If it's being...That's one of the larger ifs I've seen
And yet each being represents the free will of choice to ignore being for wanting to be. As for the foundation of if/then (implication)...motion. If set into motion; then being within motion.
Unit is a top-tier word. It can be used for anything!
ONES (partials) within ONEness (whole)...for all represents one in energy. Motion represents the only perceivable sequence (tier), while suggested words tempt one to slap (mentally) affixed label upon it. Before a unit can be used it's being divided into units.
lest the action become something else entirely without the state-change
Action implies constant change (inception towards death), while reaction (life) needs to resist being change, hence having the choice to react to being enacted upon.
The set of elements not in the element of "set".
How to explain "everything" by using "nothing" (not) to explain it without contradicting self?
"flow of value"...Is that the "pipeline" I keep hearing people talk about?
a) within line (inception towards death) one has the free will of choice to change position (left/right; up/down; forward/backwards) within balance (momentum of motion). The suggested progressivism by others tempts one to consent to confine ones point of view into a pipe; focusing on suggested outcomes, hence narrowing ones field of awareness within everything perceivable.
b) try comparing holding onto suggested values with being within an ongoing flow of perceivable value? Want to hold onto or need to let go...a choice with consequences. What happens if one wants to hold onto that which one needs to let go?
seconds are already times of energy
Seconds represent temporary counting ongoing, while suggesting labels for internal communication of energy. Notice the difference in perceiving time when getting older or among different life-forms. The few suggest seconds (tick; tick; tick...boom) to tempt the many to count down their lifetime, while aiming for the next thing in line.
what an absolute flood of them has gone by already!
It's oneself trying to accumulate those numbers which tempts one to view surrounding as going by; while ignoring to be center growing within the ongoing inspiration of loss. If one looks at loss, then one sees "an absolute flood going by"...
going back to the beginning of when seconds began
Seconds; minutes; hours represent the same motion aka the ongoing generation for the temporary EONS (Greek aion) - "vital force; period of existence"; perceiving it differently from within. Beginning/end represents the momentum (balance) within the same motion for each living difference (choice) within.
line of descent
Line of descent (inception towards death) generates parts of ascend (life)...and accent (ya know wha'm sayin?)
"discerned oneness"...It's not an easy skill to do, since there are so many of them out there
Self discernment would filter the suggested noise of all the other ones out.
For sale: small horse with limited trick repertoire
A one-trick pony...
that's remedial
Sleight of hand from "The Prodigy"...
"I got the poison" (dissonance)..."I got the remedy (resonance)"..."the rhythmical remedy (frequent adaptation to sound)"..."I got the pressure; the pressure (choice)".
Isn't that just the worst? Tryin'a count, bein' all twenty seven, twenty seven, twenty seven...
One counting each one of the suggestible "twenty seven"...does one need to count to sustain oneself?
accumulation of sediment
Consenting to the suggested information by others, which accumulates it as sediment within ones mind/memory, hence ignoring the flow state of perceivable inspiration. Gotta shake it up to loosen up. Compression (internal comprehension of externally perceivable) requires momentum, hence representing a process within motion.
those greek-army words, now those really do have two hundred little attachments on 'em!
Military aka MIL-LIT (mill to produce litter aka baby-making); booby-trap; fox-hole; foot-soldier aka sole of the foot; private (ones privates); privates at attention (erection); lance-corporal (flesh spear); arrows (eros); shaft of an arrow + fletcher + quiver; axe (ass); cutlass (cuddle-ass); rapier; artillery (tilling with the heart); ass-ault; am-bush; combat (cum-bat); surr-ender (bringing an end to above; beyond; over); seamen (semen); navy (nave; navel; native aka to be born, hence from flow into form); phalanx (phallus); sergeant (sir donating genes aka surrogate); officer (offering); lieutenant (tending the loo); battle of the bulge; trench warfare; captain (copulate); admiral (admire) rear-admiral (admiring the rear); vice-admiral (as if sodomy wasn't worse enough); pistol (piss-hole); win-chester; mag-num (magazine numb); to chamber a round etc.
Once set in motion, there's no stopping it. The only way to stop is to not continue.
That represents you describing reactions set into motion; while ignoring to be reaction (choice) set within enacting motion (balance aka momentum of motion). Neither can motion be stopped; nor can those within motion stop reacting, hence the need to adapt. Others suggest "no; stop; it" to distract one from comprehending that.
I breathe in, down, up, and out.
In (nose); down (belly); up (chest); out (mouth)...after chest is where the opportunity to compress is offered.
no energy input
How to put without energy; how to be without energy; how to sustain a within without energy; how to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing without energy?
Well that doesn't sound like much of a puzzle. More of an... assembly experience?
Impressing disassemble (loss) generates expressing assemble (growth)...resisting the temptation to hold onto represents the expression of growth within loss. The few suggest the many to puzzle together fiction in hope of assembling reality, while the many ignore whole reality dissembling itself into each one of them.
to know they keep the plaintext copies
The few don't require keeping copies of suggested information; they comprehend the ongoing origin of perceivable inspiration, out of which they can shape as many copies as the many consent to put up with. The trick of keeping is to suggest others to believe that one can keep anything...ones consent given is what the ones suggesting are holding for as long as one gives it willingly.
it's a sentence of words, not some manner of instructional guideline. In fact it's just for decoration.
