incurring heavy losses
INCUR; verb - "to bring an undesirable consequence upon oneself"...does heavy (life) loss (inception towards death) imply an undesirable consequence for oneself or an opportunity to be oneself?
an excuse to attack
Excuse/excausa aka out of cause, which implies effect (perception) out of cause (perceivable)...not an attack.
A jew tempts gentiles into conflicts of reason (attack vs defend) to seek excuses from outcomes, instead of origin. Hence: "You will be sorry once I'm done with you".
In other words...gentiles excuse and seek excuses from others, while ignoring to be EX within CUSE/CAUSE.
israel created
YISRA (to resist) EL (all) implies being one (perception) within all (perceivable)...not created out of nothing.
A jew suggests creationism to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore resisting.
jews are running from Israel
a) Each jew (singular) implies israel (one resisting all)...suggested pluralism (jews) tempts consenting gentiles (already collectivized) to ignore that.
b) Only nature runs/rei - "to flow"...gentiles ignore ones sight within nature for what a jew shows, which permits a jew to "run the show" for gentiles...and since nature flows..."the show must go on".
both white and negro
Nature sets white (pure light) and black (absence of light) apart from one another, which establishes spectrum of visible light aka color.
Few suggest identiarianism (identical; same) to mix colors together, which when consented to by many, will be ripped apart by nature. Many willingly ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested), which permits few to craft artifice, while utilizing natural order against many holding onto artifice.
As for South Africa... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry_in_South_Africa + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Droit_Humain
"Le Droit Humain is a global Masonic Order, membership of which is available to men and women on equal terms, regardless of nationality, religion or ethnicity."
Always artificially equalizing differences, while distracting from nature equally (inception towards death) differentiating (life).
The lord giveth, the lord taketh away
a) Giveth (inception) and taketh (death) within (life) a way (inception towards death).
b) To lord implies to dominate (balance) freely (choice) aka towards (motion) dominating (momentum) freely (matter).
be content
CON (together, with) contradicts being apart from one another.
equality is a blasphemous
a) Equality (inception towards death) generates diversity (life)...few suggest diversity to establish equality as the inversion to equalize differences among consenting many.
b) BLAS (to speak) PHEME (utter/outer)...hence putting perceivable sound into suggestible words aka spell-craft.
Sound cannot be uttered by anyone within without ignoring that sound sets apart, while anything uttered implies putting together.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never shared
- And no one dared disturb the sound of silence
c) https://www.etymonline.com/word/Hottentot#etymonline_v_14499 aka stammer/stummer - "being mute".
Also...HOT (heat) TOT (death)...only during process of dying can life heat up. Motion implies cold; matter resisting motion implies friction aka heat generation within cold velocity. Cold implies lack (loss) of resistance (growth).
As long as they are around....apartheid...as it should be
To be implies apartheid (ones perception) within wholeness (all perceivable), hence apart from one another. As long as one (singular) chooses to view another as they (plural), so long does one ignore apartheid within wholeness for togetherness within conflict among partials.
What we need
Need (motion) separates want (matter)...one needs to resist wanted temptation. Choosing want over need implies matter holding onto each other, while ignoring that motion (inception towards death) sets matter (life) apart from one another.
Few suggest pluralism (we) to singular (one) to ignore self for others. Nature doesn't generate WE...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one). Generation implies external velocity (inception towards death) generating internal resistance (life) aka action generating reactions aka motion generating matter aka whole generating partials etc.
box
Ones sight within left/right + up/down + front/back implies being within a box...few draw a ring (circular reasoning) around the box (sight) to tempt many to fight each other.
your psyche has been captured
Psyche (animating power) cannot be captured while being (life) animated (inception towards death)...others suggest "your" to tempt ones consent to hold onto the suggested, while ignoring the animating power.
