jews own OR control it all.
Because a) gentiles believe in ownership and b) because consenting to a jewish suggestion establishes control aka contra (against) rota (to turn) aka turning gentiles against each other within conflicts of reason.
If only there's a connection between British and German aka ashke-nazi...
Compare the Concordia, Integritas, Industria emblem of Rothschild (Bauer) with the coat of arms of Frankfurt...
Did I mention that the Yiddish word "bris" for the circumcision ceremony "bris milah" is pronounced by ashke-nazis as BRIT milah... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bris#etymonline_v_27422
Whitsitgetsit
Listen to Owen Benjamin interviewing Dave Weiss...the guy funding the trip to Antarctica has a criminal rep sheet for fraud, facing financial debts and a prison sentence.
Dave Weiss was the first "flat earther" he asks to make the promotional trip to Antarctica under the slogan "The Final Experiment", and when Weiss called him out and declined, he went for the next in line...Whitsitgetsit and Jeranism.
In short...having to use sloppy seconds for a final experiment, while mediating the results in the name of the "leader of Flat Earthers" is just more fraud.
As usual...a jew at every step of the narrative.
a real truther
Truth vs false implies fiction; change implies reality. Fiction tempts one to choose a side; reality sets each each ones choice in-between sides.
Being choice implies within balance...choosing a side imbalances choice.
real shame that words can be redefined and outlined to common culture, shouldn't be that way
a) Hence way of sound implying reality and shaped words implying fiction. It's mass consent to the definition of suggested words which cultivates a common way of thinking aka a hive mind.
Sound particularizes/differentiates/separates each instrumental being within so that each one can hear the differences among one another within all sound.
b) Being implies within (life) line (inception towards death)...the "outline" of words imply the beginning and end of it aka first and last letter, both of which ones consents LETS another ones suggestion shape together.
It's this fictitious outline, which distracts ones mind from being inline of reality aka the outline of a shaped word tempt one to ignore being within the line of moving sound, where one is being able of shaping form within flow.
shepherd
Herding sheep implies keeping many together, while preventing few from straying apart. That implies DOM-estication of FREE will of choice through a shepherd...an inversion of being free (choice) within the dominance (balance) of nature.
Domestication implies slaves selecting master...
his flock's eternal souls
"His" possession of plural (flock) is based upon each singular sheep choosing to ignore being (matter) within the eternal/ether (momentum) of soul/sole (motion), which requires self discernment, which herding sheep prevents each one from expressing, while following the herd.
hard money
Only within fluid (inception towards death) can there be a solid (life)...holding onto currency tempts one to ignore the flow of current, hence the sleight of hand..."current see".
let the genie out of the bottle
An inversion of generation (genie) bottle-necking (inception towards death) regeneration (life).
Life runs out while being held by death within a bottle... https://img.gvid.tv/i/21STiP5x.jpg
do we back all
All implies the back of each one being forwarded within.
Like no offense
Same (inception towards death) offers differences (life)...few tempt many to ignore that by consenting ALIKE to suggestions.
Taking offense (holding onto suggested) implies ignoring offer (being set free within perceivable).
The secret is that we are highly suggestible creatures
a) Suggestions such as theism (the); pluralism (we) and creationism (creatures)...
b) Secret/seco - "to divide"...that's what one ignores when consenting to a suggestion, hence choosing to hold onto it aka coming together with it.
The insidiousness of the the crafted spell "secret"...nature reveals by division.
unfortunately tied
a) Seeking a fortune ties one to outcomes suggested by others. Only perceivable origin sets each perceiving being free from one another.
b) Consenting to any suggestion binds ones free will of choice.
All our power as a species
Species implies a particular (one) within whole (all). Many ignoring this permits few to wield all power over each ones diminished potential, by simply using all of nature against each one ignoring it.
The difference between power and potential...potential requires each ones choice to draw from power, as to live up ones potential...or ignore it.
all our efforts are tied to survival
a) Living implies being moved from inception towards death, hence living (growth) within process of dying (loss)...zero survial chance for each one choice.
