psychoanalysis, changed our perception
a) Psycho implies animating power, while analysis implies partial responding to whole during animation.
b) Ones perception (partial) implies being changed within all perceivable (whole)...any suggestion by another tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring change.
c) Psychoanalyzing each other by suggesting diagnosis inverts analysis (setting apart) with synthesis (putting together).
Nature implies analysis (perceivable separating perception)...artifice implies synthesis (consent upholding suggested).
psychological techniques
Logi (circular logic + conflicts of reason) tempts one to ignore psyche (implication of being animated).
Techno/tekhnē implies artificial (suggestion), which tempts one to ignore natural (perception).
Holding onto implies artificial want, letting go implies natural need...psychological techniques are used to suggest one to want to ignore need.
Hunger implies need; appetite implies want...tempting appetite with suggested consumption of food implies a psychological technique to distract from hunger. If many ignore hunger, then few can utilize famine against many...and not just famine of food, but information; confirmation; absolution; interaction etc.
It also shifted the "center of world trade"...
what this is?
A suggested image (artificial representation) tempting each consenting ones imagination to conceal what nature reveals.
Ai generative thing?
Nature generates things...artifice tempts things to hold onto, which nature destroys.
photo shopped
a) Consenting to a suggested photo implies buying into what another sold.
b) Photo implies "light", which generates analysis by setting itself apart into a spectrum for each ray within. A suggested photo inverts this by tempting a synthesis with ones consent.
to join in the effort
Aka an effort towards outcome...tempting one to ignore being an effect of origin.
light wins
a) Win vs lose conceals...light reveals.
b) Light generates a spectrum, within which rays are set apart from one another. Win vs lose implies rays joining each other in conflict, which tempts each to ignore (dark) discernment (light).
Light is knowledge
Knowledge (perceivable) WAS before one (perception) came into being...suggesting others what IS tempts one to ignore that.
likelier that it will
Each ones free WILL of choice was set apart from one another, hence allowing each one (perception) to respond to all (perceivable)...few utilize suggestion to tempt many to consent alike.
In other words...same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...few equalize differences among many aka equality through diversity.
energy war
War/wers - "to confuse; mix up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/war#etymonline_v_4825
a) Energy cannot mix, because all implies one in energy. With what could energy mix?
b) Energy sets itself apart internally into action (inception towards death) and reactions (life). Reactions reacting to each other (suggestion); while ignoring action (perception)...get mixed up, hence blending back into action, while loosing access to react.
still correct
Cor-rect implies being moved together within a straight line... https://www.etymonline.com/word/correct#etymonline_v_19105
Motion sets matter apart from one another, so neither could one move together, nor remain still, while being moved.
Basing ones assumption on a conflict of reason (correct vs incorrect) tempts many to respond alike to suggested conflict by few, which turns (versus/vertere/wer) many together in mutual destruction.
from around...years ago
a) How could linear time be a-ROUND?
b) Ago/agon - "departed; passed away"...how could a-ROUND circle depart or pass away?
behold...which say they are
a) A jew suggests SAYings to tempt a gentile BEing to HOLD onto it by consent...it doesn't matter what a jew says, only that gentiles behold it within self (circular logic), while fighting each other (conflicts of reason).
b) Coming (inception) into being (life) implies procession (death)...holding onto implies the temptation to ignore resisting being moved.
revelation
a) Action (inception towards death) reveals reactions (life). To be implies REVEL during ATION.
b) Reacting to each other conceals action...hence, holding onto a suggestion tempting one to ignore perception.
we are all interconnected threads woven together
a) All sets each one apart from one another.
b) Few tempt many together (tikkun olam - healing the world by bringing together) to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
a) Chasing after - Temptation - Holding onto...where's resistance?
b) Chasing after diminishes resistance.
c) Holding onto grows temptation.
possession of an evil spirit
Consenting (taking into possession) to a suggestion permits another to breathe (spiro/spirit) life into the suggested, which becomes a dead weight burden upon those consenting to carry it.
derived from the word
De (division) rivo/rivus (stream) implies the division of all perceivable sound into each ones perception within.
