I take it back
Only flow (inception towards death) can take form (life) back...anything form takes back from one another implies a mercantile exchange aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion).
That wasn't a total fail at all.
All implies fall (inception towards death) for each ones rise (life) within...others suggest totalitarianism aka all together to distract each one within from being apart from one another.
Actually having 2 eyes
a) Being implies reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)...actually aka "as matter of fact" tempts reactive matter to hold onto active motion as "fact/faction". Doesn't work; yet it tricks to ignore being moved.
b) All (perceivable) seeing (ones perception) I (phonetic eye). One doesn't have two eyes; one wields each one apart from one another within motion, hence blink/blican/bhel - "to shine, flash, burn"...a temporary expression within the ongoing impression of light.
each representing 'sides' of perception of One
One implies response within presented (represent) aka perception within perceivable. Discerning self as choice implies being within balance...viewing balance as sides tempts one to ignore being at center, while inclining towards a side.
Are inception and death sides for the life in-between or does it imply different form within same flow? Branding something as a side contradicts perception (expression) within perceivable (impression)...which cannot be held onto.
Same with choice...one cannot hold onto choice; one needs to choose at every moment of being aka adaptation to being moved. Choice is about balancing aka shaping form within flow...not about holding onto any side/sight.
I chose the name to show how each 'side' needs to come to the One
Choosing the name to show implies choosing a brand for suggestion aka tempting consent to hold onto a suggested brand from either of two sides within a conflict of reason...want vs not want aka agree vs disagree aka consent vs denial etc.
That whole line of thinking ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
Furthermore..."I chose" tempts one to ignore being choice for holding onto a side chosen before. Balance implies motion...holding onto a side implies imbalance of choice.
As for "to come to the one"....it's oneness coming towards being each one aka whole separating into partials.
without misleading
Nature leads (inception towards death) within (life)...others suggest "without" to tempt one to miss that.
Also; nature as leader doesn't generate followers, but resistance to being led towards death. Anything suggested tempts another to follow by consent.
You stress this by showing the 'ass' of each word that exists.
The issue is "showing" which tempts one to look forwards. Perceivable sound operates behind those who consent to suggested words. Consenting to a word tempts one sight to focus on a brand, hence establishing tunnel vision, while sound moves through one.
The stress of showing perceivable is felt by the one holding onto suggested as a friction...as not wanting to let go of what one wants to hold onto, while others are showing the need to let go.
You admit the One as non-dual, yet use dualism to duel with words.
a) You vs me + admit vs deny...that's the dual perspective of ones suggestion; establishing a conflict of reason aka a duel with words.
Free will of choice operates as want within need...not within conflicts....unless willingly chosen.
b) Non-dual implies nothing vs everything dual aka suggested nihilism (non) and dualism (dual) to distract one from everything perceivable.
One cannot perceive "non" nor "dual", yet "everything" and "one" is implied in the suggestion thereof. One cannot suggest non/not/nothing without implying everything, and one cannot suggest dual/duo/two without implying one.
Free will of choice binds itself when consenting to suggested nihilism (non) and dualism (dual).
a needed medicine to some poisons that exist.
Poison/poise- "counter-balance"...being implies choice within balance; others suggest choice to counter balance by choosing a side to hold onto. Ones consent then permits those suggesting to become accountants holding one accountable to ones choices.
COUNTER; noun - "table where a money lender does business; table or bench of a merchant or bank" aka to compute - "to count, sum up, reckon together".
What's the opposite of poison? Remedy/remederi aka ones response to heal/kailo/whole... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heal#etymonline_v_6245
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-prodigy-poison-lyrics
- "I got the poison, I got the remedy"
- "I got the pulsating rhythmical remedy"
- "I got the pressure, the pressure"
Who's singing that? MAXIM; noun - "an axiom, statement of a self-evident truth"
I'm curious.
Miao...
Do you have a way to express a connection to/desire for/appreciation of the One, once words fail?
a) A way (inception towards death) to express (life)...can't be had; sets connections apart; tempts resistance with desired temptation; moves value (perceivable) through evaluation (perception).
b) Words fail because one ignores to be a rising in-stru-ment during fall of sound.
c) Connection doesn't appreciate one...it tempts one to desire another.
