sound of freedom gets funded by mexican billionaire carlos slim who also gave $200 million USD to clinton foundation initiatives.
q paytriotards fight the deepstate by going to see the movie.
the deepstate can't stop the movie for some reason, but they can turn off the airconditioning in some movie locations for some reason.
the same week that channel 4 bbc have a takedown of russell brand, vice puts out an investigation of ballard, though it was known he had resigned back in july.
not sure what to make of this, is this to make red team supporters look like sex pests, and also get red team enthusiasts to support sex predators.
Weaponized accusation should be the word of the year.
a) there's only one weapon...ones weapon of choice.
b) to accuse aka to charge aka to load; entrust; put a burden on...implies suggestion towards consent. If one consents, then one puts the burden of suggested upon self.
c) suggested words over perceivable sound represents such a self inflicted burden.
Oh look, you're Quoting Fatboy Slim. Now if you're just going to be a little bitch. At least entertain us as you do. Useless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCDIYvFmgW8
a) to quote implies by free will of choice; hence choosing to repeat from another. Quote originates from "weapon of choice".
b) quote in commerce (price of article) implies the suggested value of artifice, hence tempting others to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested); which devalues self.
c) why would you associate "weapon of choice" with a suggested idol (fatboy slim) instead of ones free will of choice? What if others utilize suggested idols as ammunition of weaponized choice?
"Listen to the (perceived) sound of my (suggested) voice"..."Don't be shocked by the tone (Latin tonus; sound) of my (suggested) voice".
Can one discern perceivable (sound) underneath the noise of suggested (word)?
...then there must be a big bitch elsewhere. This is where I could insert a "yo mama" joke, but that would imply questionable behavior.
None of that is relevant to what I have said. You are a liar.,
plz don't feed the bot.
downvote, report, and move on.
Reporting him won't help. He is here with admin's blessing. As I already inquired of this account years ago.
maybe appealing to axo directly might help. i might do that.
That implies that I offered truth beforehand. Yet; according to you..."he ain't never done nothin for no one". If you're offended; then you took an offer I didn't made.
Relevant implies "dependent on"...being implies IN (life) DEPENDENCE (inception towards death). Consenting to the suggestions of others makes one dependent to them, hence a many being exploited for dependence on a few.
You are a really huge asshole. The biggest.
not sure what to think of this.
brand always seemed to be obvious controlled opposition.
both brand and sound of freedom felt astroturfed.
did brand go off-script, or is it controlled humiliation ritual to make the false saviors the false sacrificial goats.
a) the internal organ within external -tion (action) implies ones reaction.
b) choosing to ignore perceivable for suggested organizations implies misuse (abuse) of ones reacting choice.
c) sleight of hand...serve (inception towards death) to protect (life) aka serve loss to protect growth. How does one serve (render habitual obedience to) loss? By resisting it, and resisting fertilizes ones resistance (growth).
Protecting others implies sacrificing self; which in return hurts others.
Suggesting a brand implies a burned offering; consenting to a suggested brand implies putting the heat on self, while permitting a controlled burn by others.
Being implies free (choice) within dom (balance/momentum) of sound (entire/motion).
if the satanic child predators are as deeply entrenched or the cabal's corruption as pervasive as most of us think, it's unsurprising there's going to be some pervs on our side. whether from a period they now regret, or being witting/unwitting plants.
as hard as (((they))) are attacking the material, we must be (dare i say it) over the target. (((they))) know (((they've))) lost us. the goal is to discredit the material and sources to keep normies from getting redpilled.
Asset flipped. Now they have to assassinate his character a la Cosby, Brand, ALEX Jones and hundreds of others in case they spill the beans on (((pedowood))). Hence the well-poisoning.
Or....and stay with me here....there's a shitload of rightwing pedos projecting.
Haven't seen a single protest outside of a church.