Storm Shadow is a clone of Taurus or vice versa (or, at least both based on the same core). So, the fate of Taurus will be the same as of Storm Shadow.

Hardly current Russian authorities will react to Taurus any different. Looks like quiet mitigation of yet another wounderwaffe produce much more butthurt for Western MIC than any loud PR, regardless positive or negative. It's truly infuriate them when use of their crap can't be used for stock exchange games.

With high probability, there will be just transient mention of that Taurus somewhere in the middle of routine daily list of downed missiles and drones and that's all.

On the political level, the fact of using Taurus will be added to the huge bureaucratic catalog of facts under some category like "unfriendly actions of Germany authorities" kept since Germany establishment as a state. Also, it will be put in some UN papers too, just to have a yet another bureaucratic link. And who knows, when and for what purpose this will suddenly pop up putting Germany into the corner in some future important deal that looks completely unconnected.

Name one instance of liberals migrating to a country less liberal and the country not turning more liberal as a result.

This easily solved with switching to meritocracy. Liberals have no merits, so they will be thrown out of such society and none of their words will have a value.

It could be a very bright idea to somehow integrate Canada into US, but not the way all that idiots think.

• Canada is full of all resources US potentially will ever need for independent and wealthy existence without any need for its "reserve currency" scam.
• It could be a greatest spit into the disgusting inbred muzzle of shabby British crown.
• It could solve to some extent a problem with workplaces and reasons for creating wealthy educated workforce class during development of endless frozen land on the north.

However, none of this is on the table, nobody think about it in that way and nobody really will do anything about it.

Again.

• "taRtar" and so "taRtaria" comes from ancient Greek language and means something like "hellish". Comes from mythology as name of location. It is mythological toponym.
• "tatar" and "tataria" comes from ancient Turkic language and comes from the "tat" - "to pull", "to drag" because nomands dragged their belongings travelling. In Russian there even word "тащить" from the same origin, with same meaning - "to drag".

None of horse nomads named "taRtars" ever here.

That "taRtar" thing is purely European thing. Ancient Greek and Greek mythology was part of higher education in Europe in MidAges. So "taRtar" came into European culture along with ancient Greek literature. It was used to name something unknown and so horrible and intriguing. When some cartographer had no clue about some area on the map, he, being educated person often name that "terra incognita" as "TaRtaria". Obviously, people that should live in that fictional land named "TaRtars" by ignorant Europeans.

"TaRtaria" is exactly the same as "Atlantis", but unlike Atlantis scary and horrible. Mythical unknown land. Sometimes, due to ignorance, placed in the unknown to Europeans lands to the East of Volga river, to hide absence of real knowledge. That's it.

Word "tartar" is a greek word that means something close to "hell".

This have absolutely nothing to do with any nomads at all.

But it have everything with dishonesty of MiddleAge cartographers.

Mid-ages cartographers often draw "misterious" "Tartaia" (as literally Kingdom of Hell) on maps to attract buyers and pose themselves as like they know something about places they don't know shit about.

There also was and is Tatars, an old indo-european ethnos inhabitating region along and beyond Volga river where it merges with Kama river that become at some point Tatar kingdom that now is Tatarstan Republic in Russia. Tatars never was Asian looking. They are Turkich (Not as in Turks, Tatars have nothing to do with Turkey and never ever was even in Osman Empire, but as much larger ethnic family).

Asian looking was Mongols. At the time of Golden Horde Tatars took the side of Mongols after Mongols defeated their kingdom. So Golden Horde became known as Tatar-Mongol Horde.

Words "Tatar" and "Tartar" have absolutely nothing common at all, aside from similar letters. They are from completely different ancient languages and have completely different meaning.

"Tararia" on MidAge maps is a pure bullshit. On very few maps "Tartaria" kind of cover or touch place where real Tataria should be, but that's just a coincidence, because MidAges European cartographers was not aware about anything to the East of Novgorod in the best case.

Most doctors are perfectly replaceable by a simple script in some noob programming language, there is even no any need for ANN.

Basically all modern doctors do is ask about sympthoms, measure few parameters, then search through established protocols and read prescribed procedures and medicines. Then tell you do that procedures and medicines. No any warranty given at all.

Only surgeons and few other types of medics do some human job.

There was no any Tartaria here. There was and is Tataria - land where tatars live. It have nothing to do with "Tartaria" - fictional land that could be found on ancient maps.

This "Tartaria" shit comes from ancient cartographers who right with each other on the market of selling maps. Who would buy a map with just boring towns, rivers, hills and fields, if there will be a map with "Tartaria" and "Here live dragons" and naked murmaid in the corner.

"Tartaria" comes from ancient greek "tartar" - hell. Europeans like scary things.

