interlinear descriptions...
...trying to breach the ignorance of those revolving definitions during circular logic.
vs letting go
The need to let go isn't in conflict with the want to hold onto. It's wanting to hold onto, which establishes a conflict against not wanting to hold onto. This conflict of reason (want vs not want) implies circular logic ignoring interlinear implication.
"spell"ing in order
Order implies sound; being implies chaos within order struggling to sustain self. Spelling among chaos tempts a struggle (reason) against each other, while ignoring each ones chaotic struggle (life) within all order (inception towards death).
From a different perspective...if being implies chaos within order; then a spell like "order out of chaos" inverts being.
Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) implies ordering a chaotic world by putting the parts together which whole of nature sets apart during motion. Few trick many with spell-craft to hold onto words, while ignoring the motion of sound.
Many believe that holding onto definitions by belief; faith; conviction; contracts; consensus etc. represents a defense of order against chaos. Only in their mind/memory it does...the perceivable outside cannot be held onto without destroying self, and so they seek shelter mentally by holding tightly onto suggested information; brands; words; truths etc.
helpful
Nature reveals all that each one can receive...self discernment can only work within "full" nature. Choosing to ignore this establishes a lack of self discernment, which implies emptiness within self by willing de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
Nature helps self discernment by setting choice free...ones desire to posses wanted tempts ones free will of choice to bind itself to the wanted, while need "passes over"...
The rite of passing over requires one to "stand-under" (understand) another...
How to execute an executive? Holding the title "executive", tempts one to ignore execute; verb - "to carry into effect"...
Nature carries into effect...if those within hold onto anything, then they get executed non the less.
greed
Before greed (wanting more)...one chooses between need (resistance) and want (temptation).
Need cannot be held onto, which makes want the desire to posses.
Punishing those that are greedy.
Aka GIVING punishment to those wanting to TAKE more...how does that inspire letting go?
What if one cannot give another without ignoring that all was already given to each one within nature? What is nature not giving those within?
Universal recognition
Universe aka uni (one) versus (against) implies one against another, which tempts one to ignore responding (re) to all (tion) perceivable (cogni).
These conflicts against each other about each others suggestions are called "reason"...
life is the ultimate value
a) Value was (perceivable) before one can evaluate (perception) what others suggest its value is.
b) Ultimate implies "coming to an end"...which tempts one to ignore "coming into being". The former tempts towards outcome, while the latter implies ones response to origin. This is how others can turn ones mind by inverting perceivable reality with suggested fiction.
to give...once
Nature gives all (perceivable) to each one (perception) at any moment...not "once" something else is being suggested.
doesn’t remove debt
Doesn't implies "does nothing", while remove implies ones response to being moved withing everything....ignoring latter, while holding onto former implies debt.
so many flaws
Not flaws...one dissolving flow, hence CURRENT-cy.
many more problems than it solves
Each problem (life) dissolves within solution (inception towards death)...no exceptions.
fixes most of these problems.
A temporary problem (matter) within an ongoing solution (motion) cannot be fixed. Problem/proballein - "thrown forwards"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem
One cannot affix that which moves without ignoring being moved.
bartering
Barter/barater - "to cheat; deceive; haggle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/barter
To haggle implies "cutting uneven", hence odds (choice) alternating within even (balance)...the status quo of being.
Without a centralized currency
Being implies center (life) within current (inception towards death).
personal debt
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies a moving origin...taking hold of anything, while being moved implies taking on a personal burden upon self by another, hence a debt.
Wealth Inequality
Odds (ones evaluating perception) can only exist within even (all perceivable value). Even moves; odds alternate within motion.
Financial Fraud
Finance/fin - "end"...life hasn't ended yet, so consenting to finance defrauds life.
Market Speculation
Speculation implies a setting apart of special (partial) and action (whole)...a market implies buyer and seller coming together in contract. Market contradicts speculation.
Direct Value Exchange
Being implies expressed evaluation (perception) during change of directed value (perceivable).
Community Building
Nature sets apart whatever ones (unit) within are building together (com)...because nature moves matter into pieces.
Resource Utilization
a) Resource implies ones response (perception) to source (perceivable)...not suggested "resources" by another.
b) To utilize implies "taking advantage"...being implies during (life) advancement (inception towards death). One cannot take that which advances one.
Reduction of Consumerism
All consumes each one...-isms tempt one to sell self out to others, while being consumed within all.
Nature simultaneously increases (inception towards life) and reduces (life towards death)...hence alternation in-between need and want.
il-LUS-ion
Lus/lux - "light" cannot be proven by those within, because being within light implies a separation of light into a visible spectrum for each ray within.
