Death is a fact of life.
Others suggest death as a fact to distract one from living within the process of dying. Loss (inception towards death) generates growth (life); growth struggles to sustain self within loss.
FACT (an effect produced; that which comes to pass)...life represents the effect produces within cause aka that which comes to pass from inception towards death. Others suggest "death" as the inversion of "life", while using factionalism as the temptation for ones consent.
Death is game over
GAME, noun - "jest; opposed to earnest"...what if ongoing to temporary (inception); temporary within ongoing (life) and temporary to ongoing (death) implies ones earnest duty within perceivable, as opposed to suggested games by others?
Pushing a bioweapon
a) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) for bio (life) is ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice". Others suggest weapons to tempt one to harm self and others when consenting by free will of choice.
b) nature pushes (motion) to the limit (momentum) to pass the point of no return (choice).
sacrifice
a) sacrifice aka SACRED (ones creed to another's curse) + FACIO (to make)
b) CREED implies ones consent to want or not want another's suggestion; while CURSE implies uttering imprecations towards ones affirmation (want) or denial (not want).
c) suggestion invokes (imprecates) ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
Bonus: consider the difference between cursive (running forwards) and print (pressing forwards)...
food for thought
Perceivable inspiration implies contemplation (food for thought); while suggested information implies constipation (fast food).
human and animal
The hue (color) of man implies spectrum within animation, hence hue-man being a species within anima. Others suggest the labels "human" and "animal" to distract from discerning this.
Furthermore...HU'MAN, adjective (Latin humanus; Heb. form, species) can only exist within AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul).
beasts of burden?
BE (being) AST (astute; discerning) implies ones burden of self discernment...ignoring this for taking on the suggestions by others MARKS one.
the sheeple
Instead of just focusing on the following sheeple; also consider the trailblazing ram aka the aries (aryan).
should we feel remorse
a) "we" implies ones (singular) consent to suggested pluralism, hence ones guilt (remorse) by willing association with another.
b) remorse (Latin remordeo) implies German MORD (murder; killing), hence the association of murder and RE (respond to) MORDEO (murdering).
Are they wrong?
Many reasoning (right vs wrong) over suggestions by few; permits few to domesticate many within the confines of reason/logic.
natural selection
a) TION (action) NATURE (to produce) SELEC (to react) ...nature implies action (inception towards death) producing reactions (life).
b) Ones consent to the suggested choices by others selects them as ones ELITE (selection; choice) aka as chosen ones.
Voice to skull?
Suggested words into consenting mind/memory. Perceivable implies sound going through mind/memory; suggested tempts one to hold onto definitions, hence memorizing words.
Personalized..."nudges"?
PER (by) SONOS (sound) inspires (nudges) ones arranged-mind (instru-ment) to adapt.
Basic mass media messaging?
Suggested media can only be shaped within perceivable base...those ignoring perceivable (inspiration) only get the suggested message (information).
The Mass Scale Trauma Based Mind Control was the suggested question towards many; each ones consent was the answer. Consenting implies wanting or not wanting suggested; while ignoring perceivable need.
The resulting conflict of reason (want vs not want) represents the controlled environment.
The triggers for the mind control?
a) if one consents to suggested, then one permits another in-between ones perception and everything perceivable, hence another in the middle (Latin medius; media) aka suggested (information) as the mediator for perceivable (inspiration).
b) action (perceivable) triggers reaction (perception)...others utilize suggestion to trigg (trick) one to ignore that.
The use for the mind control?
Motion controls momentum/memory/mind...those employed within (used) adapt (reuse) or ignore (getting abused by others).
Control implies "directed action"; being controlled implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death).
Only the controllers know this.
Knowledge (perceivable) controls ones perception...ignoring it for the suggestions by others implies ones free will of choice within a controlled environment (balance) choosing an artificial environment (imbalance).
This environment is called logos/word + logic/reason and ones consent permits another to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the confines thereof...IF one consents by free will of choice.
MYTHOS (speech) LOGOS (word)...suggested (word) tempts one to ignore perceivable (sound).
They want you to live in fear
a) It's oneself that chooses to want or not want to be afraid about what others are suggesting.
b) Fear implies towards outcome, hence "fear is the mind-killer" for those who ignore origin (perceivable) for outcome (suggested).
want
Nature implies perceivable need; those within tempt one to consent (want or not want) to suggested, while ignoring perceivable (need).
criminalized me in saying; "Death to Tyrants"...government oppression.
a) ones consent to representative government by others implies their exercise of power over subjects; hence consent (slave) breeding tyranny (master).
b) CRIME, noun (Latin to separate, to decree; to divide)....being implies crime (life) within natural law (inception towards death), hence a division of whole into partials.
can we
A suggestion in the name of others.
we
Suggested pluralism tempting singular one to ignore self for others when consenting.
agree
Suggested conformism tempting one to consent to a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree).
bad
Suggested moralism tempting one to consent to another conflict of reason (good vs bad).
were and are
WERE (to be) + ARE (to measure)...the whole extent (measure) of being implies UNIT (Latin unus) aka one. Others suggest conjunction (and) to distract one from discerning self.
racism
RACE (Latin raddix; radius; ray) implies ones growth as center into circumference...suggested race-ism tempts one to consent/submit to others within ones circumference, hence the resulting conflicts.
cause the human to become
"become" implies coming (inception towards death) to be (life), hence as human (Heb. form) through animal (Latin anima; animating spirit aka animation).
will...cause
Free "will" of choice implies effect...caused within balance. Will can only respond to cause, hence choosing to adapt (need) or ignore (want) cause.
disorder
Being implies within (life) natural order (inception towards death)...disorder (neglect of rule) implies ones ignorance thereof when consenting to suggested orders.
start to act
Starting towards action ignores that action is required for one within to start a reaction towards something.
