I always wondered.
Why are there not many "records" of Caligula that aren't made-up? Why is that all we hear about these Roman Emperors is how they are insane rapists and pedos? Is it because we've been occupied by the Blood god-worshiping Canaanite Jews since around 500AD and we've been deluded into thinking that their blood god is somehow our savior?
(Meanwhile, the blood-god worshiping Jews aka the Vatican starving people to death for hundreds of years, hiring child soldiers they call knights and paladins and destroying all historical records is glossed over.)
It mirrors what is happening nowadays recently. Tell a lie big enough, it becomes immutable truth. If they can make us believe that Baal and Dionysus is our savior and sheperd, what stops them from making us believe that genders are mere constructs and American presidents are insane racists?
a) insane aka IN SANUS (within sound). Being able to perceive sound implies being within perceivable sound. If reality represents sound; then everyone within reality represents "insane" (within sound).
b) Sigismund Schlomo Freud is being suggested as the "the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical method for evaluating and treating pathologies seen as originating from conflicts in the psyche"...therefore; anyone suggesting others to be "insane" willingly consents to Schlomo's psychoanalysis method, hence giving those who suggest in the name of Schlomo the sole power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of psychoanalysis and everything analyzed.
a) the suggestions of the so called jews represents the truth (want) or lie (not want) for those consenting to them.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the assurance of consent.
Because each ones mind/memory represents the record for the suggested information by others; hence RECORD', verb (Latin recorder, to call to mind, to remember). Remembering implies ones choice to RE (respond to) MEM (mind/memory), while ignoring that nature is based on motion; and that momentum of motion represents the memory within motion.
Who suggested the label Gaius 'Caligula' Ceasar and who consented to it? What if anything suggested represents made-up labels for everything perceivable?
CALIGUA (little shoe); diminutive of CALIGA (big shoe)..."these shoes (jews) are made for walking (diaspora)...that's just what they do...one of these days these shoes (jews) are gonna walk all over you". Written by Lee Hazelwood, and performed by Nancy Sinatra ("she later described him as part Henry Higgins and part Sigmund Freud").
...because ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) surrounds one with the noises of others, while tempting one to ignore being partial (perceiving instrument) within the momentum (resonance/dissonance) of whole (perceivable sound).
The many reasoning against each other about "insane rapists" allows the few to become the-rapists suggesting who is or isn't insane...which ties back to the alledged father of psychoanalysis (Sigismund Schlomo Freud).
MIR'ROR, noun [Latin miror, to admire.] - "a looking glass"...ones consent to admire the suggested information by others, tempts one to view perceivable inspiration (what is happening) through the lens of the suggested looking glass.
The black mirror represents ones ignorance of perceivable when viewing the reflections of suggested. "mirror; mirror on the wall..." that wall represents ones willing ignorance to adapt to perceivable, while allowing the "masons" of free will to build bricks of suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory; cause..."we don't need no education...we don't need no thought control... all in all, it was all just bricks in the wall".
A lie can only affect those who already consent to believe that a suggestion by others can be "truth"...suggested lies represent the contradiction of suggested truths. Nature neither lies, nor does it suggest any truth...it moves everything; hence communicating constant change aka perceivable differences, which those within perceive as inspiration for adaptation.
Sameness doesn't inspire adaptation; difference does. The few suggest sameness (equality) to corrupt differences (diversity), but only the consent of the many gives them the power to continue.
The biggest lie; the lie so big that those who believe it cannot see it...represents truth.
Being within sound (in-sanus), hence by sound (per-sonos), implies having the free will of choice to mute self.
Others can only tempt one to consent to believe (want) or disbelief (not want) what others are suggesting, which implies ones willing consent to ignore perceivable (need) first.
The parents of the so called goyim domesticate their children into "trust" by grooming them to consent to the suggested word over perceivable sound; hence setting them up to be controlled through spell-craft (word over sound). Meanwhile; the so called jews encourage their children to struggle learning language "backwards"...that grows caution and resentment, instead of blind trust, hence growing ones (center) resistance among others (surrounding) aka DIAMETRIC (through center) SPORADIC (separate) behavior aka diaspora.
In short: others don't make one believe, it's always "I WANT TO BELIEVE"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/32N2vMab.jpg
Both Dionysus and Apollo are suggested to tempt one to consent by free will of choice into the conflict of reason in-between aka suggested dualism (two) to tempt the perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
What if GEN-eration (inception towards death) cannot be stopped by those (life) within? What if others can construct suggestion about genders to tempt one to willingly ignore being a perceiving reactor (living) within a perceivable generator (process of dying)?
Gen for Genesis
a) aka formation (life) by motion (inception towards death), hence implying division (sex; seco; to divide).
b) the religious connotation suggests genesis as origin aka beginning, which tempts one to ignore that ongoing motion exists before beginning (inception) and end (death) of temporary form, hence whole flow exits before partial form within.
The deception is based on suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies within; out of, and in response to everything). Base generates ingredients within itself through self differentiation.
c) a beginning without an end implies within nothing, while beginning/end in balance with each other represents momentum of ongoing motion (everything) for each temporary choice within (everyone).
d) the origin of nothing represents ones free will of choice to ignore perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing)...hence a reaction within an enacting system.
One of the rhetorical tricks to deceive the many goes: "making something out of nothing", which represents the inversion of: "making nothing (suggestion) within everything (perceivable)"...one can only discern this by oneself within perceivable, not by consenting to the suggestions of others.