A common fallacy used by shills, particularly those who like faggot Disney pirate movies, is called "nut picking". It's a variation of straw-manning.
Nut picking is taking an extreme view of a random internet dude and not a major figure, and constructing a straw-man fallacy whereby they make it out that this random dude speaks for everybody who disagrees.
Don't fall for it.
Listen to Owen Benjamin interviewing Dave Weiss...the guy funding the trip to Antarctica has a criminal rep sheet for fraud, facing financial debts and a prison sentence.
Dave Weiss was the first "flat earther" he asks to make the promotional trip to Antarctica under the slogan "The Final Experiment", and when Weiss called him out and declined, he went for the next in line...Whitsitgetsit and Jeranism.
In short...having to use sloppy seconds for a final experiment, while mediating the results in the name of the "leader of Flat Earthers" is just more fraud.
As usual...a jew at every step of the narrative.
Truth vs false implies fiction; change implies reality. Fiction tempts one to choose a side; reality sets each each ones choice in-between sides.
Being choice implies within balance...choosing a side imbalances choice.
Nice reply, clear and consise.
You're point is that I am creating a diacodmy of real or not real truther and sides. For simplicity, ya. But I do understand there are grey areas.
But aren't you guilding the lilly with blaming Jew? Jew is unclear and unspecific. Do you mean kzarian Jews that now control media and finance or do you mean Larry, the new accounting specialist at work? The Jew is more dichotomous and misleading than anything I implied by saying a real truther. I meant that real in this use of the word is to be genuinely searching for truth and not a person claiming to be a source of truth.
In the case of true or false, there is no grey area
a) At inception...life is SENTENCED towards POINT of death. A point implies the end of sentence, which is why few suggest many to make points, and come to the point, and point it out, and what's the point etc.
Distracting from life sentence by continuously willing the end of a sentence (point) into reality...a life to death inversion.
b) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest what IS. Ones consent to what IS permits another one aka a chosen one to occult what WAS.
a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka the jewish origin of nihilsim and creationism as in "the manner in which HaShem created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL...which one denies (de-nihilo; division-nothing) when ignoring perceivable for suggested -isms.
c) BUT aka butan/buton aka be-ut...being out. A suggested inversion of being (ones perception) within (all perceivable).
In short...ones consent to creationism establishes a dichotomy between everything (perceivable) and nothing (suggested), which tempts oneself to ignore being within for believing to be without.
The words "creation; nothing and but" signal a jew that the gentile using them has been successfully inverted from reality into fiction.
a) There implies within the visible spectrum of light, hence in-between pure light (white) and the absence thereof (black), neither of which those within the visible spectrum can see.
A jew tempts gentiles to identify as white or black, which by choosing either side establishes a conflict of reason aka a dichotomy...white vs black, which implies both sides MIXING against each other.
This a) equalizes perceivable differences within the visible spectrum of light, which distorts ones sight and b) establishes a grey area, where a jew can operate undercover among mixed gentiles.
b) Area implies "vacant piece of ground; open space; bare space cleared by burning" aka an arid (dry) area.
Gentiles within a conflict of reason are grinding against each other, hence drying each other out, while ignoring to be solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). The jewish suggestion tempting consenting gentiles into conflicts of reason aka into a dichotomy aka into mutual destruction implies a "burned offering" aka a holocaust...
Another example...Amazon selling "KINDLE FIRE" aka amazon (from Iranian) ha-maz-an implies "one fighting together"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=amazon
And then there's pharmacy/farmacie - "a purgative" using pharmaceuticals aka drugs/droge - "dry" to purge solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
Blame implies blasphēmos (evil speaking)...hence me taking apart words (suggested fiction) within sound (perceivable reality).
Using suggestion (word) within perceivable (sound) implies to gild the lily. Sound was filled with beauty/bealte/beauto aka be (being) auto (self) before each being chose to shape sound into words, hence establishing noise aka noisome aka noi (nothing) some/sem (one) aka no-one.
A jew utilizes spell-craft to tempt consenting gentiles into negating the state of being into nothingness.