Suggestion tempts one to let oneself be instructed by others; consent allows others to guide by suggestion. Suggestion decorates perception with willing ignorance.
I should get an endorsement deal. It'd be great.
Face value (perceivable) doesn't require endorsing (suggestion)...taking such a deal will get one stabbed in the back.
I can already see the advertisement
Turning aside (advert) from perceivable towards suggested clouds ones view.
Don't they mostly just try to take photographs of it these days?
Captured moments (pictures) tempting one to hold onto suggested moments within perceivable momentum.
And yet each being represents the free will of choice to ignore being for wanting to be. As for the foundation of if/then (implication)...motion. If set into motion; then being within motion.
ONES (partials) within ONEness (whole)...for all represents one in energy. Motion represents the only perceivable sequence (tier), while suggested words tempt one to slap (mentally) affixed label upon it. Before a unit can be used it's being divided into units.
Action implies constant change (inception towards death), while reaction (life) needs to resist being change, hence having the choice to react to being enacted upon.
How to explain "everything" by using "nothing" (not) to explain it without contradicting self?
a) within line (inception towards death) one has the free will of choice to change position (left/right; up/down; forward/backwards) within balance (momentum of motion). The suggested progressivism by others tempts one to consent to confine ones point of view into a pipe; focusing on suggested outcomes, hence narrowing ones field of awareness within everything perceivable.
b) try comparing holding onto suggested values with being within an ongoing flow of perceivable value? Want to hold onto or need to let go...a choice with consequences. What happens if one wants to hold onto that which one needs to let go?
Seconds represent temporary counting ongoing, while suggesting labels for internal communication of energy. Notice the difference in perceiving time when getting older or among different life-forms. The few suggest seconds (tick; tick; tick...boom) to tempt the many to count down their lifetime, while aiming for the next thing in line.
It's oneself trying to accumulate those numbers which tempts one to view surrounding as going by; while ignoring to be center growing within the ongoing inspiration of loss. If one looks at loss, then one sees "an absolute flood going by"...
Seconds; minutes; hours represent the same motion aka the ongoing generation for the temporary EONS (Greek aion) - "vital force; period of existence"; perceiving it differently from within. Beginning/end represents the momentum (balance) within the same motion for each living difference (choice) within.
Line of descent (inception towards death) generates parts of ascend (life)...and accent (ya know wha'm sayin?)
Self discernment would filter the suggested noise of all the other ones out.
A one-trick pony...
Sleight of hand from "The Prodigy"...
"I got the poison" (dissonance)..."I got the remedy (resonance)"..."the rhythmical remedy (frequent adaptation to sound)"..."I got the pressure; the pressure (choice)".
One counting each one of the suggestible "twenty seven"...does one need to count to sustain oneself?
Consenting to the suggested information by others, which accumulates it as sediment within ones mind/memory, hence ignoring the flow state of perceivable inspiration. Gotta shake it up to loosen up. Compression (internal comprehension of externally perceivable) requires momentum, hence representing a process within motion.
Military aka MIL-LIT (mill to produce litter aka baby-making); booby-trap; fox-hole; foot-soldier aka sole of the foot; private (ones privates); privates at attention (erection); lance-corporal (flesh spear); arrows (eros); shaft of an arrow + fletcher + quiver; axe (ass); cutlass (cuddle-ass); rapier; artillery (tilling with the heart); ass-ault; am-bush; combat (cum-bat); surr-ender (bringing an end to above; beyond; over); seamen (semen); navy (nave; navel; native aka to be born, hence from flow into form); phalanx (phallus); sergeant (sir donating genes aka surrogate); officer (offering); lieutenant (tending the loo); battle of the bulge; trench warfare; captain (copulate); admiral (admire) rear-admiral (admiring the rear); vice-admiral (as if sodomy wasn't worse enough); pistol (piss-hole); win-chester; mag-num (magazine numb); to chamber a round etc.
It's pretty fucked up...
Hence; claim (greed) generating counter-claim (envy).
That represents you describing reactions set into motion; while ignoring to be reaction (choice) set within enacting motion (balance aka momentum of motion). Neither can motion be stopped; nor can those within motion stop reacting, hence the need to adapt. Others suggest "no; stop; it" to distract one from comprehending that.
In (nose); down (belly); up (chest); out (mouth)...after chest is where the opportunity to compress is offered.
How to put without energy; how to be without energy; how to sustain a within without energy; how to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing without energy?
Impressing disassemble (loss) generates expressing assemble (growth)...resisting the temptation to hold onto represents the expression of growth within loss. The few suggest the many to puzzle together fiction in hope of assembling reality, while the many ignore whole reality dissembling itself into each one of them.
The few don't require keeping copies of suggested information; they comprehend the ongoing origin of perceivable inspiration, out of which they can shape as many copies as the many consent to put up with. The trick of keeping is to suggest others to believe that one can keep anything...ones consent given is what the ones suggesting are holding for as long as one gives it willingly.
Suggestion tempts one to let oneself be instructed by others; consent allows others to guide by suggestion. Suggestion decorates perception with willing ignorance.
Face value (perceivable) doesn't require endorsing (suggestion)...taking such a deal will get one stabbed in the back.
Turning aside (advert) from perceivable towards suggested clouds ones view.
Captured moments (pictures) tempting one to hold onto suggested moments within perceivable momentum.