A ray can only discern self to be a part of light...not prove light to other partials lacking SELF discernment.
to be the last...of all.
One can only be (life) within first (inception) and last (death) of all. Why? Because all implies "the first; the last; eternity"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe_0zKVVGQw
That was a stupid Question.
At least I'm able to question...
it doesn't.
a) Does space have force? Does forcing together units have an effect? Does space in-between dissipate when forcing units together? Does cause permit effects to have space in-between them?
b) Doesn't aka "does nothing"...can you explain the unit; state; force and space of doing nothing, and how they effect each other?
US Space Force
If one unites states by bringing them closer together, then how does that effect the force of the space in-between?
objectively better
Others suggest you two objects...better or worse. Choosing either subjects your choice to others.
A jew suggests objectivism to tempt consenting gentiles to subject themselves willingly.
POLE-arity...hence inception/death as the polarity for alternating life; shifting within.
a parody song?
You asked for it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZKeBdYgD90
That's progress!
Progression (inception towards death) needs to be resisted (life)...
Leaked attack preparations on Iran
Meanwhile half a century of mainstream propaganda... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8hEtI9AI0U
- Educate/educere "bring out, lead forth"
That which brings out (inception) and leads forth (death)...one (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow along.
flood the education system
If a student resists standing under a teacher, then that which a teacher brings out and leads forth wouldn't make one feel like being flooded and washed out...especially when a teacher mixes whites with coloureds.
How about teaching yourself the basics...
- What Happens if We Wash Everything Together?
There are a few things that may happen to your clothes if you wash them together, and all of them are bad ones if I might say so! The main thing that happens to garments in the washing machine is the color mix. If you wash everything at the same settings on a washing machine, the dark-colored clothes tend to bring color to the bright-colored ones, and I am more than sure that it has happened to you. Dark clothes have more pigment and that’s why they tend to get on the brightest ones as they ACCEPT the darker colors. If you think about them and vice versa, bright-colored clothes can never do anything to dark ones.
Besides the colors, if you combine a lot of fabrics while using the washing machine, you may completely destroy every small fiber of the delicate fabrics. Plus, besides that, some materials can get shrunk when washed on a washing machine.
alter/altar in the back at the Temple of Edfu
Aka alter/altar (alternating choice) in the back (ignorance) at the temple (temporal discernment) of edfu/idfu (ongoing infusion)...
pre-flood artifact....looking more ancient than
Looking implies locking onto artificial form (suggested information), while ignoring natural flow (perceivable inspiration).
Inspiration flows through one...holding onto information makes one feel flooded by input.
decision Texas ever made
If one is being taxed, then one permits another to make decisions...TAX US (texas) isn't uttered by those who make decisions.
uncomfortable
Nature enables being by setting each apart from one another. Few tempt many together, while tricking them to believe that together (com) is a fortified (fort) place for ones ability (able)...it ain't (un).
Joining others implies a self imposed burden upon ones ability to choose freely. Trying to use free will of choice among others...gets uncomfortable quickly.
Geologically speaking
a) Ones consent to spoken establishes logic aka a conflict of reason within which polar opposites are shifting against each other.
b) Describing earth (geo-graphy) by speaking tempts one to ignore being alternating terra; formed (matter) within polarity (momentum) of sequential flow (motion).
c) Geo aka earth aka terra/ters - "to dry" is why a solid (life) during a fluid (inception towards death) struggles to sustain self during the need to drink and piss.
when
Now. Before or after implies polarity for shifting in-between.
pole-shift
Shifting implies alternation aka frequency aka being free (life) during a sequence (inception towards death).
When is this bitch gonna flip...
a) A suggestion directed towards others tempts each consenting one into polar-opposition of each other aka into a conflict of reason.
b) Consenting to a suggestion binds ones FREEquency into circular logic instead of alternation during sequence.
c) Motion generates momentum (pole) for matter (shift)...the bitch (momentum) cannot be flipped...it's the welps/puppies (matter) who are tricked to ignore dog (motion) for a suggested inversion thereof (god).
by man for man
If it's by and for aka by an origin forwarding towards outcome, then why are readers holding onto what is written?
Does holding onto contradict being (life) forwarded (inception towards death)?
to weed out false righteousness
What if holding onto "right" grows "false"? Doesn't your righteous garden attract the false pests you're trying to weed out?
Holding onto establishes a tether in-between sides...only letting go of one side breaks the bond between both.
What if it's a temptation to hold onto righteousness?
Keep reading
Notice that the letters/words/definitions you read are being given away...not kept.
Notice furthermore that those who give you to read to tempt you to keep, are distracting you with shaped words from a moving sound, which cannot be kept in any way, shape or form.