A jew suggests words to tempt gentiles to consent to a definition (definite; affixed), hence ignoring that which moves (inspiration) for that one takes possession of (information).
COVID is DIVOC
Invert implies "turning into opposite direction"...being implies in-between (life) opposites (inception/death) during same direction.
Origin and outcome imply same...only in-between can differences come into being.
Edit: Dybbuk aka Debug (removing faults)...
a) Notice the flag in the background... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=doublecross
b) Alien/alius - "another". To be implies one apart from one ANOTHER through alternation.
An "alien abduction" implies abduct/abducere - "to draw away" aka another one drawing one from way (inception towards death) of alternation (life).
An UFO (unidentified flying object) implies each alternating being, hence not identical, but different from one another, when flying/flowing as a formed object from inception towards death.
So inceldom?
a) IN (being within) CELIBATE (unbound aka free) DOM (dominance aka in-between boundary)...being implies free (life) withing dominance (inception towards death).
b) Suggested inceldom hides "involuntary" aka by ones own free will of choice. Why? Because ones consent to a suggestion implies shirking ones free will of choice to another, hence binding self to another.
c) To bring this back to male/female balance aka giving/taking...male needs to resist taking; female needs to resist giving. Neither can abstain the temptation of the other. Hence self sustenance implying a struggle.
A jew inverts this by suggesting males to "give it all you got" and females "you can take it...you are just as strong as them". This is how you'll get incels and sluts...the former draining themselves in isolation, and the latter getting filled up in company.
tl;dr: An ongoing division cannot be possessed by parts within, and pretending to be free from boundaries to one another (inceldom) only distracts from the original division of whole into partials...a division (inception towards death) which inspires resistance (life).
perhaps
Per (by) haps (happen; to come by chance)...by implies ones origin, while chance implies ones lack of self discernment as choice (matter) by balance (momentum) of nature (motion).
Putting together PER and HAPS implies suggested spell-craft tempting ones consent to hold it together. This is where choice gets inverted by chance, hence consenting to a suggestion implying a gamble.
universe
Aka uni (one) + verse/vers/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verse#etymonline_v_4738
Nature implies oneness (motion) turning (momentum) into ones (matter), hence an internal setting apart/separation/differentiation/transformation of whole (all perceivable) into partials (ones perception).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many together, hence "turning" them against one another within conflicts (versus) of reason.
Therefore it's on oneself to either discern self as verse within uni or ignore it for suggested "universe", which turns one against one another.
for us
Oneness (whole) forwards ones (partials) by setting units apart from one another...few (chosen ones) tempt many together with for example suggested pluralism (us) aka United States aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
Once again it's on oneself to discern that UNIT implies apart from one another, while suggested UNITY tempts together.
Energy implies singular...not plural. All implies one in energy. Pluralism implies a fictitious suggestion to distract ones singular perception from all perceivable singularity setting itself apart internally/inherently aka energy.
to observe and name it
a) Ob (before) serve/servo (to keep)...a forwarded (inception towards death) being (life) cannot keep anything.
All perceivable moves through ones perception as "inspiration"...others suggest "information" to tempt ones mind/memory to hold onto it. Those who hold onto information are ignoring to draw from; within and in response to inspiration, while permitting others to shape information at will.
b) Motion through momentum into matter implies sound through spectrum into instrument. That's why ones structured mind within sound can specify voice.
Misusing voice to utter artificial words, which tempt others to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix), while branding the moving world around them with "meaning" establishes dissonance within sound.
Words tempt one to ignore ones response (re) to sound (sonance)...
Notice that the picture you posted doesn't show "lake washington"...but a jpg branded "lake washington" for many to share among each other, hence domesticating their memories to associate picture with label. That's idolatry.
to imply that action cannot reflect is stating the ends without recognizing the means.
a) Implic-ATION aka if/then implies origin (action) and outcome (reaction)...unless ignored by ones reacting choice for another ones chosen suggestion.
b) Cannot aka suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything acts upon one, for one to be enabled to re-act.
Choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested) implies balance as origin of choice...even when ignored.
c) Responding (re) to being bend (flect) implies ones stance within the visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion) as a ray (matter) bend from one another.
Any suggested "state" tempts one to ignore ones position within all.
d) Mean/medius/medhyo - "middle" implies effect (matter) in the middle (momentum) of cause (motion).
Consenting to a suggested meaning permits those suggesting to "mediate" through "media" as a centralized intelligence agency what happens in-between cause and effect.
e) Suggested "without" tempts ones perception to ignore being "within" all perceivable.
implies pick of nature
To pick implies to choose from...nature (motion) sets apart (momentum) choices (matter), which only then allows picking.
Nature cannot choose (react)...nature (energy) enacts (balance) reactions (choice). Only inside of balance (inception/death) is choice (life) required for the sustenance of one self among one another.
Nature (motion) nurtures (momentum) natives (matter)...natives wield the free will of choice to ignore nurturing nature for artificial curation by one another. That's how nature allows each unit within to learn/teach self about consequences of choices aka "fuck around; find out".
moves up and down to match water levels of two given water bodies.
a) Only while being (life) moved (inception towards death) can one respond to left/right; up/down; front/back position aka balancing as choice.
b) Few suggest "mix and match" to distract from equal nature (inception towards death) differentiating each off-spring within (life) from one another.
c) Oneness (whole) gives ones (partials) temporal access to being a part...chosen ones tempt choosing many into a dual (two) conflict of reason aka a "dual duel" about access to suggested information.
Buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts one (perception) to ignore all given (perceivable). Nature cannot be bought and sold...unless ignored by the majority within for a few merchants of temptation suggesting a trade towards traitors, who willingly sell themselves out.
to get high af
Aka bending out of shape, which nature orders by forcing balance upon ones choice....hence feeling down after getting high. Few suggest many to mix uppers and downers to keep the imbalance going.
bender from Futurama
Bender aka bending the rules, which shows robot/robur - "strength"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Roboration
Rama/ramate - "stands still"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/Rama#etymonline_v_3323 Those who watch a bending of rules in the future are pretending to stand still, while ignoring being (life) moved (inception towards death), which diminishes strength.
Looking implies observation without action
Choosing to look implies reacting while within enacting input towards ones senses.
I looked at the hot waitress
Looked/locked aka waitress/wait rest aka rest-aurant aka re-store...all branded to distract from being moved.
My action of looking
Looking implies re-acting to what can be seen, which nature enacts as input through each beings outputting senses.
Few suggest actors under directors to distract from action (motion) directing (momentum) reactions (matter).
My Bowels continues to move
Nature continuously moves hunger through the bowels of each temporal being tempted by appetite. Choosing to resist hunger grows strength to the temptation of appetite.
Nature implies the continuous need to let go for those within struggling with the want to hold onto...hence all the bowel re-movement issues aka indigestion.
a) JPG implies a digital compression of an image aka the further manipulation of a captured moment (picture).
Nature implies the ongoing motion generating the MOMENT-um for each temporary perspective within...few suggest many to look at (lock onto) captured moments (pictures) to distort each ones perspective within the momentum of motion.
b) If one stands at lake washington, then ones choice to look at it implies ones response (re) to being bend (flectere) by nature.
In short...nature implies action; each thing within implies reaction. Action cannot reflect...only re-action can re-flect upon action.
c) It's oneself looking/locking onto either the suggested jpg (picture) or as the perceiving sight, which mirrors/mirare - "to look at".
Nature continues to move, while those within look/lock onto things...which bends (flect) ones responses (re).
mass media lies are actually directives
Fictitious directives towards outcome tempting those who consent to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death) within actual origin.
Truth vs lie (fictional) distracts reaction (life) from action (inception towards death).
which lies to regurgitate
Ones consent regurgitates any suggested truth or lies until withdrawn from aka letting go of, hence holding onto information establishing circular logic aka internal regurgitation of external "food for thought".
Suggested information (fictional) tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration (actual) cannot be held onto or regurgitated.
