what are you trying to say?
a) nature doesn't SAY (to utter in words)...instead it moves sound.
b) consenting to suggested (information) tempts one to ignore perceivable (inspiration).
c) ones consent permits a suggesting other to be ones SOOTH'SAYER - "a foreteller; a prognosticator; one who undertakes to foretell future events without inspiration".
d) perceivable inspiration inspires adaption...choosing to ignore this by consenting to suggested information, tempts one to "not even try" being part of whole nature.
double minded
a) if mind/memory is fueled by moving input; then motion (input) generates momentum (mind/memory).
b) can motion double its own momentum?
c) if energy (inherent/internal power) implies whole for each partial within, then what does doubling partial imply for whole?
Can anything within energy double itself without implying a further division of energy?
unstable in all his ways
a) there can be only one way (inception towards death) for all the ones within (life).
b) stable (inception towards death aka ongoing loss) generates unstable (life aka temporary growth)...but wait...
Suggested STABLE (fixed; firmly established; not to be easily moved) tempts one to ignore that perception (solid) is moved within perceivable (fluid).
USSLibertyVeterans have memorials every year for 60 years
That implies spending ones resistance to hold onto.
Why are Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder horny for debating college chicks?
That implies tempting others to hold onto things to debate each other over.
Less resistance implies more opportunity for exploitation.
how little it takes to "convince"
a) Suggested convinces ones consent to ignore perceivable...if one gives in and takes it.
b) the trick to sell suggested is to utilize implication (to convince; to overpower) against the buyer by making him believe that if being convinced, then being overpowered by others.
In reality...underling (consent) chooses overlord (suggestion) or resists and thereby grows self.
I've been able to figure out
Being implies enabled as figure (life) within (inception towards death)...others suggest rhetoric (able to figure out) as the inversion thereof.
Using such rhetoric implies ones willing consent to it, hence enabling a figure of speech aka a golem controlled by others (those suggesting rhetoric).
What times we live IN...i've been able to figure OUT.
That's me holding a mirror to your mind on contradiction. Only oneself can discern to be within (partial) outside (whole).
the fundamental difference
Foundation of differences (partials) implies sameness (whole)...ones consent to suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore that by placing self under the authority of another, hence marking a difference as ones foundation.
normie takes
a) Consenting to a suggested norm implies taking hold of it.
b) norm; normal; perpendicular aka at right angles (life) to the horizon (inception towards death) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss.
Latin perpendere - "balance carefully"...choosing to hold onto, while balancing carefully, implies balancing self.
In short...following any suggested orders (norms) tempts one to ignore resisting (living) natural order (process of dying). Suggested tempts taking; perceivable inspires giving.
authorities from which to choose
Aka authorizing another by ones free will of choice, hence establishing a chosen one with ones choice.
flood the zone
Flood (motion) generates zone (momentum) for transformation within, hence establishing form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
comfortable because they're moving along
Does being (life) within cause (inception towards death) offers comfort for following along or does one need to resist to reinvigorate (comfort) self?
The conspiracists are...
...willingly consenting to suggested the-ism and conspiracism, hence following suggested orders, while ignoring to resist natural order.
in the know
A sleight of hand for being (perception) within known (perceivable)...with the parasitic suggestion (the-ism) hiding in plain sight in-between...in THE know. That's media (Latin medius; middle) aka the suggesting middleman in-between perception and perceivable.
he path to digging out
What if path (inception towards death) forces in (life).
And of all the truths I've managed to dig out, zero of them made me feel more comfortable in any way.
a) How could digging within loss (inception towards death) make growth (life) more comfortable? How deep into loss will you dig until you realize that you're burying growth?
b) who suggests ONE "zero"? Another ONE? Putting ONEself under another ONE, when consenting to suggested "zero"...there ain't much growth in that.
the mechanism of why so many buy into
Others sell suggested theism (the); mechanism; collectivism (many) and progressivism (so, into) to tempt ones consent to buy into it; while ignoring the implication (if/then) of perceivable..."of why".
Why within? Because out of! If within; then within outside. One can discern this, but juggling four -isms suggested by others doesn't help ones self discernment.
flat
a) Does plane (inception towards death) of existence (life) sound circular?
b) Does ones consent to suggested permit others a sphere of influence?
c) KIKE; noun - "circle; ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning; no end"
No one could possibly know what's really happening"
To know reality implies perceiving (effect) perceivable (cause). Others suggest HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" as the inversion of being effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
Consenting to suggested happenings, positions one into a "happenstance", hence taking a chance aka gambling ones life one chance.