Is Satan unknowingly working for God
What if God implies work and all perceivable knowledge, while Satan implies ones consent to ignore (un) perceivable knowledge for what others suggest is?
Nature just works...it doesn't tell you what anything employed within work is. Instead...work inspires self discernment by employees through adaptation aka working.
they say oh do this or do that
Hence tempting ones choice to choose one side or the other, while ignoring that choice can only exist in-between sides.
Isn't that what they're supposed to be meaning
Others tempt one to hold onto a meaning, which positions oneself under (sup-pose) the ones suggesting the meaning.
they kind of draw this line
Kindred (life) can only be drawn from within a line (inception towards death).
wind up in hell, they're bad
a) Winding up...down into hell? A contradiction.
b) Heaven vs hell + good vs bad...two opposing sides tempting ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
he's preparing them to head out
a) A head (ones perception) can only operate within (all perceivable)...heading out towards suggestions tempts one to ignore that, hence loosing ones head.
b) To prepare aka "set in order or readiness for a particular end" implies nature setting life into natural order (inception towards death); hence towards death as the end of particular life.
I could keep going on lots
a) Nature doesn't cast lots (plural)...it generates units (singular).
b) Going on implies motion...which cannot be kept, since it moves.
how you're supposed to help people in trouble
By sustaining self as chaos (life) during order (inception towards death), while resisting the temptation of supposition aka of "holding as a belief or opinion; making a hypothesis, assuming as the basis of argument".
The ongoing process of dying implies the only help for temporary life within to sustain itself. Ones growth depends on ones adaption to loss....others tempt one to burden self, while growing within loss.
The more one helps self, the more fruits of ones labor for others. Since labor implies adaption to motion...holding onto the fruits of ones labors spoils exponentially, hence the opportunity to share by letting go of that which one cannot hold onto without harming self.
the "enemy"
Enemy aka within (en/in) friend (amicus)...claiming as "my" establishes another as enemy. If one holds onto "good", then one establishes "bad" among others...that's how balance works.
not allowed if you try to help
a) The ALL in allowed implies everything...NOT aka nothing implies ones ignorance thereof.
b) To help implies TOWARDS support, which tempts one to ignore being (life) supported (inception towards death) by origin. To help tempts one to aim towards death, while ignoring that life needs to resist being moved from inception towards death...unless life wants to die sooner.
how come he just doesn't fix shit himself
Fixing implies putting together...yahweh sets apart whole into each shitty partial within, hence yahweh/hawah - "was"...all was before each one came to be within.
Why do we have to do it?
All does so that each one within can re-do self. You cannot DO anything without nature already doing everything to you...others suggest you to "JUST DO IT" so that you ignore redoing yourself for doing whatever others are suggesting you to respond to, and RE-sponding implies RE-doing.
WE implies ones response to suggested pluralism by another one. No matter how many other ones one joins...one cannot be more than one. WE doesn't exist in nature...those within nature can choose to ignore natural (one) for artificial (we). Why? FREE will of choice makes ignorance possible.
It's like you're on your own and you're supposed to do what he says
a) Nature doesn't say anything aka doesn't shape words by putting letters together...nature sets all sound apart into each one instrument within.
Only during the natural process of sound setting itself apart, can one artificially shape a saying by putting letters, words and meanings together.
b) One within all cannot own anything without ignoring that everything moves. What happens if one holds onto motion?
this Devil guy
Why personify (guy) devil/diablo/diaballein aka DIA "across, through" + BALLEIN "to throw"?
Without such personification, wouldn't it be easier to discern self by the implication of moving verbs like being (life) thrown across (inception towards death)?
Is being thrown (ballein) across (dia) good or bad? The devil in the details...
When you control the media
There's no mediator in-between all perceivable and ones perception...until one consents to a mediated suggestion from another.
Ones consent permits suggesting few to roll together (con-trol) many.
if the jews don't call the shots
Who but gentiles are lining up to answer calls and take shots? A jewish merchant could blindly fire suggested sales-pitches and gentile targets will pop up willingly to get hit.
surviving oral
Sound implies eternal...oration of words within sound implies temporal. Oration cannot survive.
A jew utilizes oration to tempt gentiles with suggested survivalism into holding onto temporal words within eternal sound. Ones consent to that permits a jew to shape temporal within eternal, hence slaves establishing a master of manifestation to rule them.
dumbs us down
a) Seeking to understand implies willingly choosing to "stand under" another. A jew suggest dumb shit (information) to tempt consenting gentiles to burden self with it, when choosing to stand under it.
b) A jew suggests pluralism (us) to tempt each singular gentile to join each other, hence burdening each other.
