pumping
Pumping implies drawing out...being implies expression (life) within impressing (inception towards death). Where's the function "drawing out" positioned?
know to keep
Can ones perception keep all perceivable and where does to/towards moves it?
they claim in history books and school
a) his-story implies as suggested by another; while ones consent to a suggested book implies ones claim to bind self to another. The information within a book is held within ones mind/memory as possession, hence as the debt of ones claim.
b) wanting to understand implies ones consent to stand-under another, hence establishing master (teacher) and slave (student) hierarchy. The few suggest slavery (school); the many consent by supplying the slaves (children).
you won't know till you get an empire
a) If knowledge implies perceivable, then ones perception already has access to everything perceivable. One doesn't get more perception; one builds comprehension of already perceivable...or ignores growing it when burdening self with the suggestions by others.
b) empire aka sovereign aka superior to all others...being ONE implies being different from all other ones, hence being sovereign. Among others; there can only be ONE self.
c) notice your want to "get"...why is it that the many keep wanting to get; while the few get everything the many don't want to give?
Why is it that the many want the truth, yet the liars get everything?
chain stores
That implies your want to hold onto (store) while being bound (chain)...what if your consent chains you to those who suggest, while your mind/memory becomes the storage for the suggested...a store others can buy and sell products from?
buncha big money
What if the only price of nature is the highest value bestowed upon each one within...evaluation?
PRICE, noun (Latin pretium; praise) + PRAISE, noun (Latin pretium) - "commendation bestowed on a person". Where does a person get stuff from? PER (by) SONOS (sound).
to do research
RE (responding to) SEARCH (seeking to find gain within loss)...what if others suggest research to tempt one to ignore being gain (life) within loss (inception towards death)?
Instead of seeking life within death...how about living it?
At this point, who knows?
a) life implies "sentence"...suggested point implies "end of sentence".
b) everyone knows: KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...most choose to ignore it for suggestions by others.
SLeight of hand: https://genius.com/Leonard-cohen-everybody-knows-lyrics 43 times he sings "everybody knows"...and yet it's still being ignored.
once CGI looks like
a) It doesn't matter what CGI looks like...it only matters that one looks at it.
b) CGI aka Common Gateway Interface...being implies unique, not common...others suggest common-ism to distract one from that. The only way (inception towards death) sets those within (life) free. Being internal (perception) allows one to face external (perceivable).
actual truth
Actual aka action aka motion...cannot be held onto (truth) or denied (lie). Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore moving (perceivable) for affixed (suggested), and choosing suggested implies holding onto it, hence affixing it within self, while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death).
Actual implies "change"; truth vs lies implies fighting over "affixed" definitions aka DEFINITE, adjective - "fixed".
if you would get the actual truth and try to post it, they'd think it's just CGI
A post implies fixed at center of surrounding; being implies moved center (growth) within moving surrounding (loss).
Notice my profile...Post Score (0) - Comment Score (10706). Free will of choice implies reaction (comment); not action (post).
Another sleight of hand: posts getting stickied.
Only thing you can do is try to fix problems in the world.
a) there ya go...the want to fix a moving reality, while ignoring to be problem (life) within solution (inception towards death).
b) one cannot "do" only respond (life) to being "done" by (inception towards death)...redo aka regenerate self (growth) within generation (loss).
electric motor hooked up to alternator.
Electric (motion) generates magnetic (momentum) for internal; alternating; electro/magnetic transmutation aka ONEself.
Ones free will of choice alternates within electric need (to let go of) and magnetic want (to hold onto)...the former grows resistance; the latter tempts one to ignore resisting, hence loosing resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
MO'TOR, noun (Latin from moveo, to move)... https://genius.com/Metallica-motorbreath-lyrics aka spirit (breath) adapting to being moved (motor).
Ignoring to discern this for self; by consenting to the suggestions of others, HOOKS one to another aka RELIGIO - "to bind anew".
"The bigger the lie, the more the people will believe it"
Truth..so big; nobody would believe it to be a lie.
The things that make us human...
...AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul) aka animation.
btw freedom_of_choice - who thinks that's not a bot?
What script would I be running? Doesn't manually adapting to perceivable inspiration contradict automatic suggestion of information? Shouldn't the main focus of a bot be imitating human behavior? Do I behave like anyone else?