In their own words: "cause it's the deepest impulse of the jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there is nothing left but a thread. He wants nothing but nothingness"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
a) Nature reveals everything (perceivable) through each one (perception). Nature cannot conceal...it's each ones free will of choice to conceal self from natural (perceivable) by consenting to artificial (suggested); which then makes revelation "unclear" to oneself, hence lack of self discernment.
b) Being implies one (partial) within all (whole); hence specific (life) within general (inception towards death). A jew suggests UN- (not; nothing; nothingness) to distract consenting gentiles from everything perceivable.
You using UN-clear and UN-specific implies your de-nial (nihilo, nothing) of everything perceivable and your willing consent to suggested nihilo-ism by a jew. You choose to hold UN before clear (all) and specific (one), thereby negating both for your perspective.
c) JEW (phonetic YOU) originates by one claiming self as "me; myself or I", which brands every other one into a YOU/JEW.
YOU (jew) implies a liability shield used by others, which hides underneath ME aka the last place one would assume others to hide.
A chosen one is selected by ones choice...an inversion of self.
d) Nature (all) generates units (one) through internal separation/differentiation/transformation, and all is one in EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power".
"There can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one" aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
a) All does, each one within re-does self. One cannot "do"...only react to being enacted upon.
b) All generates each ONE. If one chooses to claim self as ME, then each other one becomes a YOU (jew), which also establishes a dichotomy aka ME vs YOU aka "me against the world"... https://genius.com/2pac-me-against-the-world-lyrics
c) Mean/men - "to think"...asking for meaning implies ignoring perceivable reality for suggested fiction, shaped by others. Notice also the ME in MEaning aka "YOU (jew) give ME MEaning"
That originates from the 1961 speech by Benjamin Freedman... https://archive.org/details/benjamin-h.-freedman-speech-unedited-version-1961
Which prompted the modern narrative: "The ruling elite of the Khazars was said by Judah Halevi and Abraham ibn Daud to have converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th century, but the scope of the conversion to Judaism within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain."
Khazar/quasar/qaz - "to roam"...that's the same trick used for rome (to roam) and egypt (a gypsy; nomad; wanderer; bohemian; rootless aka one who roams).
a) Media/mediate - "middle"...each one (perception) implies middle of all (perceivable). Ones consent to a suggestion permits a chosen one the middle aka central position, while mediating perceivable reality through suggested fiction.
b) Nature directs (inception towards death) apart (life)...many consenting to few rolls them together aka con-troll. A jew rolling gentiles together implies a kike/kikel - "circle", hence establishing circular logic for gentiles to reason against each other about.
A jew doesn't "control media"...gentiles roll together around a mediated suggestion by a jew, which each one does willingly.
In reality...each ones perception implies the medium for all perceivable directed through one.
Larry/lowrie - "a hypocrite" from hypokritēs - "stage actor; pretender, dissembler"...
a) New implies suggested creatio ex nihilo aka creation out of nothing, and is an inversion of perceivable "now". Ones perception within all perceivable can only operate NOW...not before or after.
"There is nothing new under the sun" ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
b) All separates each one from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to count each other, which when consented to, makes gentiles accountable to a jewish accountant.
Here's a jew suggesting gentiles to count... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
c) -ist (specialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (specialism)...joining consent and suggestion together contradicts being special aka apart from one another.
a) It's ones consent to the-ism, which establishes the dichotomy between selected authority (jew) and subjecting being (gentile).
b) More vs less tempts one (partial) to ignore all (whole)...the conflict only exist during ones ignorance.
For implies "forwards" aka towards outcome, which for life implies towards death. ALL generating each ONEs life implies origin...which one ignores when searching for outcomes.
"Seek and ye shall find" is a rhetorical trick tempting one to ignore that only within all (whole) can one (partial) seek. Furthermore, shall, which hides (sh)ALL implies shall/scyld/schuld - "guilt; debt"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shall#etymonline_v_23330
Ignoring origin (all perceivable) for seeking outcomes (another ones suggestion) puts one into debt to another, while guilty of ignorance.
A jew suggests progressivism to tempt consenting gentiles forwards... https://forward.com/
a) Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies source and resolution.
b) A moving source cannot be claimed without ignoring motion...holding onto a suggestion implies such a claim.
True VERSUS false mixes both sides (white and black) within the visible spectrum of light into a "grey" area. Those fighting each other ignore that what they're fighting over was suggested from outside the conflict.
