never is a promise to no...
a) what if one represents an obligation within perceivable ever (everything) before one can shape promises towards no (nothing)?
b) PROM'ISE, noun [Latin promissum, from promitto, pro and mitto, to send.] - "a declaration, written or verbal, made by one person to another, which binds the person who makes it"...what if perceivable sends towards perceiving before one can send promises to one another?
Also; being able to perceive implies one to represents the recipient of what's being send...not the sender of it. Suggestion represents repacking of perceivable.
promise...which implies trust in an unseen future.
a) who's suggesting bank & trust, while offering promissory notes as bills of exchange...and who's consenting to them?
b) implication (if/then) implies ongoing motion (velocity) for each temporary (resistance) within...hence; suggested trust tempting one to ignore perceivable obligation; unseen (suggested) tempting one to ignore seen (perceivable), and suggested past; present; future tempts one to ignore ongoing momentum of "now" aka the only perceivable moment of ones existence.
In short...to perceive implies "at this moment"...before or after represent suggested distractions, which only work if one consents to them, hence remembering what was or trusting what will be, while ignoring what is.
to stave ongoing loss
a) what if ongoing staves itself through momentum, which allows delayed temporary existence momentarily for those within?
b) what if living cannot stave the process of dying; but only grow itself as resistance (growth) within temptation (loss)?
c) what if the steadiness of ongoing represents the momentum (balance) for those within (choice)? What if choosing to ignore this represents the implied imbalance?
d) how could temporary growth generate without utilizing ongoing loss as the generator?
e) consider being delay (life) within dispatch (inception towards death)...
one must be filled
a) how could one (partial) within oneness (whole) be empty when everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving) at any moment?
b) consider the difference between wanting to hold onto and needing to let go, when discerning self within a moving system? Does wanted appetite tempt one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable hunger?
c) what comes first...the want to fill or the need to adapt to being emptied?
d) how could whole be empty if partials are within?
continually refreshed
a) what if continuation of whole (inception towards death) generates temporary discontinuation of partials (life)?
b) looked at my kingdom, I was finally there, to sit on my throne as the... FRESH (moving with celerity; speed) PRINCE (a sovereign) OF (out of) BELL (instrument; vessel for resonance/dissonance) AIR (Latin aer; Heb. to shine; to radiate outwards).
the source of that living water
a) what if one exists in-between (life) source (inception) and conclusion (death)?
b) what if loss (inception towards death) and growth (life) in balance with each other represent the internal/inherent sustenance of energy?
c) what if ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore balancing as center (free will of choice)?
liquid is dead when it is unmoving, stagnant, diseased
a) LIQ'UID, adjective (Latin liquidus, liquo) - "fluid; flowing"...implies motion.
b) disease (being at dis-ease) implies one to answer a demand, hence being a temporary reaction (sickness) to ongoing action (health).
c) suggested stagnation (cessation of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable -TION (through action)...only within action can reaction pretend to stagnate.
d) "unmoving" implies finding level, hence balancing within the momentum of motion. It's ones lack of self discernment (as form within flow) which corrupts ones perspective when suggesting that things are "unmoving"...others exploit that by suggesting "affixed" information to tempt one to hold onto it, hence willingly ignoring motion.
The affixed word (suggested information) tempts one to ignore ongoing sound (perceivable inspiration).
the rituals were made several days prior
What if suggested prior and subsequent tempt one to ignore perceivable rite of passage? What if ones consent to the suggestions of another makes one oblivious (ignorant) to obvious (perceivable)?
Are...really insane?
a) insane aka IN SANUS (within sound). Being able to perceive sound implies being within perceivable sound. If reality represents sound; then everyone within reality represents "insane" (within sound).
b) Sigismund Schlomo Freud is being suggested as the "the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical method for evaluating and treating pathologies seen as originating from conflicts in the psyche"...therefore; anyone suggesting others to be "insane" willingly consents to Schlomo's psychoanalysis method, hence giving those who suggest in the name of Schlomo the sole power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of psychoanalysis and everything analyzed.
