likes
a) liking (want) vs disliking (not want) suggested tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable (need).
b) can you discern any relations between the few suggesting "credit scores" and them offering tools for upvote vs downvote aka like vs dislike aka voting left vs voting right?
no one
Have you ever seen "no one"?
No one likes your comments, pretty much ever
a) should I be offended if others dislike me; or flattered about being not alike them? What if I resist either suggested temptation by simply adapting to whatever inspires me to express myself?
b) About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) Comment Score (10014)...I neither offer; nor judge (no up/down-votes given); yet others choose to be offended, while passing judgement upon me. Why do you think that is?
I want...I want...I want...I want
a) nature offers need (perceivable); those within tempt each other with want (suggested) to ignore need.
b) choosing to ignore need for want shapes conflicts of reason (want vs not want). As long as one ignores need; so long will one be stuck within conflicts of reason, hence fighting others over suggestions.
3rd party
a) whole (inception towards death) sets partials (life) apart from one another...other ones suggest "parties" to tempt partials back together, hence destroying them.
b) ones (1) consent to the suggestions by another one represents dualism (2) which tempts one to fight other ones within dualism over the suggestions of a third (3) party.
I rename next month as Jew/Lie
AUGUST (Latin augur; that which is increased); followed by SEPTEM (7) OCTO (8) NOVEM (9) DECEM (10)...setup by jew-lie.
- Suggestion: selling missiles to Iran
- Reasoning: legally selling missiles to Iran vs illegally selling missiles to Iran
- Talmudic Reasoning: suggesting contradiction to both sides within reason.
a) ones consent to suggestion tempts one into a conflict of reason against other ones; while giving the "chosen ones" suggesting the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested.
b) suggestion represents the inversion of perception, since any suggestion can only be shaped within already perceivable.
c) reasoning (imbalance) represents ones willing ignorance of being (choice within balance).
- Blackrock... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2ESa2eoi.jpg
- Chainlink... https://img.gvid.tv/i/YiiLwaGH.jpg
- Chainlink Labs... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3SvZNtCX.jpg
shadow of doubt
Ignoring (shadow) adaptation (to light) shapes hesitation (doubt).
official masonic monitors
The screens the consenting many are looking at represent the official masonic monitors of the suggesting few.
- OFFICIAL (administered authority)
- MASONIC (walls of ignorance built with suggested bricks and mortar of consent)
- MONITOR (to instruct a division of class)
at its core
Being implies core (life) within circumference (inception towards death) aka whole communicating through each partial aka from surrounding through center.
Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore self for others.
Bonus: the alleged origin of hebrew letters represents an apple "core"; depending on ones perspective of looking at it, hence each letter being encoded within/derived from ones changing perspective surrounding the core of an apple. This puts apple = temptation into a way different light...
Cancer is a symptom
a) nature needs to be let go (motion); while tempting one to want to hold onto (emotion). Cancer represents the protective layer around what one holds onto; while cancer treatment aims to destroy that layer of protection.
Nature (inception towards death) generates resistance (life)...resisting (need) represents ones choice to resist temptations (want or not want).
b) SYMP'TOM, noun (Greek to fall) aka fall of men (life) from inception towards death; which also represents a rise of men if men chooses to resist falling.
c) SYM (syn; together) PTOM (piptein; to fall)...that's the rhetorical deception. Falling from inception towards death implies apartheid (life)...others suggest togetherness to tempt one to hold onto others, while ignoring need to let go...like the need to let go of ones OFF-SPRING. Pregnancy to birth implies carrying out, hence setting children apart...not together.
Suggested "together" implies towards getting; which represents the inversion of being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
- AN'ARCHY, noun (Greek rule) + RULE, noun (Latin rego; to make straight).
Natural order implies straight (inception towards death) for flexible (life) within...suggested orders tempt one to ignore that; hence a few being enabled to prevent many from flexing.
In short...anarchy implies natural; norm represents artificial.
thought they were cured
CURE, noun - "to prepare"...animation (inception towards death) prepares resistance (life). Others suggest "resistance is futile" to tempt one to ignore perceivable cure...resisting.
special agent
a) SPECIAL (particular) AGENT (action)
b) action implies whole; reaction represents particular.
c) being implies special (particular perception) within agent (perceivable whole)...others suggest to be a special agents in charge to as the inversion of being charged as special through agent, hence wield ones free will of choice to recharge self.
No one consented to see...
Consenting to watch a screen implies seeing reality through a monitored frame of fiction.
get nut cancer
a) that implies bigger nuts
b) have you checked out deez nuts?
develop
DEVELOP, verb - "to uncover; to unfold; to lay open"...that represents the status quo of nature itself; which gives those within the opportunity to grow discernment thereof or ignore it...
do not realize is not realizing doing nothing
a) "is not" implies utilizing "is nothing" as the foundation to describe something. That's a contradiction...something out of nothing.