A jew suggests survivalism to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore living within origin for "outliving" outcome.
b) Velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life)...that's the foundation for each ones effort to resist (need) temptation (want), and the path of least resistance implies ones choice to ignore resisting, hence showing lack of effort.
Elites
Aka French élite - "selection, choice" implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
power comes
Coming into being implies from power (inception towards death) into potential (life)...making use of such potential implies each ones FREE will of choice.
they needed to unlock the human potential, but ... They feared losing their grasp
a) Many grasp by consent onto suggestions by few, hence locking onto suggested, while wasting potential.
b) Few suggest terror-ism (Latin terrere; to frighten) to tempt many to fear outcome, while in return ignoring perceivable origin.
convince people using their own visions against them
Visor (suggested) conceals vision (perceived)...if one consents to put it on.
sell a future
Ones perception within all perceivable implies NOW...not before or after. Before one consents...a suggestion describes a future. After one consents to hold onto it...a suggestion misrepresents a past.
Both taking and holding onto a suggestion contradicts all perceivable moving through each ones perception...which can only be drawn from (inspiration), not held onto (information).
come true
One ignores coming (inception towards death) into being (life) when choosing to hold onto a truth, which then establishes a conflict of reason against lies.
Nature cannot lie...nor can those within hold onto nature to make it a truth. Nature changes, and each one within has the FREE will of choice to ignore change. Few distracts many from change by tempting ignorance of perceivable by consenting to suggested.
the goal is meaningless when reached usually....and something must take its place.
Taking a goal by setting a point...tempts one to ignore being (life) sentenced at inception towards point of death.
Ones place is within motion, so any start and finish set into motion tempts one to ignore that motion moves on. Furthermore...one can only start NOW and one can only finish NOW.
It needs a game that never ends..
Need never ends...want does. Games are suggested to tempt players to gamble on wanted outcomes, while ignoring the need to resist the wanted temptation of perceivable origin.
The only solution to replace the current situation
Current (inception towards death) situation (life) aka only generating each aka solution generating problems aka ones response to being placed towards.
will be to change...
Will implies the response of being (life) to change (inception towards death).
We need
Need (all) generates want (one) by setting apart want (life) within need (inception towards death) from one another, which tempts each other with want to ignore need.
a game that cannot be won
Being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...to game implies gambling growth on loss.
Wanting an outcome tempts one to ignore needing to resist origin. Few suggest many to spend resistance against each other (wining vs losing) in a game of chance, where those who loss less are declared winners.
Winning tempts with wanted outcome; being (life) needs to resist origin (inception towards death) to be able to grow within loss.
A jew suggests progressivism like forward.com to tempt gentiles forwards. Historically a jew remains after gentiles reached the climax of their progressive goals in mutual destruction...
doesn't matter what you transmit if the signal cannot break the noise level.
a) Motion transmits (inception towards death) matter (life) as signals to one another by breaking each one apart from one another.
b) Transmission implies level (balance); signals implies odds (choice)
c) Motion implies sound; transmission of sound implies breaking into signal instruments, which only then can make noise among each other by ignoring sound.
In other words...sound generates level; signal (choice) ignoring level (balance) makes noise (imbalance).
a) Conspire aka breathing (spire/spiro) together (con)...it's ones consent which breathes life into the suggestions of another.
b) Behind vs before; stupid vs smart; real vs fake; less vs more; obvious vs oblivious...these represent two sides coming together to breathe life into conflict.
c) Being "excellent" from one another (as Bill said) implies being set apart from one another, not together within a conflict. Hence Ted saying "PARTy on dudes"...
None-ism aka nihil (Latin nihilo; nothing) -ism...consenting to nihil-ism makes one a nihil-ist, while de-nying perceivable for suggested.
socialism...never been achieved
An -ism tempts an -ist to follow. If an -ism could be achieved; then an -ist would have no incentive to continue following.
What -ism was ever achieved?
connected with that inner commitment to action
Action moves and cannot be connected with. Inner of action implies reactions set apart from one another. Commitment implies holding together within mind, while ignoring that everything outside mind continues to move.
driving force in development
Aka driving force (inception towards death) developing minds (life) aka action setting reactions apart from one another.
