a) partial (life) cannot survive whole (inception towards death).
b) others suggest SURVI'VE, verb [Latin supervivo.] - "to outlive" as progressivism (towards suggested outcome) to tempt one to ignore "inlive" aka living within the process of dying. A simple rhetorical inversion of reality (inlive) with fiction (outlive).
c) each partial (growth) represents the opening within the closed; whole (loss). Ones free will of choice implies an opening opportunity to experience the perceivable whole from within, while nothing can get into a closed whole from outside, since whole implies outside for everything within.
d) life imprisonment implies being within mental prison during life aka choice confined to balance momentarily.
a potential kill rate of 40%
What about obesity; Herr Schmitz?
ideology known
Consenting to a suggested ideology tempts one to ignore perceivable knowledge.
original sin
Perceivable origin sets one free (will of choice); suggested sin tempts others to restrict their choices.
to make everyone believe...
...implies each ones willing consent to believe the suggestions of others.
suffering because
Being (life) within cause (inception towards death) implies SUF'FER, verb [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear, to undergo.] aka bearing the burden of growth while undergoing loss.
same sex
SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.]...others suggest sameness to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences.
fluid gender
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) through sex (division).
will become truth
will coming to be implies through constant change (motion). A suggested truth represents an affixed assumption tempting those who consent to hold onto it to ignore perceivable change, while giving others the opportunity to contradict the unstable truth with destabilizing lies.
past is no different from the present
Suggested past; present and future only exist within the mind/memory of the one consenting to hold onto them. Perceivable reality implies constant change; hence ongoing momentum aka perceivable moment of "now".
One can only exist "now"...before and after represent fictitious states. Ones Inception and death cannot be perceived by oneself while being alive.
The few trick the many to label momentum of motion by them consenting to uphold the suggested labels within their memory.
history repeats
Ongoing instance (inception towards death) generates temporary repetition (life)...he-brew his-story to distract jew from that.
is no
a) where is nothing? What is nothing? Why is nothing? Who is nothing?
b) if nature represents "yes", then does ones "no" negate nature?
c) ask yourself if positive and negative represent temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) simultaneously. Only within loss can there be growth aka only within negative can there be positive. Now rebrand it again...only within nothing can there be everything? That represents the suggested inversion tempting one to ignore (nothing) perceivable (everything).
Nothing represents ones denial of everything perceivable for the suggestions by others about it.
Deutsch > Dutch > Ditz > Dish > Yid-Dish...?
unimportant John Money
- JOHN (Hebrew; yohanan) - "jehovah has favored"
- JEHOVAH (transliteration of Hebrew Tetragrammaton YHWH)
- TETRA (four; for) GRAMMA (grammar; grimoire; incantation) TON (measure of weight)
- MONEY aka m-one-y (my one) aka ones ownership claim over another one.
What's required for incantation to measure the weight of ones ownership over another? Free will of choice aka WILL I AM, hence John William Money.
voids within
What if ones ignorance of whole represents one being void of comprehension? As for within...can one be anything else than center of surrounding?
It is not possible...
How is "nothing" (not) possible? How could a thing be not? Not being where?
all-owed
Each one (perceiving) owes it to all (perceivable)...not to the suggestions of other ones.
Sam Altman...i hope to encounter ...alone.
It ain't easy to encounter all in one (alone) if the other one represents a man of ALT aka ALTERN'ATIVE, adjective - "offering a choice of two things"; especially a MAN who suggests in SAMUEL (Hebrew Shemiel) - "the name of god".
Fake it until you make it
a) suggested information represents fake, while perceivable inspiration represents real.
b) faking it represents suggesting information; making it represents consenting to suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
In other words...consent of many makes what suggestions by few fakes.
Nothing is or ever was organic
Ones consent to suggested "nothing" tempts one to ignore everything perceivable. Ones free will of choice represents the natural instrument (organ) and others utilize suggestion to tempt one to consent to be played like a fool.
fraudulent liars
Suggested truth represents the fraudulent foundation for every suggested lie build upon. Perceivable nature implies constant change, hence not allowing those within to hold onto (truth) for long (lies)...others ruthlessly exploit those who ignore that.