Sleight of hand: "If you change your mind (take a chance)...(Take a, take a chance-chance)...I'm the first in line...Honey, I'm still free (take a chance)"
They keep repeating this line over and over again and people are falling for it.
Line (inception towards death) implies fall of men (life)...falling (loss) offers momentum for raising (growth)...to raise (resistance) while falling (velocity) requires adaptation by choice (frequency).
Repeat aka RE (response to) PETO (being driven forwards)...
most...are not very different from normies.
Being implies one (life) different from one another within same (inception towards death)...others suggest norms to tempt consenting ones to respond alike instead of as differences.
just take the opposite side of everything
a) everything (perceivable) can be ignored for nothing (suggested)
b) ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want) positions one within a conflict (want vs not want) called "reason". While ignoring everything; one is being tricked to just take the opposite side within conflicts of nothing aka reasoning about suggested, instead of adapting to perceivable.
c) inception and death are not adverse (in opposition) to each other, but coexist as momentum within the same direction of motion for those living within. Ignoring this, while holding onto something suggested, puts oneself into an adverse position.
what you see...playing the parts seen...
To see implies "to perceive by the eye"...not consenting to watch as suggested by others.
PerSEEving...watching implies attending (to await); instead of being (to adapt).
to pass as an actor
Life can only "react" to being passed from inception towards death...ones consent to suggested actors tempts one to ignore that.
line propaganda
Propagation of line (inception towards death) sentences life.
Repetition of nazi
Continuation of ashke-nazi...
"This is a typical contract with IBM and the Third Reich"...
The letter reads "Deutschen Reich"...what a coincidental mistranslation within a documentary about using numbers to identify people.
Palestinians tagged with ID numbers
Six digits aka 999999 max...just keeping tabs here before the spin-doctors go nuts again.
part of life
What is life part within? How does life came to be a part within? If out of cause, then partial effect within...?
sift thru the shit
Nature offers hunger; those within choose how to respond and process it. Being able to perceive this process going through one inspires self discernment about ones response-ability (free will of choice).
Others tempt one to ignore needed process for wanted outcomes, hence so many "sifting through shit" instead of adapting to hunger.
How about getting ones head out of ones ass to see why one put in that which came out as one don't want it to be?
to identify
Being implies difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death), so differentiating self makes it really hard for others to identify (identical; same) one.
One may be afraid of standing out; but fitting in is way more destructive.
Some youtube videos seems like a trap
TUBE, noun (Latin tubus) - "a pipe; a siphon; a canal or conduit" aka siphoning from you...if consented to. To consent to any suggested information (solid) makes one a conductor within inspiration (fluid).
a) Choosing to ignore being (perception) within fluid (perceivable) permits others to influence (suggestion).
b) consenting to suggested -ism, permits others to exercise influence (mesmerize) with the suggested.
c) fascination aka irresistible influence tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
Ir-resist implies ones free will of choice to not resist (need) temptations (want).
d) to gaze implies to fix upon, hence willingly ignoring to see/sea aka to be solid (perception) within fluid (perceivable), being enabled to discern moving differences from one another.
e) HYP (depression of spirits) NOSIS (to know; to perceive; to adapt to perceivable)...consenting to suggested permits others to depress ones expressions within perceivable.
Sleight of hand: "don't believe the hype"...oh say; can you see? https://vidmaxviral.com/video/221452-well-flava-flav-sang-the-national-anthem-at-a-bucks-game-and-it-was-um
serifs
The many are tricked to believe that inception and death are terminal to life aka beginning and end of creation. Few comprehend that temporary life can only exist within the momentum (inception towards death) of ongoing motion.
Serif implies being within ongoing; sans-serif inverts that as "without". Consider that sound continues; while hearing diminishes when a tone stretches.
Another trick is suggesting a point at the end of a sentence, which tempts one to consent to point out end of life-sentence.
jews are accustomed to the motion which makes them.
a) form (life) habituates flow (inception towards death)...other form tempts one to hold onto suggested habitats; while wondering why they keep falling apart within the flow-state of natural order.
b) singular (whole) was before units (partials) can be...others suggest that plurals (jews) are to distract unit (unus; one) from self with concern about other ones.
c) a chosen one is shaped by ones choice, when consenting to a suggestion. The consenting underling shapes the suggesting overlord.
expelling
a) being implies ex (life) within pello (inception towards death) aka a driven expression.
b) others suggest expel (forcing out) to distract one from being forced in (inception) and out (death) of expression (life).
