Wondering about free will of choice from within the confinement of reason...
believe in a singular
To believe implies holding onto...if you are a part within a singular whole, then there has to be separation by motion.
we are all part of whatever it may be
Letting go of ones belief in pluralism (we) allows singular (one) to discern self as partial within whole.
I believe what you do to others
Believing what others are suggesting binds one to others, hence permitting them to do to you.
ripples in a pond
Ripples can only be made within a level (balanced) pond and balance can only exist within motion.
What if matter are the ripples within the momentum of motion?
cant be fathomed
Being can fathom...suggested nihil-ism (nihilo,nothing) tempts one to believe that being can't.
My views align more with native americans than they do any singular religion.
a) Native (internal) implies within foreign (external)
b) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies bound together, while ignoring to be singular.
c) Ones view aka visual perception is based on motion..."my" implies holding onto, while ignoring motion. One cannot take possession over self, while being moved. Others tempt one to cast "me; myself or I" upon self to become possessed by the belief of being able to hold onto self.
This point really reaches out to me for some reason.
a) Those spiritual attacks imply reasoning against others and circular logic within self. Nature moves through one aka in (inhale) and out (exhale) aka spirit without a conflict.
b) A point implies end of sentence...nature moves ones life sentence towards point of death. Reaching towards point (death) established a conflict of reason among sentence (life), which corrupts spirit (breathing).
I want to believe in god
To believe (anything suggested) establishes a conflict of reason (want vs not want), while ignoring that "God" generates all perceivable for each ones perception.
Consenting to a suggestion by another aka "believing" contradicts the first commandment.
I cant believe in something I have never seen
One cannot see ones inception or death...nor does life require to hold onto any belief to be able to discern self in-between inception and death.
Letting go of the belief one holds onto implicates motion...hence being (life) moved (inception towards death). Holding onto ignores motion, hence corrupting discernment.
if god did exist
Reason (did vs didn't) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then)...the former only exists in nature if oneself uses free will of choice to hold onto a side.
he wouldn't want us relying on faith
It's your faith that establishes the would vs wouldn't and want vs not want conflicts of reason against others and the circular logic within your mind/memory.
You think in wouldn't and want because you already gave faith to a suggestion by another. Your mind is now running in logic circles until you let go.
its man that creates
Creationism was suggested by other man and implies something out of nothing aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
It's jewish... "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
more than just the material
Material implies odd; momentum of motion implies even. Nature evens (inception towards death) odds (life).
More vs less implies you stuck within circular logic. More vs less implies an artificial conflict tempting you to ignore that nature offers all perceivable to each ones perception at this moment.
we are born behind a mask
a) Being born implies a natural expression aka a revelation...not a concealment. Choosing to ignore revelation conceals ones mind.
b) Being born implies off-spring aka a setting apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self.
perceive with our limited systems
Only balance limits ones FREE will of choice...choosing to limit self further by consenting to suggested systems implies ignorance and denial of nature.
struggling financially
The FIN in finance implies "end"...being alive implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death), hence ones struggle to grow self during loss.
A jew suggests finance to tempt gentiles to burden self with debt, while paying towards end of life...neither of which supports growth.
a) Positive vs negative aka want vs not want implies circular logic (reason) aka the cycle few draw around many.
b) Many willingly GIVE consent to, while TAKING into possession the suggestions by few...like voting representatives.
Represent implies "show, display, bring to mind by description"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=represent That's what many are taking into possession, for granted, while mentally holding onto it.
That's what one votes for...an artificial show; a divisive play; a dividing script to follow aka a distraction from shirking ones response-ability (choice) by voting for another.
consider themselves white
Con-sider (siding together) can only happen after white (pure) sets itself apart (impure).
genocide of white
White implies generator of any matter within...ignoring this kills self.
white
From within the visible spectrum of light...one cannot see white (pure light) or black (absence of light).
Few suggest black and white together (checkerboard; panda; yin/yang etc.) to tempt many into admixture, hence disturbing the visible spectrum of light by equalizing differences.
what is more important, intention or result?"
IN implies being within. RE implies responding to...both imply a perceivable origin, which one ignores when reasoning (more vs less) about suggested importance.
I would agree that searching for meaning
Agree vs disagree implies reasoning about a suggested meaning one already consented to.
searching for meaning comes before whether something matters.
Only matter can search FORwards...doing so tempts matter (life) to ignore motion (inception towards death) aka the forwarding origin of coming into being.
The truth matters. The truth is the only thing we seek.
a) Seeking truth to hold onto...destroys matter (life) during motion (inception towards death).
b) Only implies motion (oneness)...thing implies matter (ones). Only within motion can one come into being.
the truth of the moon landings
Whatever one wants to hold onto becomes truth...others not wanting to hold onto it becomes lie.