There can be only one...one for all and all for one...alone aka all(in)one.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svJvT6ruolA
Bonus edit: Which one of The Prodigy killed himself? KEITH FLINT aka keith/kith/gno - "to know" + flint/splei - "splice; split" aka splitting knowledge to start fires... https://genius.com/The-prodigy-firestarter-lyrics
Researchers are not inclined to study "nothing" as cause -- it is an intentional act of finding some thing.
a) Everything (perceivable) implies cause for each effect (perception) within.
b) Ignoring cause (perceivable) for another effect (suggested) implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing)...few suggest nihil-ism to tempt many to de-nial everything for nothing.
c) Responding to a search (research) implies ignoring everything already perceivable for searching for something suggested. Few suggest progressivism to tempt many to seek outcomes, while ignoring origin.
d) Intent (Latin intetus) implies stretching out within, hence as reaction (life) within action (inception towards death)....few suggest "intentional acts" to tempt many to ignore stretching reactions outwards.
Consenting to a suggesting implies submission of self to another, hence repression of self, instead of expression.
Sleight of hand: "Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/madonna/humannature.html
d) Having choice implies being at center of balance...consenting to suggested choices inclines one towards another, which imbalances self.
of course it's a gene
Generation implies being (life) within course (inception towards death) aka in line. Few suggest "of course" and "online" to invert perceivable for consenting many.
key questions on everyone's mind
a) Momentum (all perceivable) generates each ones mind (ones perception) as temporal memory of matter within ongoing motion.
b) Questioning another "locks" one to suggested answers by others, while ignoring that all perceivable sets each ones perception free from one another.
Key aka "instrument for opening" tempts one to ignore being instrument (perception) within sound (perceivable) aka an opening (life) within a closed environment (inception towards death).
MIND telling us who PAYS
a) Payment...it's many who pay with their minds when consenting to suggestions by few.
b) Suggested pluralism (us) tempts perceiving singular (one) to sell self out to others.
c) TELL; verb from Proto-Germanic taljan - "mention in order"... implies mind paying for order.
Sleight of hand: "Pray Tell" aka a request for information aka ones consent (pray) to another ones suggestion (tell). In nature one pays for ignoring perceivable (need) for suggested (want).
different than us
Differentiation implies singular (one)...suggested pluralism (us) implies equalization.
AI doesn’t have desires or the ability to “want”
Using artifice (want) over natural (need) enables AI with DESIRE; noun - "to wish to obtain" hence waiting for an answer when asking a question.
Few utilize suggested artifice to tempt consenting many to disable themselves within natural, while expressing desire.
outside the box
a) Side implies within a box aka in-between left/right + front/back + up/down.
b) Few suggest outside as the inversion of inside, and the-ism to tempt many to stand under few through willing authorization.
it's own empire
EMPIRE, noun - "authority of an emperor; dominion"...asking AI implies giving dominion over answer to artifice, while ignoring to be free (choice) within dom (balance) of nature.
some billionaire who can afford
a) AFFORD; verb - "to put forth"...only flow (inception towards death) puts forth form (life), hence making being affordable aka enabling effort.
b) A jew calls it chutzpah to get away with something hidden in plain sight like BILL ON AIR...
No one believes or trusts you.
Trust implies self inflicted bondage to another, while denying free will of choice. Trust a jew and a gentile abortion will be delivered.
You destroyed good faith and made the truth impossible.
a) Faith implies holding onto, which in return establishes conflicts of reason such as good vs bad and truth vs lies. No matter which side one holds onto; one becomes stuck to the conflict itself.
b) Inception towards death implies destruction and formation of life...only during destruction can one build. Notice that to build one requires ingredients...it's destruction which separates ingredients from one another.
c) This (inception towards death) makes; this (life) remakes aka responds to being made.
You chose to remake your world with the ingredients "faith; good and truth", while ignoring balance, which implies the ingredients "distrust; bad and lies".
d) Impossible implies within possibility...others suggest "without" as the inversion thereof.
There is air around you like corpses, and the decay of rotten flesh
a) Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) moves through one...holding onto anything establishes a "circular" conflict of reason within self, which is what tempts one to move "around", instead of being (life) moved linear (inception towards death).
Adapting to linear movement aka air moving through one implies SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, spiro, to breathe) - "air in motion"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/spirit
b) Being implies difference (life) during sameness (inception towards death)...few tempt many to react "alike" and consenting; believing; having faith implies alike behavior aka order following aka submission of self to another aka self imposed slavery.
c) DECA'Y, verb (French dechoir, from Latin decedo/decado) - "to fall"...only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life). One cannot ascend without decaying.
