Yawn, what needs to be done is thinking about it. Instead of blaming everybody else. It's your fault. It's your body. Take responsibility for your actions.
Kept secret. We aren't dating. God forbid. But there's no secrets. I'd care. Unless you're just another whack-a-mole. Then hell. Keep it. What are you dumb or something?
Yawn. The only record of Pilate is a single inscription. Jewish historian. Haha. Gonna have a laugh about that. The name Jew is a very modern one. Few centuries old. But a historian after the destruction of Jerusalem? CE 90. Yea.
Which Apostle wrote of the miracles? Did you miss my former comment. There weren't 12 in other versions. Neither was there Resurrection in other early versions. Strangely still it omitted other testaments. Christianity had several civil wars. Importantly on founding. It believe it or not was over the version of the Bible. Then again much later in the Reformation. Where two all of two prominent historians rewrote history, giving us AD and BC. Again on its split from Catholicism. And probably later, but who is counting.
Which version of the Bible, it was largely rewritten later into another version. King James is the basis of most modern versions, it was relayered much later. Like the original versions. The source material has been rewritten over sometimes as many as 5 times ontop of the source vellum. Impossible to even see the original texts. You're going by the Greek version based off the codex of the Vatican, fragments of incomplete scrolls from Egypt from 4 testaments? The majority has been rewitten. In any event there is huge controversy. They match it with that other print from there, and then go it must be accurate. Except they monopolised it. Where other versions were largely destroyed. Civil war gnostics, coptics. But there are old versions, that are quite different. When backtracking to the source. Incomplete Fragments or the vellum has been relayered, they wrote on top of it. It has changed, compiled by monks, adding miracles, adding more apostles etc.
If he existed. It hasn't been validated. They raised hell, looking. Until it's a belief. Not taking it away. Questioning it. Was he married?
If Jesus existed. Unlike Muhammad who was a real person. The cause and effect were no different. Both religions fought bloody civil wars on founding that lasted centuries killing millions and millions and millions. Both have been responsible for claiming countless lives. Both were founded in bloody revolutions completing rewriting previous religious narratives, completely expelling and changing prior religions. Both had renaissances. And founded Empires. But both religions were founded on lies. Mecca isn't Muhammed's birth place. Jesus didn't resurrect. Both were likely married. Who cares about ages. Then, marriage was different.
The Kibblah was home to the prophet. Why does every early founding mosque, they face it, face somewhere else? Because it got moved to Mecca after civil wars. They lasted close to 3 centuries. The Koran was rewritten.
Same as the bible. Many early versions have less disciples, no resurrection, and omitted testaments. In particular Magdaline. Presumed to be his wife.
Hot topic, controversy. Belief is what it is to the believer. You won't change it. You'll just piss them off. No intention when seeking knowledge and origin.
No, it's the end of Twitter. It should be. Nobody uses anymore except the bots, and the shills. Who even uses it for advertising. It simply isn't worth it. It isn't informative. They took all the fun out of it, banning everybody else.
Okay, but it doesn't mean Russia will engage them by direct warfare. If it does, it will likely because as stated, another flank has opened up, or it has been critically hit. In a war zone, specify, who did what. Ukraine definitely did. But, it was the Americans. That doesn't work, specifics, or release the nukes, and invade. Yea. Nope.
There is a lot of talk on it. It still might. Dubious. There's still a buffer. Nato. And Ukraine in the middle. An active conflict, it hasn't won. But in fact draws more fire.
Tactically it's still quite localised. But they'll keep raising it, and somebody will fold, bluff, or go all in. 2 more weeks.
Not really. It's a matter of standards. Meat is meat. Bugs are just damn creepy. And cause chronic indigestion. Eating humans, would be simply because all the other meat eaters do. And it's biblical. Cannibalism wasn't frowned on in Ezekiel or some book, maybe Jeremiah, it even had a price on the human meat, in the seige. But the bugs didn't. Why is that. Because by the time you caught enough of them, surviving all the indigestion, you're still hungry and in need of meat. We're talking extremes here. Not a simple take away of let's have an Indian or a Chinese for dinner. There you are rustling up all the bugs, remember you're talking hundreds to survive the week, needing all the herbs and garnishes and spices, but somebody else has you on their menu. It's much easier that way. Or forget about the bugs.