Are we sure it's not a lie made by the Jews?
a) the suggestions of the so called jews represents the truth (want) or lie (not want) for those consenting to them.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the assurance of consent.
Why are there not many "records"
Because each ones mind/memory represents the record for the suggested information by others; hence RECORD', verb (Latin recorder, to call to mind, to remember). Remembering implies ones choice to RE (respond to) MEM (mind/memory), while ignoring that nature is based on motion; and that momentum of motion represents the memory within motion.
"records" of Caligula that aren't made-up?
Who suggested the label Gaius 'Caligula' Ceasar and who consented to it? What if anything suggested represents made-up labels for everything perceivable?
CALIGUA (little shoe); diminutive of CALIGA (big shoe)..."these shoes (jews) are made for walking (diaspora)...that's just what they do...one of these days these shoes (jews) are gonna walk all over you". Written by Lee Hazelwood, and performed by Nancy Sinatra ("she later described him as part Henry Higgins and part Sigmund Freud").
Why is that all we hear about...
...because ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) surrounds one with the noises of others, while tempting one to ignore being partial (perceiving instrument) within the momentum (resonance/dissonance) of whole (perceivable sound).
insane rapists
The many reasoning against each other about "insane rapists" allows the few to become the-rapists suggesting who is or isn't insane...which ties back to the alledged father of psychoanalysis (Sigismund Schlomo Freud).
it mirrors what is happening...
MIR'ROR, noun [Latin miror, to admire.] - "a looking glass"...ones consent to admire the suggested information by others, tempts one to view perceivable inspiration (what is happening) through the lens of the suggested looking glass.
The black mirror represents ones ignorance of perceivable when viewing the reflections of suggested. "mirror; mirror on the wall..." that wall represents ones willing ignorance to adapt to perceivable, while allowing the "masons" of free will to build bricks of suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory; cause..."we don't need no education...we don't need no thought control... all in all, it was all just bricks in the wall".
Tell a lie big enough, it becomes immutable truth
A lie can only affect those who already consent to believe that a suggestion by others can be "truth"...suggested lies represent the contradiction of suggested truths. Nature neither lies, nor does it suggest any truth...it moves everything; hence communicating constant change aka perceivable differences, which those within perceive as inspiration for adaptation.
Sameness doesn't inspire adaptation; difference does. The few suggest sameness (equality) to corrupt differences (diversity), but only the consent of the many gives them the power to continue.
The biggest lie; the lie so big that those who believe it cannot see it...represents truth.
immutable
Being within sound (in-sanus), hence by sound (per-sonos), implies having the free will of choice to mute self.
If they can make us believe
Others can only tempt one to consent to believe (want) or disbelief (not want) what others are suggesting, which implies ones willing consent to ignore perceivable (need) first.
The parents of the so called goyim domesticate their children into "trust" by grooming them to consent to the suggested word over perceivable sound; hence setting them up to be controlled through spell-craft (word over sound). Meanwhile; the so called jews encourage their children to struggle learning language "backwards"...that grows caution and resentment, instead of blind trust, hence growing ones (center) resistance among others (surrounding) aka DIAMETRIC (through center) SPORADIC (separate) behavior aka diaspora.
In short: others don't make one believe, it's always "I WANT TO BELIEVE"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/32N2vMab.jpg
Dionysus
Both Dionysus and Apollo are suggested to tempt one to consent by free will of choice into the conflict of reason in-between aka suggested dualism (two) to tempt the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
what stops them from making us believe that genders are mere constructs?
What if GEN-eration (inception towards death) cannot be stopped by those (life) within? What if others can construct suggestion about genders to tempt one to willingly ignore being a perceiving reactor (living) within a perceivable generator (process of dying)?
a) how could one perceive "never"?
b) if thirst represents ongoing loss, then what represents temporary growth?
c) how could liquid be dead?