Notice a penis...no germination without shrinking.
complete
Few suggest filling (plete) together (com) as the inversion of depleting (inception towards death) apart (life).
תודה על ההשראה
"ready to drink" is just like "fast food"...the vendor has to dump it on predefined intervals. The wholesale through retail market is based on long term storage.
So this guy's (mike) a thorn in the cabal's side.
Nature transmutes from same into differences...few within tempt many to get MXD (mixed). Cabal/cabbala/qibbel - "to receive, admit, accept" implies each one of many consenting to be mixed with one another, when consenting to suggested collectivism...which in this case is hidden underneath consumerism.
As for Mike/michael/mikha-el - "who is like god"...that implies a difference suggesting others to behave alike in the name of sameness aka "equality through diversity".
news
Suggested N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) always lures core (ones perception) into periphery (all perceivable)...a destabilization of being.
It doesn't matter where the news(noose) comes from...it always tempts one to put ones neck outwards.
influence
To be implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...others utilize influence to diminish ones form. Influencers lure followers forwards.... https://forward.com/
still watching...like before
Forward being (in motion) cannot be still (not moving)...keeping watch tempts one to ignore that everything moves.
it's all fragmented
Frag/frago - "to separate" + ment/mentis - "mind"...all (motion) separates (momentum) minds (matter).
nobody in the real public would be tuning into any of that shit.
TUNE, noun (Latin tonus) - "sound"...ones within all cannot "tune out". Reality cannot be tuned out by those within...only ignored/denied, and ignorance among many implies host environment for parasitic few.
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole"...hence affecting each partial effect within.
b) Good vs bad implies dissonance within sound, hence effects fighting each other, while ignoring to be affected by sound.
c) To say implies putting words together; to being implies as instrument set apart within sound.
d) HEART, noun (Latin cor, cordis, and allied to Eng.core, or named from motion, pulsation) aka motion (inception towards death) driving pulsation (life)....hence BE (being) AT (direction towards).
In short...being implies core (perception) within periphery (perceivable) of sound.
Because awe/aue - "fear; terror; apprehension" implies towards outcome, which has to be advertised (suggestion) to those who ignore origin (perception). Without some advertisement how would one know what to be afraid of?
Also...some/sem - "one together with" inverts one apart from one another.
Well (will) coming (inception towards death) to be (life) back from origin.
- Curse/cursus/course (onward movement) from root kers - "to run"
Being implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...running with onward movement curses one, hence few putting the spell of progressivism upon many to curse them out.
- Descendant/descendre - "to come down"
Being implies temporary rise (life) during ongoing fall (inception towards death) hence coming to be up from down under (underground; nether-realm etc.)
I think they like this godlikeproductions cause these guys are religious, eh. lol. That razzes them. lol.
God (same) produces differences...others suggest likeness, and ones consent to a suggestion implies binding self anew aka Latin religio - "to bind anew", hence binding ones free will of choice set free by "God".
The issue...The word "GOD" was suggested by others and ones consent to hold onto it contradicts sameness (all perceivable) differentiating (ones perception) through motion aka movement (moving mind).
In short...produced beings behaving alike contradicts god setting each one apart from one another.
it transmits what your damn brain thinks
Consenting to suggested information permits another to define; redefine and contradict what ones damn brain thinks.
phone transmits
Phonic transmutes aka all perceivable sound transmuting into each instrumental ones perception.
real deal
DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate; hence, to divide in portions; to distribute"....reality deals from all (perceivable) into ones (perception).
Buying into a suggested deal...sells one out to another.
AI that runs everything deals with everybody simultaneously
If many ignore nature (perceivable) for artifice (suggested); then many respond simultaneously instead of as separated units.
like a cube
Left/right + up/down + front/back...ones perception within all perceivable.
who knows
Consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore perceivable (knowledge).
Apparently, entities get confused?
Entity implies being within, hence separated from whole, and differentiated from one another. Consenting to a suggested apparition tempts those set apart from one another to fuse together (con-fuse).
mirror
Origin (perceivable) + mirror (suggested)...ignoring former for latter implies seeing through the looking glass.