The government of mars consisted of ten...
Aka control of mind (government) through conflicts of reason (mars; war) by dividing perceivable reality (1) with suggested fiction (0)...it's those who consent to suggested, which then stand together (consist), while ignoring to be apart from one another as partials within whole of nature.
elon
Aka EL (out of) ON (onward)...out of motion (inception towards death) onward matter (life).
a) -ist (socialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (socialism)... Elon Musk as an influencer tempts gentiles with suggested -isms, while pretending to be an -ist.
b) Social/socius/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/social#etymonline_v_23811
Elon Musk is directed to play a leader for gentile followers. He isn't social, but the opposite...private; exclusive; special; selected.
c) Shifting resource implies turning (shift) the responses (re) of gentiles against each other and away from origin (source). Following another implies ignoring source.
d) Most vs least implies a conflict of reason among gentiles about a jewish suggestion. Both sides mutually destroy each other.
There's no most vs least conflict in nature...only each one being (partial) within all (whole) of nature.
e) Nature generates beings, which implies a being to be the product of nature. Only nature produces products...each jew tempts gentiles to ignore that by utilizing suggestion (fiction) to sell perceivable (reality) for the price of gentiles selling themselves out, when buying into it.
Example for lack of production among beings...only set apart from one another can there be intercourse in-between one another, which leads to a further separation of being aka each OFF-SPRING.
In short...a partial within whole cannot add anything to whole. Production implies from whole into partials, hence a separation/differentiation...apartheid.
because they’re a little different?
Cause (inception towards death) differentiates beings (life) by setting each apart from one another. Few equalize differences among many by tempting together. Why? So that few can remain different, while many mutually destroy each others differences.
As in...a jew tricking gentiles to amalgamate, which in return makes it easier for a jew to remain a jew.
autistic
Autism was coined by (((Eugene Bleuler))) who together with the father of psychoanalysis ((((Sigismund Schlomo Freud))) conspired to "conquer psychiatry"... https://img.gvid.tv/i/gBLxX6jE.jpg
Nowadays gentiles willingly label each other as autistic; which implies the jewish conquering of their minds was successful.
on the spectrum
Spectrum implies a setting apart of each thing within. One cannot be "on" the spectrum; only "within" it.
A jew suggest spectrum disorders as the inversion of the natural order aka whole (motion) generating spectrum (momentum) for each partial (matter) within.
Gentiles cannot see this, because each one ignores being a SPEC (special; partial) of whole, while trying to be part of each others groups. If many join together, then few remain apart/special, while many become "unwashed mashes; plebeians; common people; NPCs; order follower; peons; slaves; cattle; mixed multitudes etc."
neurodivergent
Neuro/nerve - "drawn by strings" contradicts divergent/diverse - "apart from one another".
Nature sets all perceivable and each ones perception apart from one another, while each jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentile consent, which attaches a string to each consenting gentile.
Gentiles ignore perception, while being controlled through suggestion by a "hidden hand" operating outside each gentiles grasp.
I keep on hearing
Holding onto (suggested information) contradicts hearing (perceivable inspiration). Nature moves sound through each being within...a jew suggests words to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore sound.
This "keeping" of words is the foundation for idolatry, which tempts gentiles to brand each other. This in return permits each jew to shape acceptable and unacceptable brands for gentiles to be controlled with.
a) As flat as the screen one looks at...
b) GGG = 666
draw you in with hidden plight
Aka the temptation of suggestion drawing ones plight/pledge of consent into hiding from perceivable.
using "hello".. you begin by using the word "hell
Entrance aka IN TRANCE + Exit aka X IT... endless such rituals hidden in plain sight for those with eyes to see.
Heaven/heave/habban "to hold, possess"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heave#etymonline_v_6257
Holding onto aka taking into possession implies becoming possessed by.
Hell/hel/kel - "to cover; conceal; save"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hell#etymonline_v_9125
Entering heaven by taking into possession conceals one in hell...until one exits by letting go.
it became viral
Viral - "caused by a virus" aka Virus - "poisonous substance"...
Few utilize "poisonous substance" to invert "poise of essence" among many.