They have to keep growing
Current (inception towards death) represents loss...resisting current represents the growth within (life). Suggested currency tempts one to ignore resisting current, while consenting (credit; creed; consent) to suggested puts one into debt to those suggesting it, hence drowning faster within current while clinging onto currency.
What if wanting to get represents ones credit (creed; faith; belief; consent) to the suggestions of others, hence tempting one into SCORE, noun - "debt, or account of debt"?
a) while being moved from inception towards death...every goal set destroys life.
b) life needs to adapt to perceivable origin, while resisting suggested outcomes.
c) if GOAL - "end to which a design tends", then does nature tend to end life or does nature generate inception of life first?
d) how is it that the few suggest goals, while the many fail to reach any, yet losing so many?
I don't know what that looks like in practice
Suggested Pepsi vs Cola temps participation; perceivable thirst demands adaptation. If one adapts to thirst; then one grows resistance to temptation.
What if the best way out is to not participate?
a) inception towards death represents the only way for life.
b) consenting to suggested "not" (nothing) tempts one to ignore being partial within everything (whole).
c) wanting "out" tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to being (living) within (process of dying).
d) best vs worse; in vs out; yes vs no represents reasoning over suggested; which contradicts implication (if/then) within perceivable.
Stabilizing oneself as the center of ones surroundings allows one to experience balance; while others within ones surrounding experience imbalance...until chosen otherwise.
Partial represents center of whole...other partials tempt one to ignore center for surrounding.
Reveal of method; penance as a vetting process; alleviation of guilt; a test of might by being forced to resist the consequences; feeding the cattle what they want; which will reduce their resistance to what they don't want, and as usual...chutzpah.
are they wrong
Right vs wrong represents ones consent to reason with others about suggested information. Ask yourself if the few require confirmation or denial from the many about right or wrong choices?
If it's being...That's one of the larger ifs I've seen
And yet each being represents the free will of choice to ignore being for wanting to be. As for the foundation of if/then (implication)...motion. If set into motion; then being within motion.
Unit is a top-tier word. It can be used for anything!
ONES (partials) within ONEness (whole)...for all represents one in energy. Motion represents the only perceivable sequence (tier), while suggested words tempt one to slap (mentally) affixed label upon it. Before a unit can be used it's being divided into units.
lest the action become something else entirely without the state-change
Action implies constant change (inception towards death), while reaction (life) needs to resist being change, hence having the choice to react to being enacted upon.
The set of elements not in the element of "set".
How to explain "everything" by using "nothing" (not) to explain it without contradicting self?
"flow of value"...Is that the "pipeline" I keep hearing people talk about?
a) within line (inception towards death) one has the free will of choice to change position (left/right; up/down; forward/backwards) within balance (momentum of motion). The suggested progressivism by others tempts one to consent to confine ones point of view into a pipe; focusing on suggested outcomes, hence narrowing ones field of awareness within everything perceivable.
b) try comparing holding onto suggested values with being within an ongoing flow of perceivable value? Want to hold onto or need to let go...a choice with consequences. What happens if one wants to hold onto that which one needs to let go?
seconds are already times of energy
Seconds represent temporary counting ongoing, while suggesting labels for internal communication of energy. Notice the difference in perceiving time when getting older or among different life-forms. The few suggest seconds (tick; tick; tick...boom) to tempt the many to count down their lifetime, while aiming for the next thing in line.
what an absolute flood of them has gone by already!
It's oneself trying to accumulate those numbers which tempts one to view surrounding as going by; while ignoring to be center growing within the ongoing inspiration of loss. If one looks at loss, then one sees "an absolute flood going by"...
going back to the beginning of when seconds began
Seconds; minutes; hours represent the same motion aka the ongoing generation for the temporary EONS (Greek aion) - "vital force; period of existence"; perceiving it differently from within. Beginning/end represents the momentum (balance) within the same motion for each living difference (choice) within.
line of descent
Line of descent (inception towards death) generates parts of ascend (life)...and accent (ya know wha'm sayin?)
