- WARN, verb - "to give notice of approaching or probable danger"
a) motion inspires adaptation; hence giving notice of approaching danger (death) for those being moved (life).
b) being (life) implies exposed to injury (inception towards death); hence temporary shelter (living) within ongoing danger (process of dying).
tried to warn
Suggested warnings tempt those who consent to ignore perceivable danger.
"OPEN SOCIETY" implying OPEN BORDERS.
a) before that came "FREE MARKET"...the foundation for that represents marketing suggestions towards ones consent by free will of choice.
b) COMMERCE, noun - "intercourse between individuals"...does one sell seed to buy pussy? Intercourse for offspring implies bartering (finding balance)...not buying vs selling (imbalance).
c) B'ARTER, verb - "to traffick or trade, by exchanging one commodity for another, in distinction from a sale and purchase" aka EX (expressed life) within CHANGE (inception towards death aka impressing change of motion).
Reality has layers
a) consider STRATUM - " layer artificially made" aka suggested information as the stratum within perceivable inspiration?
b) layered information is obvious; but what about layered inspiration? Can flow of inspiration be layered? How? Where?
morph
MORPH - "genetic variation of animal"...aka generated variation (life) of animation (inception towards death).
under the order
a) if many are under the spell of a few; then why would few be under instead of above?
b) what if layering above buries the one layering under it?
c) what if one can only exist within (life) natural order (inception towards death); hence in-between above/below?
secret occult
"I have a box"...if you consent to this suggestion; then I gain the power of your consent to conceal (occult) what's in the box as a secret. Notice then that I didn't suggest a "box" but only a word implying a box to put stuff into. Your consent to that word by assuming that I could've put something into it...that makes your consenting mind/memory the box for my suggestions.
suburban sense of superiority.
If urban is flushed with inferiority; then suburban grows superiority...
colonialism
Abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka multiculturalism aka cosmopolitanism aka internationalism aka colonialism etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NylNXBMxVAY&t=8s (Atari 2600 Port of Doom)...scary as fuck flicker-rate.
- LOCH (river) NESS (from inverness; innerness)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverness
a) outer flow (inception towards death) through inner form (life)
b) LOCH (German hole) aka "hole within self" (want) or "whole through self" (need)...ones free will of choice.
c) Loch Ness Monster aka MON'STER, noun (Latin monstro, to show, a sight) aka for those with eyes to see.
d) Loch Ness Monster: " it was brought to worldwide attention in 1933"...
I though Science...told us we needed
Scientism implies as suggested by others; Science (Latin scio; to know) implies perceivable...want (suggested) or need (perceivable) represents ones free will of choice.
Suggested "we" (pluralism) tempts perceiving one (singularity) to ignore self for others.
no reason
Ones consent to suggested "no" implies reasoning (no vs yes).
- LIT'IGATE, verb- "to dispute in law"
Perceivable law (natural) cannot be disputed by those within...suggested laws (artificial) can tempt one to ignore natural, while being distracted reasoning (dispute) against one another about artificial.
human right
- HUMAN (Hebrew form, species) + RIGHT (Latin rectus, rego, straight)
Only within straight (inception towards death) can there be curved (life); hence ones "rite" of passage as temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying)...suggested rights by others tempt one to ignore that.
All Roads Lead to Rome
If one (life) ignores perceivable course (inception towards death) for suggested ROAD ([Latin gradior; grade) - "open way or public passage; communication between one and another"; then one is being led to ROAM (Latin ramus) - "to wander; to ramble; to rove; to walk or move about from place to place without any certain purpose or direction".
two...tri...
a) ones consent to count what another one suggests (dualism + trinitarianism) tempts one to ignore ones sovereignty (free will of choice)...no one else can wield ones free will of choice.
b) "unus, duo, tres"...one represents the only unit that can COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one".
black nobility
NOBLE; from gnoscere; gno - "to know"...knowing black implies acknowledging ignorance (dark) aka destitute of light (comprehension).
final boss
Suggesting a final boss tempts one to ignore being the one that sends the hero on his journey towards the final boss. The few even mock this ignorance by suggesting the hero to fight his mirror image before the final boss, hence offering a sleight of hand for self reflection.
Nature represents perceivable origin; not gatekeeper for suggested outcomes.
cain and abel
a) CAN, verb - "to be ABLE"...
b) CAN-A-BLE...
- HYPER (denotes excess, over or beyond) SONIC (Latin sonus; sound)
Sound implies everything audible; while inaudible represents those within sound. Excess; over or beyond "everything" audible represents suggested fiction tempting one to ignore perceivable reality.
anti-
Aka against; AGAIN (Latin con, whence contra) - "a second time"...energy implies that there can be only first. Suggested "second" tempts one to ignore perceivable SECO (to divide), hence the internal/inherent division of energy.
hear a rap song
a) viewing lyrics; symbolism and sound apart from one another disarms suggested musical modulations.
b) RAP, verb [Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid] aka suggested progressivism tempting one to ignore being progressed (inception towards death) resistance (life).
overload
Ones consent to stand under (understand) suggested information tempts one to feel overload by the consented to burden.
motherboard
Consider the difference between a "printed circuit board" (PCB) suggested by others, and being "central processing unit" (CPU) aka center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable); while being processed from inception towards death as a living unit (Latin unus; one), hence apart from every other unit?
taboo
a) aka "to forbid" aka FOR (forwards) BID (to ask; offer; propose; request) aka wanting suggested bids, while ignoring perceivable need to adapt to being progressed forwards within origin.
b) a bid implies ones wanted desire for; hence a temptation one needs to resist.
c) being implies permission to wield free will of choice (reaction) within dominance of balance (action)...ignoring this for the suggestions by others gives others the power of ones consent to prohibit choosing, hence establishing taboos aka "rules for thee; but not for me".
