Are ALL accounts here completely authentic? If you are a Jewish Unit8200 staffer what would be the best way to subvert this place or other forums like it? How can you change the consensus?
Shills come in all shapes and form. The worst shills are the ones who you will never suspect of being one.
Imagine if donpon, XxxRDTPRNxxX, DrLeaks2 and vpnsurfer are all the same person? It only takes one staffer hired full-time to completely subvert this place and 4 or 5 more forums like it. They can have a simple piece of software to manage their different personas and accounts.
-donpon spreading flat earth.
-DrLeaks2 making endless posts about nothing really with a dedicated effort.
-vpnsurfer pretending to be just a normie hanging out on a conspiracy forum
-XxxRDTPRNxxX pretending to be an American Jew fully supportive of his people who can do no wrong.
And a few more accounts that are created some time ago and made couple of posts who can be revived.
No, not everyone who disagrees with me is a shill nor is everyone supportive of militant Jewish militias. And one or all of the above could be legit users who are not shills. But you must also consider the possibility that there are some shills here and it's interesting how their tactics is mostly about deflecting hate and anti-Jewish sentiments into targets which are not the cause of anything.
Are "Negros" or "Sand Niggers" the cause of everyone's problems? Whose behind it all? What is the root cause?
a) ALL (perceivable) authorizes each ones (perception) free will of choice.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies taking on a debt aka an account. Therefore...accounting interdicts authorization, while re-authorizing another (chosen one) over self (ones choice).
c) One (growth) implies deficiency within all (loss)...complete (having no deficiency) contradicts being, which is why a jew suggests perfectionism to trick gentiles to aim at reaching completion.
Suggesting "best", which establishes a conflict of reason (best vs worse); which can then be rebranded into "upvote vs downvote" for the gentiles to fight each other over, while ignoring that there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
Ones consent implies ones SUBmission, and the resulting conflict of reason implies turning against (verto; versus) others, hence sub-version.
All changes (inception towards death) into each one (life) by internal differentiation...a jew suggest gentiles to come together (con); while ignoring differentiation of sense (sensus).
In short: One can only sense moving differences...suggested "consensus" inverts that.
A jew suggest AND (conjunction) to tempt gentiles to ignore that flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life) by setting apart...not by joining together.
Suspect/suspicio aka sub (under) specio (view)...focusing on another narrows ones sight. Look at this... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/suspect.html aka knowledge as the opposite of understanding.
Per sonos (by sound) implies differentiation (ones perception) by same source (all perceivable)...a jew suggests pluralism (they) to distract singular (one) from discerning this for self.
A jew can utilize different personas because a gentile ignores being a different instrument within same sound, when joining other gentiles.
a) SHILL, verb - "to put under cover; to sheal; to shell".
b) Suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to put everything perceivable under the cover of ones wiling ignorance.
c) Agree vs disagree implies a conflict of reason aka a conflict shaped by ones consent to suggested fiction, while ignoring perceivable reality.
In short...consent; ignorance and reason are the foundation of shilling, and it's ones free will of choice to put that cover over self.