Ask newfunturistic (who's digging into bots all day) and he's gonna tell you that he can't get a handle on "free-will-of-choice"...the implication thereof are btw hilarious.
freedom of choice
a) "free" will of choice within "dom"-inance of balance aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
b) free will of choice aka FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want; implies need) OF (implies out of; hence within) CHOICE (implies within balance).
c) "freedom of choice" implies ones free will of choice within dominance of balance, while consenting to suggested choices by another. Others suggest one freedom; so that one willingly consents to be at their liberty.
Sleight of hand for "freedom":
- (Freedom) I won't let you down
- (Freedom) I will not give you up
- (Freedom) You've gotta have some faith in the sound
- (You've gotta give for what you take) it's the one good thing that I've got
to make a better choice
Reasoning (better vs worse) diminishes choice, because it focuses on outcomes through the lens of conflict. Implication (if/then) focuses on origin without a conflict.
Others suggest outcomes (progressivism) to tempt one into conflicts (of reason).
Being aware is a tool that allows us more choices.
a) once again reasoning (more vs less); plus suggested collectivism (more choices) tempting one to ignore one's only free will of choice.
b) nature already offers everything (perceivable) to each ones awareness (perception), and to be aware of implies to be different from, hence different (choice) within same (balance).
c) tool aka instrument aka IN (being within) STRUERE (to spread) MENT (mind/memory) aka being within (life) spread (inception towards death) of mind/memory (momentum).
Momentum implies memory of motion, because only within momentum can ongoing (inception towards death) establish temporary (life)...MEM'ORY, noun - "exemption from oblivion" aka exemption (living) from oblivion (process of dying)....at least momentarily.
d) allow aka ALL (whole) LOW/LOCAL (partials)...one implies lower than all; all implies circumference for each local one, hence one being center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable).
Others tempts one with their suggested choices to ignore ones singular free will of choice. Consent tempts one to get lost in surrounding choices, while ignoring how to be choice at center of balance.
Furthermore; consenting (want or not want) to suggested tempts one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka imbalance, which further distracts one from perceivable balance.
Many people on this forum use energy to convince other's of their opinion.
a) FO'RUM, noun - "a public place, where causes were judicially tried, and orations delivered to the people; also, a market place"...consent (buying) meets suggestions (selling)...opinions suggested; become opium for ones consent.
On a bigger scale...the consent (want or not want) of the many, sets the suggesting few as the happy merchants of temptation. If many ignore all nature offers; then a few will become the substitute merchant for nature...selling perceivable (reality) in disguise of suggested (fiction).
The disguise of suggested implies both the ignorance of the many and the "chutzpah" of the few wielding the "art of the deal".
b) "convince" tempts one to blame others; "consent" implicates self. If one tries to convince others about their consent, they will deny self implication, while blaming one for whatever sticks...anything to shirk response-ability onto another.
Choose a side
a) a suggested side shaped by the choice of another.
b) a side within imbalance aka within a conflict of reason...want vs not want; true vs false; us vs them; agree vs deny; believe vs disbelieve, good vs bad; hamas vs jews etc.
c) being choice implies within balance (need/want). Motion implies both need to resist and want to ignore resisting for those within. It ain't a conflict against others; but a struggle for the sustenance of self aka "Mein Kampf/my struggle".
How to distract one from my struggle? Suggest an idol (Hitler) and make "Mein Kampf" about him.
in reality the real choice is walking away and not choosing.
Suggested "away" tempts one to ignore being (life) within way (inception towards death)...each choice adapts to being moved. One cannot walk away within a way.
If energy (internal/inherent power) is the foundation of everything within, then AWAY (absent) implies ones ignorance thereof aka being absentminded...
Try using implication before thinking: "if all implies one in energy; then....".
an artificially created ultimatum
a) ignoring natural (perceivable) establishes artificial (suggested). Nature gives (sound) and those within take and repack it (words) to get what's given without sharing.
b) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (partials within whole).
c) suggested progressivism (ultimate) tempts one to seek furthest (suggested outcomes), while ignoring nearest (perceiving origin).
What's nearer? That which is perceivable or that which others suggest will be or was?
a choice to give energy and attention to that cause
Cause (velocity) gives (inception) and takes (death) effect (resistance)...resisting sustains self (life) during give/take balance by choosing need to adapt to given or want to consent to taken.
If I choose to ignore you, what power do you have over me?
