AI will cause
- cause (need) affects will (want)
- artificial suggestion (will cause) tempts one to ignore perceivable nature (cause to will).
- standing under (understanding; intelligence) suggested tempts one to ignore growing (life) within perceivable (inception towards death).
risk of AI
Aka exposure (ones consent) to harm (suggestion by another)...a risky business.
finance markets
a) FINANCE (revenue; income) aka RE-sponding (life) to VENUE (inception towards death) aka COMING (inception towards death) to be (life) with-IN.
b) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass; sign of distinction) aka distinct life passing from inception towards death. If life goes into risky business with another life, then that shapes a marketplace aka a venue where life (consent) responds to other life (suggestion).
This implies mercantilism aka MER'CANTILE, adjective (Latin mercans, mercor, to buy) aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion). Others tempt one with suggestions to barter ones consent aka making a commodity (interest) out of self, which implies being a traitor/trader.
area between the 1st and 2nd
a) all implies one in energy...others suggest "and" aka a conjunction to distract from whole (all) setting itself apart (ones) internally/inherently.
b) instead of suggested collectivism (1st and 2nd); it's FIRST (advanced before or further than any other in progression) as the progressing motion itself, and SECOND (Latin seco; to divide) as the momentum of motion transmuting form (life) out of flow (inception towards death)...aka differences (growth) within sameness (loss).
Energy doesn't need to be counted by those within...since being within implies as designated unit (Latin unus: one).
c) A'REA, noun (Heb. to reach, stretch, lay or spread)...being alive implies stretched from inception towards death. Temporary growth (area) within ongoing loss (whole).
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/area.html
triad
TRI'AD, noun (Latin trias, from tres, three) - "union of three; three united" aka suggested collectivism tempting perceiving partials (ones) to ignore perceivable whole (oneness).
Counting starts with ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another, hence establishing a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka dualism (Latin duo; two). Consent to suggested implies one binding self to another one.
the grail stone
a) suggested the-ism tempts one to consent to the authority of another. If one uses "the"; then that implies shirking of response-ability onto another aka slave permitting master.
The foundation of suggested "the" implies perceivable implication (if/then). Consenting to "the" exchanges IF (motion) with THE (authority of others), hence permitting others to use "the" to shape "then", while oneself ignores motion.
In short...if motion; then moving forwards, yet if one ignores motion for the-ism, then others are permitted to direct one.
b) grail (partial) implies each one within holy (whole); hence each solid difference within fluid sameness.
c) stone (concretion) aka CONCRETE, adjective - "to grow together, united in growth" is being suggested by others as the inversion of each one growing apart from one another, while united (life set apart) within loss (inception towards death).
In short...ones (grail) consent to suggested "the stone" tempts one to ignore perceivable (holy), while permitting others authority (the) to collectivize (stone) consenting ones.
Bonus: suggesting collectivism implies GEM (to germinate) STONE (concretion), hence planting the seeds of temptation within the soil of ignorance.
what about
Others suggest "what-about-ism" to distract one from WHAT (energy aka internal/inherent power) ABOUT (Gr. butan, without; around, on the outside).
Ones consent to suggested what-about-ism implies ones lack of self discernment about being within (perception) outside (perceivable), hence continuously asking others "what about...?".
%
PER (by) CENT (a hundred)...a hundred implies a collection of units (Latin unus; one); so who's collecting and who's the one collected? Are those who suggest percentages collecting each consenting one?
Did the science change?
a) science (Latin scio; to know aka to perceive)...perception can only perceive moving differences aka constant change.
b) ones consent to suggested the-ism tempts one to ignore perceivable change for holding onto something suggested.
sex rituals
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) RITUAL (rite of passage)...Rite (life) of passage (inception towards death) implies division of whole into partials.