Cartographers was too lazy and greedy to research and map endless Russian lands, so just put scary and misterious "tartatia" on the map. Who would check? That's all. No any mistery, no any enigma. Only business.

We have more than enough real misteries and miracles here, no any need for European cartographers scam.

There easily could be "more probable faces" due to encoding nuances in DNA.

Or may be humans see less difference in some face configurations and more in other, like they do with colors, odors and taste.

You are not the only one who meet with such phenomena. :)

Technically cloning is not very complex, so it is possible it could be done in the past, So you can't ignore that possibility too.

Flat Earth is an old British psyop with the goal to undermine knowledge that threated British baseless myth that Britain is a Queen of Seas. It was financed and pushed by British Crown directly. Idea was to inject it into circles around world who began to question British myth to make them look idiotic. First abroad center of that shit was established in US, as a rival of Britain at the time. Again using money of British Crown.

You can't GPT things that nobody ever wrote about. That way things become even more interesting. It's easy now to separate original thinkers from those without own thoughts.

I wouldn't dismiss meme completely too, but it could be inteesting to estimate a probablility of twin for living people.

Human genetics is in strange state today. From one point it is studied intensely and financed a lot, but from the other side, it is under heavy pressure to not even try to discuss and study things that could be accounted as "intolerant". Looks like studying connection of the human appearance with actual DNA code fall into "intolerant" area.

Human DNA have limited capacity. So, you could encode a limited number of different faces. If your pool of people noticeably larger than that number, you will always be able to find a twin.

Do the math and show that it is impossible, that number of distinctly different faces that could be encoded in DNA is larger than number of all people ever lived or live in past 100 years.

Then your meme will get a lot of sense, and become a serious proof of conspiracy. Current one, without math and even without names of people shown have no much sense.

There is no any magic, just a technology we are not aware of. There is no matrix, it's an excuse for dumb to do nothing and waste time for senseless thought games. Nature easily tell her secrets, you only need to listen. Everything that is not replicateable is a total, complete bullshit. We have God given ability to practically study, research, understand and use His creation. In all its glory and depth. Those who do not want to practically study, research, understand and use God's creation are waste.

There is still no any useful and replicateable device that use aether theory. Not a single one you could build, use and be certain aether exists. It's OK when new theory exists only in the mind of inventor for years or even decade. But if for centuries we have absolutely nothing working on the principles of that theory, then it is a pure bullshit or blatant scam.

Life is real. So everything that make it is absolutely real too. Everything real have physical properties.

Nice. Nobody want to study physical properties of aether, so it is still just another hypothetical concept just like "dark matter" or "Higgs field". Shitloads of talks and math, without any practical study or even physical proof of existence. There are a lot of exactly same things in modern science, aether is just one of the first. It is kind of normal today - invent things you could write a lot of articles about and do a math masturbation endlessly, but without any attempt to study and use practically.

So, OK, 19th century "dark matter". Something abstract, that somehow "should exist" but inherently could not be used or even studied practically. Nothing exceptional.

Then why do you need spreading of that fucking blatant lie about "removing aether from periodic table"? What's the point of meme you posted?

I'm in no way against any concept by default. But when concept apologists don't even care about anything practical about their concept, it is at least suspicious.

When I apply perfectly scientific and valid question - "was the thing isolated?" to the coronahoax, f.e., then it's OK. But if I apply exactly same question to, say, aether, or another thing circulating in conspiracy theorist circles, that's generate tons of butthurt.

Not isolated, never studied practically, inherently could not be used. And with that stupid and completely unnecessary lies on top. Sorry, I will not buy that theory, just like I will not buy "dark matter" or "relativity", or whatever abstract shit in physics. Even if the math is perfectly OK.

Some older versions of the periodic table

I posted older versions of the periodic table. One is directly from Mendeleev handwritten drafts. There was no any periodic table older. There is no any aether in it.

one published by Mendeleev in 1904

Mendeleev published an article in 1905, with a modified table where he marked a place for two hypotetical elements "x" and "y" he discussed in article and tried to estimate their properties. He never assumed this table as a "correct" one or intended for teaching or whatever.