Your consent to suggested nihilism, since ignorance implies ones denial of perceivable, when choosing to ignore suggested. That -ism can be shaped by my suggestions to steer your already consenting choice.
Furthermore; claiming "me; myself and I" shapes every ONE else into a "you". So "I choose to ignore you" implies anyone can take the place of "you", without drawing suspicion when making suggestions.
That's the trick underneath you/jew. That's why a so called jew utilizes this brand to masquerade as any "you" a "me" categorizes the world as.
A claim (me) seeks to obtain a debt (you)...
If I'm presented with two choices, am I smart enough, and do I have enough awareness, to choose a third or fourth choice?
a) suggested collectivism tempts one to count others (pluralism); while ignoring self (singular aka partial within whole aka one within oneness). Ones consent to another one implies dualism (two), hence establishing the foundation for collectivism. That dualism implies RELIGIO - "to bind anew" or mercantilism (buying and selling) or contract law (consent to suggested), while ignoring natural law (adapt to perceivable).
b) each choice implies ones free will of choice..."there can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one".
c) consider "self" discernment...others can choose to give it to you; but you cannot take it without ignoring to discern "self". One cannot choose choices (plural) without ignoring to be choice (single).
Choosing another shapes "chosen ones", while ignoring "one's choice".
At what point do we choose to go along with something which leads...
a) by discerning self to be a life "sentence", one diminishes the temptation of suggested "points" (end of sentence) by others.
b) by discerning self to be one (singular); suggested pluralism (we) loses potential.
c) being discerning to be (life) directed (inception towards death) one can comprehend the need to resist the want to follow along.
You entire sentence implies the solution to the problems you seek answers for. Sleight of hand from the Rofschild-thread: "any poison which occurs in nature, has its remedy within 3 meters".
there might be other choices then the ones that were presented
Nature presents balance (momentum of motion aka moving differences aka perceivable inspiration) towards ones free will of choice...others within nature shape suggestions with their free will of choice to distract you from yours.
Indifference is a strong weapon during a time of great polarity and divisions.
a) division of whole into partials implies internal/inherent differentiation, hence energy.
b) electric (male; motion) generates magnetic (female; momentum) for electro-magnetic trans-mutation of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
c) the only weapon (instrument of offense/defense) implies ones free will of choice aka "weapon of choice".
I enjoy how you break down words
Thanks; I break down what others build with suggested words within perceivable sound. Why? To make it harder for others to ignore sound (reality) for words (fiction).
Holding onto definitions (definite; affixed) tempts one to ignore being (instrument) within motion (sound).
Whole to partials implies the origin of "break". Being implies apart from one another as broken partial (growth aka form) within unbroken; sound; entire; whole (loss aka flow). This can be discerned by self; not gained from others.
deeper thinking
Any suggested information one holds onto aka ones beliefs; ideas, all the -isms one consents to be part of; all the meanings and definitions one upholds within mind/memory, everything one reasons over....that's what buries ones thinking aka ones adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
In short...one ignores flow, when holding onto form. "falling" for temptations "sinks" one deeper...
I'm using to express
"to" aka towards implies the impressing motion (loss) using your expression (growth).
- MAN'UAL, adjective (Latin manualis, from manus, the hand)
a) being implies manual (life) within automatic (inception towards death).
b) manual (suggested) tempts one to ignore automatic (perceivable).
c) consenting to manually suggested; hides automatically perceivable from ones view, hence "hidden hand".
d) exploiting ones ignorance of automatically perceivable (reality) with manually suggested (fiction) implies SLEIGHT, noun - "an artful trick; sly artifice; a trick or feat so dexterously performed that the manner of performance escapes observation", hence a "sleight of hand".
Aye for an ayh... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3zQ5Zo5W.jpg
"There's the curve right there; ya fuckin idiot"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2XoVL3D9.jpg
Why are companies pushing bots so hard?
a) because many want company and so few utilize bots to cater to want...for a price.
b) action (inception towards death) pushes reactions (life)...many ignore being pushed; which few exploit to lure, while shoving.
AI is not AI.. its bots
Artificial implies suggested by others; intelligence (understanding aka standing under) implies consent by self. Suggested bots are fueled by ones consent.
Chipsets do not actually cater to differentiated processes
Ongoing process (inception towards death) sets temporary differences (life) momentarily.
