collapse of the markets
You mean collapse of shitty jewish casinos that just pump money from regular people to elite?
They worshipped the government when the helicopter money came.
So, shitty jewish casino that stole money from people is collapsing and government gives money. Why should they struggle for jewish casino that stoleing their money and hate government that gives them money?
Why they should do anything about it?
While I do not support just printing and giving out money, even as a compensation for coronahoax and vaccinehoax (big pharma and its slaves in governments should pay for it, from their personal wealth, not from tax money), I'm shure that "markets" have to be completely destroyed and all that profiteering and gambling with stocks, futures and other valuable things have to be prosecuted as felony.
We have WiFi 5GHz since 2009 when 802.11n was introduced. Most routers made since 2010 have 5GHz and it turned on by default. So, a dozen of years and hundreds of million devices and nobody from "awakened" crowd tell a word about it, versus few of 5G when hype become annoying.
It could sound sad, but sometimes I think that "awakened" crowd is not very different from "woke" one. And the worst thing is that while "woke" crowd poisoning sheeple, "awakened" crowd poisoning those who have a chance.
I see the same bullshit from ignorant "truthtellers" over and over, while it is their first and main task - question everything.
Here I found one of rare places where at least some users really do that. Seriously, it is very rare thing even among conspiracy theorists and I appreciate it here.
As for effect of 5GHz frequency - you have absolutely reasonable concern, but we just don't know anything about it. I already take some effeorts to do some math in that thread about mentioned paper, and thing they really study is not the thing you could meet in real life from all sources of 5GHz radiation. It is just like studying harm of heat (terahertz radiation!) using gas torch on mouse and then some journalist will write an article "scientists prove that central heating radiator in your house is a serious threat that could burn you to the ash!!!".
This is sad as fuck, really.
Most interesting thing for me is why US nearly banned all research on fast-neutron reactors (breeders). Looks like a treason to me.
Shortly, fast-neutron reactor fuel is depleted fuel from regular reactors. And fast-neutron reactor waste is a fuel for regular reactors. That way you could utilise more than 30% of stored energy from uranium ore, instead of 3% in one-way fuel cycle. To close fuel cycle you need 1 fast-neutron reactor for approx. 10 regular ones. In the end you get much less harmful waste with short-living isotopes that have to be hold in storage for few years only to become harmless. Aside of that, this waste is a source of very rare elements, like technetium or extremely rare rare-earth metals.
In Russia there are 2 commercial fast-neutron reactors on Beloyarsk NPP that work on nuclear waste from other NPPs and provide heat and electricity to Ekaterinburg region. There plans to build more to completely close local nuclear fuel cycle and use foreign nuclear waste as fuel. And as a result get not only electricity, but also new fuel for regular NPPs. Just think a little - west wil give us nuclear fuel and pay us for taking it. IDK, looks like very interesting business, isn't it?
Why other countries that own advanced nuclear tech like France or US just abandoned that ultimate stuff years ago, despite relatively good results? France even had a most powerful fast-neutron reactor in the world, but ran it only in test mode and despite good and stable results it was suddenly shut down and disassembled 1998. Old small one, working from 1972 again only in testing mode was closed in 2009. And all research in that direction was stopped. US closed two unfinished projects of fast-neutron reactors without waiting any results.
Looks like some insanity, really. Especially when at the same time, same countries cry about nuclear waste problem.
I have nothing against coal. I consider burning coal even useful, because it returns useful CO2 into Earth atmosphere making Earth greener and with better climate in some distant future. I want my grandchildren live on Earth that is green from pole to pole, not on that half dead Earth we live now.
But having nothing against coal does not mean that I have to have something against NPPs or hydroelectric, or natural gas or black oil power stations. They are all good things, that provide energy to people.
Fission isn't even economically viable,
I already provided you numbers. It is more than economically viable in Russia and gives stable profit. IDK, if US have some strange tradition to overprice every nut and bolt for any more or less serious tech and have no tech to use depleted fuel, it does not mean that NPP is not profitable. It means that US economy is broken.
I believe the nuclear shilling is just a diversion to tie up money while not creating a solution.
Nuclear power is too old to be a diversion for anything. It does not differ much from coal burning power plants nowdays.
