CORIOLIS FORCE

In classical mechanics, an inertial force described by the 19th-century French engineer-mathematician Gustave-Gaspard Coriolis in 1835. Coriolis showed that, if the ordinary Newtonian laws of motion of bodies are to be used in a rotating frame of reference, an inertial force acting to the right of the direction of body motion for counterclockwise rotation of the reference frame or to the left for clockwise rotation--must be included in the equations of motion.

The effect of the coriolis force is an apparent deflection of the path of an object that moves within a rotating coordinate system. The object does not actually deviate from its path, but it appears to do so because of the motion of the coordinate system. The Coriolis effect is most apparent in the path of an object moving longitudinally. On the Earth an object that moves along a north-south path, or longitudinal line, will undergo apparent deflection to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere. There are two reasons for this phenomenon: first, the Earth rotates eastward; and second, the tangential velocity of a point on the Earth is a function of latitude (the velocity is essentially zero at the poles and it attains a maximum value at the Equator). Thus, if a cannon were fired northward from a point on the Equator, the projectile would land to the east of its due north path. This variation would occur because the projectile was moving eastward faster at the Equator than was its target farther north. Similarly, if the weapon were fired toward the Equator from the North Pole, the projectile would again land to the right of its true path. In this case, the target area would have moved eastward before the shell reached it because of its greater eastward velocity. An exactly similar displacement occurs if the projectile is fired in any direction.

The Coriolis deflection is therefore related to the motion of the object, the motion of the Earth, and the latitude.

The Coriolis effect has great significance in astrophysics and stellar dynamics, in which it is a controlling factor in the directions of rotation of sunspots, It is also significant in the earth sciences, especially meteorology, physical geology, and oceanography, in that the Earth is a rotating frame of reference, and motions over the surface of the Earth are subject to acceleration from the force indicated. Thus, the Coriolis force figures prominently in studies of the dynamics of the atmosphere, in which it affects prevailing winds and the rotation of storms, and in the hydrosphere, in which it affects the rotation of the oceanic currents. It is also an important consideration in ballistics, particularly in the launching and orbiting of space vehicles. In modern physics, application of a quantity analogous to Coriolis force appears in electrodynamics wherever instantaneous voltages generated in rotating electrical machinery must be calculated relative to the moving reference frame: this compensation is called the Christoffel voltage.

To;dr start firing high velocity shells as described above and see the effect for yourself. On a perfectly calm day with no wind to cause a vector, your shell will still not land in a perfect straight line away from you due to the earths rotation. This is REALY shitty hill to die on man. You could just as easily say the flat earth rotates too and come up with some bullshit that math won’t work to explain. But instead you claim this “just doesn’t exist”.

Your argument from authority falls flat. You wont respect my page that simply hosts scanned images of the official documents because you won’t even go to it, your words. You won’t accept official pages either, anything from .gov or nasa is not an official source to you because you call them all liars. I can’t give you an official government web page or you’ll poo-poo it, I can’t give you a “fringe” website (unbelievable that a conspiracy website user doesn’t think smaller lesser known sites can hold any useful information) or else you’ll poo-poo it cause it’s not official enough. You will ONLY believe any official or unofficial info that agrees with your bias. Simply claiming “nah they don’t actually use it” is bullshit. You have no first hand knowledge of artillery or naval gunnery, you searching for 3 seconds and not seeing exactly what you want isn’t proof of anything either. Take the time, look at Russian, USA, German, British, French, take your pic of any naval power you wish and look at their charts for naval gunnery and you can find the tables they use for shot adjustment. Naval gunnery and sea battles is quite an interesting topic, it shouldn’t even be that boring to poke into.

I listed the page as the source for the scanned material you asked for. I also gave you the bureau of ordnance letter number itself as well as the date. You are free of course to request the document officially yourself or search for a scan of it on a website you do trust.

https://www.mathscinotes.com/2017/12/earths-curvature-and-battleship-gunnery/

This page gives a good breakdown on the math and redoing the tables. He includes his sources and provides his math. You’re welcome.

https://eugeneleeslover.com/USN-GUNS-AND-RANGE-TABLES/OP-770-1.html

Navy Department Bureau of Ordnance Bureau of Ordnance Circular Letter No. F8-43 Date: 2 September 1943 Subject: Range Ballistic Corrections due to rotation and curvature of the earth—method of handling

Fifth scan down on the page given.