In my personal view
Person aka per sonos (by sound)...claiming mine distracts one from being insane aka in sanus (within sound).
Others suggest THE VIEW to distract ones sight from being within moving sound by tempting one to focus aka narrow ones sight to what another shows.
These authors view culture war not as an unavoidable result of widespread cultural differences
Taking a side within a war implies ones ignorance of being set apart from one another. TAKING truth or false from one another establishes the artificial war against each other, while ignoring that only nature is GIVING.
Nature differentiates being...few within tempt many together, which establishes a) like-minded behavior and b) conflicts of reason against each other aka war.
technique to exploit differences
Technique/tekhnē - "art, skill, craft" implies suggested artifice distracting different beings (ones perception) from same nature (all perceivable).
It's ones consent given to any suggestion by another which opens the exploit by closing ones awareness of perceivable.
Example...If I craft a house, then I can tempt those who consent to live in it to ignore the natural need to shelter for the artificial want to seek shelter from me.
Seeking becomes the very addiction one needs to shelter from... https://genius.com/The-rolling-stones-gimme-shelter-lyrics
The very main goal is controllable and obedient crowd.
What if a suggested outcome (goal) tempts those who consent to be obedient to and controllable by those who shaped the suggestion?
What if each ones perception within all perceivable implies a response to origin...not a consent to outcome?
Just look at any woke person
Does looking/locking onto a suggestion make one awake to per-sonos (by sound) aka to being (perception) by sound (perceivable)?
the way it was meant to be.
The way (perceivable) was before one came into being (perception)...others suggest meaning to distract one from that.
a) Asking for liberty permits answers to be held within captivity...
b) Only during DOM-inance (inception towards death) can one be FREE (life)...
Nature doesn't reflect...each one within responses (re) to being bend (flectere). Few suggests mirrors to invert that by tempting many to hold onto the reflection thereof.
Mirror/mirare - "to look at" implies ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable) looking/locking onto what another shows (suggested).
- Cause what you see you might not get
- And we can bet, so don't you get souped yet
- You're scheming on a thing that's a mirage
- I'm trying to tell you now, it's sabotage
I've gone from being...to having to
A being cannot have/own/possess inwards...only express potential outwards.
You'll eventually notice that changing sides within a conflict of reason (for vs against) doesn't impact the outcome of a suggestion (Connor McGregor).
A jew suggests Connor McGregor fighting within a ring, to tempt consenting gentiles to reason from outside whose gonna win or lose. Simultaneously a jew suggests narratives including Connor McGregor to establish a ring (circular logic) within each consenting gentiles mind/memory, as to manipulate both sides within the resulting conflict of reason (for vs against) among gentiles.
A gentile is being tricked to believe that consent given (to buy) implies possession gained over suggested (to sell)...while ignoring that perception (life) within perceivable (inception towards death) cannot hold onto anything.
we are to believe
WE implies ones (singular) belief in suggested pluralism. Holding onto such an -ism tempts one to ignore the implication of TO aka being (life) moved from inception TOWARDS death.
Be-lieve implies BEING LEAVING...the state of being.
who lied...in order to
A lie can only be shaped within the natural order moving life from inception TOWARDS death. A shaped lie or truth tempts one to believe aka to hold onto the suggested shape, while fighting (reason) within a ring (circular logic) about the meaning thereof.
The ongoing natural order doesn't stop for the temporary chaos within choosing to fight each other over fiction, while ignoring reality.
seen all over CCTV
a) If it's a CLOSED CIRCUIT telling a vision, then how did ones sight get in it?
b) How could such a closed circuit represent ALL if each ONEs sight operates outside of it?
c) Is it ones sight when looking at visions told (TV) in shapes within a closed circuit by another?
to have sex
How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?
Yes I agree
Implies tethering self to the following conflicts of reason...YES vs NO; I vs YOU, and AGREE vs DISAGREE.
What a commitment for one to fight in three different conflicts simultaneously...would Connor McGregor commit to such odds?
antichrist
Consenting to a suggestion by another tempts one to ignore self, hence turning one against (anti) the anointed (christ) self.