Umm, the patents are still on record. The patents going back for hundreds of years, or at least until they established the patent office.
History has been whitewashed because of this. Until you get some black guy inventing the bullshit for black history month. Nope already patented. But okay before patents the shit didn't exist. Really. Yep really. Whitewashed into ownership and invention. Despite peanut butter being Mayan. But okay Rome invented the Iron. And everybody else wasn't recorded prior.
Although they might not include military, or experimental technology at the time of innovation. They're classified. But are often on record for various clauses and audits.
To say they can't build shit from before is a matter of they don't, and not because they can't. It's because it's not profitable. Wait until they put EVs everywhere and what went wrong, autism. They won't be able to repair it like your old CFT monitor, it'll be replaced for an even bigger number. You need the 48k ultra slim edition. Where you have to purchase a bunch of other services and products, but don't worry it's connected into the Internet, just so it can monitor you, and sell you an even bigger number and subscription.
Yes I understand this. But it doesn't mean they can open another flank. America however can, because Europe will happily engage prior. If they're talking about Nukes despite Russian numbers it's another gangbang. Where Nato Europe and it's most nations, even one's you don't know about, will let them rip.
Despite your muling opinion. Russia will not engage America first in that scenario. Unless another opportunity becomes provided, by partners. Leaving a very tactical question of how far they escalate it in the Ukraine. It's mostly because it could draw more they haven't, and because tactically it doesn't win them partners. But at what point haven't they removed coms and targeted command structures. Possibly because it can internally rally more. Not at this point. Leaving a question of goal. Goal to cause a larger war perhaps? Or simply to win, by playing a longer game. The long game often causes a larger war. Winning is often getting ahead of the competition. A larp. Completely Speculative. They're using it as well, selling the renewables at premium rates, banning nitrates, eating bugs, and generally becoming even more annoying. No it's not necessarily a territory, where pacman will keep gobbling up the Ukraine.
You're buying into the rhetoric of the fall of the West. Where this war is buying time, and drawing out, as it has other geopolitical agendas. It could run into the Winter otherwise turning the gas off does mostly bullshit. Uncertainty causes chaos, where there is gain, or it simply gets worse. But decisively it's still toying with the food. It is drawing out.
Obviously from opposing perspective, they can still move on it, often at their leisure, they're not taking that hit. Markets, yawn. It's still Russia's fault. In fact, they can hit Russia easier from it. Topically. Sure there's all the theatre, and political shenanigans. But it doesn't change much in the face of conflict at all. It often simply provokes it.
Bugs are creepy, snails are slimy, fish eggs are rotten.
I don't eat any of that. Tried Caviar. No. Don't like it. Don't like that kind of fish food. Same as mussels, not fond of oysters either, or a fan of octopus.
But bugs. No. There are lines. If I am starving, sure. No, I'd probably become a cannibal first.
Not happening without Chinese involvement. Possibly others. They're not in position to move without China. Or another flank providing the opportunity. Could they strike at somewhere else. An escalating question. It's like a high stakes poker game. How much are they willing to gamble and will the other player fold. Unlikely. But they'll keep raising it. The pot is blowing steam. Despite the gas being off.
It's not about redlines anymore. Because they don't exist. Where are they? Obviously don't hit Russia. Okay that's Red. But hitting them in the Ukraine, is still debatable. I mean what have they done about it. Hit Ukraine more. Irony.
Hence the previous tactical debate.
But they haven't. Yes it was obvious they had the ability and have demonstrated it. Used it presently in Ukraine. No. Communications becoming disrupted are pivotal to achieving victory and hindering an enemy's ability to successfully attack.
Striking Ukrainian command and power structures hasn't occurred. What are they in command of, where is their morale, once government is hit, what are they protecting, hindering their ability to wage war. Who listens. But it can become problematic, because it could draw other sides in to claim power. If he is even operating from there. Remarkably Parliament, and the presidential compounds haven't been hit, instead they continuously draw increasing aid, and visits?
They are two of the most fundamental ways to win almost any war. But haven't really occurred?
