perceivable) implies RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by)...
Nature is, as always, natural.
Artificial represents one choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for what others are up to (suggested), which tempts one into opposition to natural.
a) INTER (internal reaction of oneself) ACTION (external oneness acting upon oneself)...other ones suggest oneself to count aka to collect units together, instead of being the partial unit (unus; one).
b) ONLY (single; one along) TWO (one and one together)...it's only oneself who chooses to count other "ones" together as "two", and doing so tempts one to ignore self.
a) what can life extract from other life, that the process of dying won't take from both?
b) what if one exits (life) in-between insert (inception) and extract (death)?
c) what if suggested values tempts one to ignore being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable)?
d) what if value (process of dying) inserts and extracts evaluation (living)?
a) what if choosing want (seeking outcome) tempts one to ignore need (adapting to origin)?
b) what if being (growth within loss) implies being "for" sustenance of self; not "against" others?
c) what if the few suggest "weapon of choice" to tempt one to ignore that ones free will of choice represents the only weapon (instrument of offense) within sound?
In other words...reasoning (conflict) about weapons (offense) OF choice tempts one to ignore being choice (defense) within balance (offense), hence in need to defend self from offending wants.
IN'STANT, adjective [Latin instans, insto.] - "pressing"...what if perceivable inspiration is pressing upon oneself, while suggested information is pulling one from resisting the impressing?
Which still implies one counting each one of them.
Everything was perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it is.
a) self implies each partial one expressing whole oneness. Consider self as the sameness within each difference; required for shared intercourse.
b) "one's self" implies ones choice to claim self for oneself, while suggesting other ones ownership over one's self.
Nature sets itself apart (from whole into each partial)...others suggest one to come together (to meet). Togetherness requires one to choose to hold onto another, while ignoring apartheid...ignorance corrupts comprehension.
How could one perceive PRE (before) SENT (transmission)...while being (life) within transmission (inception towards death)? Have you ever experienced anything other than "this moment"?
Maybe that's why he always cautiously rings twice?
a) NUMBER (designation of a unit) aka UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...hence: "look out for one-one".
b) looking for one tempts one to ignore being one within forward motion, hence one being tempted to ignore resisting that motion when looking for other ones.
Does it seem like the few will ever run out of squeezable masses to press for extraction? Discerning this as oneself would allow one to loosen the squeeze as expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
If want tempts one to hold onto, then need teaches one to let go...most seem to struggle with learning how to teach that to self.
Ones discernment of coming in or going out makes all the difference.
"Stardom is like living in a bubble"...pffffffffffffffff
...being forced into (inception) a (w)hole (towards death) implies being partial resistance (life), hence the consequence of friction. Utilizing the incoming force (value) to resist (evaluation) sustains broken (partial temporary growth) within loose (whole ongoing loss) a moment longer.
Notice that you evaluate that which keeps, while ignoring that the whole (process of dying) lets go of each partial (living)...hence setting one "free" will of choice.
a) everything is already open (perceivable) for everyone (perceiving) within.
b) ones want to open for gain (food) tempts one to ignore need to resist incoming (hunger).
Release (let go) or pressure (sit down)...if living holds onto without releasing, then the process of dying pressures it through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTp-dGNwSEk Worth the price of admission.
Real vs fake; easy vs hard; peace vs war...implies being within a conflict of reason, hence with a mind set on conflict. A peaceful man is conjuring war with his outlook.
All the killings among humans hasn't stopped all the killings among humans...it's one oneself to discern the implications thereof by wielding the weapon of choice.
Adapt to being done by.
Suggested INTERLO'PE, verb - "to run between parties" tempts one (choice) to ignore perceivable momentum (balance) in-between whole (inception towards death) and partial (life).
Others suggest parties (plural) to tempt one to ignore being a part (singular) within whole. A nice sleight of hand would be the lyrics of "get the party started"...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk aka "I'm your operator, you can call anytime...I'll be your connection to the party line" (written from the perspective of the incoming process of dying to those living within).
"there" implies momentum; hence in-between beginning and end..."ending up" distracts one from that, as does "never", and "others" are suggesting them to you. Nature represents ever; sets one apart among others and only communicates momentum, yet its met by ones free will of choice to ignore.
Staying within momentum makes it harder to be pointed at with sticks. Utilizing sticks while being within momentum makes everything else a flowing canvass for the point (and any other part ) of ones sticks...
I wouldn't call Andrew a guy, but his "mother" sure looked like one... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#/media/File:Julia_Warhola.jpg
Then you back out of your driveway and pfffffffffffffffft...