Try to fit everyone in
Being one implies set free from one another within all, hence separated...not fit together.
playing the people against each other
Playing implies ones consent; game implies suggestions by another. To play implies ones plight (solemn oath) to another by taking part in a suggested game/gamble, which implies falling for temptation hence getting addicted/added to loss.
real problem
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka problem (life) responding to solution (inception towards death)...few suggest many to solve problems, which implies dissolving self when consenting.
system they created
- SYS/SYN implies together with
- THEY implies suggested pluralism
- CREATED implies suggested creationism
Using these words implies ones consent to be together with another, ones ignorance of being singular aka apart from one another, and ones ignorance of being trans-formed (life) within flow (inception towards death)...not created out of nothing.
Infrastructure aka infra/inferior (below) and structure/structura (fitting together)...the hidden hand underneath communication networks.
Look into...Ericsson - 'Helping to shape a world of communication' aka the Wallenberg family. Their motto... Esse, non Videri (not to be seen).
third eye
a) There can be only one eye/ouga - "to see"...one's sight.
b) Counting implies putting together, which implies focusing, hence narrowing ones sight.
a sort of cornerstone
a) CORNERSTONE; noun - "stone which lies at the corner of two walls and unites them"
b) Unity implies one...two contradicts that.
c) Choice isn't a cornerstone within balance (left/right), but an adaptive center within a moving circumference.
d) A cornerstone is utilized to affix a center, while sort/assort - "to line up" implies different center (life) within same line (inception towards death).
Pineal gland
Consider PENAL (punishment) GLANCE (snatch of sight)...does ones mind gets punished for snatching/taking into possession ones sight?
Could others exploit that punishment by tempting one to snatch (consent to suggested) ones sight (perception within perceivable)?
to see the full picture
a) If one could see full, there would be no possibility for improvement for ones sight. Only while being (life) diminished (inception towards death) can one grow.
b) A picture implies a captured moment...ones sight implies free within momentum.
every other generation prolly tried to destroy evidence of the old one.
Does the "evidence" of spring need to be destroyed or does winter take care of it anyway? Does spring destroy the evidence of winter? Where's the evidence that spring and winter happen within the same motion?
A little bit of a stretch
Aka a little bit (life) of a stretch (inception towards death)...
hands are a very unique aspect
A unique manual (Latin manus; hand) aspect within an auto-matic system. If hand is manual, then what is auto? Notice that a hand wanting to hold onto something needs to let go...where does the force of that need originate from?
sounds alot like the aether
a) SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken; whole" implies same. Only after sound breaks, can different parts within respond (resonance or dissonance) alike each other.
b) Aether aka aēr (lower air) + aithēr (upper air) implies a separation of; within and in response to sound.
Sound (motion) to aithēr (momentum) to aēr (matter)
c) LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance" aka CHANCE, noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"
Few suggest "alot" to tempt many to consent to chance, while ignoring to be effect (choice) within known cause (balance). Consenting to suggested chance implies gambling for a stake while squandering self away.
Force surrounded...electric universe...carving
Why carve within a force that shapes? If the electrical patterns are inherent, then why utilize magnetic effort to carve them into other shapes?
there may be a deeper operation of the Universe facilitated by these connections
What happens if electricity connects? Do those within electricity need to avoid connection with electricity? To be within an electric universe implies being set apart from it and one another...
what I just described
Describing to others and carving within electricity...what's the difference? Could a description be inscribed into memory? How does electricity generate memory?
it is necessary to build society where everything is measured in something completely different.
Society implies together; difference implies apart. A jew suggests society to collectivize gentiles together, which in return tempts each gentiles to ignore being a partial within whole nature. The collectivization of many implies the debt each one within is carrying along for a few.
Cash is not worth any efforts
"Is not" implies your effort to evaluate a suggested value by another. This evaluation implies your consent permitting those suggesting values to shape values for your to evaluate. You are being tricked to evaluate something reevaluated (suggested) from value (perceivable) by another.
All ones efforts are drained by another if one ignores value (perception) for resale value (suggestion).
CASH, verb - "to convert; turn; exchange", hence exchanging reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion) by turning away.
the % of people that believe in the holocaust is at an all time low. Yet they still "worship ZOG"?
The % according to whom? Did these people get their holocaust percentages from zionist occupied governments? Does consenting to suggested percentages imply ones belief in it?
check out this Gallop poll
a) POLL, verb - "to take the votes of". If one votes by free will of choice and a poll takes the free will of choice of voters, then...?
b) Could few utilize suggestion to SPUR consenting many into GALLOP aka into consenting to progressivism?