Sleight of hand: "mirror; mirror (repeated suggestion) on the wall (ignorance) who is the fairest one (perception) of all (perceivable)?"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWflyssB9i8
- EX'ORCISE, verb - "to adjure, to bind by oath"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/exorcise
Ones consent to a suggestion binds one by oath to another, while adjuring self with a burden...that's how exorcism works.
supplication
Solicitation of suggestion tempts supplication of consent. It's why a few merchants rule many consumers.
possess
Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; taking possession of suggested information gets one possessed by it aka whatever one holds onto; drags one down with it.
a) Bio (life) weapon (choice)
b) Suggestion implies ahead (towards outcome); perception implies astern (in response to origin).
a) Worth of ship implies measuring animation....worshiping animals implies holding onto; while ignoring being animated.
Applied to topic...holding onto memories about dog, while ignoring momentum of children.
b) If one measures up; then one keeps self down.
Welcome back.
How about this? Equator/Ecuador - "which runs through it"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Ecuador#etymonline_v_32136
Aka which (inception towards death) runs through it (life) aka sameness running through differences.
Equator/equate - "to make equal". Nature doesn't make equal; it differentiates each one within from one another. Can you show me equal without putting yourself at odds with whatever you show me?
a) What am I covering up? What do I shill for? Where does the potential for you to suffer annoyance originate from?
b) Fed/federal implies "covenant, league, treaty, alliance" aka a coming together...everything I write is about nature setting apart.
Look no further than free-will-of-choice
a) Looking/locking restricts free will of choice.
b) How could one look at "no"?
c) Further implies farther along, hence going with the flow instead of resisting (life) it (inception towards death).
you want a fake
Need implies real (perceivable); want implies fake (suggested)...its ones free will of choice to discern or ignore this.
Are ALL accounts here completely authentic?
a) ALL (perceivable) authorizes each ones (perception) free will of choice.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies taking on a debt aka an account. Therefore...accounting interdicts authorization, while re-authorizing another (chosen one) over self (ones choice).
c) One (growth) implies deficiency within all (loss)...complete (having no deficiency) contradicts being, which is why a jew suggests perfectionism to trick gentiles to aim at reaching completion.
would be the best way to subvert this place
Suggesting "best", which establishes a conflict of reason (best vs worse); which can then be rebranded into "upvote vs downvote" for the gentiles to fight each other over, while ignoring that there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
Ones consent implies ones SUBmission, and the resulting conflict of reason implies turning against (verto; versus) others, hence sub-version.
How can you change the consensus?
All changes (inception towards death) into each one (life) by internal differentiation...a jew suggest gentiles to come together (con); while ignoring differentiation of sense (sensus).
In short: One can only sense moving differences...suggested "consensus" inverts that.
all shapes and form
A jew suggest AND (conjunction) to tempt gentiles to ignore that flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life) by setting apart...not by joining together.
you will never suspect
Suspect/suspicio aka sub (under) specio (view)...focusing on another narrows ones sight. Look at this... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/suspect.html aka knowledge as the opposite of understanding.
their different personas
Per sonos (by sound) implies differentiation (ones perception) by same source (all perceivable)...a jew suggests pluralism (they) to distract singular (one) from discerning this for self.
A jew can utilize different personas because a gentile ignores being a different instrument within same sound, when joining other gentiles.
No, not everyone who disagrees with me is a shill
a) SHILL, verb - "to put under cover; to sheal; to shell".
b) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to put everything perceivable under the cover of ones wiling ignorance.
c) Agree vs disagree implies a conflict of reason aka a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested fiction, while ignoring perceivable reality.
In short...consent; ignorance and reason are the foundation of shilling, and it's ones free will of choice to put that cover over self.
How could there be a single within a connection? What connects a chosen ONE?
Latin religio - "to bind anew" aka to connect together aka to ignore singularity aka to ignore "thou shalt have no other gods before me".
Aka native (life) within generation (inception towards death)...set apart from one another.
What could matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) hold of or lock up? How could one look at without locking in ones sight?
a) What about everything perceivable?
b) BUT aka butan/beutan aka BE (being) UTANA (from without)...an inversion of being (life) within (inception towards death).
Aka mine - "belonging to me; in my possession; held onto by me"...now consider the nature of a mercantile contract aka selling (to give) and buying (to take).
How is it that a mercantile few have everything when a consumerist many takes everything?