And as you'll find out, having a same sex partner or fluid genders will no longer be a heresy in 30 years. It will become truth.
The past is no different from the present -- history repeats.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Consenting to a suggested ideology tempts one to ignore perceivable knowledge.
Perceivable origin sets one free (will of choice); suggested sin tempts others to restrict their choices.
...implies each ones willing consent to believe the suggestions of others.
Being (life) within cause (inception towards death) implies SUF'FER, verb [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear, to undergo.] aka bearing the burden of growth while undergoing loss.
SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.]...others suggest sameness to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences.
Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life) through sex (division).
will coming to be implies through constant change (motion). A suggested truth represents an affixed assumption tempting those who consent to hold onto it to ignore perceivable change, while giving others the opportunity to contradict the unstable truth with destabilizing lies.
Suggested past; present and future only exist within the mind/memory of the one consenting to hold onto them. Perceivable reality implies constant change; hence ongoing momentum aka perceivable moment of "now".
One can only exist "now"...before and after represent fictitious states. Ones Inception and death cannot be perceived by oneself while being alive.
The few trick the many to label momentum of motion by them consenting to uphold the suggested labels within their memory.
Ongoing instance (inception towards death) generates temporary repetition (life)...he-brew his-story to distract jew from that.
a) where is nothing? What is nothing? Why is nothing? Who is nothing?
b) if nature represents "yes", then does ones "no" negate nature?
c) ask yourself if positive and negative represent temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) simultaneously. Only within loss can there be growth aka only within negative can there be positive. Now rebrand it again...only within nothing can there be everything? That represents the suggested inversion tempting one to ignore (nothing) perceivable (everything).
Nothing represents ones denial of everything perceivable for the suggestions by others about it.