Nature cannot be held onto since it moves. Truth (want) vs lie (not want) tempt one to ignore change (need).
Only through truth
Exchange truth with "motion" and notice that motion cannot be held onto as truth, nor could motion lie.
make correct decisions, protect ourselves,
Decision implies "free from hesitation or wavering"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/decided
Having free will of choice implies ones struggle to hesitate and waver as matter within balance of motion.
Any decision held onto harms ones FREE will of choice through neglect of choosing to adapt to being moved.
identify and fix our problems
Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life) through differentiation, hence setting each being apart from one another.
Identification and fixation dissolves (inception towards death) problems (life), hence destroying being alive in the process of dying.
same process of thought
Thinking implies differentiation. Many "thinking" alike implies equalization...which benefits few.
real or not
Fiction can only exist within reality...and it's shaped by ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of reality.
Few suggest OR to tempt many to consent to alternatives aka substitutes for perceivable reality...that's fiction.
accident or planned
a) Plane (inception towards death) of existence (life)...
b) Accident implies that which comes by chance...an inversion of coming into being as choice within balance of nature.
There are no accidents in nature...unless one chooses to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
would not have purpose
Purpose aka pur (forth) pose (position) implies being positioned (life) forwards (inception towards death)...one needs to resist purpose.
the reasons as to WHY
Reasoning implies a conflict about suggested artifice, which tempts both sides to ignore perceivable nature/nasci - "to be born"; which implies the why of being...
furthering understanding
The longer one "stands under"...the longer it takes for one to grow.
the whole point
Being implies sentenced (life) towards point of death...as partial (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
why events play out the way they do
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...few suggest events and plays to tempt many to ignore that.
I am interested in rationalizing the reasons...as well as the implications and motives
Reason (versus) inverts implication (if/then)...motion (motive) implicates, while reason tempts one to hold onto a side within a conflict against others, while ignoring to be (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In order to substantiate
TO implies towards...natural order (inception towards death) destroys substitutes (life) unless resisted.
Few suggest progressivism to tempt consenting many to think "towards" suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin.
refute ideas
Before one can refute ideas one has to consent to suggested ideal-ism by either agreeing or disagreeing...no matter the side, both find themselves within a conflict of reason against each other afterwards.
give meaning
Nature impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life)...a moving process of action generating reactions. Few within nature suggest many to hold onto meaning which tempts the ignorance of motion.
Holding onto, while being moved, implies constipation...nature flushes the shit out of any constipation within, and many choose to behave like shit, which permits few to treat them as such.
motivation must be explored
Exploration (life) during motivation (inception towards death) aka status quo of being...unless ignored for finding suggested meaning, evidence, opinion etc.
Motive is equally as important as result.
Motive (inception towards death) generates result/resultare/resilire - "resilience" aka life rebounding during the process of dying.
Equal (inception towards death) generates differentiation (life)...few equalize differences by tempting many to respond alike.
Responding alike lowers resilience, which tremendously benefits a parasitic few feeding upon many hosts.
to zero
All is one. A jew suggests nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to encircle one within nothing aka ayin (ein sof). Here's the symbol... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4N9o4RDQ.jpg aka 1 within 0 aka shutdown symbol aka 1 hidden (kryptos) within 0.
when
Now...one and only moment of existence.
a) Women implies pluralism, hence you ignoring nature setting apart for the artificial temptation of putting together.
b) Feeling rejected by many implies wanting many, while ignoring the need to sustain ONEself by intercourse through another ONE for off-spring of yet other ONEs.
c) Reject/reciere implies ones response (life) to being thrown (inception towards death)...not attraction vs rejection among each other, which implies an artificial conflict called "reason".
d) ME implies one claiming self, which collectivizes other ones into YOU...hence singular feeling rejected by multitude.
How could one get embraced by another if one holds onto self?
Drawings are suggested to tempt consent...ignoring consent (rape) implies falling for a temptation.
Subjecting pure implies impurity. Nature was pure before each impurity comes into being within. Being impure (temporary chaos) subjects one to purification (natural order).
Subjective impurity (life) during objective purification (inception towards death)...
don’t draw children naked? Is that difficult?
To draw from implies accumulation...difficult/differ implies separation. Nature separates; artifice accumulates.
That's also why those who accumulate (wanted temptation) withdraw into nakedness...hence wanting to separate cloth from body aka guilt from innocence aka adult from child.
perhaps
Aka by (per) happenstance (haps) aka by chance (artifical) as oppose to as choice (natural).
drawn pics
If one picks/pics artificially drawn; then one withDRAWs from reality. Few tempt this behavior among many by suggesting escapism...no amount of artifice lets one escape from nature.
now the same as real people
Now implies the momentum of same (motion) for each different (matter) person within.