Others suggest sex (coming together) as the inversion of being set apart from one another (divided), and rituals (sacrifice) as the inversion of opportunity for growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
Those who consent to suggested "sex rituals", ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want), hence viewing sex rituals through the lens of wanted temptation (lust). To distract from perceivable; others set the stage for suggested, hence promoting lust.
he who controls the grail; controls the world
GRAIL, noun - "small particles of any kind" aka he who controls partials (perception) controls whole (perceivable). How to control perception? Suggest others to ignore perceivable (reality) for your suggestions (fiction).
Holy (whole) Grail (partial)...holy (inception towards death) generates grail (life).
ABRA (abracadabra) XAS (axis)...as in axis - "straight line, real (perceivable sound) or imaginary (suggested words), passing through a body".
That picture above shows partials put together by suggested words, which tempts one to ignore that nature (whole) sets itself apart for each one within.
Consider...DETAIL, verb - "to narrate in particulars; to recite the particulars of; to particularize; to relate minutely and distinctly; as, he detailed all the facts in due order"
Natural order (inception towards death) particularizes (life)...being implies DE (tached) TAIL (hindmost part) of motion.
mark passio
Aka marking passion...ones consent to a suggested label, name; brand; MARK ; tempts one into PASSION (passio, patior, to suffer), hence others utilizing suggestions as an external agent (temptation) upon ones internal consent (to ignore resisting).
black gnostics...white lodge
a) one can only exist in-between (spectrum) black (absence of light) and white (pure light), hence being enabled to view the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man.
b) gnostic implies perceivable; lodge (deposit for keeping; to fix) implies ones ignorance of being (perception) within momentum (perceivable) of motion.
their owners programmed them to be
Consent by many to suggested "programs" by few implies each one of the many holding onto, hence claiming for self aka taking possession over aka owning.
In short...others utilize suggestions to tempt one to own self, while permitting others to hold the deed.
most men are satanists
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka ones submission to another...not satan, but the chosen one suggesting the -ism aka the one oneself chose to consent to.
there is no reincarnation trap
a) RE (response to) IN (being within) CARN (meat; flesh) ATION (action) aka action (inception towards death) making reactions (life) into flesh aka solid within fluid.
b) others utilize suggestion to entrap ones consent...one such suggestion is "no" aka suggested nihilism by others tempting one to consent by denial.
the only reason...is a prison...the stupid box
a) reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested implies imprisonment (in-restrained-mind) aka ones self imprisonment by consent to another.
b) perceivable implies motion (inspiration); suggested tempts one to hold onto (information); while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death); hence stupid/stop/cessation of motion.
Ignoring motion boxes oneself into definitions (definite; affixed) suggested by others.
so many resources
There's only one who can choose to RE (respond to) SOURCE (origin)...oneself.
schizo
https://files.catbox.moe/4ve91i.jpg ...the guy who coined "schizo" (bleuler) and the father of psychoanalysis (freud) conspiring to "conquer psychiatry".
Why are you utilizing jewish instruments of subversion on others?
truth movement
a) holding onto suggested truth tempts one to ignore perceivable movement.
b) change moves mind (memory; momentum)...truth tempts one to ignore motion, while fighting others over contradiction (lie).
SIX/SEX (Latin seco; to divide) aka division of whole (inception towards death) into partials (life) aka HOLO (whole) CAUST (combustive; burning; caustic) aka caustic growth within gentle/gentile loss.
Edit: import (inception) to export (death) aka wholesale (inception towards death) for retail (life).
VI'OLENT, adjective (Latin violentus) - "forcible; urged or driven with force"...only within violation (inception towards death) can on be a piece/peace (life).
a preventable choice
Action (balance) forces reactions (choice). Choosing cannot be avoided; only ignored, and the consequence of ignoring choice implies imbalance.
