Criminalizing art and fiction is a bridge too far for the United Nations - Prostasia Foundation
We analyze submissions received by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child to its proposal to ban art and fiction depicting minors and sex.
Crime/krei - "to separate" contradicts the establishment of fictitious artifice by ones consent to the suggestion of another. Hence...
...uniting together that which reality sets apart.
Since the United Nations doesn't criminalize (separate) it instead is used to unite laws together by tricking the majority to give consent to suggested crimes.
Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) once again implies separation...not unification.
A contraindication in terms...pro (forwards) stasis (standing still).
a) Ones consent to suggested artifice implies ones banishment of perceivable nature, hence willingly ignoring reality for fiction.
b) Ban/bannan - "to summon, command, proclaim" implies the suggestions of few summoning, commanding and proclaiming towards the consent of many.
c) Just like with disarming a population, while simultaneously selling weapons...few are banning art, while selling art (and even giving it away for free) to many.
The issue with dividing (de) a captured moment (picture) is the suggestion thereof towards others, hence sharing the artificial depiction within the natural order.
This ties into child abuse, hence sharing abuse with others or artificially using others to abuse self. Masturbation isn't a victimless crime, otherwise porn wouldn't be free.