"discerned oneness"...It's not an easy skill to do, since there are so many of them out there
Self discernment would filter the suggested noise of all the other ones out.
For sale: small horse with limited trick repertoire
A one-trick pony...
that's remedial
Sleight of hand from "The Prodigy"...
"I got the poison" (dissonance)..."I got the remedy (resonance)"..."the rhythmical remedy (frequent adaptation to sound)"..."I got the pressure; the pressure (choice)".
Isn't that just the worst? Tryin'a count, bein' all twenty seven, twenty seven, twenty seven...
One counting each one of the suggestible "twenty seven"...does one need to count to sustain oneself?
accumulation of sediment
Consenting to the suggested information by others, which accumulates it as sediment within ones mind/memory, hence ignoring the flow state of perceivable inspiration. Gotta shake it up to loosen up. Compression (internal comprehension of externally perceivable) requires momentum, hence representing a process within motion.
those greek-army words, now those really do have two hundred little attachments on 'em!
Military aka MIL-LIT (mill to produce litter aka baby-making); booby-trap; fox-hole; foot-soldier aka sole of the foot; private (ones privates); privates at attention (erection); lance-corporal (flesh spear); arrows (eros); shaft of an arrow + fletcher + quiver; axe (ass); cutlass (cuddle-ass); rapier; artillery (tilling with the heart); ass-ault; am-bush; combat (cum-bat); surr-ender (bringing an end to above; beyond; over); seamen (semen); navy (nave; navel; native aka to be born, hence from flow into form); phalanx (phallus); sergeant (sir donating genes aka surrogate); officer (offering); lieutenant (tending the loo); battle of the bulge; trench warfare; captain (copulate); admiral (admire) rear-admiral (admiring the rear); vice-admiral (as if sodomy wasn't worse enough); pistol (piss-hole); win-chester; mag-num (magazine numb); to chamber a round etc.
It's pretty fucked up...
Counter-claims.
Hence; claim (greed) generating counter-claim (envy).
Once set in motion, there's no stopping it. The only way to stop is to not continue.
That represents you describing reactions set into motion; while ignoring to be reaction (choice) set within enacting motion (balance aka momentum of motion). Neither can motion be stopped; nor can those within motion stop reacting, hence the need to adapt. Others suggest "no; stop; it" to distract one from comprehending that.
I breathe in, down, up, and out.
In (nose); down (belly); up (chest); out (mouth)...after chest is where the opportunity to compress is offered.
no energy input
How to put without energy; how to be without energy; how to sustain a within without energy; how to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing without energy?
Well that doesn't sound like much of a puzzle. More of an... assembly experience?
Impressing disassemble (loss) generates expressing assemble (growth)...resisting the temptation to hold onto represents the expression of growth within loss. The few suggest the many to puzzle together fiction in hope of assembling reality, while the many ignore whole reality dissembling itself into each one of them.
to know they keep the plaintext copies
The few don't require keeping copies of suggested information; they comprehend the ongoing origin of perceivable inspiration, out of which they can shape as many copies as the many consent to put up with. The trick of keeping is to suggest others to believe that one can keep anything...ones consent given is what the ones suggesting are holding for as long as one gives it willingly.
it's a sentence of words, not some manner of instructional guideline. In fact it's just for decoration.
Suggestion tempts one to let oneself be instructed by others; consent allows others to guide by suggestion. Suggestion decorates perception with willing ignorance.
I should get an endorsement deal. It'd be great.
Face value (perceivable) doesn't require endorsing (suggestion)...taking such a deal will get one stabbed in the back.
I can already see the advertisement
Turning aside (advert) from perceivable towards suggested clouds ones view.
Don't they mostly just try to take photographs of it these days?
Captured moments (pictures) tempting one to hold onto suggested moments within perceivable momentum.
Consenting to suggested masquerades perceivable...ones consent allows those suggesting to wear the suggested as a mask.
blehblahblehblbalbhalb blahblbbllgbha blha blhelph
Rumor has it that if one holds a politician to ones ear; one can still hear it gargling on a circumcised dick.