Leaders will
a) ones free WILL of choice to follow, permits others to lead by suggestion.
b) natural order (inception towards death) leads resistance (life)...if one lacks the will to resist; then another will mislead one to follow.
- COINCIDENCE, noun - "the falling or meeting of two or more lines, surfaces, or bodies in the same point".
a) what if there's only one line (inception towards death) for each ones view-point (life)?
b) CO (in conjunction) IN (within) SEE (perception) DENSE (compact; parts closely united)...what if nature sets whole (perceivable) apart (perception) from one another?
dual citizens shouldn't be put in the position of choosing one
a) Ignoring one's choice by consenting to whatever another one suggests...that positions one's choice under a chosen one.
b) ignoring self (single one) by consenting to another one, establishes dual (duo, tow) -ism.
There's no two in nature...unless one chooses to count other ones.
c) citizen implies city; center...how could a center be dual? Is ones position as center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable) a dual position?
As far as I can tell they're not representing their constituents.
a) Constituent (essence) of form (life) implies flow (inception towards death)...not any suggested constitution by others.
b) form (life) needs to RE (respond to) PRESENT (given) flow (inception towards death)...not consenting to suggested representatives.
c) F'AR, adjective (Latin porro; Gr. connected with, a way, a passing)...being implies near (life) passing within far (inception towards death).
What's nearer than oneself? What's farther than motion passing through one?
Mind, body, and spirit is my guess for humanity.
a) What about animal aka anima; animation? Mind/memory responses to moving input. Body is formed within flow. Spirit implies breathing aka impression (inhale) forcing expression (exhale).
b) others suggest GUESS, verb (Latin conjicio) - "conjecture; to form an opinion without certain principles or means of knowledge".
Ones consent to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
tl; dr...before concerning about dual; one needs to discern self and before concerning about a chosen one; one needs to comprehend one's choice.
a) How could a chosen ONE be DUAL (duo; two) without oneself consenting to believe in suggested dualism?
b) Why would one living under e pluribus unum (out of many; one) consent to suggested dualism?
a) power (potential) cannot be stopped or ended...only ignored.
b) one's ignorance of choice distributes power to chosen ones.
c) want to "remove" tempts one to ignore the need to RE (respond as life) to being MOVED (from inception towards death).
d) US aka UNITED STATES implies ones condition...not the state of others.
a) matrimony implies MATRI (matrix; mother) MONY (monium; mentum; momentum)...momentum (inception towards death) implies matrix for each ones choice (life) within.
b) the suggested matrimonial bond tempts one to bind self to others; while ignoring that being implies "free" will of choice.
c) perpetuation of self through intercourse with another implies OFF-SPRING...not binding together.
d) ones consent to suggested collectivism (togetherness) shapes a conflict of reason aka want to be together (marriage) vs not want to be together (divorce).
are we Finnish
Consider FIN-NISH-ANS (phoneticians)...
how many soldiers...
a) each one who consented to the suggested offer...SOLD to DIE.
b) SOL (whole) DIA (apart) aka being apart (life) within whole (inception towards death).
a cult that profane the scriptures
a) cult (cultivation aka growth); profane (impure); scripture (writing)
b) writing onto something implies making pure impure, hence blotting white paper with ink.
Impure (suggested words) stains pure (perceivable sound)...until natural order cleans out impurities.
c) only within release (inception towards death) can one cultivate (life) aka only within loss can there be growth.
Here is an example
Suggestion amplifies (ample) repression of ones expression (ex); because one submits by consent to the suggestions of another. Others keep suggesting examples to tempt one to consent willingly to self repression.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature" by Madonna.
if thy right eye offend thee...
Eye cannot offer; it can only react to offered sight. Others can suggest offers to tempt eye to watch and get offended.
