brand always seemed to be obvious controlled opposition
Suggesting a brand implies a burned offering; consenting to a suggested brand implies putting the heat on self, while permitting a controlled burn by others.
sound of freedom
Being implies free (choice) within dom (balance/momentum) of sound (entire/motion).
Ayh don't trust it.
FO'RUM, noun - "a public place, a market place; a tribunal; a court; a jurisdiction"...ones consent to the private suggestion of a public forum implies credit given without examination (trust).
Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (dailymail) conducting a study about suggested cause (perpetual indulgence) and consenting effect (publicly masturbating for an hour).
to push an agenda
In reality...action (inception towards death) pushes reaction (life).
sheep and shepherds
Oneself consents to the suggested labels, which binds them together, while tempting one to ignore that ones consent binds self to the suggesting other, hence putting self into confinement.
Consent implies herd mentality of many and HERD (collection or assemblage) opportunity for suggesting few...consent is CHEAP (sheep); resisting temptation is expansive, hence "resistance is fertile".
It's hard to keep a secret
a) Latin seco - "to divide; segregate". Ongoing (inception towards death) generates temporary (life) through division; segregation (from whole into partials).
In other words...nature holds (keep) surrounding; while inherently/internally giving center the free will of choice to participate as partial within whole.
b) if one makes the "hard" choice of letting go of suggested information; then as "easy" as that, those suggesting lose control over secrecy. It's only a secret if one wants others to reveal it.
it's easy to make up 500 lies
500 suggestions towards ones consent; each tempting another conflict of reason (true vs false), while stacking the burden thereof within ones consenting mind/memory...how hard is it to resist suggested (fiction) for perceivable (reality) without burdening self?
I feel like they changed from censoring information to drowning it out in spam
Being alive implies within change (inception towards death). Choosing to ignore perceivable (liquid inspiration) for suggested (solid information) tempts one to hold onto solid; while drowning within liquid.
Others utilize suggested (solid) to distract one from perceivable (liquid), and ones consent to suggested information, upholds it within ones mind/memory aka spamming ones inbox for perceivable inspiration.
conspiracy goes mainstream.
Everything (life) within main stream (inception towards death) goes down the drain...unless resisted. Others suggest contemplation (theory) to tempt one to ignore adaptation. If one consents to suggested; one permits others to conspire theories.
what does it all mean.
ALL implies liquid (inception towards death); each ONE within implies solid (life)...others suggest affixed definitions (meaning) to distract one from being liquefied (process of dying) while losing solidarity (living).
a) loss of power by inactivity (rust) requires a lot of strength (Latin robur; robot) to regrow...keeps me busy.
b) Ask yourself who isn't a robot, while considering this sleight of hand from Bad Religion: "Like workers in a factory, we do our share...But there's so many other fuckin' robots out there"
a) fiction (suggested information) represents ones ignorance of reality (perceivable inspiration).
b) if words are real; than is that which words are used to describe more or less real?
c) what does it imply about self to ask others for confirmation about reality?
d) to show implies suggesting towards the view of others...is there a view (perception) before others can make a show (suggestion) out of it?
That out of the way...consider the difference between show (suggesting others) and shower (to bestow liberally). What if perceivable is bestowed liberally upon each ones perception; while others tempt one with suggestions to ignore that?
e) consider alleged fumigation of few (zyklon B) with confirmed fumigation of many (cigarettes; cigars; vapes, engine exhaust; formaldehyde fumigation in hospitals; pest control during food processing etc.)...
Natural order (inception towards death) sets those within apart (life), those within tempt each other together aka wedlock (marriage) which natural order continuously diverts (divorce).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."till death do us part".
Because they
Suggested they (pluralism) tempts being (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable).
decided
Deciding implies forming a definite (affixed). Being implies solid (life) generated within fluid (inception towards death). It's ones decision to ignore that...
to produce motion...
...tempts one to ignore being the product (temporary growth) within motion (ongoing loss).
Astrology...is meaningless
LOGY (aka logic/reason + logos/words) implies a conflict of reason about suggested meaning.
Astro
"People they come together...People they fall apart"
"No one can stop us now...'Cause we are all made of stars"
astrologic
a) ASTRO (star) LOGIC (reason aka conflict)...ones consent to suggested astrologism tempts one into a conflict of reason.
b) consider if there could be same star underneath different formations... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3YiPDybW.png
conjunction
CON (together) JUNC (join) TION (action) represents suggested collectivism; which tempts one to ignore that action (inception towards death) sets apart (life). Ones consent to suggested collectivism establishes the link; the bond; the conjunction...
