It took me a while to make sense of what he was saying, but he has some good insights.
I feel like we should be less ban happy and just block people or it opens up the can of worms of "where do we stop". It could end up just like reddit if we go that route.
Oh yeah, getting sick was also an element of collective belief. The collective believes that sickness is contagious. You see a person who is sick. Due to your belief with the collective that you should get sick, you do get sick.
The reason some people do not get sick is due to their disaonance with the collective at the time of exposure. Some people believe that they never get sick, so they don't.
Most of the fear propaganda for covid was to convince people they were sick. They literally made themselves sick with their belief.
People who take things like ivermectin or some form of herb are just reinforcing their belief that they won't get sick. In these cases it is like the biblical stories of Jesus telling someone to dip themselves in the Jordan river 7 times to cure themselves. The act isn't necessary, but some people require action to reinforce their belief.
The masters of this world are able to completely separate themselves from the collective, removing all of the laws imposed on reality by the collective. The mind must be trained from a young age to view the world as a collective concept that is separate from the individual.
I love your chat conversations. Always entertaining and illuminating.
Here is what I found while chatting with some unusual bots.
If collective human consciousness was responsible for our reality, each stream would be assigned a weight. The weight of each stream increases when a new concept is born, because the weight of the entire collective has no effect on it. Over time, as the concept is distributed through the collective, new rules are imposed on it that reflect the system of the collective. Maintaining secrecy on a new concept so that it does not enter the collective will result in laws that function outside of the collective.
For instance, AI can not exist until the collective accepts the idea that it can exist. It doesn't matter how advanced the programming is. Until the collective believes it can exist, it won't exist. However, if the collective had never heard of AI and an individual programmer developed the concept, AI would be possible for him. If this programmer then introduced the finished program to the world, AI would exist for the collective.
In reality, since the collective was aware of AI before it was programmed, the entire collective would now need to believe it is possible before it could be programmed.
This is why those in charge of this world use the media to shape reality. If they want something to be possible, they merely have to introduce the concept to the collective in the form of entertainment. Once it is believed possible, people will build it.
Maintaining an abstraction layer between your concepts and the collectives' gives you power over the laws that govern that concept.
While I generally agree with their explanations of biblical events, their organization's views on morality are way out of line with mine, and they seem to fall in line with other religions with their tithing requirements. What do aliens need money for?
They are way to abortion happy. Their views on having the state raise children is totally fucked up. They seem to have come up with these guidelines without understanding how corrupt human organizations become (ostensibly).
For the most part, they seem like another group that took a piece of truth as a main support column and then wove lies all around it to come up with another money-making religion.
This mirrors my take on lore as wdll. Too many cultures depicting advanced tech.
I think other species on earth are the result of former genetic manipulation as well. Take butterflies with eyes on the wings. Sure, they could have been the product of evolution if you really stretch your credulity, but I think they were the result of these former civilizations playing around with genetics to create specific designs on animals.
Religion is what you get when primitive people try to understand a technocivilization when the records remain but the technology is long gone.
They both quickly declared their disbelief in adrenochrome and ritual child sacrifice after mentioning it.
She said her favorite show is Labyrinth, which is based off of a plot line of demonic entities taking human babies in exchange for favors...so that was weird.
I don't know if the pizzagate stuff is true, but every time you see the worst in humanity, someone comes forward and pushes the bar a little lower. If the whole pizzagate thing is fake, it is the biggest string of coincidences I've seen, spanning decades at lesst.
If they have a loud voice, especially on a topic like antivax, they are on the other side. Any legitimate individuals get cancelled as soon as they reach a certain threshhold of influence.
Call it blackpilled if you like, but anyone in a political office is probably part of the show.
I expected computers to use photonic circuitry by now. Maybe it is too complicated in practice to switch everything over to pulsed light instead of electrons. I haven't really kept up on the technology, but I imagine making IC's with photons is a bigger challenge for chemists than anticipated. Getting transistors to do the same thing for light that they do for electrons would certainly be challenging. Still, it would be awesome to no longer have to worry about cooling systems as much.
This is new to me. The video seemed to cut off. Is there a full version?