Striking outside the current conflict, often causes a larger conflict. If it hits Nato. Nato becomes more involved.
I am actually quite curious. Apart from it risks a larger conflict. Except it has already drawn other sides into it, too such degrees. I find it quite odd some of the achievable ways to win victory are still being debate, or haven't occurred, and contrary cause increasing opposition.
Somehow it's only a set back to their cartel.
People are that fucking dumb today.
Take congestion in London moving out. It has almost nothing to do with the weather. But everything to do with increasing taxes and surveillance.
The same with the Covid passport. It has almost nothing to do with health care. Everything to do with surveillance and taxation.
These people are a cartel. They take a good intention, health or climate, irrelevant, it won't change at all, and profit and control and become more powerful off it.
Rigging the system and monopolising it. They profit immensely off the control they enforce. The dumb sheep think they have their interests. No it simply herds them into a larger grift where the price simply increases and they have to pay more taxes for even more monopolised services. But nothing else changes. The weather won't. Getting sick won't. It just gets worse. They're faster paying even more for it.
Yes, but it has been inside Russia previously, a few times now. Refinery and other depots. Even the sinking of the Moskva.
There is still the very present issue of weapons and Intel being supplied. Particularly missiles, and satellite coverage?
Russia has satellite killers. Why not attack satellites? But these could cause conflict if they're another nation's like Nato. Doubtful if they're operating in hostile airspace, but those rules don't tend to apply if they're in upper orbit. There are still rules, and treaties, regarding space. Speculative. But an increasing option. Or there's removing the Ukrainian command structure with a tactical strike. This is obviously a last resort, because it causes a worse response, and much greater potential for a larger conflict. Still largely unnecessary presently.
However going to war with America is largely a parody at this point. I doubt Russia would strike first, or indeed outside of the present conflict without much larger grounds to do so. Incidents like this increase the risk of it, or at the least the above. Perhaps they could on other involvement. Suggestably in defense of an allies. Speculative. But America or Nato could act inside Ukraine, and it remains an increasing escalation the longer this conflict continues.
I am only debating the topic. Not in support of. Trying to factor the odds.
Why not tactically nuke Ukraine first. Problem solved. If there's no command structure, there's always Russian command structure. Because it isn't in Nato, or in the EU. Obviously it won't win them World opinion, in fact it completely threatens it. They'd become a hermit rogue state like North Korea. But a conflict with America, would only happen if other flanks get involved. They don't need them to win their supposed goals. But this conflict can only escalate. As it is with missiles hitting Russian homeland. Anybody else, and nukes would fly? Questioning why would they open another front. Instead of causing victory?
A direct war with America and Nato, can only occur, if they move into Ukraine, ground troops and no fly zones, or if more Russian partnerships become involved.
Presently how does Russia respond to the continuous flow of arms, increasing in the risk of escalation. At what point don't they fully remove Ukrainian command structures. And if they do, does it cause a counter offensive by NaTo? What is Russia's endgame? Partitioning Ukraine, and adopting gained territory into Russian law.
Of course angry Russians are demanding war with Nato and nukes. Currently Russia can still win without using nukes. But at what point doesn't this conflict escalate,
I haven't seen the video/documentary. It's probably watered down where they've tried to debunk the prophetic connotations. Plenty of hits doing this on searches. But succession has poked at it. Going so far as nominating it. Although who knows what it all was? It supposedly hasn't been entirely accurate, and kinda vague. During that time period it was an art. They made machines for predicting the future. In Islam as well.
But I thought the last pope was either the fall of Religion or something along the lines of the destruction of Rome, or the Vatican. And it was supposed to be ominous. But it could've easily had another meaning, where religion has changed. Look at today. Look at Rome today. Easily misconstrued. But then again who knows. Read about it briefly, probably also watched an episode of ancient aliens where it was mentioned.
If you find a link please share?
Didn't realise they bunker bust apart from beating defences? At that speed it's curious what that penetration is. On other hand the Yanks have supposedly developed a deeper impact, cookie cutter. But that's not its name.
Those hypersonic currently are rivalling defences, and so they're scrambling to adopt laser defense.
Yes and no. The Koran had been relayered. It still doesn't explain why the earliest mosques face somewhere else?