The run off is toxic. Sodium. Salt is toxic. It kills fauna and flora. Way to go and turn Wyoming into a desert.
It could potentially be much worse than carbon.
Where are its emissions occurring? How do they affect the surrounding environment. It could potentially cause a much worse environmental effect. Sodium into an otherwise wooded state. What complete fuckos. Just more mad corporate bullshit. Their ad campaign is almost convincing except study under that hood.
That is ridiculous. Sodium is salt. It has the same chemical properties of salt. Sodium. You are like a dumb link bot. Google's what did you Google, molten salt. Was that everything they quoted in the press? How did you understand it? Did you read the chemicals of molten salts. Chlorides and nitrates? In that Wiki.
How can these people say there is no impact on the environment? Calling it Natrium. It isn't natural it is chemical and has big run off. Hence I asked. Sure it doesn't have the same nuclear waste. It has other run off. Read that Wiki link. Can you do that. With the rest of the chemicals in molten salts, they are environmentally toxic. Again they aren't the full process of that reactor.
Sodium is a type of salt. There are many different types of salts.
You are like a dumb link bot
Because "I'M" the one completely ignorant of how MSRs function. Ok, pal.
How did you understand it?
Nuclear energy is an interest of mine. I have a laymen understanding of MSRs, Chernobyl, weapons development, etc.
How can these people say there is no impact on the environment?
MSRs are self regulating. If the pressure gets too high it will stop, that's just because of the properties of these molten salts. Chernobyl on the other hand was made from spying on other programs so they were trying to fill in gaps. It had what was called a "positive output ratio" or some such nonsense. Basically the hotter it got, the better it ran. Which is completely illegal and imoral by any intelligent standards.
Sure, I bet if it did leak it wouldn't be great. It's by far much safer than what we're doing now, but you can't refine molten salts and attach them to an ICBM.
The speculation fucko was is sodium harmful to the environment. Yes.
Speculation was does the reactor called natrium, nothing natural about it using a chemical process, create run off. Again the answer is yes
Now answer how using sodium was so much better than carbon? I am struggling to understand it.
I didn't need your life story. I didn't ask for it, I don't care what you studied if you're bullshit and stupid. I speculated and since have had really dumb little bitches tell me really stupid things. The paper shits some advertising, next they're getting vaccinated for free and now their face is crooked, they can't have kids, and their brain is cloted, and their heart is enlarged, then they're in a coma but the press told them to swallow. I don't care about your Chernobyl. Speculation was the above. Not dumb analogies. Not how does it compare to nuclear, it doesn't, it doesn't have the same output.
The run off is toxic. Sodium. Salt is toxic. It kills fauna and flora. Way to go and turn Wyoming into a desert.
It could potentially be much worse than carbon.
Where are its emissions occurring? How do they affect the surrounding environment. It could potentially cause a much worse environmental effect. Sodium into an otherwise wooded state. What complete fuckos. Just more mad corporate bullshit. Their ad campaign is almost convincing except study under that hood.
You seem to be confused.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt
"Molten salts" are salts of compounds like flouride, cyanide, chlorine, etc. Not literally table salt.
That is ridiculous. Sodium is salt. It has the same chemical properties of salt. Sodium. You are like a dumb link bot. Google's what did you Google, molten salt. Was that everything they quoted in the press? How did you understand it? Did you read the chemicals of molten salts. Chlorides and nitrates? In that Wiki.
How can these people say there is no impact on the environment? Calling it Natrium. It isn't natural it is chemical and has big run off. Hence I asked. Sure it doesn't have the same nuclear waste. It has other run off. Read that Wiki link. Can you do that. With the rest of the chemicals in molten salts, they are environmentally toxic. Again they aren't the full process of that reactor.
It potentially is worse than carbon.
Sodium is a type of salt. There are many different types of salts.
Because "I'M" the one completely ignorant of how MSRs function. Ok, pal.
Nuclear energy is an interest of mine. I have a laymen understanding of MSRs, Chernobyl, weapons development, etc.
MSRs are self regulating. If the pressure gets too high it will stop, that's just because of the properties of these molten salts. Chernobyl on the other hand was made from spying on other programs so they were trying to fill in gaps. It had what was called a "positive output ratio" or some such nonsense. Basically the hotter it got, the better it ran. Which is completely illegal and imoral by any intelligent standards.
Sure, I bet if it did leak it wouldn't be great. It's by far much safer than what we're doing now, but you can't refine molten salts and attach them to an ICBM.
What are you babbling on about?
The speculation fucko was is sodium harmful to the environment. Yes. Speculation was does the reactor called natrium, nothing natural about it using a chemical process, create run off. Again the answer is yes
Now answer how using sodium was so much better than carbon? I am struggling to understand it.
I didn't need your life story. I didn't ask for it, I don't care what you studied if you're bullshit and stupid. I speculated and since have had really dumb little bitches tell me really stupid things. The paper shits some advertising, next they're getting vaccinated for free and now their face is crooked, they can't have kids, and their brain is cloted, and their heart is enlarged, then they're in a coma but the press told them to swallow. I don't care about your Chernobyl. Speculation was the above. Not dumb analogies. Not how does it compare to nuclear, it doesn't, it doesn't have the same output.