0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

The biggest problem today are stupid narratives instead of facts. It seems the press won't air coverage unless it's a narrative used for propaganda and agenda. As result it becomes debatable or contentious.

How is gaining 1km significant. It is pointless. Not worth any coverage. Why, could be for a number of reasons least of all normal combat.

Instead it gets turned into bullshit. Who cares until facts occur.

Until it is every single story covered today, gossip. I should stay out of this, but constantly with everything aired about this conflict, it's the same story. What is fact. Until it's easier just switching it off completely, like the rest of any coverage.

-1
Ep0ch -1 points ago +1 / -2

Only if it becomes legal tender. The only tender exchanged.

As it is not replacing currency, it will have a much harder time.

For instance, credit cards have separate laws.

I don't think you understand the specifics.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +3 / -2

A complete oxymoron. Are people in this World. What about animals, plants, nature?

Things in this World aren't to be treated with reverence and professionalism when doing your duty, an act of service, employment, labor. Some even say love. Cooking, making, music, painting, writing, agriculture, etc etc

How about you stop posting crap.

It's clear little retarded monks living in a cloister wrote the scriptures. I really do not want to get into a theological debate on what you think they meant. It's in clear contradiction. Their life they chose other means and methods often in conflict with society. Look at Christians. However the basis of their monastic orders are far older. But it did not mean what you think it does. Because if you do not look after your tools and possessions please tell me quoting what those other passages have to say.

You spurious, dumbass. Sick of it. It makes no rational sense. Where perhaps we might agree civilization has become corrupted by its greed, but regardless of this, it has little merit on the absurd statements you're spewing. They don't specifically state this and instead mouth off about some other sentiment. It is often in contradiction to almost every other passage.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

No it's just television. CNN are increasing their numbers or trying too. By appearing to be more netural hosting GOP.

In fact CNN never had as many numbers as they did when under Trump. He brought big viewing, news, on every network.

Now who is watching the news until look at these numbers. Clever ain't it.

Did she do a bad job. No it did as it was intended. Host a townhall for the candidacy. Back at the office they can scrutinise. While playing the numbers. If it was completely bias would it get the coverage. He'd faster use a different network.

4
Ep0ch 4 points ago +5 / -1

Bullshit.

Insert school in Zimbabwe. Nobody credible can identify.

Children claim an alien told them about the dangers of pollution and technology.

Why would an alien tell children in Zimbabwe? They are going to change the space time continuum. I mean Mugabe will just execute.

Spurious claims nobody on the planet can validate. It would have zero consequences in Zimbabwe, in fact could only get them killed.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

How do you pay 10s of thousands of dollars for trafficked prostitutes?

They're trafficked or something? He wasn't their pimp. Unless he was trafficking them. Why would they tell their client?

It seems like conjecture. Fact. The laptop incriminates his use of narcotics and prostitutes. At what point are they being trafficked? International sex trafficking ring???

That article has said nothing but bullshit. It has possibly identified corruption. The rest of it is nonsense. Or provide the details.

Stop posting crap.

-1
Ep0ch -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yawn. That is cruise missile not hypersonic.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes that she's put her name on. The others however are possibly Pseudonyms.

She continues writing. It is largely what market. You heard it on CNN.

You saw her stupid Woodshed with the dog names.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's more under a pseudonym it gets into heavy kinks. Don't quote me.

Playing the odds, and I am not wrong.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Does she write adult erotica? Possibly under a pseudonym. The 50 shades of nonsense stuff. It's there somewhere. She wrote for playboy and rolling stones. But there's more...

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yawn. More bullshit from a bullshit platform. It serves no societal function. Gossip for the dumb. It has no free speech just advertising. As soon as there's free speech it's curtailed for the advertising. It is shilled backed government propagandists who invent laws to stop people speaking and instead police them.

Musk is simply trying to get the numbers. But as far as they went it's the same bullshit. It will continue to be exactly what it always was. A dystopian psyop.

-1
Ep0ch -1 points ago +1 / -2

Who cares. Click bait, nonsense. Only the press cares. It turns it into a narrative. Instead of objectifying it was a heated argument with reprobates.

Slur, no, insult. Insults are nothing else. They shouldn't be used by employees. No. Their minimum age hasn't exactly promoted level heads. Because their establishment obviously attracts the clientele.

4
Ep0ch 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's a topic that stirs too much reprisal. But there is so much information that questions the narrative.

It was a narrative that sought retribution, wielding it to the full extent of recourse. Do I disagree with it. I cannot answer.

Because it has always happened in history, and history is no stranger to it. The winner rewrites history, to the victor go the spoils. As any loser's entire lineage is wiped out, shamed, and destroyed. Nothing has changed in history except for the rhetoric. Parading itself as some other cause. Nope it's primal.

It has happened throughout history as far back as history began, and as brutally. Why would I care. They won and justice inserted its dominance. It sought nothing else apart from crushing its foes completely less it repeat itself. Somehow it always does regardless, in some form or another, because a paradox occurs. It will be no different the next time. No matter who claims victory and inserts their form of justice.

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

They never do. They drop and dip and gain and rise on exchanges. But at no point has gold bottomed out. Hypothetically even if a currency does. Gold still retains value as a sought after exchange.

If gold floods the markets perhaps it might cascade. But where is this globally, reserves, not accounted for? There are some new finds, but not enough to significantly impact the market prices.

I think he invented the philosopher stone?

by pkvi
0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

All part of the UK service. It's somebody else's fault.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +2 / -2

It isn't hypersonic Ukraine shot down?

1
Ep0ch 1 point ago +2 / -1

Both antibotics and steroids are cancerous when taken in lengthy courses. In medicine serve an immediate use of removing disease and ailments often by boosting the immune system.

Are you suggesting antibotics increased height and size and yield. I doubt it. Rather a cocktail of repeated drugs and shots are used. Where things like possibly hormones are added into any supplements.

0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Woke and stupid narrative infused. The next court, tell me about the next court?

Despite what the idiot jurors did. The press has just shown his accuser to have no repute. None whatsoever. Begging how this nonsense ever went to trial. It is from supposedly decades ago. Why is it tried today. It's a mockery of justice. The entire sham, should've never gone to court.

It seemingly wouldn't have mattered in that court. It was a kangaroo lynch mob of tribal justice.

But the next court is different. Isn't it a higher court, in the tier system? Who knows. I don't understand it.

The conversation around this today needs to look at how. How these trials are being opened and why. It was obviously conducted on the whims of hearsay. Convicted anecdotally. What evidence was there. It has undoubtedly been proven false.

by pkvi
0
Ep0ch 0 points ago +1 / -1

Russia flag

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›