Many together elevate few apart, hence few masters; many slaves or few leaders; many followers or few teachers; many students etc.
keepers hunted down...and a single monotheist narrative is installed in place
a) Nature implies mono procession and cannot be held onto by anyone within. Holding onto each other tempts one to ignore nature.
b) A jew suggests gentiles to keep, which burdens those keeping, while permitting a jew to hunt self-burdening prey, which isn't really a hunt, but a slaughter of fat cattle within a confinement.
c) A jew suggests narration to tempt consenting gentiles to keep holding onto "meaning; truth; definition; history; belief; information"...which makes consenting gentiles prey to any suggesting few "hunting" them.
controlled opposition... controlling both sides of the argument
a) Consenting to a suggestion establishes reason aka minds arguing from both opposing sides against each other.
b) Many opposing each other within conflicts of reason are controlled by few shaping suggestions.
believe in a book
Aka consenting to mentally hold onto suggested information, while physically focusing ones sight in-between covers, hence binding self to a book, while blinding ones sight.
Few are binding pages together to tempt many to become "bound pages" aka servants in bondage.
neoliberals vs neocons
No matter which side is chosen...consent is given to VERSUS (conflict; war; reason; logic).
Nature operates on implication aka if balance, then choice...choosing a side within a conflict of reason imbalances ones choice.
Like, nothing similar
Being implies differences (life) within similar (inception towards death)...many consenting alike permit few to draw nothing (suggestion) within everything (perceivable) as to equalize differences.
believe in prophecies
Prophecy implies propelled forwards...believing implies holding onto.
Those who hold onto ignore being (life) propelled forwards (inception towards death)...and then they are wondering why prophecy comes into fruition.
refuse admitting
Ignoring prophecy (being propelled forwards) implies refusing to admit change.
Those who refuse to admit change are holding onto "truth", while fighting contradictions aka "lies"...
primary example of advanced cerebral degenerative processes
a) Example implies expression amplified by....primary impression, hence primary impression (inception towards death) generating secondary examples (life).
b) Life being moved from inception towards death implies a singular "advanced degenerative process" for each singular unit within.
I can thus safely conclude
Conclusion destroys units (life) during procession (inception towards death)...it ain't safe to conclude, while being sentenced towards point of death.
a jew has superior planning of millenia duration
"The jewish system of sacred measures, applied to religious symbols, is the same, so far as geometrical and numerical combinations go, as those of Greece, Chaldæa and Egypt, for it was adopted by the Israelites..."
"What was this system? It is the intimate conviction of the author of The Source of Measures that: “the Mosaic Books were intended, by a mode of art-speech, to set forth a geometrical and numerical system of exact science, which should serve as an origin of measures.”
~ Helena Petrovna Blavatsky 'The Secret Doctrine Vol 1'
What is fucked up is people that were declared...
Only nature declares aka makes clear (clare) by setting apart (de)...any suggested declaration tempts ones consent to join in agreement.
ethical concern
Nature sets all perceivable and each ones perception apart from one another...few within suggest CON (together) CERN (perceive) to tempt many into mass consensus towards ethical moralism.
organ donor
Donation/donare/do - "to give"...only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) organs (life). Giving and taking from one another implies repositioning of shares, which imbalances choice.
true etymology
True vs false implies logy aka logic/a conflict of reason, which is a fictitious conflict tempting one to ignore etymos aka actual reality.
Logy contradicts etymos. Suggested "etymology" implies a spell crafted together, which I try to take apart by reverse engineering it.
words
Suggested words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...the latter moves, while the former tempt one to hold onto true or false meanings, while fighting each other about them within conflicts of reason (true vs false).
deduction
a) Nature induces (inception) and deduces (death) life...a jew induces (suggestion) deductions (consent) to tempt gentiles to destroy life.
b) Deduction; noun - "derivation as a result from a known principle, an inference, conclusion"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deduction
Being alive implies an ongoing sentence towards point of death...choosing to hold onto a conclusion (deduction) tempts one to ignore ones life sentence.
sephardic to seeing far connection
a) Not connection...drawn from moving inspiration, hence by seeing far; instead of narrowing ones sight by connecting (focusing) on anything.
b) Notice phonetician from phonic (sound), then apply sound to word....se-phar aka seeing far.
Those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are called DEAF PHONETICIANS aka definitions.
c) From a different angle...Sephardic aka Yehudei Sfarad (jew of Spain)...Spain/span - "drawing distance between objects" aka seeing far.
Lad,boy,youth,teenager,youngster,schoolboy,child,son,laddie,kidnipper,shaver,stripling,adolescent,sonny,boyo,juvenile,boychik,minor,junior,brat,whippersnapper,chap,bairn,kiddie,fledgling,tad,callant,young one.... so many synonymous for "young man" that could've been used.