- Scenario 1: Being at "dunkin donuts" to show that "1 coffee" is as dangerous as "14 donuts"
- Scenario 2: Being at "drug-house" to show that "1 bag of cocaine" is as dangerous as "14 rocks of crack"
A simple rebranding is enough to distract one from asking "why are you at a drug-house (dunkin donuts) buying cocaine (coffee) and crack (donuts)?"
they're not...nothing about it...it isn't...it has no...it won't be...I don't...you aren't...not.
That's eight times using "nothing" as the foundation to define something. That represents the suggested embryo of nihilism germinating into ones ignorance of perceivable (everything) for suggested (nothing).
This represents a model of subversion by distracting partial (perception) from whole (perceivable) with a substitute (suggestion).
It has been grown by an A.I.
Ones consent to suggested represents INTELLIGENCE (Latin inteligo; to understand); hence one consenting to stand under another. ARTIFICIAL (artifice; fictitious; in opposition to natural) represents ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
In the aforementioned example of your behavior...you grew suggested nihilism (nothing) by perpetuating it eight times within a single response. That implies your consent (intelligence) and ignorance (artificial) aka AI.
will divide humanity
HUMAN (heb; form) implies divided through ANIMAL (animation), and will (want) implies divided within need...animation forms will.
My forewarning...
...represents suggested progressivism tempting others to ignore perceivable origin (reality) for suggested outcomes (fiction).
clone
CLONE; noun - "a transplanted part of one original"...aka whole (inception towards death) transmuting into partials (life). Clone implies status quo of being, yet being willingly ignores perceivable implication for suggested dualism aka duplication (cloning) and that implies being a DUPE; noun - "a deceived person".
I know the definitions
Knowledge implies perceiving everything moving: definition implies a suggestion of something affixed, and THE-ism implies ones submission to the authority of another one.
Definition (affixed) contradicts knowledge (moving). Nature doesn't define; it sets each one "free" (will of choice)...it's choice that can be tempted to choose to hold onto (affix) suggested definitions.
Synthetic, synthesised. Not human.
SYN'THESIS, noun -"composition; putting together"...being implies set (inception towards death) apart (life), while having the free will of choice to compose (as instrument aka instructed mind) within sound (entire; whole; everything perceivable).
Others suggest composition (collectivism) aka putting together...e pluribus unum (out of many; one) + tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) + abrahamism (father of multitude) + miscegenation; mass migration; multiculturalism; melting pot + united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; universal basic income; unicode; one world system and so on.
So what if it's cells.
Free-dom aka "free" will of choice within "dom"-inance of balance...that represents the foundation for ones confined mind (confinement; cell; apartment aka partial mind; compartment etc).
Balance implies momentum (inception towards death) of motion for each ones choice (life) within. Others suggest organism to distract one from being ORGAN (instrument of action aka instrumental choice within enacting balance). Ones consent to suggested organism permits others to suggest CELL (Latin celare; to hide; conceal; cover), hence utilizing ones consensual ignorance as the cover to conceal perceivable underneath suggested.
I do not understand one word of it.
a) to understand implies ones choice to "stand under" another one, hence repressing self. Others tempt one to repress self (understanding), while ignoring to express self (comprehension).
b) can you give me a definition of "not; nothing; nothingness"?
c) does nature communicate itself through words? What are the requirements for shaping a word?
d) you wrote about murder (unlawful killing)...killing implies "deprive of life", while being alive implies being moved from inception towards death. That's nature depriving those within of life aka lawful killing.
How could there be unlawful killing; while being killed lawful?
CIA aka Central Intelligence Agency
a) center (central) of action (agency) implies reaction.
What's the foundation of reaction? Choice...which represents the reacting center of what surrounding action? Balance.
b) INTEL'LIGENCE (Latin intelligentia, intelligo, to understand) implies "standing under" another when consenting to suggested.
How does one tempt central (choice) to ignore agency (balance)? With suggested choices (intelligence).
CIA (phonetic breakdown)
a) SEE/SEA + I/EYE + AYE, adverb - "always; forever; continually; for an indefinite time"
b) being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death); hence I/EYE (perception) within SEE/SEA (perceivable) aka temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss).
c) ALL (perceivable) SEEING (sensing) I (perception) implies perception sensing perceivable.
d) all water/sea/current/piracy allegories are based on motion and oneself as solid vessel (life) within fluid motion (inception towards death).
e) suggested CIA (reaction; understanding; action) can be defeated by CCA (reaction; comprehension; action). Understanding implies standing under another; hence repression of self; while comprehension implies compressing within self for expression of self.
tl; dr: intelligence (submission) destroys central (life) within agency (inception towards death)...if one consents to the suggestion thereof.
MY RACE...
RACE (Latin radix; radius; ray) implies ones expression (giving), while MY implies ones repression (holding onto).
"express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"
What is the boundary line of life/death?
Line (motion) generates boundary (momentum) for each thing within.
And that is what the debate is all about.
Debate equals reason equals conflict...whatever side one chooses perpetuates the conflict.