When you can't trust....people will believe anything
Believing implies trusting...both imply ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence giving credibility and authority over self onto another.
collapse of credibility...more gullible
What if giving credit to others implies selling self out? What if giving credit implies being credulous/gull/gullible?
without trusted authorities, ppl just believe anything.
Does that which authorizes ones free will of choice require trust or does trusting another contradict ones FREE will of choice?
If choice can only exist within balance, then does choice need to believe in balance to make choices?
a) Before implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death)...hence being within that which moves forwards. Tick tick tick...what could that imply?
b) The EX in exist implies expression (outwards) which implies from within, and the separation of outward inwards implies motion.
c) TIME, noun - "a particular portion or part of duration"...that implies a partial within whole, hence made durable within action (dur-ation).
d) Notice that "before" implies as opposed to after....a conflict...not within time, but within your thinking aka your reasoning.
What if all the above described can be distracted from by suggesting one to measure time aka to take a count (account) within duration? How could one count something that "existed before time itself"?
Nature WAS separating from whole into partials before one within can choose to suggest what truth IS, which divides one against one another within a conflict of reason (truth vs lie).
Separation implies forwards; division implies against...hence a turning aka a tournament (turn of mind) into circular reasoning.
how to summon up entities
Sum implies "together"; entity implies being apart from one another. Few summon entities by collectivizing many together.
DIVISIVE, hence truth vs lie.
The moment you realise
What realizes moment(um)?
being replaced
If being replaced implies being responding to place, then what place/plateia/plat - "to spread; sprout" does one respond to?
own land
Can one own natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) while being processed within it?
a) Why can a lie be faster than truth?
b) What drives artifice?
c) Can one take away reality, while being (life) within way (inception towards death) of reality?
d) If the google/goggle is over ones eyes; then all search results are on top.
natural conclusion
Nature reveals by setting apart...those within suggest conclusion to tempt together.
For example...suggested liberalism tempts one to seek to be liber/free, while ignoring that perceivable nature already set one free...otherwise one couldn't use ones free will of choice to consent to a suggestion, which in return binds one to another.
distort reality
Reality implies linear direction (all perceivable through each ones perception)...ones consent to a suggestion implies ones ignorance of perception, hence twisting/distorting ones view.
Furthermore...ones consent (agree or disagree) to any suggestion establishes a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka circular reasoning in ignorance of linear direction.
Fiction (reason) distorts reality (implication)...if consented to.
Target told to stop calling the police over crimes
- Target: "They are shooting at me"
- Police: "Bro..."
- Fiat (antisemitism)
- Derivative (persecution)
- Interest (blame)
Ones consent to suggested fiat permits another to charge one with interest, while drawing derivatives from ones self imposed burden.
escalation ladder
Few are given the high ground by many lowering themselves when consenting to suggestions by few. Trying to climb towards those who hand-down, while lowering self...doesn't raise one.
In other words...a slave doesn't become master by kissing up to a master. It's a master who suggests slaves to master each other by kissing up, while kicking down.
they couldn't have their own discernment
a) They/their (plural) contradicts ones (singular) self discernment.
b) Separation (Latin discernere) implies within motion, hence during change...which cannot be owned/possessed/held onto by one being (life) moved (inception towards death).
empty vessel
a) There's no lack (empty) within whole (all perceivable) for each partial (ones perception)...unless one chooses to ignore all (perceivable) for one another (suggested).
b) For a vessel (life) within sea (inception towards death) to be able to float it has to be buoyant... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Buoyant
c) Ones mind/memory becomes an empty vessel for the suggested information by others IF one ignores perceivable inspiration (sound) moving through by consenting to hold onto suggested information (words).
downloading propaganda
Aka downloading (consent) propaganda (suggested information) into an empty (ignorant) vessel (mind).
use their own minds to see
Seeing implies ones sight within all...focusing on something owned/held onto mentally tempts one to ignore that.
Few suggest many to leap forwards...
...while commemorating many passing (inception towards death) over (life).