(Notice that nobody from those obsessed with aether posts ever discuss that second element - coronium. How is that? It is as important as aether element named "newtonium" by Mendeleev, and if coronium does not exist, then there is no place for newtonium)

This modified periodic table from 1905 article is nothing more than an illustration for the article. Mendeleev himself wrote about this:

Я и смотрю на свою далекую от полноты попытку понять природу мирового эфира с реально химической стороны не более, как на выражение суммы накопившихся у меня впечатлений, вырывающихся исключительно лишь по той причине, что мне не хочется, чтобы мысли, навеваемые действительностью, пропадали. Вероятно, что подобные же мысли приходили многим, но, пока они не изложены, они легко и часто исчезают и не развиваются, не влекут за собой постепенного накопления достоверного, которое одно сохраняется. Если в них есть хоть часть природной правды, которую мы все ищем, попытка моя не напрасна, ее разработают, дополнят и поправят, а если моя мысль неверна в основаниях, ее изложение, после того или иного вида опровержения, предохранит других от повторения. Другого пути для медленного, но прочного движения вперед я не знаю

my simplified English translation:

I look at my attempt to understand the nature of aether from real chemical side, which is far from completeness, as expression of the sum of my accumulated impressions, flowing out only because I don't want my thoughts about it to be lost. Probably thoughts like mine come to many minds, but until they expounded, they easily come lost, does not develop and so does not accumulate as knowledge which is only matter. If they have a tiny bit of natural truth we all look for, my attempt is not vain, it will be developed and enchanced by others. If my thought is inherently wrong, after one or another kind of disproval, it's expound will prevent others to make my mistake. I don't know any other way for slow, but strong movement forward.

Mendeleev know about aether theory since the beginning, but never really included it in his periodic table, because it is a table of physical and chemical properties. He directly wrote that there are much more research on aether have to be done, but nobody tried to isolate it in pure form and study its physical and chemical properties. So, it was never put in periodic table.

Do the research, find out physical and chemical properties of aether, and only then it will get a right to have place in periodic table. This had not been done earlier and nobody of those who talk about aether theory today have any intention to do that. Case closed. There is no place for aether in periodic table, just like 150 years ago.

His 1905 article was like "OK, guys, if you wnat to imagine where aether could be placed in periodic table, then here is my assumptions, and it could look like that.". Account it as a prove of aether existence or whatever such memes try to achieve is a plain idiocy.

Nobody removed aether from periodic table, because it was never in it since the beginning.

There was no aether in periodic table.

One of the first ever Mendeleev tables, vertical version from his drafts of 1869: https://minio.nplus1.ru/app-images/196881/972c542a7e93707f0a85e8c4d8302083.jpg

First printed version of vertical table Mendeleev sent to universities for discussion: https://elementy.ru/images/eltpub/otkrytie_period_zakona_04_474.jpg

Mendeleev periodic table from 1871 textbook: https://minio.nplus1.ru/app-images/196894/02c36bc808269b9c50c21ede30614e4b.png

Wall-mounted periodic table found in St.Andrews University from around 1885: https://news.st-andrews.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/periodic-table-001.jpg

Aether coudn't be in periodic table, just because Mendeleev discovered a today well-known pattern in "atomic and chemical properties of elements". Aether was never studied on the atomic and chemical properties.

Mendeleev wrote a big article about aether only in 1905, where he tried to find its place in periodic table for the first time, in response to multiple questions about aether place from other scientists, but went to conclusion that it is out of its scope, until aether atomic and chemical properties will be discovered and studied. He even tried to estimate aether properties it should have to fit into the table, and estimated aether "atom"(particle) mass as 9.6e-7 to 5.3e-11 atomic mass units ( 0.9Kev - 0.05 eV) constantly moving with a speed of 2250 km/s. This particles does not interact with matter or do that very rare. For me, this looks more like some low-energy neutrinos - light neutral leptons that rarely interact with usual matter. Who knows, may be there could be kind of matter (gas/liquid/solid) made from neutrinos created in quantities allowing studying physical and chemical properties of this substance, and only then we will be able to talk about placing "zero" element in periodic table, Pretty interesting task and research, but nobody tried to do that yet. At least I don't know about such attempts among existing researches on creating exotic matters of different kind.

There was no aether in periodic table, so there was nothing to remove in 1908. Mendeleev wrote an article on aether only in 1905, and didn't find a place for it in his table, because aether didn't have known physical and chemical properties at the time. Since scientists who was very interested in aether theory want to have aether as element, they tried to place it in a table of elements, so there could be some third-party unofficial periodic tables printed with aether in it somewhere, but they was just counterfeits of original one.

Aether problem is very interesting thing, actually, regardless of how it named in some timeframe - "dark matter", "higgs field", "fluctuating vacuum" and other stuff. Why there is a need to lie about it? There was no aether in periodic table, so nobody removed it. This does not mean anything about aether. I see a lot of narratives circulating about aether in conspiracy theorist circles, but never saw anything about studying it with modern technologies. Nobody from that circles talk about chemical properties of aether f.e. So why it should be in periodic table in the first place? It's just doesn't have any sense. Everything about aether today is as senseless as all that Nikola Tesla stuff, torsion fields stuff, and so on. Only talks and shitty memes based on lies. Why aether need that lies? What those who spread lies about aether and its position in science want to achieve with this lies? Marginalise it even more, or feed the sheeple who are LARPing conspiracy theorists?