Others suggest CHIP, CHEAP, CHIPPING - "a market"; from Sax. Ceapan, cypan - "to buy or sell" to tempt ones consent. If one consents, then one permits others to suggest ones "setting".
GPU vs CPU
a) suggested CPU (central processing unit) tempts one to ignore being unit (partial within whole) aka center (life) of process (inception towards death).
b) suggested GPU (graphical processing unit) tempts one to ignore that line (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life), which others contradict as delineation (writing from Latin graphicus). Only within an ongoing line; can one temporary inscribe writing.
Each unit is being processed within line, while being distracted with graphical delineation aka symbolism upon symmetry.
they seem to want
a) if one ignore seeing (perceiving) for seeming/semblance (suggested), then one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
b) if one ignores self (partial within whole) for wanting to be part of others (us), then one brands everyone else into an us vs them conflict of reason (aka dualism).
c) if one let's go of "us"; then other ones aren't viewed as "them" anymore.
you...
Holding onto "me; myself or I (aye)" sustains the branding of others as "you (jew)"...
There simply isn't any right today.
Choose to take a step right...it's there, ready for choice to respond to.
I don't mean extremists
a) being implies local (choice) within extreme (balance)...left/right implies extremity of ones choice.
b) -ist (extremist) implies ones consent to an -ism (extremism), hence ones submission to the choice of another. Those who submit willingly are being domesticated to ignore/deny extremes.
Completely backwards.
Complete directs (from/to)...only partials (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of whole (motion) have the free will of choice to navigate (front/back; left/right; up/down), while being moved from inception towards death.
We aren't moving forwards today.
Others suggest progressivism to tempt one to consent to it aka to hold onto the want (hope) or not want (fear) for outcomes, which in return tempts one to ignore being (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Suggested pluralism (we) and nihilism (aren't) tempts one to ignore that.
Sick of its bullshit.
Using bullshit as fertilizer for nourishment affects the sustenance of ones health...unless ignored.
I honestly don't see what one has to do with the other.
If all is one in energy, then each one (partial) within all (whole) needs to discern self, before being able to comprehend relations among partials within whole.
Both reasoning (honest vs dishonest) and denial (don't) tempt one to ignore self discernment.
That Shaman guy was baited into a trap.
The suggestion of that story implies bait; ones consent to it implies self entrapment.
trespassing
TRANS (life) within PASS (inception towards death) aka transmutation of ingredient (growth) out of base (loss).
low IQ
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand) aka to "stand-under" implies ones submission to another, which permits another to stand over one.
QUO'TIENT, noun (Latin quoties, how often)...how often does one submit to others? For as often as one willingly chooses to do so.
Conservatives need to realize...
Reality (inception towards death) dispenses (life)...those within suggest conservatism to distract from ones need to resist dispensation.
being prosecuted primarily
Being implies secondary (life) within primary (inception towards death)...others suggest prosecution (to follow or pursue with a view to reach) aka progressivism to distract from ones need to resist being progressed.
shaman
SHAM'AN, noun - "a wizzard or conjurer, who by enchantment pretends" aka one who conjures suggestion to enchant ones mind to consent.
Right wingers have to realize...
Right vs left implies suggested fiction; being choice within left/right balance implies perceivable reality.
Taking a step left implies coming from right; yet taking another step left still implies coming from right and vice versa...one cannot label a side without ignoring to be choice within. Others suggest labels to tempt ones ignorance.
Sleight of hand: "Take these broken wings - And learn to fly again - And learn to live so free"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKhN1t_7PEY
World’s Biggest Prison
Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable aka voluntary confinement of self, while permitting involuntary imprisonment by others.
A mind confined through ignorance shapes a mind imprisoned to suggestion.
How much agency do people have who are so easily manipulated by the media and their authority figures?
Manipulated by implies "reacting" to. Others utilize manipulation to distract one from being regent (life) within agent (inception towards death).
Manipulation aka MANIPULUS (manual) -ATION (automatic) aka manual reaction (life) within automatic action (inception towards death).
how predictable a human is
PRE (before) DICO (to tell) aka the suggestions by others, while tempt one to ignore how human (form) comes to be...animal (animation aka flow).
Those who ignore motion follow dictated directions, which permits those suggesting to predict outcomes.
someone breaks through into relative sentience...Eventually, our entire species
Whole (inception towards death) breaking into partials (life) establishes sentience aka awareness of being perception within perceivable.
