Wasn’t it insured for too small amount to cover everything though? Don’t get me wrong, I’m 99% positive they swapped Olympic and titanic cause of the previous damage to Olympic, the other ship was simply in the wrong place to take on the passengers, and no captain instantly slips into his dress uniform when woken up due to an iceberg collision. Still, it jogs the noggin why the insurance wasn’t enough to cover the loss.
I went down the rabbit hole of Olympic - Titanic swapping a few years ago and when you compare pictures, it's pretty undeniable.
Opponents of the central bank were on board. They get killed, and the federal reserve act is pushed through congress in the middle of the night a year and a half later.... And here we are
So are you thinking they used the “tragedy” as the plot to be rid of them, or was it a happy happenstance that they were onboard and they took the chance and used it to off them?
Wasn’t it insured for too small amount to cover everything though? Don’t get me wrong, I’m 99% positive they swapped Olympic and titanic cause of the previous damage to Olympic, the other ship was simply in the wrong place to take on the passengers, and no captain instantly slips into his dress uniform when woken up due to an iceberg collision. Still, it jogs the noggin why the insurance wasn’t enough to cover the loss.
I went down the rabbit hole of Olympic - Titanic swapping a few years ago and when you compare pictures, it's pretty undeniable.
Opponents of the central bank were on board. They get killed, and the federal reserve act is pushed through congress in the middle of the night a year and a half later.... And here we are
So are you thinking they used the “tragedy” as the plot to be rid of them, or was it a happy happenstance that they were onboard and they took the chance and used it to off them?