Anti (ignorance) Christ (self discernment)...it's each ones free will of choice.
the prophecy surrounding
The suggestions by another become prophecy by ones consent, which establishes circular logic within self, hence surrounding ones thoughts with prophecy by another.
debated
Consenting to suggested establishes circular logic within self and conflict of reason against others, hence the perpetuation of debates over suggested information.
fictional callouts of hopes without true basis. Movies.
Mo-TION implies the base for fic-TION. Call outs are made by few to tempt many to watch moving pictures (movies), while ignoring to be (life) within motion (inception towards death).
synagogue
Syn (together) agein (put in motion) ag (to drive, draw out or forth, move)...an inversion of nature putting in (life) motion (inception towards death) by driving apart each one within from one another.
The SYN in synagogue implies gentiles being brought together (tikkun olam) by each jew tempting each gentile to ignore that motion sets matter apart...which implies the AGOGUE.
In short...casting out SYN/SIN.
Sin to Gog
Sin out of Gog aka togetherness (indigestion) out of apartheid (procession).
Nature sets apart; few within tempt many together so that the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) forces temporary indigestion (life) out of the way of few.
GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group
a) Onco - "tumor" + Gyneco/gynē - "female/woman"...
b) Logic/logy - "conflict of reason" aka the grouping of gentiles together.
c) The MA in magog implies MAMA...
Uterus gives inception to life
ALL gives...uterus receives given and carries (gestation) each ONE apart (off-spring).
Sins Of The GOG
SYN/SIN (singular)...hence tempting consenting ones together.
While being moved from inception towards death...life can only hold onto each other, hence putting together (syn) what nature sets apart aka sinning.
is Inception towards Death
Motion WAS before matter (life) can suggest each other what momentum (inception towards death) IS.
Rabbi
Rabbi/robh - "multitude"...hence consenting (slave) to a rabbis (master) suggestion establishing jew (minority) and gentiles (multitude).
That's also the foundation for "robbing"...a rabbi robs ones potential by tempting one to join others.
Owner of the Eye
If one claims self as "me; myself or I (eye)" then one demands a right from a YOU (jew)...because a moving nature cannot be claimed.
The claim of "I" shapes each other one into a "YOU"...and demanding a right from a YOU by making the claim of I implies that YOU owns I.
printed currency
A print implies "impression upon surface"...being implies expression (life) within current (inception towards death), hence sur-face; sur-charge; sur-pass; sur-vival etc.
A jew utilizes print to impress WORD (suggestion) upon the current of SOUND (perception)...within the consenting minds/memories of gentiles.
conflating wordplay
a) I took "flag-pole" apart after others conflated it together.
b) Playing implies gambling for suggested outcome...which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin.
conflating...with reality
Real implies a setting apart of ones RE-action (life) within ALL action (inception towards death)...reacting to each others suggestions conflates consent together.
Information war is by itself is an attempt to break the pattern recoginition abilities of public.
a) Public (plural) implies a suggested aggregate tempting each perceiving person (singular) to ignore self for others.
b) The break implies from all perceivable into each ones perception, while the suggestions by few tempt consenting many together.
It is all about patterns...
Pattern/pater - "father" + about/abutan - "on the outside"...hence pattern re-cogni-tion aka internal reaction (re) perceiving (cogni) external action (tion).
for that moment
aka FORward MOMENTum...others suggest a this vs that conflict of reason to distract one from being matter (life) within forward momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
still could see
How could ones perception see all perceivable without motion aka from within stillness? Meanwhile...believing implies holding onto suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
a) Each ones perception within all perceivable implies a moving differentiation. Therefore...what one sees can never be identical to what another sees.
b) Object/obicere - "thrown forwards" implies flying/flowing.
In short...each one within all implies an unidentified flying object.
ALL implies WAY (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. Whatever tale few are telling implies the process utilized to shape and share that tale.
The trick...the tale (suggested information) distracts those who consent from the process (perceivable inspiration). Why? Because consent implies holding onto, which contradicts procession.