Consider this instead...everything "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is". Ignoring was (perceivable) for is (suggested) represents ones ignorance of everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
In short...nothing represents the state of ones own ignorance of everything perceivable; which others exploit with suggestions.
b) can life; while being moved from inception towards death, "do nothing"? How could one do nothing within a moving system?
it is unawareness
Can one be unaware of breathing aka the need to adapt to impressing input? How about thirst and hunger? Nature (action) forces adaptation (reaction)...RE- (respond to) ACTION (enacted upon). Reaction can only exists within action, hence partial reactions (life) within whole action (inception towards death).
In short...awareness is implied for being; ignoring implication (if/then) represents each beings free will of choice; and choosing to ignore prevents ones growth of self discernment.
One (center) is aware of surrounding, even if one lacks to discern ones position...lacking self discernment implies ones willing ignorance about growing it, hence "self" discernment.
so how does one not know something?
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...ones choice to ignore perceivable (knowledge) for suggested (understanding) prevents one from comprehending what one ignores.
The trick...suggested words (fiction) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (reality). Guess how fucking hard it is to communicate this while using words...
Anyway...you consented willingly to suggested "not" (nothing) and only you can choose to let go of it. The more you resist the temptation to hold onto suggested nothing (fiction); the more your comprehension about perceivable everything will grow.
Take "not" out of your question and ask yourself: "how does one know something"? Nature doesn't suggest words, so being told something implies an artificial suggestion tempting one to ignore naturally perceivable.
by not learning that thing
a) to teach self implies to learn for self and vice versa.
b) ignoring to learn implies teaching oneself about ignorance.
c) choosing to not learn that thing teaches one how to avoid learning that thing...avoidance from implies awareness of.
Example..."not" learning about degeneracy aka ignoring the degenerate behavior of others will teach one about degeneracy, when the consequences of ignoring it are starting to fill up ones surrounding. Ignorance attracts those who exploit it.
which is almost everything.
Suggested "almost" represents a rhetorical trick to deceive one to doubt all (whole) for most (greatest part). Another such deception represents a "puzzle"...partials can never create whole, because even if one puts all the pieces together; they each are still apart from one another, hence showing a visible outline.
The sleight of hand for puzzles...partials within the box; whole on the box.
reality must be realized or its not reality to the subject.
a) does a subject (reaction) within an objectifying system (action) need to suggest other subjects what it "is" or does a subject (life) while being objectified (inception towards death) adapt to what "was" before one came to be within?
b) "reality must be..." tempts one to ignore "being within reality". Being represents the subject (center growth) within objectifying reality (surrounding loss).
c) energy (inherent/Internal power) implies velocity (loss) generating resistance (growth) at its center, which in return allows resistance to experience velocity...
All of this can be discerned if one resists the suggestions by others...
real; fake
a) ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want).
b) ones consent to the suggestion gives the one consenting the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested.
c) real vs fake represents revisionism of wanting vs not wanting suggested; while ignoring perceivable need.
Test this: hold your breath and reason (real vs fake) about breathing...a few moments later...velocity will force you to resist by breathing. Velocity doesn't care if resistance reasons about real vs fake...velocity was before resistance can reason what it is and velocity will be when resistance runs out, because resistance runs out back into velocity.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it goes flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka transmutation of ingredient out of base...alchemy.
missing the key to understanding
Free will of choice represents ones key to resist "standing under"...which unlocks ones growth of comprehension.
don't realize
a) how does one realize doing nothing (don't)?
b) does reality (perceivable) have to be realized or do those within (perceiving) need to resist wanted fiction (suggested)?
top
...more likely Rick Rubins' bottom.
Squinty eyes from indigestion maybe...
electron acceptor
a) ELEC'TRON, noun -"amber; also, a mixture of gold with a fifth part of silver"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/electron
b) "electron acceptor" implies someone taking bribes aka VE'NAL, adjective [Latin venalis, from venco, to be sold.] - "mercenary; prostitute; that may be bought or obtained for money or other valuable consideration; as a venal muse; venal services".
Here's the funny part...VE'NAL, adjective [Latin vena, a vein.] from the root of venio to come, to pass - "a passage, a conduit".
Hence suggested rhetoric with hidden; multiple-meanings aka "double speak".
c) energy as the foundation for electric (ongoing whole) and magnetic (temporary partials) implies for ELECTRON aka "electric ion" the passage of electric (flow) through magnetic conduit (form) aka flow (inception towards death) through form (life).
electron transport
Aka electric flow TRANS (transmuting) magnetic form to carry (PORT aka Latin porto; to carry) load aka ongoing loss (inception towards death) loading temporary growth (life) aka magnetic reactors (partials) within electric generator (whole).
it has become increasingly difficult to improve the efficiency
Cause (inception towards death) generates effect (life)...being affected (living) by cause (process of dying) implies "increasing difficulty to improve efficiency".
If only velocity (ongoing loss) could be utilized for resistance (temporary growth)...
consisting of different numbers
- NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit" aka U'NIT, noun (Latin unus) - "one".
- CONSIST, verb - "to stand together; to be in a fixed or permanent state".
Being one implies apart from every other one, and being partial within whole implies being differentiated through momentum of motion, hence neither standing together; nor be affixed within a permanent state.