Few suggest theism (the) and pluralism (people) to equalize differences among consenting many.
you have been warned
Warn/wer - "to cover"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/warn
Nature reveals being (been)...few suggest progressivism (warnings) to tempt many to conceal themselves in fear/hope towards outcomes.
to destroy another comment thread
Do you view me unraveling the threads others bind together as destructive? How is revelation a destruction?
I see. It amazes me...
That which amazes ones mind distracts from what ones eyes see.
The mind/memory tempts one to hold onto suggested, while ignoring that perceivable moves. Amazement implies a stunned perception and "a maze" of suggested information held within ones memory.
I see...thousands of times you have been reported
If one reports aka REsponds to PORT, then one ignores to sail the SEA/SEE by permitting others to dry dock one...
They simply will not ban you.
Making suggestions in the name of others (they) while wanting to ban "free will of choice"... what does that imply for self?
What is more destructive...trying to ban free will of choice or the samson option (being free will of choice)?
Ash White Privilege?
a) Is that suppose to be an ash-ke-nazi pun?
b) White implies pure; privilege implies separation...separation contradicts purity.
A jew suggests "white privilege" to gentiles complaining about "black lives matter"... an impure thought aka a chosen privilege by those ignoring purity.
a) A threat implies a suggestion tempting ones consent...feeling threatened by holding onto the thread of fear permits others to pull it.
b) World/vault implies a repository (momentum) for partials (matter) within entire (motion)...a world can never be entire, only enveloped within entirety.
c) Samson aka sam/shem (semi; half) + Son/suh (to give birth) + Option (choice within action)...action gives birth to reacting choices by setting balance in half.
Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death) aka samson option aka nuclear bomb (explosive projection of nucleus).
is the greatest
All perceivable WAS always greater than anything anyone within suggests IS the greatest....suggestion is about fooling the eye of the beholder to ignore WAS for IS.
a) That dudes name is Mutahar/muṭahhar - "purified"...the ongoing process of dying purifies/eradicates anything living within by dissolving impure matter back to pure motion.
Being implies impure aka being within (im) purification (pure)...few call many who willingly ignore this the "unwashed masses".
b) Being implies from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of man (life)...a process of assisted growth during eradication.
Suggested "past; present; future" tempts a perceiving being to ignore ones position at the center of assisted growth during eradication...thinking about past or imagining future distorts ones presence (present).
Preservation
That's a suggested inversion of perpetuation aka inter-course for off-spring...life cannot be preserved; only perpetuated during a moving nature aka during the ongoing process of dying aka during purification of impurities.
A jew suggests preservatives to tempt gentiles to willingly destroy their reproductive system.
pandora tomorrow
As the unwashed masses are fighting each other over wanting to open "pandoras box" again and again, while complaining to loose access to it by few...each one willingly ignores PAN (all) DORA/DO (to give) aka that all perceivable was given to each ones perception.
splinter cell
a) What does it imply to splinter (split) a cell/celare/kel (to conceal; hide; cover)? Revelation!
Nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...ones consent to a suggestion by another conceals ones perception from all perceivable.
b) Concealing that which nature reveals...is a stealthy game.
c) What is Splinter Cell famous for? The third echelon googles...the 3 lights shown cover the 2 eyes for seeing. 3 + 2 implies what? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes
veil
Ignoring what WAS perceivable by consenting to what others suggest IS...that's the veil from within self; obscuring ones sight of all reality with fiction by others.
shelter
a) Being implies eye (life) of storm (inception towards death)...
b) Shelter/shield/skel - "divide, split, separate"...coming into being implies by division of all into one aka by splitting whole into partials aka by all separating each one from one another.
Ones struggle to sustain self by resisting, while being tempted by one another out into the storm...that's what sheltering implies. Others tempt one to seek shelter, hence to reach out and hold onto for protection...that only lures one out of ones sheltered position aka ones only position at center (living) of storm (process of dying).
Naturalism Vs. Supernaturalism
a) Any suggested -ism tempts one to ignore perceivable nature.
b) Only within nature can there be an above (super) and below (subpar).
c) Nature turns each one within apart from another...turning against (versus) each other implies ones ignorance of nature.
solutions for problems
Being implies temporary problem (life) during ongoing solution (inception towards death). The process of dying dissolves each thing living within, hence ones problematic struggle to resist temptation.
spiritual causes
There can be only one cause (motion) of spirit (momentum) for each breathing life (matter) within.