I believe the word that eluded you was detriment :)

Long range sniper shots laying on the dirt require the same math. If you’re firing at something far enough away to set world records you’ll need to understand trigonometry. Factoring for wind, your speed, enemy speed and bearing, if you’re shooting east to west or west to east, all this shit matters if you actually wanna hit the thing you’re shooting at. This is something I recommend testing and having fun with lol. Of course I support all responsible adults having firearm proficiency and impeccable accuracy. Shooting at a burglar and hitting the neighbours dog ain’t exactly helping.

A point to consider. If earth is flat and not rotating then why would naval gunnery require rotation of the earth for calculating their shots? Hitting a target is pretty important to those guys, considering if the enemy hits you and hits you more before you can hit them, you die and they don’t. It’s honestly really important to shoot and hit something with a 16 inch shell that weighs over 2000 pounds and does significant barrel wear each shot. There was no space race or nasa or optics to consider like today when these calculations were being used to hit the target in 1944. If these corrections aren’t required then adding them would lead to a larger number of misses, where as including them leads to actually hitting the target. Unless flat earth theory has an explanation as for why adding globe earth math into weapon trajectory calculations to make them more accurate, I have to side with the globe model. Plus every other celestial body being spherical when it reaches a large enough size adds more credence. Sphere moon. Sphere sun. Sphere planets in our solar system.

Guessing you never had a big 20 foot wide satalite dish for tv back in the 80’s and 90’s. That dish wasn’t pointed south. Hell I had to change it depending what satalite I wanted signal from and still remember when they fucked up aiming a surface based weapon to take out an obsolete military satalite and missed, taking out a tv satalite. All 24 channels on that one were gone, and had to be rerouted off others. Next you’ll be telling me my gps is magically working in areas with no cell service but it totally is connected to a cell tower. My phone has lost all signal, my Garmin gps is full on honey badger.

Graves from a time when many people died of typhus and other ailments is no shocker to anyone with a brain. But the easily lead sheeple will flock to the MSM piper and bleat about how horrible things are.

All this hinges on the unknown DEW being small enough, portable enough and discreet enough to be taken close enough to the location, used, and removed without being noticed, photographed etc.

A large team isn’t required to plant the explosives and they also have the benefit of setting this up weeks or months ahead of time and hiding charges in places requiring extra clearance, etc. Unless the DEW is flown around in a c-130 like a spectre gunship, getting it in and out seems rather complicated. We know the military has BUDS school, you’ve had marines trained in demo since ww2. It’s not inconceivable to me to send in a black ops team that’s done similar ops around the world to do the job in New York.

Hell I still wonder how a plane that supposedly flew mostly though the tower didn’t have enough momentum to cause the top to fall off in the direction of the plane travel and fall off leaving the top gone and the rest standing. Why free fall straight down?

Being an inside job is enough of a conspiracy. Why do we need holograms and projectors when we know we have drone technology? No one has to be flying a plane in the plane when it can be done remotely. No one in the plane means maneuvers that would cause a pilot to black out or red out can be done safely and without worry.

Removing all important materiel from the towers days prior and planting demo charges then having drone planes fly into them to change the national narrative is all that had to happen that day.

What was the major news story on 9/10? What happened before this? Why does no one remember this shit? Bush was elected, people complained it wasn’t legitimate(man is that part of history repeating a drag), and all of that went away in a moment of burning reichstag I mean WTC.

You don’t use a sledge hammer when a tack hammer will do. You don’t use a shopping cart to move groceries from your fridge to your table. You don’t use a directed energy weapon when conventional explosives do the job with less effort and requirement for secrecy.

Very interesting thank you for the insight. 15 years is no small dip of time. I never got into reddit, and only ever briefly visited a page or two if a google search for something dragged me there looking for obscure info. But even keeping away I heard from other sources how it was being pushed left and that an echo chamber was forming. I try not to give it any traffic that I can and I’m waiting to see what the next iteration of that part of the web is going to be called.

For comparisons sake, the nukes dropped in WW2 are 76 years old. As far as tech goes, that’s ancient. They’ve done prototype nuclear reactors for airplanes and while shielding was an issue(dead pilots are rather unreliable), using pilotless drones makes things easier. Aircraft carriers are old tech too. But add a nuclear propulsion system to an aircraft carrier in the sky, to launch and resupply unmanned aircraft and you have a nightmare for some. This is just looking at technology we KNOW about and adding the two together.

Now add in tech they haven’t told us anything about. Most cool military tech is skunkworks and black budget and we only get to “know” about it after leaks or accidents. If they didn’t have to disclose anything, normies would have no idea what a stealth bomber or fighter are. The microwave oven most people have in their house is from the Japanese betting on a “death ray” in WW2 and it having very shitty range. Having a chip track everyone is something no one would want, until it’s built into their cellular phone and offers too much confidence to not have and ignore what else it’s doing in the background.