Interesting. AFAIK he didn't do the same for Netanyahoo with videos of actual ongoing Jewish genocide of non-Jews in Plaestine.... And this is taking in account that you could make a succesfull deal with a nigger, but you should never ever make any deal, even a tiny one with a Jew. As a businessman, Trump should know that.

Because it wasn’t his choice as you assume.

So it is even more strange. If it was not his choice, today he have endless options to break out.

Also I'm not quite understand what's the point of dead, but alive celebrity for Jews. Jews make money and other profits from celebrities by using them as celebrities. Dead celebrity is not a celebrity anymore. Today Elvis, if still alive is just an ordinary old man for man, completely useless fro them.

Whell, that's yet another thing I don't quite understand in american culture.

As far as I understand theory of alive Elvis is that Elvis simulated his death to get rid of popularity/enemies/attention/etc. and live incognito as ordinary man somewhere. Perfectly valid, as some celebrities really become tired of their celebrity status and just want to live normal life.

All Elvis alive theorists I met are fans of Elvis.

So the controversy - why the people who at least respect Elvis, are trying to ruin Elvis' plan for normal life?

Elvis decided to change his life and leave the stage. Why not let your favorit singer to live in peace and quiet? He obviously deserve that.

And why it's the news?

Adding or removing protons to or from atoms is nothing new at all. People do it since mid-1900. Nature do that since the beginning of times.

Creating gold is kind of "jump the shark" for such lab. Not much different from making iron from nickel or aluminium from sulfur. Gold is too cheap to make creating it from other elements in any way profitable.

I'll be much more exited about producing technetium in market quantities or some even more rare and expensive elements. Or if they finally find that "stability island" among transuraniums. Who wouldnt want naquadah?

Gold is not the metal that will ever justify using this technology of elements creation to make it. Gold is everywhere and cheap as dirt in comparison with things that really interesting.

Most Zionists do not like the religious zealots with twirly hair and bowlers -- they just wanted the ethos of the land.

Religious zealots have special role in that tribe. They are kind of strategists, keepers and watchers. Zionists, Western libtards, bankers are different tactical forces.

I got my first computer in april 1997.

Well, I made my first computer in 1990. Sinclair ZX Spectrum clone. In 1997 I already had few PCs and notebooks. Usually bought used ones for cheap, often broken, fixed them, and used.

Then you go over to the other end.. and try to shoot them back between the goal posts. It was lotsa fun.

IDK, shooting cans from shotgun or even pneumatic handgun exite me more. May be just not my game inherently.

what you want is the damn club to be in the same spot, right.. so if you're moving your arms all over the place.. it's bad.

Kind of. Hands are less repeatable, because there are too many muscles in them, so it is much more complex to command them all properly and precise.

That is why, f.e. in sport handgun shooting, they teach you to grasp a gun in your hand so, that you don't need to move your hand to look stright throgh the gun sight to the foresight. Gun should be positioned like it is a continuation of your strightened arm. And you just rise your whole hand and target is in sight already, you don't need to use dozens of muscles of hand to catch the target in sight, just rise your hand and shoot.

Same with golf. To hit the ball you need stright hand, then it's repeatable and less complex, so much precise, because you have to command only few muscles, not dozens.

Even hammering nails is much easier if you grasp hammer properly beforehand.

Didn't actually play baseball at all. In childhood, I tried to play similar game, "lapta", very old traditional Russian game, but wasn't succesfull in it at all. :)

how old are you, man

A tiny bit younger than you. :)

But good day today.. beat the cabal at sports betting. Now it's cash on hand with no slaverly. lol

Congratulations! But remember to quit timely. Cabal don't like lucky ones.

Remember, TPTB* do not live in Israel

I'm not sure that term "live" applicable to that species. As for TPTB puppets, Jewish ones will use Israel as perfectly safe place if caught red-handed to avoid persecution.

Thanks, but I don't like computer games that simulate things I could easily do for real. :) I just can't understand, what's the point. I have a good golf field near me, only 50km/30miles avay, so why would I play golf on PC if I could just drive to real golf? Especially taking in account that PC is more a tool for me than a toy. If I have some free time, spending it with computer will be the least option I'll choose.

Well, actually golf is playable only 5 months a year here, but there is also many winter entertainments too. Starting with cleaning paths and road from a sudden feet of snow in the morning. Best fitness ever, even with snowblower, and it's free! :)

From the other side, I have to admit that writing computer golf game could be a pretty interesting thing, from the implementation od realworld physics simulation point of view. I could imagine myself writing computer golf game as self-entertainment, not playing it. :)