Thank you for the definition. A miscarriage is a different word. It states it. Abortion now, hoohaw, is trying to include a bunch of those words. Because it's selling abortions. Perhaps by scaring you into it. Technically as stated prior there are removal procedures, because as stated there are concerns, big concerns. I won't repeat them and the horror stories. Again certain technicalities due to the word abortion, and what it legally means. Another horror story you can miscarry, drugs, alcohol, jeopardy, etc, intentionally, and law has been brought into that scenario, also for victims of perhaps assault or questionable accidents. So much Insurance, so much bullshit. Further, abortionists have expanded the definition, where therapy, medical, legal, criminal has been provided.
But okay, apology for using miscarry. Not miscarried abortion. Technicality. Miscarried abortion. Needed medical therapy to help a miscarriage. It could have been simple. It should be simple. Until the concept has been corrupted. As you said prior insurance. Needed support away from it. Why. No blame. But any insurance investigation is hell. It was resolved. It should be simple. But abortion has complicated it. Obviously any claims, rights, and laws. Technicalities on what it is. It will obviously be addressed again. As it isn't, I understand.
Hang on. An abortion is a termination. I don't know what you yanks call it. A miscarriage isn't an abortion. If the miscarriage has complications by often being advanced. It's still a miscarriage despite of similar abortion procedures on removal. They are often unnecessary, but sanitary. Unnecessary because the body rejects it, naturally. But it needs support, emotions, help, and care. Help sometimes where did it go. Horror stories of the dog ate it, or it got buried under the barn.
Yes planning if only you had that knowledge first. Tests like okay, you and your partner are health checked, then compatible for it. Life doesn't always work like that. Love is what it wants. But honestly, why not be careful. Instead as you're admitting to me. You couldn't ask any mother later what she'd choose. So tell me why you're considering later? Life is what it is.
Children talk stupidly, they repeat back what you say, because they don't comprehend anything else. They're quite autistic, their brains develop off of adapting, it often means mimicking, instead of actually learning. Learning was the simple suggestion previous. Now I'll just insult you some more. Further, Blocked, because you're not worth it. Far too dumb. Generically inbred tag, generically screams fiction. Who cares what Ukraine can't do? Nobody else. They're happy for more Xmas toys, until they go and break them. Then what happens? More toys, getting broken. No I mean they're gonna win? Keep giving them more toys to break. Sure it worked out in Syria didn't it.
An abortion for a dead baby? Scientifically I struggle with this. The body naturally rejects it. It might need medical help, if it's further along. Sometimes there are complications on it. Although not often, it drops out quickly, it isn't developing. The procedure is not called an abortion. That baby is aborted, miscarried, it was already dead. Yes it is absolutely devasting to lose any pregnancy, by miscarriage. But suggesting you need an abortion for miscarriages is wrong.
Also I understand your youth and studies. It affects your life and image immediately. But again why not plan and makes sure you have contraception, when fertile, if it isn't right then at the time. I do also understand your youth. Care free, it can't happen, until it does. But it does. Why run to a hospital to stop something you could have done yourself much easier beforehand by simple contraception? An inconvenience maybe. But instead of all that regret. It's huge. Something there, all that worry, not right, costs abortion, then more regret after. Until it kinda hardens you. That experience. Wouldn't it. I mean how would it make you feel, if you didn't have your son? Sure it's easier to blame it could've been different. But it what it is. It wouldn't be any different? Honestly.
You can't read. I guess not. Look at that skanky tag. It's obviously autistic.
A question, isn't what am I trying to say. I've said it, Moron!
A question ask specifics. What are you specifically asking? Phrase it. By directly suggesting which concept you have struggled with.
Otherwise I am just going to insult you for being dumb. You are dumb. Look at how you talk.
You are a child. Repeats yourself, blowing raspberries, and just look where they're planted. That username. Ultimately illiterate because you have no grammar. Sooner triggered, by constantly bitching, no wonder, those balls, chip on your shoulder, becoming an obvious troll, reflected into your usage of abbreviations to express yourself. It's autism. It's also foreign, and it's inept. Read that username, completely inept. Shriveled in fact, like you're pubescent. Bugger off.
Would've could've should've. Tell me Einstein who are fielding these weapons? Simple question. Last time we checked. Okay. If you give gun to monkey. What happens. Monkey shoots itself. Seriously that concept can be applied to recruits. Veterans are gained how. Where are they? A bunch of new hardware does what? It actually kills far more of them. Simple odds. No experience. Yes they do hold the enemy back, but not very effectively. No experience. Because what occurs is more and more infrastructure and lines and obviously civilian areas get hit.
Until what happens. Who is more at risk off the escalation? Could it escalate into all out war? Could it risk into a tactical nuke. Why not simply stop the flow of arms before all out war which is nuclear anyway?
Obviously you're keener to draft the women. Better protest, much abortions. No?