Meanwhile, do you know that ash dump of regular coal power plant is more radioactive than working NPP?
They've managed to produce a return.
And as usual it is not how it sounds. For very short time they produce excess heat spending a lot of electricity using a very complex device. This is very far for producing electricity and running device is self-sustainable mode and I'm not shure that for their device they will be able to solve the problem of converting heat they get back into electricity efficiently enough to run the device on its own.
It is even worse than this, really. If journalists did not lie, they get 2.5 MJ of heat from 2.1 MJ of laser beam. How many MJ of electricity was spent to get that 2.1 MJ in laser beam? Something tells me that laser with efficiency more than 80% does not exist. Best semiconductor lasers have something near 60% efficiency, and they barely available in amounts enough to build 2.1 MJ assembly. Whatever, even with unreal 60% efficiency they spent 3.5 MJ (1kWh) of electricity to get 2.1 MJ (0.6kWh) of laser light to make 2.5 MJ (0.7kWh) of heat. It is just a very expensive, highly sophisticated and complex, but very unefficient electric heater.
Nearly all possible fusion reactors produce excess heat if they somehow ignite fusion reaction. Even fusor you could build in garage on weekend could do that. But that does not make any breakthrough at all. Seriously, you literally could repeat same "breakthrough" in your garage for something like $100, but with another technology. Just use protection from high-energy neutron radiation that will be a result of fusion reaction to be on safe side.
Tokamaks, now in form of ITER have that "breakthrough" since 60s, when first signs of fusion reaction was received. But it seems that it is much more profitable for fusion crowd to constnatly receive multibillion grants for endless research than to make really working proof-of-concept device.
Moreover, fusion reactor is not "cheap, clean energy" even if it will be finally working. Fusion energy is neraly same as regular fission reactor energy with nearly same problems and drawbacks. The differences only in sources of radioactive waste and dangers of meltdown. Fusion gives a powerful stream of high-energy neutrons, that easily convert materials used in core into radioactive isotopes. So, instead of depleted rods you will get a nuclear waste in form of reactor core case that become radioactive and weared by extreme temperatures. Same with meltdowns - that will not be rods that could melt if something goes wrong, but core that could be burned if fusion plasma become unstable. The main difference is in fuel cost, but it is not as large as many think. Deuterium is not a cheap thing, despite being everywhere. Tritium is even more expensive. Add to this complexity of maintenance and risks of new technology and you will get nearly same cost as for relgular NPP. So, no, fusion reactors will not solve anything really. It is nor clean, nor cheap energy as they told you. And again - that power stations will belong only to big corporations, in no case you will allowed to buy a compact Mr.Fusion for your EV to replace a fucking battery.
Yes, that is the same case.
The main thing they hide about greenhouse effect is that it lead to lowering all possible temperature gradient on the planet - day vs night, summer vs winter, equator vs poles. Right now in equatorial areas where local greenhouse is in effect, there are tropical forests with gradient near 10°C, and at the same lattitudes there exists deserts where gradient is near 60°C.
Rising of average temperature in some place does not mean higher maximum temperatures, what will you prefer - -10°C to +30°C with average +10°C or +5°C - +25°C with average +15°C? looks like "awful temperature rise", but really it is a nicer and more comfortable climate. That is the real effect of greenhouse on Earth.
Really green Earth from pole to pole without deserts, ice caps and severe weather like hurricanes, tornadoes and other stuff that is driven mostly by temperature gradients. Greenhose effect could make Earth really lovely place that could sustain magnitude orders more people than we have now. Endless habitable land with good agriculture and stable, nice climate with good protection against solar maximums and minimums and other space weather events. As it was, for tens of millions of years in the past with short periods if ice ages. Along with 4 times higher CO2 levels. As an ultimate unconcious thing we keep 20°C at our homes in the honor of that past, and that is exactly the average temperature of eocene when mammals appeared and thrive on Earth. Greenhouse effect is not a problem, it is a solution. But somehow, that elite bastards want it stopped at any cost.
Do people in Russia have stem cell and/or planceta injections, or vitamin infusions?