The US might as well just annex Ukraine
ANNEX (connect with, to join; attach) + UKRAINE (ukraina; borderland)...connecting with Ukraine implies US becoming borderland of Russia.
Gotta mcgyver the mercator maps again for that to work...
I believe there's a collective....
Believing implies ones consent to suggested collectivism. Those who consent hold onto suggested information; while those suggesting it are aggregating/collecting those who consent.
conscious
CON (with) SCIO (knowledge) aka being within (perception) knowledge (perceivable)...others utilize suggestion to distract ones awareness thereof.
our explanation
EX (life) within PLAN (inception towards death) of TION (action) implies ones singular reaction aka free will of choice...suggested collectivism/pluralism (our) tempts singular (one) to ignore this.
SLEEP, verb - "to take rest by a suspension of the voluntary exercise of the powers of the body and mind"...how about trying to invest some effort instead?
...are sluts. Why?
Slut (ones contempt for a woman) implies ones consent to suggested feminism, hence now judging others from within a conflict of reason (hate vs love).
This tempts one to ignore being trans-form within momentum (female) of motion (male) aka flow (inception towards death) to form (life) transmutation.
One can only exist within fe(minine)male + wo(mb)man + s(plit)he, hence only there intercourse for off-spring being possible.
What would you do if you had an intense....paralysis
Discerning the obvious...INTENSE (strained; strict) contradicts PARALYSIS (loose; weakened).
The jew thing is so obvious...
...and yet most are oblivious to JEW/YOU.
so blatant
BLA'TANT, adjective - "bellowing as a calf"...if jew equals blatant; then why do gentiles behave like cattle?
plastered everywhere
Like suggested information (word) over perceivable inspiration (sound).
jews are not intelligent, creative and powerful enough to subjugate
a) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand) aka a gentile consenting to "stand under" the suggestions of a jew
b) consenting to suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (partials within whole)
c) consent by the many becomes the permitted power of the suggesting few. In other words...a chosen one is only as powerful as the collective that chose him to be their representative choice. Each jew represents the ignored power of gentiles combined.
Each suggestion is powered by combined consent.
What could be such power?
Consenting to suggested "what could be" tempts one to ignore "what being can" do within perceivable. It's that simple to trick one into repressing self by ignoring to express self.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself"...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
planet
PLAN'ET, noun (Latin planeta; Greek wandering)...anything being moved (action) implies reciprocal vicissitude (reaction), hence vibration aka VIBRA (reaction) within TION (action) aka VIBRA (life) within TION (inception towards death).
cube
Aka solid body (life) generated within six equal sides (up/down; left/right; towards/backwards)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4R3fFGCP.jpg
Is this place for free...
Consenting to suggested places restricts ones "free" will of choice to the confines of a controlled environment.
- Concert of Europe until WW1
- League of Nations until WW2
- United Nations until...
Each re-brand another burned offering.
The box experiment.
Suggested information shapes a box out of ones mind/memory if one consents to keep holding onto it. Only within perceivable inspiration is one free to choose...suggested information tempts one to ignore that.
Overdosing on maple-syrup, while hearing a muffled voice above the pillow whispering: "I heard you didn't clean your room; bucko"...O Canada!
destroy empathy
EM (within) PATHOS (suffering) aka moderation (life) within suffering (inception towards death). How does life moderate self while being moved from inception towards death? Choosing to resist temptation.
PATH (inception towards death) destroys EM (life within).
I sense it from media
Sensing implies being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable)...consenting to suggested MEDIA (Latin medius; middle) tempts one to ignore self (center) for another (middle).
Instead of moderating self within reality, one is permitting others to mediate fiction to moderate one.
"What, somebody died?!"
Your consent to suggested progressivism (towards outcome) tempts you to focus on death over life...others mediate death (watchpeopledie) to tempt you to ignore life.
Growing life grows ones resistance to being tempted by death.
The ongoing process of dying implies generator for each temporary life as reactor within. Choosing to react to generation implies re-generation aka self sustenance...
SENTIENT, adjective (Latin sentio) - "faculty of perception"..."covid" was sent by few and received by many aka suggested by few and consented to by many; who in return ignored perceivable for it.
Simultaneously...you consented to suggested nihilism (not); which also ignores "everything" perceivable.
In short...not lack of sentience; but ones ignorance about perceivable sending before a suggestion can be shaped.
If one can discern cattle and farmer; then one can discern self outside the suggested PEN (Latin penna; point) and therefore inside perceivable life sentence (inception towards death). Try MOOO...ving!