-
RETARD (delayed living) within ATION (velocity aka process of dying)
-
DE (from) GEN (generated by) ATION (action) aka living reaction generated by, hence coming from generating action.
why kids cant read now?
Because perceivable now doesn't suggest books, yet ones consent to read suggested books tempts one to ignore perceivable now.
Why cant kids do math now?
Suggested MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath" tempts one to ignore perceivable addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole).
In other words...suggested math is based on zero (nothing); perceivable math is based on one (everything). The few suggest the many to "solve problems", while the many ignore being problem (life) within solution (inception towards death).
Why is our infrastructure failing?
a) because temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) requires ones struggle of resistance to be able to sustain self longer.
b) INFRA (to break) STRUCTURE (building)...hence implying being build to break.
Why is the military struggling for recruits?
Because the many are already consenting to be at war within the conflicts of reason; as militants against one another about the suggestions of the few. Furthermore; it's the natural order which RECRUITS, verb - "repairs by fresh supplies (living) anything wasted (dying)".
Why is entertainment so shitty?
Because it "enter-tamed-mind" until it's so full of suggested shit that ignorance becomes harder and harder to ignore, aka perceivable constipation inspiring one to let go of all that shit...
Look around...
...tempts one to ignore being the center of ones surrounding, hence in need to express growth outwards instead of repressing self by consenting to incoming suggestions from outside.
our enemy
a) suggested "our" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self.
b) the outer jew suggests one to consent to conflict (reason)...the inner jew consents. How to acknowledge the inner jew? Resist blaming the outer jew.
This (living) is not a situation (process of dying) that improves...
...but a momentary opportunity to improve self by resisting (need) temptations (want).
What if "corpus oration" requires more stimulus than the voices of the living?
The chutzpah to utilize the black mirror for broadcasting what those who willingly look don't want to see...their own reflection of weakness.
Wanna feel strong? Just switch the channel... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGIY5Vyj4YM
"still implies one counting"...Duzzit though?
If it's being done; then that implies it to be partial within whole, hence not counted together; but being set apart into "integral units". Even simpler...how could one count without being able to differentiated between other ones? What then differentiates these partials to allow ones discernment of them?
Is a "two" a "set of ones such that the total thereof is equal to the value of one and one again"
a) what represents ones setting? Partial within whole, hence total (motion) generating equal (momentum) for partials (resisting life) within.
b) value (motion) to perceivable flow of value aka inspiration (momentum) to perceiving evaluation within perceivable value (resisting life).
c) AGAIN, adverb (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...that's why consent to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason. Try to apply "again" to oneness (energy)...is there a second time of energy, or does time represent the perceivable moment(um) for those temporary existing within ongoing energy?
or is a unique monad of "two", with a twoness that is all of its own, and probably terrible besides.
a) monad implies "indivisible"; being implies divided (partial) within sole (whole).
b) TWO (one and one) NESS (quality of)...once again use energy and question "and"...energy and what else? Having discerned oneness; wholeness; soleness of energy allows one to comprehend that energy represents value; and that ones discernment implies the evaluation within value.
c) if energy differentiates itself and thereby shares whole with each partial, then does a system based on sharing represent one based on "owning; possessing; holding onto"? Does ones evaluation of moving value sound like holding onto (want) or letting go (need)?
Do hands have fingers, or are hands fingers?
Each digit represents a unit (Latin unus; one), hence oneself being able to express a thumbs up; pointing at stuff; giving the finger; using a guitar-slide or flashing the pinky when taking a sip. Each unit represents another partial (difference) within whole (sameness)...others suggest labels to make singular appear plural, by distracting from moving whole with the labels as an immovable partial.
Take a post-it; write "wind" on it and then go out into a storm and try to affix that label...guess what? It's much easier to suggest one to "affix" that label within ones consenting mind/memory and you can also keep the post-it.
BEFORE! (before!(aah-haaa!)) And there I was, run over by that same train for a second time, but at the same time, only it was going the other direction.
