a) all implies one in energy...others suggest "and" aka a conjunction to distract from whole (all) setting itself apart (ones) internally/inherently.
b) instead of suggested collectivism (1st and 2nd); it's FIRST (advanced before or further than any other in progression) as the progressing motion itself, and SECOND (Latin seco; to divide) as the momentum of motion transmuting form (life) out of flow (inception towards death)...aka differences (growth) within sameness (loss).
Energy doesn't need to be counted by those within...since being within implies as designated unit (Latin unus: one).
c) A'REA, noun (Heb. to reach, stretch, lay or spread)...being alive implies stretched from inception towards death. Temporary growth (area) within ongoing loss (whole).
TRI'AD, noun (Latin trias, from tres, three) - "union of three; three united" aka suggested collectivism tempting perceiving partials (ones) to ignore perceivable whole (oneness).
Counting starts with ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another, hence establishing a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka dualism (Latin duo; two). Consent to suggested implies one binding self to another one.
the grail stone
a) suggested the-ism tempts one to consent to the authority of another. If one uses "the"; then that implies shirking of response-ability onto another aka slave permitting master.
The foundation of suggested "the" implies perceivable implication (if/then). Consenting to "the" exchanges IF (motion) with THE (authority of others), hence permitting others to use "the" to shape "then", while oneself ignores motion.
In short...if motion; then moving forwards, yet if one ignores motion for the-ism, then others are permitted to direct one.
b) grail (partial) implies each one within holy (whole); hence each solid difference within fluid sameness.
c) stone (concretion) aka CONCRETE, adjective - "to grow together, united in growth" is being suggested by others as the inversion of each one growing apart from one another, while united (life set apart) within loss (inception towards death).
In short...ones (grail) consent to suggested "the stone" tempts one to ignore perceivable (holy), while permitting others authority (the) to collectivize (stone) consenting ones.
Bonus: suggesting collectivism implies GEM (to germinate) STONE (concretion), hence planting the seeds of temptation within the soil of ignorance.
what about
Others suggest "what-about-ism" to distract one from WHAT (energy aka internal/inherent power) ABOUT (Gr. butan, without; around, on the outside).
Ones consent to suggested what-about-ism implies ones lack of self discernment about being within (perception) outside (perceivable), hence continuously asking others "what about...?".
a) all implies one in energy...others suggest "and" aka a conjunction to distract from whole (all) setting itself apart (ones) internally/inherently.
b) instead of suggested collectivism (1st and 2nd); it's FIRST (advanced before or further than any other in progression) as the progressing motion itself, and SECOND (Latin seco; to divide) as the momentum of motion transmuting form (life) out of flow (inception towards death)...aka differences (growth) within sameness (loss).
Energy doesn't need to be counted by those within...since being within implies as designated unit (Latin unus: one).
c) A'REA, noun (Heb. to reach, stretch, lay or spread)...being alive implies stretched from inception towards death. Temporary growth (area) within ongoing loss (whole).
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/area.html
TRI'AD, noun (Latin trias, from tres, three) - "union of three; three united" aka suggested collectivism tempting perceiving partials (ones) to ignore perceivable whole (oneness).
Counting starts with ones consent (want or not want) to the suggestion of another, hence establishing a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka dualism (Latin duo; two). Consent to suggested implies one binding self to another one.
a) suggested the-ism tempts one to consent to the authority of another. If one uses "the"; then that implies shirking of response-ability onto another aka slave permitting master.
The foundation of suggested "the" implies perceivable implication (if/then). Consenting to "the" exchanges IF (motion) with THE (authority of others), hence permitting others to use "the" to shape "then", while oneself ignores motion.
In short...if motion; then moving forwards, yet if one ignores motion for the-ism, then others are permitted to direct one.
b) grail (partial) implies each one within holy (whole); hence each solid difference within fluid sameness.
c) stone (concretion) aka CONCRETE, adjective - "to grow together, united in growth" is being suggested by others as the inversion of each one growing apart from one another, while united (life set apart) within loss (inception towards death).
In short...ones (grail) consent to suggested "the stone" tempts one to ignore perceivable (holy), while permitting others authority (the) to collectivize (stone) consenting ones.
Bonus: suggesting collectivism implies GEM (to germinate) STONE (concretion), hence planting the seeds of temptation within the soil of ignorance.
Others suggest "what-about-ism" to distract one from WHAT (energy aka internal/inherent power) ABOUT (Gr. butan, without; around, on the outside).
Ones consent to suggested what-about-ism implies ones lack of self discernment about being within (perception) outside (perceivable), hence continuously asking others "what about...?".