Others suggest same numbers and togetherness to tempt one to ignore self aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka collectivism aka multiculturalism aka mass migration aka miscegenation aka melting pot aka united states aka united nations aka european union aka uniformity aka university aka unicode aka universal basic income aka unicef aka unisex aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka compound interest aka WWG1WGA (where we go one we go all) aka "there comes a time...when we heed a certain call...when the world must come together as one" etc.
reddit is lockstep
Readers who "reddit" represent lockstep followers of writers who wrote it.
legacy media
LEG'ACY, [Latin legatum, from lego, to send, to bequeath.] + MEDIA; noun [Latin medius, middle.]...if perceiving center ignores perceivable surrounding; then the suggestions by others become the bequeathed (legacy) middle (media) of ones source for input.
If one consents to what another one suggests; then one ignores ones own position (center) for others as middle-man.
In short...the few suggest the screen; the many consent to look at it. That represents being "lockstep with legacy media". It's the many who are impairing their movement (locked steps) when consenting to the suggestion of the few...chosen to move freely.
classic; AI; bot
Classification (classic); artificial understanding (AI); dehumanization (bot)...all suggested tools of subversion tempting ones consent.
comment
Does perceivable nature require annotation (commenting) from those within?
an AI bot
AN, adjective (Latin unus, una, unum; Gr)- "one" - https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an
Doesn't a suggested "bot" imply one suggesting it and one consenting to use it? How can a bot represent one if it implies dualism?
a) suggested data (information) tempts one to hold onto...perceivable data (inspiration) can't be held onto; only adapted to.
b) few control many by tempting many to consent to suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
c) suggested information tempts questions and answers...perceivable inspiration represents solution (inception toward death) to any problem (life).
One god, many religions.
a) many (partials) within one (whole) aka ones within oneness.
b) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one...dualism. Consenting to suggested dualism shapes conflicts of reason among two consenting sides over the suggestion of a third party...trinitarianism.
c) ones consent to suggested trinitarianism (patris et filii et spiritus sancti) tempts consenting one to ignore suggesting one (e nomine) for whatever authority above self the other suggests.
d) oneness (whole) represents enacting authority; ones (partials) represent authorized reactions within.
WWG1WGA
- WHERE (center of surrounding)...anywhere else tempts one from center.
- WE (suggested pluralism)...temps one to ignore self when consented to.
- GO (suggested progressivism)...tempts one with suggested outcomes to ignore perceivable momentum (inception towards death) of discernible outcome (death).
- 1 (suggested nihilism)...tempting one to ignore oneness for 0 vs 1 dualism.
- WE GO...repetition of suggesting pluralism and nihilism aka frequency used against resistance.
- ALL (suggested collectivism)...tempts one to ignore self for others.
Parallel vocabulary
- PAR'ALLEL, adjective (Greek; against or opposite)
a) reasoning (dualism aka one vs other ones) tempts each one to consent to parallelism aka simultaneously reasoning about suggested, while ignoring being within perceivable.
Ignorance paralyzes...reaction (perceiving) paralyzes itself when ignoring being enacted upon (perceivable).
b) one perceivable sound; many suggested VOCAB'ULARY, noun (Latin vocabulum, a word) aka the crafting of spelling (spell-craft).
c) simultaneously to suggested vocabulary...every -ology and -ism.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_words_with_the_suffix_-ology
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_philosophies
Light on matter casts shadows that imitate the form, depending on one's 'angle'.
a) suggestion (shadow) imitates perception (light)...adapting to the later grows ones comprehension (enlightenment); ignoring it for consent to the former grows ones ignorance.
b) ones ignorance represents the stage for the suggested shadow-play by others (Plato's cave allegory).
c) shadow offers matter shelter from light; while shelter tempts matter to ignore light....response-ability (choice) balances in-between guardian angle/angel or angle of sorrow, hence a matter of ones perspective (comprehending or ignoring).
Things outside our plane of existence
What if existing implies as things inside (matter) of outside (immaterial) aka as partials at center of surrounding whole?
seem like magic because
Ones consent to artificial influence by others (suggestion aka magic) tempts one to believe in "because" (being cause); while ignoring to be effect (growth) within cause (loss).
constraints
How constraint can "free" will of choice be? What if ones consent to the suggested choices by others tempts one to restraint ones free will of choice; hence binding it to others; which then wield a chain of command?
There can't be any magic, only processes we don't understand yet.
What if ones consent to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions by others, while ignoring to be processed within perceivable, represents MAGIC (art of influencing)?
ARTIFICIAL (suggestion) within FLUENT (perceivable)...
it was even retrocausal
a) if balance represents cause (action); then choice represents retro (reaction).
b) if balance represents even; then choice represents odds.
Is there an outside to nature? If not; then nature transmutes everything natural within itself. Those transmuted within (life) nature (inception towards death) suggest creationism as the artificial to tempt each other to ignore perceivable nature.
That implies ones state of mind within conflict (good vs bad reasoning)...if perceivable represents abstract and suggested the substance within, then choosing to ignore abstract for substance represents "substance abuse".
Does getting "on" really gets one "off"?
Why then do "bad drugs" overshadow "good drugs"?