Who is fielding those arms? If this keeps up, what occurs?
I do genuinely understand. There are plenty of anomalies like you suggested, hormones. As well as late cycles, missing cycles. Pregnancy tests that need to be read a few times, or by the hospital. No guarantees or certainities.
But questionably what did you want? Would you have changed it differently, if on being faced then with that choice. Why? Hindsight sometimes there is regret. With choice it's fickle to fancy. But could you? Young plenty can, others who hate to face an inconvenience, and would rather have all the options available.
But couldn't there be planning. Perhaps if it's not so available there's other prep. Like simple contraception. Not necessarily the pill. Perhaps condoms more frequently. I hate them as a guy, but don't regret them.
However there's the run off. Society today has been affected more. I am not sure it has created more careers. Less is often that occurrence. In fact I know women, mothers who often tend to be further ahead because of all that experience and strength gained by the children they develop. But they might be further behind others younger, and perhaps can feel trapped. Because there's always mistakes. Partner wasn't right. Health. Etc. But overall the run off women might not be as aware is a society which has skyrocketed. It fills its declining birthrates with foreign immigration increasing offshore investment. The result is much less home ownership. Increasing inflation. Many more. And something sooner starts lacking.
Also you're from Texas couldn't you go to a different State to get it done if you needed it done? Cost perhaps. Not covered on insurance. Or is there direct laws preventing it across state lines?
I am not Chinese, retard. Women have abortions when they're pregnant. So why are they protesting? Think. It's an absolute Oxymoron. It's illogical.
They could get pregnant, they're not, they'd have had an abortion, but they're protesting for abortions. Because it could happen. Yea you could get pregnant. How about it? Seriously it's very funny don't you think.
They haven't been denied anything.
You have no humour. Are they pregnant? Simple question. Exactly. So why are they at an abortion rally? Because they might get pregnant. How do they know they want an abortion. It seems like a joke. They haven't factually been denied anything.
There you are buying a what if. What if they can't have an abortion? It's the same what if they could. Are they actually faced with that choice? Before they're screaming what if.
But you have no humour.
Regardless, State Laws. If it indeed gets overturned. It only means a restriction. It might take better planning.
Banning abortions, if it even gets overturned completely, is a medical procedure. Won't banning it, fall under State laws.
Why can't they move/go to the next state?
I doubt it will be the prohibition. It just means certain restrictions. Where let's face it. It hasn't changed much.
Are these women even pregnant? That's the bigger joke. There, they are, my abortion. Except, here's the thing, they aren't even pregnant. But OMG they could be. Exactly. Hahaha.
No I mean come on. They're getting all bothered before they even make that choice. They haven't factually been denied anything yet.
Too late they're actively advancing. A drone is a drone. Human operation is far too slow. But protocol has been discarded. Where any trigger, kill command was human. Too slow supposedly on the battlefield with defenses. Hence they're becoming seek and destroy. Tell it to any satellite/surveilance lock, target, beep, release drone. Fully auto.
The UN ruling has already been thrown out. Where they weren't even supposed to be being developed. Harder with software already in civilian use. If it has advanced on cars, space rovers, cameras, etc. Why not on the battlefield. Until it is being put into a heap of stuff. No sooner tanks, and mechs, submarines, even militarised boats.
I doubt she's male. She's had boyfriends, and children, and shit. I think you can find her birth certificate if you looked.
That picture as the other user suggested, might not be hers.
It doesn't have that convent image.
It is getting so hard today. But I think you'd know. Scarring is the biggest give away. Literally away from genitals are big scars on abdomen. Worse than cesareans. Yes they can get grafted, and can get stems. But they have to dump huge costs into it. Like the Adam's apple. It can get removed, but that shit really costs. That other profiling isn't much to go on. Because without surgery, there are plenty of biological anomalies. Women of all sorts. But it's getting scary if they don't say. And that legislation should be enforced.
It hasn't lost it yet. Odesa hasn't been taken. Mykolayiv hasn't been taken. Kherson oblast is under stronger counter offensives. Kharkiv hasn't been taken. Zaporizhia hasn't been taken. Dnipropetrovsk hasn't been taken.
If Russia takes that, it can declare victory. It hasn't. But too take it, it could see fighting until the Autumn, or next year, or who knows.
Of course by engaging in war, it is not in use. But Ukraine are being funded to regain it, and as there are no terms, also everywhere else.
Aliens have always been gay fakes since Roswell.
Today there are Aliens everywhere. Can't even walk down the street without running into the Aliens.
Are there any other Aliens. Has Congress even proved the Ghosts yet. Why are they trying to prove the Aliens.
They won't, if they do, it upsets the narrative. The narrative of evolution. Then they're no longer Gods. It was the Aliens. No more of their mind control. Alien control. I mean shit. Isn't it already. The poor Aliens and we better care. Paying taxes to Aliens.