Sadly, the reality of the situation is large scale super weapons are usually of limited use and a huge resource cost. The German super guns were cool and all, but limited in use, huge target for cheap energy aircraft to ruin, required tons of men and resources to move, shoot, and protect. It’s far easier to just shut off the power grid. The elites have their own generators and installations but the normies have no fridges no freezers, no way to charge their electric cars if they were foolish enough to only own electric cars, only local communication, no electrify for water pumping and purification plants, etc. Whole country or even the world goes to shit very fast when the power goes off. And it’s easier to destroy crucial infrastructure and ruin the power grid than it is to move around superweapons silently and without getting caught.

Don’t get me wrong, we CERTAINLY have super weapons. There’s just no real point to having a massive amount of them to the effect of Jon Q Redneck having a direct energy cannon next to his railgun next to his shotgun in the trucks gun rack.

Civilizations flourish, peak, fall, and restart. At a certain point we’ll lose a lot of what we have now. What comes after, who can say. Green energy is a scam like most things, but actions like rocketing nuclear waste to another planet or the sun also consumes resources. Isolating it in hopes a future civilization can do something with it is a better, more resource efficient solution.

I’d love a small nuclear reactor about the size of a doghouse to power our farm. I heard years ago China was working on them due to population density and grid needs. Nuclear pellets coated in graphite to increase the surface area to remove the worry for criticality, and supposed to make it melt down proof. Run out of water or pump dies, instead of seconds to make the right call you have a week to do something before you fuck up your fuel and need new ones. While there’s plenty of people out there I wouldn’t trust with a piece of string much less a nuclear reactor, I hate the “we can’t have nice things cause Jerry is a fucktard” approach to life.

You are correct in that there is no free lunch. Everything costs and everything has downstream impacts. Solar is hard on the environment to produce panels and they wear it quickly and are hard to recycle while solar collecting strays to heat water for steam are basically an invisible death beam to flying creatures. Wind is unpredictable and kills birds and bats en mass and the blades aren't recyclable, plus they need petroleum in their generator part. Hydro electric seems nice until one looks at the damage to eco systems. Plus dams get old and fail. Geothermal is an option, in some areas more than others but require expensive installation and even using an active volcano for the heat requires good plating to handle the sulphur. Coal is dirty to burn, radioactive and bad to mine. Electric batteries ruin the earth to produce. Nuclear requires resource mining and has radioactive waste. There IS no perfect solution yet.

The best we can do is do minimal harm while we work on newer safe and clean technology. We will get there someday, but for now, efficiency wise nuclear IS our best provider. Highest output for lowest damage of environment, when one has a suitable storage area for the waste figured out.

To help in the future we should start building waste energy plants near major cities. Burning plastics returns almost the same energy used to create them in the form of heat. Burning the plastic to heat water, drive a turbine and produce electricity to power the station and run electric vehicles on site for sorting and moving the material, maybe even charging the vehicles used to bring the waste to the site.

We can add in further usefulness by adding a double water reservoir with turbines similar to those used in Britain. They have to regulate their power carefully and can actually time increased consumption to commercials on popular televisions shows. IE everyone runs to put the electric kettle on for tea while the program is on commercial and they have a noticeable spike in electric demand. They have a large reservoir that turbine/pumps fill with water when electricity is put into the turbines, and on demand, they can allow the water to flow back through these turbines and spin them to produce power. Once the added load on the grid is gone, they can switch it back and use them to refill the reservoir again for the next need. If there’s ever a spill, it’s water. It’s not harmful to the environment, it’s cheap to refill losses and is basically a giant water battery.

By making a large power station Center we could combine technologies and have a waste energy plant burn plastics, catching the smoke and passing it through water like a stoner does with a bong, in several passes if need be, emit as little into the air as possible(with added filters if need be), power the turbines and fill a reservoir and off peak hours if say we don’t run this 24/7, the reservoir turbines continue adding power to the grid at night when people typically plug in their electric cars. Water from the bong filter can be put into tailings ponds and let the sun evaporate it and we can clean up the ashes and tailings into a remote landfill taking up much less room and getting some value back from the waste our civilizations creates. Power generation and removal of waste in 1 go, using water as a safe storage medium and a filter.

And down the road as plastics and wastes are phased out and depleted, the stations still have the water reservoir turbine system that can be reused with the next power generator built to replace the waste burnering generator. I’d be happy to take charge and lead the way for such a setup to be built and operated but it’s gonna need a LOT of permission from local and beyond politicians and energy execs.

They are currently working on refining thorium salt reactors to reuse much of the molten salt. Some will be, for lack of better common terms, “burned up” in the reactor, and will need to be replenished or topped off. How much is up to several factors like efficiency, purity, reactor output etc.