If it's being done; then that implies it to be partial within whole, hence not counted together; but being set apart into "integral units". Even simpler...how could one count without being able to differentiated between other ones? What then differentiates these partials to allow ones discernment of them?
a) what represents ones setting? Partial within whole, hence total (motion) generating equal (momentum) for partials (resisting life) within.
b) value (motion) to perceivable flow of value aka inspiration (momentum) to perceiving evaluation within perceivable value (resisting life).
c) AGAIN, adverb (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...that's why consent to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason. Try to apply "again" to oneness (energy)...is there a second time of energy, or does time represent the perceivable moment(um) for those temporary existing within ongoing energy?
a) monad implies "indivisible"; being implies divided (partial) within sole (whole).
b) TWO (one and one) NESS (quality of)...once again use energy and question "and"...energy and what else? Having discerned oneness; wholeness; soleness of energy allows one to comprehend that energy represents value; and that ones discernment implies the evaluation within value.
c) if energy differentiates itself and thereby shares whole with each partial, then does a system based on sharing represent one based on "owning; possessing; holding onto"? Does ones evaluation of moving value sound like holding onto (want) or letting go (need)?
Each digit represents a unit (Latin unus; one), hence oneself being able to express a thumbs up; pointing at stuff; giving the finger; using a guitar-slide or flashing the pinky when taking a sip. Each unit represents another partial (difference) within whole (sameness)...others suggest labels to make singular appear plural, by distracting from moving whole with the labels as an immovable partial.
Take a post-it; write "wind" on it and then go out into a storm and try to affix that label...guess what? It's much easier to suggest one to "affix" that label within ones consenting mind/memory and you can also keep the post-it.
Tricked by suggested rhetoric...BE (being within) FORE (advanced by). No counting (before and after) required, just implication (if/then) within motion utilized by oneself...unless ignored.
a) one
b) counting together tempts one to ignore being set apart by, hence in need to resist being dissolved back into.
a) that's the catch-22 of using suggested labels (words) to express a perceivable system (sound) which doesn't label itself. I can utilize "one; whole; all; sole; energy (internal/inherent power etc.) to describe that which can only be comprehended (not perceived) by those within...yet; comprehension can only be grown by oneself for oneself. Resisting suggested (want) while adapting to perceivable (need) represents ones effort to grow (living) within loss (inception towards death).
b) TI'TLE, noun - "an inscription (suggested information) put over any thing (perceivable inspiration) as a name by which it is known"...that's the name of the game.
Which implies the issue with claiming...showing off to others what one claims. Meanwhile in reality...nature shows off everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) by giving "free" (will of choice) access to it.
Add self discernment (temporary within ongoing), then consider COMPRE (compress) while being temporary (resistance) within ongoing (velocity)? Notice that breathing in and out allows for a moment of compression if ones chooses to make that effort? How about CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) by chest compression?
The process of consenting to a suggested partial (puzzle pieces); while ignoring the perceivable whole (picture on the box)...a careful deception or blunt ignorance?
...he said after sanitation of classified information and I'm like: "lots of transparent kikes in this story"
...implies within momentum of ongoing motion.
Perceivable ordinance (inception towards death) inspires perceiving resistance (life), while others use suggestion (graven image; statues) to tempt ones consent (accordance) to ignore resisting.
Which is hard to discern while the feet of tyranny are dancing the horah on ones face to hava nagila.
RE (respond to) PRODUCE (being produced by) hence representing product placement aka a mind placed within production.
Interim implies within eternal, hence having to take a leak while drinking those pints. Pissing oneself doesn't represent infinite drinking and if the interim represents a bar, then they gonna drag you out when you try to go on.
"in" a bubble implies "inside" a bubble, hence being able to mimic ongoing whole (bubble) as temporary partials (bubbles)...yet always bursting.
Latin atomos - "indivisible partial" (a contradiction in terms, since partial implies division within whole) + Greek atomos; tomos - "uncut" aka UN (reversal) CUT (division), hence the sleigh of hand "live (living division) and uncut (reversal of division)". Also; "taking a cut"; "cut to the chase"; "circumcision"; "ready; set; action...and cut"; "cutting oneself"; "cut my life into pieces; this is my last resort" etc.
Foundation goes on; those within have the free will of choice to stutter along while learning from the consequences thereof...or not...I suppose.
...by comprehending to be within (life) way (inception towards death); hence not within conflict/imbalance (want vs not want); but as self sustenance (choice) within balance (need/want). ZONE, noun - "circuit"...hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law closing the circuit, while tempting one within perceivable to "zone out" with suggested.
If sound represents health; then instrument within represents the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want), hence experiencing sickness while struggling within health to sustain self.
Volume (one); center (choice within balance); gravity (growth within loss); deception (remembering suggested instead of using memory to adapt to perceivable)...despite tempts one to ignore apparent.
To know (perceiving perceivable) implies RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by)...
Artificial represents one choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for what others are up to (suggested), which tempts one into opposition to natural.