All these hearings are exercises in more funding and more taxes for more research into Aliens. It always comes back with no proof. Not even of their own black projects
Haha, it was you who started the grammar war. A pointless attempt. You are projecting. Yeah, you're crying. You've been moaning ceaselessly about how you wanted to hurt stuff, and are in war with people. Even people representing you, are your enemy. Projection. Everybody is. It must be the pain, and the tears. Don't care, bother somebody else. You will always have a chip on your shoulder. Nigger.
No, it won't. All it does is lose money. It promises highs but drops. No fix rate, nothing but liquidity. And it's another tranny fetish or Xgen trend. Buy stonk, it's going to the moon. No it isn't. It's GME. The only people making money are pumping and dumping as regulation tightens and the market plunges. It really doesn't make much money, because it loses it even quicker. But at least you're holding the bag like an ape, for all those others dumping it, as they buy back the dips, and dump. Find yourself a real investment. Assets not ponzis. Unless you're really into tranny fetishes. Continue holding that bag, it's gonna dip.
You're an idiot piss off. I am not writing a formal letter to you. I am on the Internet.
Shall we do your English?
"It's funny seeing some of you kids". Obvious nigger. Never mind the rest of that sentence not employing grammar, like commas.
English; proper and formal. It's funny seeing children.
"The world doesn't work the way they wrote about it in the text books". More nigger.
English; proper and formal. The World doesn't work that way, the way it's written in the textbooks.
Gullible pricks like yourself. You attack me for grammar when you're an austist.
Thank you for giving me a Larp. We're in a grammar war. Did you want further bombardment. Don't fire shots at me. I will make you cry.
I know. But what to do. Believe in the Covid. The Ministry of Truth demands it. You'll only offend Armitage if you don't. He's dead certain it was the greatest thing on the Planet. So proud of his Stonehenge hertitage. He's definitely a moon lander. I bet he also likes that dinosaur they just grew.
They've fibbed about almost everything. Why it pays. People like him believe it, they've been taught so well. Believe what we say everything else is primative. No sooner do they welcome how it was the aliens who built stonehenge, because it was their spaceport. It just took the druids conjuring some stones.
No it wasn't anything like that. They turned it into that. It was missing those stones being aligned. They added the majority of those stones. It was a ruins. A ruins known as Roman for hundreds of years. Until the druid society partied on it in the late 1700s, then in the mid 1800s it started having the public, in the 1900s it was bought. It got rearranged, adding lots of stones to it increasingly. They took the stones away. Then lined them up. But they specifically rearranged them into a narrative.
What is it. It isn't what they claim it is. It definitely isn't the first World Wonder in every computer game. Lending credence to their lies. Where Britain has lied about the Scottish Stone circle too. It definitely isn't the crap they're spewing inserting it into history as some great feat of engineering. It's a hoax. Another hoax is the Terracotta army.
You want Neolithic Ruins go to Ireland their's are still intact. The Celtic Kings burial mounds matching King Midas or Turkish burial mounds. Or Northern France dating back over 5000 years.
At what point simple question if we do British history does it exist. The Romans destroyed the druids completely. They stripped away every stone to wipe people out. Like the Jewish temple, plenty of others. They rewrote narratives brutally with vengeance. Like the Druid Island off Wales. Yet there they are leaving that monument. They forgot about the greatest Wonder on Earth. But they looted almost all the other burial mounds. Because Britain hasn't got anything like the Irish. Pull my nuts off. It's bullshit. It was formulated simply to insert a dominance into history. There it is in every computer game, most documentaries, lying its nuts off.
I have no idea why you're adding Russians into this. Apart from the fact they kept the evidence of this topic. The pictures released on the Web largely came from Russian archives. Until the cat was out of the bag. Then hohol, what to do. Blame Russia for bad diplomacy. Advising the public cleaning needed to be done. Until you read the damn Wiki. How many stones have they added to it since. Look at those pictures, crane, trains, concrete, foundations. As they strain fumbling with, but ruins were there, look at the drawn pictures, nothing like it apart from a vague insertion. Most were inserted after, and commissioned for the narrative. Please research it more.
It's a bigger hoax. It has been the first neolithic monument in every computer game. In most documentaries, basing celestial alignment. But it wasn't. It is for what reason? A point of reference. Where with such expertise, formulates the narrative. Monkeys. Have a banana. Joke is on you.
Fake and gay. Even if there was a ruined Stone Structure on Sailsbury plain. It looked nothing like it does today. They've been adding more and more and more stones to it. Inserting more and more narratives into it. It never aligned with the Solistices, it was never an ancient calander. It was known for much longer as Roman ruins.
It was inserted, because even Ireland has better Neolithic ruins, but Britain makes monkeys, and it needed to compete with the Frogs. Of who has the best neolithic builders. Let's all call Stonehenge the oldest. Raspberries.
Haha, there's an obvious joke in there somewhere.