a) suggested "free will" tempts those who choose to consent willingly to ignore "free will OF CHOICE".
b) suggestions shaped by the free will of choice of others tempts those who consent to ignore their free will of choice.
c) if being (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion; then as choice (life) within balance (inception/death).
declares
DECLA'RE, verb - "to clear; to free from obscurity; to make plain"
Being free will of choice implies unique (life) within plain (inception towards death), hence in-between light (clear) and dark (obscure).
there is no
Where is "nothing"? What is "nothing"? Why is "nothing"? Who is "nothing"? If nothing implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, then can one in denial discern that?
Does one in denial wield the free will of choice to resist denying?
no responsibility
What enables one to respond? Does motion imply action enabling those being moved to react? Does being reaction imply being within action?
Can reaction choose to deny perceivable action for suggested reactions by others?
criminal act
CRIME, noun (Latin , Greek, to separate)...being (life) implies separated (crime) within natural law (inception towards death).
Action (law) generates (crime) reactions (free will of choice).
after decades of study, concludes...we don't have free will.
a) STUDY (setting of the mind or thoughts upon a subject) aka subjecting oneself willingly to the suggested teachings by others aka slave (student) generating master (teacher).
b) being alive implies as a commencing life sentence...only death concludes life.
c) others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self as partial (growth) within whole (loss).
d) others suggest nihilism (don't) to distract one from everything perceivable and thereby from discerning ones position at the center thereof.
a) suggested "free will" tempts those who choose to consent willingly to ignore "free will OF CHOICE".
b) suggestions shaped by the free will of choice of others tempts those who consent to ignore their free will of choice.
c) if being (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion; then as choice (life) within balance (inception/death).
DECLA'RE, verb - "to clear; to free from obscurity; to make plain"
Being free will of choice implies unique (life) within plain (inception towards death), hence in-between light (clear) and dark (obscure).
Where is "nothing"? What is "nothing"? Why is "nothing"? Who is "nothing"? If nothing implies ones consent to suggested nihilism, then can one in denial discern that?
Does one in denial wield the free will of choice to resist denying?
What enables one to respond? Does motion imply action enabling those being moved to react? Does being reaction imply being within action?
Can reaction choose to deny perceivable action for suggested reactions by others?
CRIME, noun (Latin , Greek, to separate)...being (life) implies separated (crime) within natural law (inception towards death).
Action (law) generates (crime) reactions (free will of choice).
a) STUDY (setting of the mind or thoughts upon a subject) aka subjecting oneself willingly to the suggested teachings by others aka slave (student) generating master (teacher).
b) being alive implies as a commencing life sentence...only death concludes life.
c) others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self as partial (growth) within whole (loss).
d) others suggest nihilism (don't) to distract one from everything perceivable and thereby from discerning ones position at the center thereof.