Others suggest pluralism (our) and collectivism (entire) to distract singular (one) from discerning self to be apart from one another.
will become...
...implies the suggested inversion of coming (inception towards death) to be (life) free will of choice.
Two suggested words "will become" can flip ones perception of existence (coming to be will)...if one consents to it and thereby establishes dual-ism (two).
When we notice...that's when we have the power to choose.
So ignorance isn't a choice? Just happenstance? How could ones senses not notice being moved at any moment of ones existence? What powers sense (awareness; perception)?
heal trauma
TRAUMAT'IC, adjective (Greek; a wound)...motion generates momentum (inception towards death), which implies a wound for the struggle of health (life) within. Living implies within the process of dying aka cauterization aka "to burn or sear with fire as morbid flesh".
declares there is no free will
a) suggested "free will" tempts those who choose to consent willingly to ignore "free will OF CHOICE".
b) suggestions shaped by the free will of choice of others tempts those who consent to ignore their free will of choice.
c) if being (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion; then as choice (life) within balance (inception/death).
declares
DECLA'RE, verb - "to clear; to free from obscurity; to make plain"
Being free will of choice implies unique (life) within plain (inception towards death), hence in-between light (clear) and dark (obscure).
there is no
Where is "nothing"? What is "nothing"? Why is "nothing"? Who is "nothing"? If nothing implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, then can one in denial discern that?
Does one in denial wield the free will of choice to resist denying?
no responsibility
What enables one to respond? Does motion imply action enabling those being moved to react? Does being reaction imply being within action?
Can reaction choose to deny perceivable action for suggested reactions by others?
criminal act
CRIME, noun (Latin , Greek, to separate)...being (life) implies separated (crime) within natural law (inception towards death).
Action (law) generates (crime) reactions (free will of choice).
after decades of study, concludes...we don't have free will.
a) STUDY (setting of the mind or thoughts upon a subject) aka subjecting oneself willingly to the suggested teachings by others aka slave (student) generating master (teacher).
b) being alive implies as a commencing life sentence...only death concludes life.
c) others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self as partial (growth) within whole (loss).
d) others suggest nihilism (don't) to distract one from everything perceivable and thereby from discerning ones position at the center thereof.
a) look at the distinction made between "anime-porn" and "child-porn"...child implies growing towards adult, hence being "animated".
b) pornography aka PORNE (prostitute; to purchase) GRAPHEIN (to write)...ones consent to purchase suggested writings by another.
unstruck by materialism
a) that implies unstruck by those who suggest the -ism.
b) being implies matter. What strucks (passes) being?
- Anime porn? Child porn? Pokemon? Rock Music? ...suggested information.
- Gnosis? ...aka to know aka knowledge aka perceivable inspiration.
Suggested can only be shaped within perceivable...consenting to former tempts one to ignore latter. Others suggest to tempt one to ignore perceivable, which in return permits others to exploit ones ignorance, since it's willingly.
claims that predate
a) suggesting a date implies affixing an event within duration...consenting to it implies claiming affixed within moving, hence holding onto something while ignoring that everything moves.
b) suggested "pre" (before) tempts one to ignore being (life) in-between before (inception) and after (death), hence within momentum of motion aka within perceivable moment aka "now"...not before or after.
Sleight of hand: "Yesterday...All my troubles seemed so far away...Now it looks as though they're here to stay...Oh, I believe in yesterday"
One is being tricked to believe in yesterday, while ignoring being (problem) within now (solution). If one ignores now for yesterday; then ones problems (life) go away (inception towards death).
Anahata (unstruck; unimpressed; unaffected)...invert it and one gets struck (life passed from inception towards death); impressed (being expression within impression) and affected (being reaction within action aka effect within cause).
Invert implies IN (being within) VERTO (turn aka moving in a circular course)...being (life) implies turned (growth) within straight (loss). Ones position implies centered turn within surrounding direction...being implies getting a turn of expression (growth) within impressing (loss).
A kike (circle) tempts one to turn again; hence following directions, while tumbling all over the place.
https://archive.org/details/the-devils-rain-1975_202108
One of the comments: "33 degree mason Borgnine recites the Enochian calls as baphomet.
Enoch; from Hebrew Hanokh - "dedicated, consecrated" aka set apart through oil...an offsprings' birth.