Abrahamics see the boundary line as natural conception...and natural departure...
a) suggested abrahamism (father of multitude) tempts one to ignore that nature (whole) sets itself apart (partial), hence whole to partial (inception); partial within whole (life) and partial to whole (death).
b) suggested "depart" (to be lost) tempts one to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
c) suggested "conception" tempts one to take and hold onto (concep) ongoing motion (tion), while ignoring to resist (growth) the temptation (loss) thereof. In-cep-tion implies being within received action, hence being the recipient free will of choice aka reaction.
life from moment sperm/egg fertilize new DNA expression
Try momentum instead of moment, and now instead of new and you'll get expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
natural cause death, not...
If nature implies cause of everything within; then "not, nothing" represents the choice of those within to ignore perceivable (natural) for suggested (artificial).
correctly define
Correct implies versus incorrect; hence an ongoing conflict of reason about a suggested definition (affixed meaning). Both sides holding onto the suggested definition as correct or incorrect; are ignoring to be form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence solid within fluid...not affixed.
illegal
LEGAL (Latin lex; law) aka natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). Suggested ILL; originates from EV-IL...the inversion of LIVE.
Others suggest laws to distract one from perceivable law...consenting to the former permits those suggesting to define (legal); redefine (illegal) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) laws at will. Perceivable law doesn't require ones consent; it forces adaptation (growth), while tempting ignorance (loss) from each ones free will of choice.
contraception
Aka reasoning against one another (contra) over received (cep) action (tion).
racists/gaytheists
a) -ist implies ones consent to suggested -ism. Others suggest -isms to collectivize (plural) ones (singular) consent, hence tempting one to ignore self for others.
b) RACE (Latin radix; radius; ray) implies ones growth outwards aka as center (life) within surrounding (inception towards death).
c) GAY (merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome; denotes more life and animation than cheerful) implies ones growth within animation (loss).
Only within sadness (inception towards death) can one be happy (life).
d) the-ism implies ones submission (by consent) to authority of another (by suggestion).
Pig-Latin (English) exchanged all perceivable connotations with suggested THE, hence the-ism. Example...the moon + the sun or la luna (female) + el sol (male) or der Mond (male) + die Sonne (female) etc.
false religion
RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding oneself by consent to the suggestion of another. In this case...true or false implies ones consent to suggested definitionism. It doesn't matter if one chooses true of false; only that one consent to the suggested definition of another; because ones consents permits others to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
Suggested religion (to bind anew) tempts one to ignore being "free" will of choice; bound within "dom"inance of balance aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
the discovery of technology
TECHNOL'OGY, noun (greek art, word or discourse) aka artificial (suggested) over natural (perceivable). Ones consent to suggested; while ignoring perceivable shapes ignorance into the cover, hence apart (dis) conceal (cover).
The goal of...
The few suggest progressivism to lure the consenting many towards outcomes; goals; achievements; trophies; resolution; fulfillment; purpose etc. Why? To distract one from being (living) within origin (process of dying); hence needing to resist wanted temptation.
Free will of choice implies response-ability, hence one being able to respond to perceivable origin (need), while struggling to resist the temptation of suggested outcomes (want).
having sex with
SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...natural order (inception towards death) generates internal/inherent division (life). Others suggest with (pluralism) as the inversion of being within (partial within whole).
One wants to "have sex" with others (temptation of lust); one needs to sustain self as sex (divided within whole) by intercourse through another for off-spring.
Off-spring implies apartheid within wholeness...not togetherness. Others suggest collectivism aka "we are family" aka FAMILY (domestics collectively) as the inversion thereof.
to keep slaves
Ones consent to the suggestions of another represents slave (consent) keeping hold of master (suggestion).
Recent sleight of hand: https://img.gvid.tv/i/24euZoxM.png
living humans
Do dead humans exist? If human implies being; then at what point does one cease to be a human?
the main reason
Reasoning implies in response to something, so how could there be a main reason? Does reason represent cause or effect? Is there a conflict between cause vs effect?
They're not humans
a) "they" implies discernible HU'MAN (Heb. form, species)...does "not" have a discernible form?
b) hue-man implies visible spectrum...can one see "not"? What color does "not" have?
transhumanism
Form (human) represents trans-mutation within flow (animal)...suggested -ism tempts one to ignore that.
Scientists grow whole...
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism; which contradicts SCI'ENCE (Latin scientia, scio, to know)...suggestion contradicts perception if one consents to it.
b) only within whole (loss) can there be partials (growth).
a) there's only one weapon...ones weapon of choice.
b) to accuse aka to charge aka to load; entrust; put a burden on...implies suggestion towards consent. If one consents, then one puts the burden of suggested upon self.
c) suggested words over perceivable sound represents such a self inflicted burden.