BE (being) AST (astute; discerning)...lack of discernment devours self.
a) does nature DICTATE, verb [Latin, to speak.] law?
b) articulation of sound tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (word).
c) naturalization (perceivable) exists before articulation (suggested)...
stop world control
a) balance (momentum) can only exist within motion...suggesting the cessation of motion (stop) tempts one to ignore that.
b) ignorance restraints choice...ignoring to be choice within perceivable for submitting choice to suggested, gives those suggesting control of it.
What does it look like to align technology with humanity’s best interests?
IN'TEREST, verb transitive [Latin inter and esse] aka being within natural essence (perceivable) is being ignored when consenting to artificial technology (suggested).
What does perceivable look like if one ignores it for suggested?
functional society
The function of society (togetherness) aims at dysfunction of unity (apartheid)...others suggest unity (Latin unus; one) as society (many; us; we the people etc.) hence inverting reality with fiction.
a race to deploy
The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to want to race towards outcomes, while ignoring that everything perceivable is already displayed (deployed) through origin.
What does nature doesn't display? Does inception towards death sound like a race towards a goal for those alive? What does one win at the finish line?
- DILEMA - "an argument equally conclusive by contrary suppositions".
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested represents contrary suppositions with equal conclusion within perceivable need.
b) as differential (life) within equal (inception towards death) one needs to resist the want to follow.
c) there's no dilemma within motion unless motion is ignored by those within.
d) artificial (suggested information) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable inspiration)...intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to stand under artificial, while ignoring natural.
tl; dr...ones consent to suggested AI shapes the dilemma among all consenting ones.
jewish people are amazing entrepreneurs...most people aren't aware
ENTREPRENEUR - "manager or promoter of a theatrical production"...the few suggest information (fiction) as theatrical productions, to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable inspiration (reality). This allows the few to manage the many ignorant of reality (perceivable) with promoted fiction (suggested).
AMA'ZE, noun - "astonishment; confusion; perplexity, arising from fear, surprise or wonder"...ignoring reality for fiction amazes one, while one stumbles within the maze of ignorance...unaware that reality solves itself.
driven to succeed
Being alive implies being driven from inception towards death; hence in need to resist wanted temptation. The so called jews suggest progressivism to tempt the consenting many towards death; while ignoring to resist.
without thinking about the big picture
a) the few suggest pictures (captured moments) to tempt the many to ignore being (choice) within momentum (balance) of motion.
b) the few suggest "without" to tempt the many to ignore being (life) within (inception towards death).
c) nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perceiving) at any moment (um)...consenting to the suggestions by others narrows ones perspective to the suggested, hence tunnel-vision instead of being center of surrounding.
- SEX (Latin seco; divide)
Change (inception towards death) divides (life)...others tempt one to regret being alive by suggesting to ignore change perceived for suggested changes.
Sleight of hand:
- "I see no changes, wake up in the morning and I ask myself...is life worth living, should I blast myself?"
- "That's just the way it is (change)...things will never be the same"
to entertain a thought
ENTERTAIN; noun - "to keep up, maintain, to keep in a certain frame of mind"...an open mind implies allowing input (perceivable inspiration) to go through; while holding onto (suggested information) closes mind/memory as a vessel for flow.
If perceivable represents steam to fuel perceiving engine; then ones consent to suggested represents closing ones valve of discernment.
Aristotle
ARISTO (of the aristocrats); from AR (to fit together)...nature sets itself apart (from perceivable whole into perceiving partials); those within suggest each other to put things together, hence utilizing collectivism as inversion of apartheid.
oligarchy (rule by few)
Are many consenting to suggested rules by few?
globalist
What if few suggest globalism, which when consented to; shapes many into globalists?
we...private (Latin prevo; separate)
If one (separated unit) consents to suggested we (collectivism); then one ignores self for others.
Ge-sta-po (Geheime-Staats-Polizei) aka secret state police
a) what if ones consent to the suggestions by others represents ones CREED given to others as CREDIT, which can then be SE-CRE-gated, hence kept away from one?
b) what if ones consent to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore state of resistance (within natural order) to state of follower (of suggested orders)?
c) what if a suggested CITY (Greek; polis) tempts one to consent to a center of commerce (marketplace) aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law?
We don't have anything
a) can temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) own/posses (have) anything?
b) what if ones want to hold onto tempts one to ignore need to let go?
c) what if ones ignorance (want over need) can be exploited by others who suggest one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of perceivable?
subvert the Constitution
a) what comes first...constitution or institution?
b) CON (together with) or IN (being within)?
c) STATUERE (established by) -TION (action)...what does action establish and where does action establish it?
a) does it matter how often (lots) one fortifies (hedge) artificial (article) nothing (zero)?
b) what if artificial nothing (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of everything natural (perceivable inspiration)?
c) what if "lots" of repetition "fortifies" suggested information within ones mind/memory?
x-files...tricked me into believing.
Believing implies ones consent to "want to believe" in the suggestions of others... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Anhdd2d.jpg
Sound represents natural (perceivable)...words represent artificial (suggested). Choosing to ignore natural for artificial hurts self and others.
a) natural order implies animation; hence ongoing flow (inception towards death) for each temporary form (life) within...others suggest cessation of motion (stop) to tempt one to ignore being within motion.
b) consider if one stops breathing or existing just because one chose to wait for perceivable motion at a suggested STOP-sign?
c) thirst and hunger cannot stop; those within can grow temporary resistance to ongoing thirst and hunger by drinking and eating.
The base for feelings aka EMO'TION, noun (Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from) implies being within motion, while choosing to ignore resisting being moved by it.
How could one feel without motion? Motion (action) tempts emotion (reaction).