Few suggest spiritualism and causation to distract many from discerning this for self.
want to cling to natural
Being alive implies the temptation of wanting to hold onto, while nature implies the solution one needs to resist. Nature cannot be held onto...other life within nature can, which destroys both. Few therefore tempt many together for mutual destruction.
A suggestion tempts ones consent to "cling" to the suggested aka to mentally hold onto suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since inSPIRation implies the natural spirit moving through being.
social of christ
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies a setting apart from one another...few suggest social-ism to tempt many together for mutual destruction of each anointed christ.
What's the "little secret"?
The big secret/seco - "to divide" implies all perceivable dividing into each ones perception aka revelation.
The little secret implies one suggesting another one to conceal self from revelation.
The big divide implies a center growing outwards, while the little divide implies a center tempting inwards.
allow to win
Nature allows choice to be free...winning or losing binds choice to a side within a conflict of reason.
cliffhanger
Wielding choice during knowledge (known edge) implies balancing a thin line....hanging onto either side imbalances choice faster.
will fix it
Fixing free WILL of choice tempts one to ignore choice alternating within balance.
Television and internet ARE weapons of mass destruction
a) Ones tell-a-vision requires another ones consent to look at visuals shown. An internal net requires consent by those allowing themselves to be ensnared within it. A mass requires the consensual participation of each one joining a mass.
b) Ones free will of choice implies the only weapon of offense and defense...and this weapon can only ever be singular. Few suggest multiple choice to distract many from ones singular response-ability (free will of choice).
c) To amass destroys matter. Motion sets matter apart from one another to allow the expression of growth (life) during loss (inception towards death), which requires from each one a struggle for self sustenance by alternation aka balancing as choice aka resisting the temptation to hold onto.
It's few who remain apart, while tempting many together by amassing them, and each one of many choosing willingly to be part of a mass, is sustaining mass destruction for the benefit of few.
change happens so subtly
Subtle implies by penetration, hence change moving through one like perceivable inspiration...suggested information tempts one to hold onto into, while ignoring the subtle penetration of ever changing inspiration.
A suggestion implies a happenstance aka an occurring of agreeing or disagreeing minds coming together...doing so ignores change by inverting alternation with confrontation.
reflection
Aka ones response (re) to being bend (flectere) within action (tion)...a subtle; penetrating impression (inception towards death) bends into shape expressions (life).
an alternate form
Both CNN and podcasts imply many consenting to suggestions by few...that's artificial alternation. Still few shaping the form of many through collectivization into a mass.
From a different angle...jewish pornographers lured gentile "coomers" with the teen category to watch, which then grew into a critical mass, which allowed the production of "teen" by a jew to be replaced by the production of "amateur" by gentiles themselves.
That's the same modus operandi as from CNN to podcasts...it implies a jew fading into the background, while leaving gentiles the center stage of their own destruction. Meanwhile...the distribution of both teen and amateur porn as well as CNN and podcast news is still operated by jewish conglomerates.
concept of self
Self implies through another, hence intercourse for off-spring. Concept/concipere implies "holding together"...which replaces a moving intercourse, with an affixed contract aka a mercantile exchange between a seller letting go and a buyer holding onto.
Concept implies the artificial opposite of natural reality...conception inverts inception.
A jew stages scenes to tempt gentiles to look at aka to focus attention while narrowing sight. Any such stage implies a fiction distracting from reality.
At a small scale such a scene can be a book tempting the reader to focus sight in-between covers. A little bigger scale and it's the screen tempting the viewers sight inside a controlled frame. Bigger and there's an internal net (internet) within a world wide web controlling users through protocols (http).
And simultaneously the largest and the smallest scale...suggested (words) distracting from perceivable (sound).
Nature moves sound...it doesn't shape words. Few shape words within sound to tempt many to ignore sound for words, hence making all the world a stage.
Whatever a gentile looks at...he ignores what nature moves for what a jew suggests it means by thinking in words; languages; definitions; suggested information; labels; brands etc.
Here for example... https://translate.how/en/tree/
An artificial multiple cross-translation dictionary in 134 languages for a nature that doesn't dictate...a nature where no other life form requires the label "tree".
- Human pointing at tree: "We have 134 different names for this"
- Squirrel living in it; running up; down and around it: "That's nuts"
what do you think is going on behind the scenes?
a) Thinking about a suggested SCENE hinders being within perceivable SEEN. In other words...instead of adapting to what is directed towards ones eyes; a staged scene tempts one to roll with imagination behind the seen.
b) Cheap migrants emptying the trashcans; vacuuming the carpets and mopping the floors...because no one else wants to do it.
If you are a musician, then why are you looking to others for the right frequency to tune your instruments? If you can not hear dissonance while making music, then what are you resonating with?
Doesn't the skill of becoming a musician imply frequenting instruments?
There can be only one...