Wasn’t it insured for too small amount to cover everything though? Don’t get me wrong, I’m 99% positive they swapped Olympic and titanic cause of the previous damage to Olympic, the other ship was simply in the wrong place to take on the passengers, and no captain instantly slips into his dress uniform when woken up due to an iceberg collision. Still, it jogs the noggin why the insurance wasn’t enough to cover the loss.
I went down the rabbit hole of Olympic - Titanic swapping a few years ago and when you compare pictures, it's pretty undeniable.
Opponents of the central bank were on board. They get killed, and the federal reserve act is pushed through congress in the middle of the night a year and a half later.... And here we are
So are you thinking they used the “tragedy” as the plot to be rid of them, or was it a happy happenstance that they were onboard and they took the chance and used it to off them?
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we represent temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow) aka growth defined by loss aka momentum (resistance) defined by motion (velocity).
The few suggest INSU'RANCE, noun [from insure.] - "the act of assuring against loss"; which represents assurance of our status quo as resistance within velocity. Why? To deceive the many to pay for their (ignored) existence to the few.
As for money...the highest value within ALL (flow) represents ONEs (form) choice of evaluation within. The few suggest substitute value (money) to the many; who when consenting to it; ignore their choice of evaluation. Money devalues ONEs evaluation of ALL existing value.
It was after it we built that the troubles came up. A collision with HMS Hawk left it troubled with a permanent 5 degree list, and they were blamed for it because even though boat rules, military is still priority over civilian. Other issues as well, but when you take damage your yard monkies can’t fix and hide? Time for some book cooking, some name swapping and an “oops”.
Wasn’t it insured for too small amount to cover everything though? Don’t get me wrong, I’m 99% positive they swapped Olympic and titanic cause of the previous damage to Olympic, the other ship was simply in the wrong place to take on the passengers, and no captain instantly slips into his dress uniform when woken up due to an iceberg collision. Still, it jogs the noggin why the insurance wasn’t enough to cover the loss.
I went down the rabbit hole of Olympic - Titanic swapping a few years ago and when you compare pictures, it's pretty undeniable.
Opponents of the central bank were on board. They get killed, and the federal reserve act is pushed through congress in the middle of the night a year and a half later.... And here we are
So are you thinking they used the “tragedy” as the plot to be rid of them, or was it a happy happenstance that they were onboard and they took the chance and used it to off them?
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we represent temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow) aka growth defined by loss aka momentum (resistance) defined by motion (velocity).
The few suggest INSU'RANCE, noun [from insure.] - "the act of assuring against loss"; which represents assurance of our status quo as resistance within velocity. Why? To deceive the many to pay for their (ignored) existence to the few.
As for money...the highest value within ALL (flow) represents ONEs (form) choice of evaluation within. The few suggest substitute value (money) to the many; who when consenting to it; ignore their choice of evaluation. Money devalues ONEs evaluation of ALL existing value.
It was after it we built that the troubles came up. A collision with HMS Hawk left it troubled with a permanent 5 degree list, and they were blamed for it because even though boat rules, military is still priority over civilian. Other issues as well, but when you take damage your yard monkies can’t fix and hide? Time for some book cooking, some name swapping and an “oops”.