How does one ignore choice? By consenting to the suggested choices of others?
people said shitty things, to the unvaccinated
The suggested label "unvaccinated" implies ones consent to vaccines, while placing self within a conflict of reason (vaccinated vs unvaccinated)...a conflict controlled on both sides from only those who suggest vaccines.
a) consent cannot be vanquished (convince) by others...only withdrawn by oneself, since it was given by ones free will of choice beforehand.
b) others tempt one to consent to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, which in return permits those suggesting to shape the suggested for those consenting.
den Markt erobern...andere Entwickler dazu zwingen
Aka to conquer the market...to compel other developer. Conquering and compelling the developing minds of others...what could possibly go wrong?
impart a secret and hidden wisdom
a) secret (Latin seco; to divide) implies division of whole into partial, hence one being a part within aka im-part.
b) wisdom implies division of WIS (wise; to know; to perceive) and DOM (dominance). What one perceives are moving differences, hence motion dominating the differences within.
c) to hide implies ones choice to ignore everything perceivable offered to each ones perception, by consenting to suggestions of others. Suggested (information) represents a self imposed layer/blanket/cover of ignorance upon perceivable (inspiration).
Ignorance conceals discernment; hence tempting one to withdraw self from perceivable reality into suggested fiction, which in return permits others to exploit that.
as it is written
Nature doesn't impress durable (to write) it impresses (inception towards death) perishable (life), hence the need to sustain self within wanted temptation.
Others suggest the written to engrave letters upon the consenting one, hence one being tempted to "let" another direct ones being en (in; into) grave (to bury; deposit; inhume) aka burying one under the suggested word aka depositing suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory.
revealed through the Spirit
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies adaptation of partial (life) within whole (inception towards death); which reveals the "unseen" motion. Notice that one cannot see ones inception and death, since one exists in-between the momentum of motion, hence motion driving momentum (balance) through center (choice).
Spirit searches everything
Action (motion) impresses itself (through momentum) into reactions...that implies adaption of reaction (life) within action (inception towards death) aka inhaling the impressing (loss), while exhaling as the expression (growth). That implies spirit (to breathe).
Nature doesn't search (finding outcome); since it implies origin of everything coming to be within. Those within tempt each other with suggested progressivism to seek outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
In other words...others suggest "lost" to tempt one to ignore being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...the former tempts one to seek; while the latter inspires one to resist.
Sleight of hand: seek and destroy aka those who seek shall find destruction.
who knows a person's thoughts except the spirit of that person, which is in him?
Thinking in words implies ones consent to suggested definitions (fixed) by another, hence permitting others to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested definitions at will, while one ignores perceivable inspiration (moving).
In short...knowledge implies moving; thinking about suggested affixes one to others, hence Latin religio - "to bind anew". Those suggesting are permitted to control the confines of ones "thinking" if one consents.
As long as the many consent to think about what the few are suggesting; so long will the few know that the outcome of any thought will be self destructive, and that the entrance of every thought was ignorance.
It's the few who control "think-tanks", while the many willingly drown themselves within.
Now we have received not...
How could one receive "nothing" without "everything" going through one?
understand the things freely
Choosing to "stand-under" binds ones "free" will of choice.
spiritual truths
Spirit implies needing to let go within perceivable; while truth implies wanting to hold onto suggested. Truth contradicts spirit; which others brand as "lie" to exploit ones ignorance.
A "liar" simply contradicts the "truth" another holds onto, while ignoring to be within (life) motion (inception towards death). Motion changes every truth into a lie.
Truth (want) vs lie (not want) tempts one to ignore change (need).
The natural person does not accept
a) Nature (inception towards death) cannot be denied by those within (life)...only ignored. Neither does nature require acceptance, since it forces adaptation aka action forcing reactions.
Others suggest nihilism (not; nothing) to distract one, yet it's oneself who consents to a suggested -ism by free will of choice.
b) person (per sonos; by sound)...sound cannot be denied by instruments within, only ignored for "words" shaped out of sound aka for information shaped out of inspiration aka for fiction shaped out of reality aka for something affixed shaped out of everything moving.