What if your want from others to behave according to norm allows the few to shift the overton window of accepted norm by ever so slightly contradicting the formerly accepted?
The most noticeable part...
Oneself represents the partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) which notices (observes by mind)...judging others as most or fewest tempts one to ignore self.
the way they talk
Way (inception towards death) generates perceivable sound, those wandering within (life) suggest talking to tempt each other to ignore perceivable sound.
irrelevant nonsense
a) what is more relevant...suggested by others or perceivable by self?
b) what if sensing implies perceivable by self, while "no; non; not; nothing" represents a suggestion by others?
...It's almost as if...others can utilize suggestion to tempt one to ignore perceivable if one consents to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want or not want) by free will of choice.
tl; dr: if one redd-it (read it) then one consented to it, hence willingly submitting to the "chosen ones" who suggested it.
What if the willing ignorance of the many represents the gate, which prevents them from resisting the suggestions of the few? As long as one chooses other ones; so long stay the "chosen ones" safe.
See how treasonous they are
What is more treasonous...government by others or ones choice to ignore governing (to control) ones own mind (ment)? If one ignores self, while willingly consenting to let others represent (representative government) ones ignored self, then ones ignorance committed treason against what? Self?
Ban all security
SE (free from) CURA (care)...being "free" will of choice implies response-ability to take care of self. Others suggest "security" to tempt one to ignore self by allowing others to take care...like healthcare.
Ones response-ability (choice) cannot be given away to others...only ignored, hence giving others the opportunity to exploit ones ignorance.
If you ban all suggested security, then you are still left will all those who ignore to take care of themselves, which in return will breed carelessness.
only advocate for problems they know they have a profitable solution for
There's only one ongoing solution (inception towards death) for each one temporary problem (life) within...the many are being tricked to ignore this; which allows the few to always overcome them in the long run.
most generous
There's only one GEN-erator (inception towards death) for each one reactor (life), so what could be more generous than giving everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at any moment?
Once again...the many ignore being within ongoing generation, which allows the few to exploit them with generosity of currency, because they comprehend that current keeps generating.
Reality represents infinity for those within, because those within represent the finite center (living) of infinite surrounding (process of dying)...
activist
Suggested activism tempts those who consent to believe in acting and moving, which tempts one to ignore being reaction (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Suggested actors under directors tempts one to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death).
to defund
DE (preposition of separation in space, meaning "off, away from"...consenting to suggested proposition tempts one away from perceivable impression. Nature doesn't propose itself; it forces itself through everything within, and that force (motion) generates balance (momentum) as the foundation for each reactive choice (resistance) within.
why trust liars
a) because trust represents the foundation for suggested truth, which only when consensual given, allows others to suggest lies.
b) anyone consenting to trust suggested truth can be exploited by suggested lies.
c) those who utilize suggested truths and lies to control others represent a "trust-fund" aka suggestions by others represent the foundation ones trust is build upon.
origin of the "debt ceiling"
If one consents to burden oneself with the suggestions by others, then the suggested becomes the debt and ones ignorance to resist suggested becomes the ceiling.
Ignorance represents the self imposed cover (roof; ceiling) over ones eyes..."the roof is on fire; you don't need water (liquidity; currency); let the mf burn".
borrow credit
BOR'ROW, verb - "to take from another by request and consent" + CREDIT, noun (Latin creed) - "belief; faith"...aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
that set the world on fire
- "We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
- "We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
turned into a shitshow by Bundeskanzler
Asked Kim Schmitz from Kiel who Bundeskanzler Olaf Scholz works for and then watch him squirm, while trying to avoid mentioning the Warburgs from Hamburg...
as a consequence; for this reason
Reasoning over suggested choices by others tempts one to ignore consequences of ones free will of choice.
to - preposition
Aka suggested progressivism (towards outcomes) as to tempt consenting ones to ignore perceivable origin. All verbs (expressing motion) come with the "to" preposition, because one exits within motion, hence BE (being within) CAUSE (caused by)...