Tricked by suggested rhetoric...BE (being within) FORE (advanced by). No counting (before and after) required, just implication (if/then) within motion utilized by oneself...unless ignored.
I tried to calculate the total
a) one
b) counting together tempts one to ignore being set apart by, hence in need to resist being dissolved back into.
the monad with the title of "one"...
a) that's the catch-22 of using suggested labels (words) to express a perceivable system (sound) which doesn't label itself. I can utilize "one; whole; all; sole; energy (internal/inherent power etc.) to describe that which can only be comprehended (not perceived) by those within...yet; comprehension can only be grown by oneself for oneself. Resisting suggested (want) while adapting to perceivable (need) represents ones effort to grow (living) within loss (inception towards death).
b) TI'TLE, noun - "an inscription (suggested information) put over any thing (perceivable inspiration) as a name by which it is known"...that's the name of the game.
"claim self for oneself"...Better hope that self has a flag prepared.
Which implies the issue with claiming...showing off to others what one claims. Meanwhile in reality...nature shows off everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) by giving "free" (will of choice) access to it.
comprehensiō, from ghed (take/hold/find).
Add self discernment (temporary within ongoing), then consider COMPRE (compress) while being temporary (resistance) within ongoing (velocity)? Notice that breathing in and out allows for a moment of compression if ones chooses to make that effort? How about CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) by chest compression?
I suppose it's like when putting a puzzle together; it's a very careful process.
The process of consenting to a suggested partial (puzzle pieces); while ignoring the perceivable whole (picture on the box)...a careful deception or blunt ignorance?
Read the punch-cards...
...he said after sanitation of classified information and I'm like: "lots of transparent kikes in this story"
At this moment...
...implies within momentum of ongoing motion.
in accordance with all statutes and ordinances?
Perceivable ordinance (inception towards death) inspires perceiving resistance (life), while others use suggestion (graven image; statues) to tempt ones consent (accordance) to ignore resisting.
mailmen are of course the veritable middle-toe of government.
Which is hard to discern while the feet of tyranny are dancing the horah on ones face to hava nagila.
the masses do reproduce rather quickly
RE (respond to) PRODUCE (being produced by) hence representing product placement aka a mind placed within production.
"coming in or going out"...and ordering a literal infinity of pints in the interim.
Interim implies within eternal, hence having to take a leak while drinking those pints. Pissing oneself doesn't represent infinite drinking and if the interim represents a bar, then they gonna drag you out when you try to go on.
"living in a bubble"...And inside of those bubbles?
"in" a bubble implies "inside" a bubble, hence being able to mimic ongoing whole (bubble) as temporary partials (bubbles)...yet always bursting.
What they call "atoms"
Latin atomos - "indivisible partial" (a contradiction in terms, since partial implies division within whole) + Greek atomos; tomos - "uncut" aka UN (reversal) CUT (division), hence the sleigh of hand "live (living division) and uncut (reversal of division)". Also; "taking a cut"; "cut to the chase"; "circumcision"; "ready; set; action...and cut"; "cutting oneself"; "cut my life into pieces; this is my last resort" etc.
I suppose? Do I suppose? Supponere? No, I probably don't, do I, or do I? Or not?
Foundation goes on; those within have the free will of choice to stutter along while learning from the consequences thereof...or not...I suppose.
if'n you land in THE CONFLICT ZONE, then the only way out is to leave...
...by comprehending to be within (life) way (inception towards death); hence not within conflict/imbalance (want vs not want); but as self sustenance (choice) within balance (need/want). ZONE, noun - "circuit"...hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law closing the circuit, while tempting one within perceivable to "zone out" with suggested.
Don't sound healthy.
If sound represents health; then instrument within represents the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want), hence experiencing sickness while struggling within health to sustain self.
When setting minds, remember that despite their apparent volume, their centers of gravity can be deceptive.
Volume (one); center (choice within balance); gravity (growth within loss); deception (remembering suggested instead of using memory to adapt to perceivable)...despite tempts one to ignore apparent.