Ones consent affixes anothers' suggestion within ones mind/memory.
not able to
What enables nothing (not) and how could nothing exist withing towards (to) motion?
person judges
a) Being by sound (per sonos) implies sound as that which "just-is" (justice)
b) Others suggest judge aka Latin judex aka JUS (law aka natural order) + DICO (to pronounce; to utter articulately; to speak; to orate; to deliver by suggestion). Why? To distract from a natural order (sound) that doesn't articulate itself, yet enables the choice for those within to ignore real (sound) for artificial (words).
c) those who lack self discernment as being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable) can be tempted with suggested UT'TER, adjective - "situated on the outside or remote from the center", hence being tempted to destabilize self when consenting to what others are uttering.
instruct
IN (being within) STRUCO; STRUGO (to destroy) aka being within (life) destruction (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain self by resisting (need) temptations (want).
Others suggest one to seek instructions aka TALMUD (instruction); from Hebrew lamadh - "he learned", which tempts those devoted to learning (students) to understand (stand-under) those who devour (teacher) consent.
Charity leader; Cecily Routman
CECIL (blindness; blind) ROUT (a rabble; people assembled) MAN (kind; similitude) aka the benevolent (charity) leading of the blind masses...towards death.
Check out Ior Bock (the bock saga) and the offer-ring ritual...
Every way
EV'ERY, adjective - "each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number"...the only way (inception towards death) sets each one within apart (life) from one another.
Others tempt one with the inversion...aggregation aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka collectivism (many under few) etc.
God understands you
If highest stands under lowest; then...
reason for self-examination
Reasoning (want vs not want) implies a conflict over the suggestion by another, hence ignoring self. Can you describe a conflict of reason that isn't about something suggested by others?
be good, or be evil.
Aka good vs evil...reasoning over suggested moralism aka rules of behavior suggested by another, tempting one to remain conflicted (reasoning) with others.
heart
HEART (hollow muscular organ that circulates blood)...how could an inside be hollow if it implies being within an outside?
Drencrom - https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oIWifxuKVgw/maxresdefault.jpg
What was the moral of the story?
You have been everywhere with your little droog Alex, suffering with him, and you have viddied some of the most grahzny bratchnies old Bog ever made, all on to your old droog Alex. And all it was was that I was young. But now as I end this story, brothers, I am not young, not no longer, oh no. Alex like groweth up, oh yes.
One can't remain young; so one needs to grow up to get horrorshow or try holding onto, while getting bezoomny.
Edit: Ein kleines bisschen Horrorshow... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=df89CgJ01KA
terror-ism
jews suggest -ism (temptation); gentiles consent to terror (Latin terreo; fear). A terror-ist implies a gentile consenting to suggested terror-ism by a jew.
Fear (and hope) implies towards outcome; being implies within (life) origin (inception towards death). "There's nothing to fear but fear itself". Nature implies generating origin; being implies re-generating product within origin; being among others implies the temptation to ignore origin (perceivable) for outcomes (suggestion).
- Incest aka IN (being within) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) aka being (life) within division (inception towards death).
- intercourse aka INTERN (being internal within external) COURSE (onward movement) aka internal form (life) within external flow (inception towards death) of onward motion.
- kindred aka KIN (sort; more loose than genus) aka partial (life) loosened up; sorted; set apart within whole (inception towards death).
- daughter (female offspring) aka fe(minine)male rising out of momentum (feminine) of motion (masculine).
- son (male descendant) aka originating from origin (masculine motion).
Generating answers
Generation implies solution; hence dissolving form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...suggested questions and answers tempt one to seek outcome, instead of resisting (solidifying) origin (solution).
The government is now controlling EVERYTHING
Ones consent to suggested the-ism (authority of others over self) permits others to control (govern) ones mind (ment), hence tempting one to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested) aka for nihilism (nihilo; nothing) aka for ones denial of everything perceivable.
It's the consenting many which are caught within the suggested system by the few, while ignoring perceivable whole (reality) for a suggested partial (fiction).