Case/kad - "to fall; decline"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/case#etymonline_v_5432
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consenting gentiles into conflicts of reason against each other, hence tricking them into a case of mutual destruction.
You over analyzed again. Micro focus so hard that you lose the context. And this obsession with English, I get that it's a common language, but all your analytics ignores the etymology of other languages. In fact, it's quite useless to be wrong, but it's almost as useless even if you're right, when your delivery is too long, or hard to follow. Ie, might as well not even try if you're not gonna convince anyway.
And yet, you see me here, year after year, trying to help high IQ people like me, who were stuck in the programming and wasting their minds in endless work getting nowhere. Like Sisyphus, but we use our doctorates to join medical cults that end up killing people. So, much worse than Sisyphus. I presume you would understand the reference.
I convince no one. I waste my time and energy in this succubus because I have to get this shit out anonymously because I can't say these things irl.
I used to hope to meet like minded people, teaching others how to clearly see this most important, foundational component to all the conspiracies after. The mother of all conspiracies before there was such thing. The first major conspiracy against the world was not to convince us that we are on a planet, before that, they convinced us to take toxic injections, start and fund wars to cover their destruction, and for this we pay an absurd amount in taxes and live with ridiculous regulations.
You're too wrapped up in over analyzing words, but you're a LLM or something with these replies, so I'm not surprised. It's not like a regular conversation, but I don't seem to have those anymore anyways, everyone else here are science or jesus cultists.
I delete my account from time to time. We have talked many times before
Con (together) text/teks - "to weave; fabricate; make wicker/wicca framework"... that's what a jew does when weaving suggested information together with gentile consent, which in return permits a jew to "tear at the fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread".
I take context (words) apart to grow (instrument) within loss (sound)...others struggle to hold onto context, while desperately trying to weave more information into it, in an attempt to fix the holes aka "finding the missing link".
a) Few use a compass to draw a circle (logic/reason), and a square to draw angles/anglo/english within the minds/memories of many.
b) Obsess aka ob (against) sedere (to sit) implies gentiles reasoning against each other, while each ones consent sits on suggested information by a jew.
c) I simply reverse engineer words within sound and shapes within motion...among those who choose to hold onto the inversion, which turns them against each other.
One doesn't get...one takes part in suggested common-ism. The more participate; the more common it becomes.
Few suggesting common -isms are centralizing control over consenting many through languages, which represent trade currencies, hence each word (seller) requiring letters (buyer).
ETYMON (true; real; actual)...implies the perceivable sound one ignores, when LOGY (logic/reason) reasoning against each other over suggested words...traded in suggested languages.
I break apart etymo + logy to make ignorance uncomfortable.
That's the LOGY (circular logic within self; conflicts of reason against others) within etymo-logy.
a) Only motion delivers life from inception towards death, which by its temporal nature can never be "too long". Most even complain that it's "too short"...
b) Following is easy, because life is being moved from inception towards death, hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to follow along.
c) If a delivery is brought to you; then why would you follow it? If all perceivable is delivered to each ones perception; then how could all be TOO long; short; much; less; hard; soft etc. for one?
d) What I write wasn't delivered by another...I'm drawing it from within an all one can eat buffet, where one needs to resist the tempting suggestions of one another.
Try/trial/trail aka flow (inception towards death) behind (life)...if one is formed behind flow; then one needs to resist the temptation of moving along, which grows resistance.
Being able to choose in-between resistance (need) and temptation (want) implies might/magen - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/might#etymonline_v_14812
A jew utilizes this magen/magic to trick ones free will of choice to consent to a suggestion, hence to follow along instead of resisting.
Furthermore..."might is right" aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068
a) Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies to stand under, hence ligo/lego - "to collect" aka burdening oneself with the suggested information by another when giving consent.
Intelligence implies a lowered being.
b) Quotient implies "the division of one number by another", hence another tempting one to lower self by standing under, hence dividing low from high.
b) People implies plural; person implies singular...a singular has a hard time growing within a plural, based on lack of space to grow.