Once mining and refining facilities are set up and streamlined, keeping them running will be a matter of cost. One of the major benefits of a thorium salt reactor is the short half life of the materials involved. Instead of spent nuclear fuel rods sitting around an area that needs guarding and shielding for thousands of years, the half life is around 50 years. It’s been a while since I’ve read up on experimental thorium salt reactors so my details may be less than perfect but they’re a good step forward.

The environmental damage from mining and shipping the reactor materials is minimal when compared to the large scale damage of open pit mining of coal, and the radiation released from the smoke stacks as coal is burnt. Fun fact, coal plants emit more radiation than nuclear plants. Strip mines for rare earth metals and cobalt for electric cars are far more damaging but you seem to know that from other posts of yours. A lithium ion battery electric car for me is no deal but a nuclear powered vehicle I can make a switch for. Probably won’t happen in or lifetime due to boomers fear of people making dirty bombs with the materials, damned fools.

In the reactor setup, the sodium in this case and pressurized water in the case of a PWR are in a closed loop to prevent exposure to the atmosphere. The heat is passed via a heat exchanger with cool water on one side of a metal wall and hot water or melted sodium on the other. The nuclear reactor heated medium be it water or sodium does NOT make contact with the cooling medium, usually water. Think of it like a cooling block for a water cooled computer. The coolant passes through my cooling block, over the metal and takes the heat from the processor on the other side, and water never touches the processor.

Or to explain it like your car, your cars cooling system is pumping coolant around the outside of the cylinder and not inside the cylinder. The heating action of the cars combustion is cooled via conduction of the heat through the metal engine block to the coolant and to the environment via the radiator.

The vents on the steam turbine and cooling towers is non irradiated cooling water dropped into the tower, allowing it to condense into water and be reused at the bottom and excess heat floating out the top as steam. You can build a nuclear tower style cooling system for water cooled pc’s, I’ve done it in the past. Use a y connector with a 4” fan to blow air into and up the “tower”, use a shower head on top of the tower to drop the water like rain, and pump the collected water in the bottom through your water cooling setup. It’s possible to run the computer slightly under room temperature with this setup, and can be built rather cheaply.

https://www.overclockers.com/nuclear-tower-water-cooling/ For an article explaining it, I was doing this kind of thing 20 years ago. Not my article, although i do have a couple on that site.

And for your car, check for coolant leaks around your heater core, hoses and radiator. If there’s no visible coolant leak you’ve probably got a head gasket blown. Get that shit fixed before you ruin your engine. I’ve got a 1977 New Yorker that still doesn’t leak coolant to this day with original hoses on it. Losing coolant ISNT normal.

Oy vey!

claps Well said. They are just using it as a propaganda piece and don’t even care about the so called “victims”. They’re merely useful right now. They’ll be forgotten until they need to use it again.

I haven’t been participating in their slave system as a blood source for the leeches for over a year now. But if I want to own my own business and sell a product world wide, unless I go full dark web the government Mafia needs their cut.

Oh indeed. They tell us lots of bullshit. But we still have to have our government slave numbers or else they’ll shut your business down and haul you to the gulag. I’m sorry, covid happy fun centres.

Goods and Service Tax. We have 2 taxes on goods you buy, GST and a provincial sales tax that’s different depending on your province/territory.

It’s nice to see some work done into this field. I spent 13 years on land based oil drilling rigs and for all the “running out of oil” scare mongering we seemed to keep working. I have no links to post but I had been told years ago the oil sands in Alberta were self renewing, and if there’s a seam leaking it to the surface from down below that makes a lot of sense.

The problem with deep exploration and exploitation of large reserves is the relative cheapness of current shallow deposits. Before I quit a year ago, we were punching out 2100-2500 meter deep wells in 3.5 to 3.7 days from start to moving the rig to the next well. Crazy stupid speeds and that was part of my quitting. Even if only 80% of the Wells we punched out produced, we would do 70-75 wells per rig in that part of the patch. There’s a significant amount of oil to be found near the surface without requiring expensive new equipment and deep wells. I fear we won’t see much public evidence of deeper reserves and generation until we tap most of the available easy fields.

The same reason they named one strain Gods Green Crack. The negative hype in its name gives it positive spin. Dennis Leary has a great bit about cigarettes years ago. “Now this asshole wants to make the warning on the pack.... BIGGER! Cause that’s the problem, all these smokers just didn’t see it. You could have the warning be the whole front of the package! Just a black package with a skull and crossbones on it, called Tumours, and you’ll have people lined up around the block the buy a pack!”