Produced by Danny Duke
Daniel/dan - "to judge" + Duke/deuk - "to lead" aka the sovereign prince of darkness leading the heavenly choir.
Check out the line up of his minions... https://www.dannyduke.co/
If it's catchy; then it tries to ensnare...
Iyah May
Iyah/Iaiah/Isaiah/yeshayah - "Yahweh is salvation/has saved" + May/mæg/magh - "to be able, have power" aka using magic to deliver into salvation/salvare/sol - "whole".
you kind of have to go against them.. even family.
a) Even and odds aren't against each other...even (inception towards death) generates odds (life).
b) For vs against implies two different sides turning alike at same conflict, hence mutually destroying each other within a conflict of "reason".
Few equalize differences among many by tempting them into conflicts of reason like for vs against; me vs you; even vs odds etc.
give me a year...I can get...middle aged guy, kind of like giving up.
If one ignores all given for wanting to get more, then one takes from other ones, who in return feel pressured to give up.
chain stores
Nature cannot be chained or stored...those within trying are perishing faster by ignoring nature.
I've got those 375 business ideas
Idealism keeps the mind busy...what about the heart?
You (ones perception) shall have no other gods (suggestions by another) before me (all perceivable)...
new orleans
What about the "old" Orleans? Before being renamed into Orleans/Aurelian it was called Genabum (bending water)...an allegory for bending solid (life) within fluid water (inception towards death) aka the waters above/waters below.
What does reuniting Rome and Gaul imply? Putting together those who roam (life) within all (inception towards death).
interesting connections
Interest aka during (inter) being (esse)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=interest implies a setting apart of essence (life) during substance (inception towards death).
Drawing connections tempts one to ignore being apart from one another...
solomon...72 demons
Solomon aka solo/sole (alone) + mon (provider), hence demon/dai-mon aka dai (divider) + mon (provider)...
72 aka seven (split even) + two (divided apart) aka divided apart (life) during even split (inception towards death)...
astrology
- People they come together
- People they fall apart
- No one can stop us now
- Cause we are all made of stars
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1rFAaAKpVc
a) Logy/logic/reason tempts the singular one to confine self with circular logic, while turning against others within conflicts of reason.
b) Looking/locking onto a constellation of stars distracts from ones point of few being a part of the constellation aka con (together) stella (star).
protect the essence of
Substance (inception towards death) exposes essence (life)...few suggest protect aka pro (forward) tegere (cover) to tempt many to ignore being exposed.
technology serves as a tool for enhancement rather than a force for subjugation.
a) Force (inception towards death) releases potential (life) by setting apart...technology is being put together to subjugate separate potential.
b) A mind can only be enhanced by ones choice to resist the temptation of burdening it...resistance is fertile.
Perceivable inspiration moves through ones perceiving mind, while suggested information tempts one to hold onto it, which in return burdens self.
As we enter
Only each singular one (life) can enter (inception) and exit (death)...a plural can only be shaped after entering; burdens the singular, and gets destroyed before exiting.
What if communism is simply a tool to make people yearn for religion again
Suggested -isms tempt consenting -ists together, hence into a commune. Giving consent to a suggestion binds ones "free" will of choice to another, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Communism to Catholicism
a) Whichever one chooses...consent to -ism is given to few by many.
b) Commune implies together; catholic implies apart, hence cathode and anode.
dark to light dialectic
a) Nature generates light (motion) towards (momentum) dark (matter)...only within motion can matter obscure each other by casting shadows, as well as obscure (ignorance) light (discernment) within self.
b) Dialect implies one vs one, hence friction generating sparks, which ignites fire...that's the burned offering one needs to resist, because fire distracts from light.
Social implies gentiles coming together; media implies each jew mediating information to tempt consenting gentiles together.
Only within all (whole) can ones (partials) be divided into major and minor.
A jew suggests pluralism (groups) to trick each single gentile to filtrate into (in-filtrate) aka joining by consent to a jewish suggestion.
A jew exists within any group before a gentile can join, because grouping together is an inverted fiction, shaped by a jew within a reality that sets each one apart from one another.
To join implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion, while ignoring that all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another.