the lowest cardinal number
a) number implies unit (Latin unus; one), while low and high implies a unit measuring other units as lower or higher than.
b) essence (cardinal) of each designated unit (partial ones) implies whole oneness. Being (substance) implies within essence, hence spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) representing substance adapting to essence.
incomplete
Aka IN (within) COMPLETE (filled) hence as partial within whole.
ex-ist
a) -IST (exist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (existentialism)
b) EX (expression) implies within impressing aka expressed growth (life) within impressing loss (inception towards death).
time
Suggested time (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore perceivable time (now) aka perceivable moment(um) of motion.
at the same
a) partial (different) among partials (differences) cannot perceive whole (sameness), hence having momentary opportunity to grow (different) within loss (sameness) aka as different life within the same process of dying.
b) suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore where ones AT, because ones consent to the suggestion of another implies ones submission to others, hence ignoring to discern self within perceivable.
CON (together; with) SPIRE (Latin spiro; to breathe)...each off-spring breathes apart from one another; not together. How is that for a conspiracy?
just too much
a) each one (perceiving) can handle everything (perceivable)
b) temporary growth (life) can handle ongoing loss (inception towards death).
What you are saying is beyond most
a) MOST, adjective - "consisting of the greatest number" aka NUM'BER, noun "designation of a unit" aka U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one".
b) being implies ONE, while YOND, adjective - "alienated in mind; gone wandering" tempts one to ignore self.
c) perceivable nature doesn't SAY (utter in words) anything, it moves each one within perceivable sound.
Thanks for the effort
EF'FORT, noun [Latin fortis; force.] - "a straining; an exertion of strength"...living within the process of dying implies force of resistance (growth) within force of velocity (loss).
Kick my ass for lacking to express even more effort than the status quo demands, instead of thanking me for being less ignorant than most others.
monkeycat
She ain't amused... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3pNsMQPp.jpg
more than one
a) there can only be one...each one (partial) within oneness (whole).
b) others suggest counting, hence tempting one to ignore self for others; while shaping others into accountants aka a registry of ones debt and credit.
the point or place where something begins, arises, or is derived.
a) point implies end (death) of sentence (life), hence tempting one to ignore origin (inception) for suggested outcomes, hence all the order following.
b) beginning (inception) and end (death) imply momentum (from inception towards death) for those within...momentum originates within motion. Those within (choice) momentum (balance) represent the center (living) of surrounding motion (process of dying).
c) rise (temporary growth of life) can only exist within fall (ongoing process of dying)
d) suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents transmutation of ingredient out of base aka origin (process of dying) generating derivatives (living). Ignoring this allows others to control derivative markets aka slavery.
fixed end or attachment of
Does the mind (ment) of life, while being moved from inception towards death, sound like a fixed or attached position?
a) HYGIENE (vital force, long life, eternity)...the ongoing process of dying represents the eternal; vital force for each temporary life within.
b) HYG; HYGRO (moist)...temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) implies a moist state, hence ones need to quench thirst by drinking before drying out.
Go woke, go broke"
Ones awakening (inception) implies one breaking off (off-spring). Fundamentally...being one implies divided; separated; differentiated; broken out of oneness, hence from whole into partial.
are they tho?
Plural (they) implies collected partials; singular (one) implies broken out of; within and in response to origin.
to cause loss
a) loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life)...temporary growth (living) can only exist within ongoing loss (process of dying).
b) currency aka current aka ongoing velocity implies loss, hence the flow-state of perceivable reality.
societal sabotage
Being part of society (togetherness) represents the inversion of being partial within whole (apartheid).
Sleight of hand: "Oh my god, it's a mirage (inversion)...I'm telling y'all, it's sabotage (by suggestion)".
Bonus: SABOTAGE; from SABOT; SAVATE - "old shoe" (elder jew)
a) there can be only one instrument of offense...weapon of choice.
b) logic (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore perceivable bio (life)...