I don't know if Nature "represents"
To know (perceiving perceivable) implies RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by)...
Nature is, as always, natural.
Artificial represents one choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for what others are up to (suggested), which tempts one into opposition to natural.
I think some people hold onto hate forever
Both want (love) and not want (hate) tempts one to hold onto; while need (change) forces one to let go...choice can only exist within balance (need/want); while imbalance (want vs not want) represents ones ignorance of balance, which others are exploiting.
religion warps it
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestions by others; hence binding oneself anew through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, while ignoring the natural bond between perceivable balance (surrounding) and perceiving choice (center).
In other words...believers and disbelievers view religion as what's being suggested to them. This view (suggested) warps what's being seen (perceivable), hence them ignoring the foundation of religion (contract law) for the distractions others are layering upon it.
Suggestion (death to life) as the inversion of perception (life to death)...
a) VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.]
b) ones consent (want or not want) towards the suggestion of others (vaccine) tempts all those consenting into a conflict of reason (vaccinated vs unvaccinated) among themselves, while keeping those suggesting out of it.
I don’t know about the fake and gay pagan gods
Sun-day; Moon-day; Tyrs-day; Wodins-day; Thors-day; Freyas-day; Saturns-day...
the foundation of creation
a) CREATE, verb - "to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist".
b) the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation represents flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of temporary ingredient out of ongoing base (alchemy).
worship
A SHIP (life) has to evaluate the WORTH aka value of perceivable current (inception towards death), while resisting all the other suggested values floating around.
one; two; three...
...implies ONE consenting to count other ONEs as two; three etc. Counting is being suggested by others ones; while oneness (whole) designates itself into units (partials), hence each one representing a perceiving partial within perceivable whole.
If you show me anything representing "two"; then I will ask you if you're able to discern between each "one" of them...
Worship no one and nothing.
Who suggested one the worth of "no; not; nothing; nothingness" and why did one consent to it?
They can always go back to Israel
Old English Israel - "the Jewish people"; from Hebrew yisra'el "he that striveth with God"...that implies each one of the jewish people; residing at any place.
The few utilize the same trick with NATION - "a people", by suggesting nationalism, hence tempting each one of a people to consent to a collective branding (nation), which in return gives the few the power of mass consent to be able to define; redefine and contradict the suggested meaning of "nation" into for example "united nations".
The few suggest "israel" by suggesting zionism (emancipation from others by forming for self).
why use words the way they want them used?
a) what if the so called jew comprehend need (perceivable sound) underneath want (suggested words), hence tempting other to reason (want versus not want) about suggested words, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable sound?
b) before suggested symbolism (letters) comes perceivable symmetry (proportion of partials within whole)...shaping collectivism (words) out of symbolism (letters) represents spell-craft aka crafting the spelling of others by suggesting them to consent to collected symbols for communication.
Abracadabra or ABECEDARY (Latin abecedarium) - "alphabet table"...
white genocide
a) can one (life) kill (cide) generation (inception towards death) or will it keep generating life?
b) can temporary spectrum at center kill surrounding balance (black/white) by choosing to mix? What if tempting center into a mixed surrounding distracts from being aka from self discernment about ones position?
c) what if suggested over perceivable represents temptation, while consenting to it shapes it into suicidal consent to genocidal suggestions?
Example: "watch porn; goy" represents an impotent temptation unless one consents to watch porn. If one does; then consent became suicidal (destroying self), while the consequences of the suggested became genocidal (destroying others...starting with sacrificing potential offspring into a sock).
Consent to impotent temptations makes temptations potent, while making oneself impotent...
a) KID, noun [Latin hoedus; vulgar.] - "a young goat; a faggot; a bundle of heath and furze"
b) suggested words (information) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (inspiration)...aka spell-craft.
c) before suggested symbolism (letters) exists perceivable symmetry (units)...UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one) or LET'TER (one who permits) aka being oneself or letting others permit or deny one to be...it's a choice.