The all (perceivable) seeing (perceiving) I (eye) needs to resist suggestions by others.
pluck it out
Being (life) implies within (inception towards death)...others suggest one to pluck temptations (want) out of perceivable offer (need)...it's each ones free will of choice how to respond.
cast it from thee
Others suggest one to "roll the dice", hence utilizing words cast as spells to tempt ones consent to gamble ones life away.
it is profitable for thee
Yet it is thee who seeks out prophets (profits) among others, while giving consent (buy) to suggested (sell), hence giving credit (creed) to the happy merchant of temptations.
thy whole body
Thy partial body (life) within whole (inception towards death)...
If your eye causeth...
...then you ignore sight causing eye to be effected.
it would be better to be
Reasoning (better vs worse) against others about being...diminishes being self.
separated from the love of God.
a) Reasoning (love vs hate) against others tempts one to ignore being (life) partial separated within whole (inception towards death).
b) OF, preposition - "from or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing"...
A regent first has to discern self to be able to comprehend agent...consenting to suggestions by others tempts one to ignore growing self discernment.
Action doesn't label reactions; reactions label each other to gain advantage through ignored action.
I have neither the time nor the energy
Others suggest time (past; present and future) to distract one from "now"; the only perceivable moment (momentum of motion)...perceived by each one center of all energy (internal/inherent power).
Temporary resistance (life) within ongoing velocity (inception towards death) of energy...resistance is fertile; if one doesn't ignore growing it, which is why others suggest "resistance if futile" to tempt one to ignore resisting.
There's only one way (inception towards death)...forwards.
All the suggested narratives aren't pushed by jews; they are being layered upon a moving system aka upon perceivable natural law, which the gentiles ignore for suggested narratives.
Each living child is born into the process of dying...the suggested narratives about "child abuse" are tempting one to blame the abuser, instead of growing the child's resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).
If many ignore resisting; then few are permitted carte blanche to exploit lack of resistance.
he wants it to be accepted
If one is "offended" by what another suggested; then one already took the suggested "offer". Anything suggested implies a burned offering, because holding onto anything within a moving system increases the heat by resistance grinding against resistance.
This friction among resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) is being suggested by so called jews as "REASONING".
Example: how to effortlessly sacrifice children to the flames? Suggest abortion and watch how reason (pro-life vs pro-choice) inflames the sacrifice, while also burning each other out as kindling.
a) What if one could write questions, already containing answers, as to navigate those stuck within dualism (question vs answer) to either discern self as problem (life) within solution (inception towards death) or attack others?
b) Does "trolling and illness" imply growth of self discernment or attempts to label others with loss?
c) Does life, while struggling to sustain self within the process of dying, require the applause or sympathies of others?
d) look at him... https://img.gvid.tv/i/37Tsj4UW.jpg All that applause and sympathy for the devil (hope you guessed my name; jew, jew) and his life is still running out...
why...owe...a count (ry)?
- who suggests one to count? https://files.catbox.moe/v9c28r.jpg
- who can be held accountable when consenting to count the suggestions of others?
- could consent (buy) to suggested (sell) generate a bond between debtor and creditor?
- What if those giving creed (credit) are burdening self (debt) with what they consented to...the suggestions by others?
- OWE, verb - "to be indebted; to be obliged or bound to pay"
- consenting many indebted to pay chosen few...that rings a bell, doesn't it?
- Could ones consent to the suggestions of another imply a bond?
- RELIGION, noun (Latin religo, to bind anew)...oy vey
- What are the implications of using ones FREE will of choice to BIND self to another?
sure
a) How could temporary (life being moved from inception towards death) be permanent (sure)?
b) why are the many seeking assurances, while the few sell insurances? Who's making an ass out of whom?
what makes you
If MAKE, verb -"to compel; to constrain"; then what constrains ones "free" will of choice?
jews are not
What if others suggest "not; nothing" to distract one from discerning self (perception) within everything (perceivable)?
Are jews suggesting nothing? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
...while gentiles choose to understand aka stand-under another aka submit (victim) to permitted authority (perpetrator).
jews suggest activism to tempt gentiles to ignore that acting AS (like) implies reacting to.
Consenting to any suggestion implies by consent of ones free will of choice aka ones response-ability...choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (action), which one ignores when consenting to the suggesting choices of others, which imbalances self.
a) How does suggested blame (blemish) injure another? Only if another consents to take it.
b) Ones perception cannot hold onto perceivable...it needs to let go of perceivable (inspiration). Choosing to hold onto suggested (information) marks oneself with it aka blemishes self with the suggestions by another.
Consent burdens self with blame...no matter what others are suggesting.