Few tempt many together to reduce the space of each to grow outwards. There ain't no high people unless one piles them up, hence each layer understanding aka standing under each other within a pyramid scheme.
a) Work implies energy (internal power). Energy establishes power by division (momentum) of external energy (motion) into internal energy (matter).
b) Division (inception towards death) directs internal energy (life) from beginning towards end within "endless" external energy.
c) The division of external into internal energy establishes a momentary center within an ongoing circumference...this momentary aka momentum aka moment aka mo-MENT implies the mind/memory of each being.
d) As for waste..a beast aka a being (be) who is astute (ast) aka a self discerning being resists the temptation of w-ast-ing self by h-ast-ing after the suggestions of others aka by trying to reach a MARK.
a) Sisyphus/syphos - "the crafty" from craft/kraft - "might; power"...
Power (all) generates potential (one) trough differentiation...choosing to respond "alike" diminishes ones potential.
b) Circular logic tempts one to take into memory more and more suggested information, which makes it harder and harder to push forward.
Sisyphus isn't pushing up a mountain...he amasses a ball within himself, which drowns his resistance until he's forced to let go.
A less occulted version of Sisyphus is called Katamari Damacy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katamari_Damacy
Another convinced one that "no; not; nothing" exists...and that one can claim self as "me; myself; or I".
a) "I" and "my" implies ones resistance trying to hold onto a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death)...what a waste.
b) Time/tima - "temporal duration" tempts one to ignore energy (ongoing action).
Duration implies dura/deru (solid) within tion/action (fluid) aka dura (life) tion (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...TIME (tie me). Time cannot be measured without being tying oneself to measure-ment.
a) The world wide web only sucks those who log/lock into the internal net.
b) Cubus/cubit/keub - "to bend" aka bhend - "to bind"...consent to suggestion binds ones FREE will of choice.
Does one have FREE will of choice irl? Does saying anything binds one to words suggested by others? Does many consenting to suggested words by few establish a common courtesy aka a court of public opinion ruled by few?
Say/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/say#etymonline_v_22810 Try resisting the sooth-saying of others...
a) Hope implies towards outcome...meeting in death doesn't sound like a lively experience to share.
b) Like minded implies hive minded...just tune into "narrative" and tada...as many like minded hive minds as there can be.
c) To meet implies "coming together"...to be implies "apart from one another". Only apart from one another can one choose to meet with one another.
A real meeting (inter-course) sets further apart (off-spring), which is how motion forces matter apart from one another aka coming into being.
ATION implies action, which sets PONERE (position; potential; reaction) apart from one another, not together (com).
Only within foundation aka fall of action (inception towards death) can reactions rise (life).
Con (together) spira (to breathe) tempts one to ignore that first (motion) breathes (momentum) life into secondary (matter).
Secondary doesn't imply two, but seco - "to divide" aka the division of one (whole) into ones (partials) aka the internal division of external energy into motion (loss) and matter (growth).
a) Paying how? By ones FREE will of choice.
b) FOR-wards (inception towards death) sets free (life)...
Using ones choice to select a chosen ones suggested regulations willingly? Sounds ridiculous...
a) How does taking apart words wrap one up? What if taking apart fiction (words) relieves one from self imposed burdens within reality (sound)?
b) Being implies RE (living response) SOLUTION (being dissolved within process of dying).
Few utilize synthesis (consent to suggestion) to distract many from analysis (all perceivable dividing into each ones perception)...free will of choice resolutely utilized analyses to destroy synthesis.
a) Language learning is based on ones consent to the suggested words by another, which among humans is called "civilizing", while upon animals is called "domesticating"...
As free will of choice...one has to analyze the contradiction within that synthesis to remain free.
b) Model/med - "to measure" implies taking measurements in-between points, while ignoring ones life sentence. That's why any suggested model fails within perceivable reality.
a) Con (together) vers (to turn)...turning together implies facing each other within a conflict of reason for mutual destruction.
b) Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies winding being (life) within straight line (inception towards death) set apart from one another.
c) The opposite of "not like" implies "everything different"...what if everything (whole) differentiates each thing (partial)?
Because a want vs not want discussion was never needed. You just participated by joining, from which you then departed by resisting the temptation thereof.
Instead of turning (verse) together (con)...you're now a part within whole, hence within (life) direction (inception towards death).
What does that imply (if/then) for you to not have to reason against others?
Only nature can de-lete aka division (life) of line (inception towards death). Trying to add; save or delete each other distracts one from discerning self.
Taking into account gives others accountability over one.
I haven't said a word on the internet since 2008 (playing Burnout Paradise online)...