We have nearly everything that exists on the West (may be except that gender-changing treatments and surgery and heavy use of sedatives for stress "treatment") plus some Soviet legacy like UHF-therapy or Ilizarov device for curing broken bones, plus some Eastern practices like needle therapy or ginseng or other herbs medications.
Do you think the stem cell and placenta therapies will be safe from the vaccines/spike proteins?
I don't know. To give an exact answer, you need reasearch which is problematic for medical scientists who are under heavy control of WHO terrorist organisation.
Theoretically, if spike protein could pass placenta barrier, and it could stick to stem cell membranes (that's any viruse spike protein primary function - to stick and penetrate into cell), than it will be definitely found along with stem cells.
Which frequency did you guys use and against which illnesses? Bacteria? So like for the common cold or pneumonia?
It is 27-150MHz frequency and it used to deliver heat into inflamation area. That have nothing to do with bacteria or anything else, just internal heating of troubled organs inside body. Just like you use hot potions, heating pads or sauna to get rid from cold, but slightly more advanced and targeted. Heating and electric currents in inflamation area change permeability of blood vessels and membranes and this intensifies inflow and activity of immune bodies into area of inflammation.
Mostly breathing system and jonts treated with UHF-therapy.
There are dozen of devices was developed for hospitals and clinics, currently four of them mostly in use - УВЧ(UHF)-30, УВЧ-66, УВЧ-70 and УВЧ-80. They are differ in power and frequency, but all used for same propose.
How do you treat colds with RF?
Put two plates over troubled area and feed them with RF as antenna poles. You could even find a schematics of that devices, say УВЧ-80-4 http://www.medteh.info/_fr/70/6067782.jpg . Plates (E3,E4) or inductor (E6) that you put on treated area are in top-right of schematic, connected to output winding of output transformer (L11,L12,L13) dirven by vacuum tube (YL1,YL2) oscillator. Not a high-tech, really, just powerful RF field generator with variable power output.
Do you point it at the head?
No. You don't cure something heating your brain, usually. But small electrodes could be used on nose to cure the antritis, f.e.
Lungs?
Yes. Or infammated knee joint or whatever.
Or use a full body device?
No, it is two plates positioned over target area, something like this - https://static.tildacdn.com/tild6461-3535-4635-b734-393131366263/963_original.jpg or single inductor (like in induction cooker) pad placed over target area.
It is common knowledge in Russia?
Yes, and widely used. Now may be less than in USSR, because of that WHO terrorist organisation guidances and big farma influence, but still popular and well-known therapy since 1950s.
This is really useful information.
You are welcome.
Up to a certain range of RF, it is awesome and collagen producing. Over a certain point it can be dangerous.
Exactly. That is why real studies necessary on that topic, not some hype articles about "scary" "5G", but thorough research on different frequences and modulations.
5G is a much wider range than 5-6GHz.
There are two frequency ranges (FR1 and FR2) in 5G. First is the same as 3G/4G - 450, 900, 1800, 2600, 4800 MHz, FR2 is 27GHz (same band used by automatic doors sensors in every mall/gas station) and 38GHz intended for high-speed data, but it appear to be nearly useless outdoors due to heavy interference from rain/snow.
And who ever said Wifi can't have effects on the human being?
It could, but somehow only 5G is declared "harmful" by "awakened" public. Not 3G/4G, WiFi, door sensors, IoT devices, weather stations, remote controls and thousands of other devices nobody care about.
It is just insane. It is like study car accidents talking only about red Ford single-cab 4WD pickups and completely ignoring all other cars.
Real 5G controversy started from introduction of high data rates when at the same time 4G bandwith was not utilised even to 30% due to absence of fiber backbone between base stations. There is no any sense to introduce higher data rate from base station to mobile if you don't have high-speed connection of base station to internet. So with number of base station clients. even today 4G base stations are heavily underloaded. Many sane people had a reasonable question - if you don't utilise 4G bandwith, then why you need 5G with magnitude orders more bandwith? And there was pretty logical answer - to establish surveilance network using introduced IoT home appliances that will be stream surveillance data to base station storages that will be available to state agencies. Even Steven Wozniak - the forgotten and betrayed creator of Apple computers (yes, that Steve Jobs "genius" was just a manager, all tech was really created by Wozniak) rised that question about completely unnecessary 5G surveilance capabilities.
And at the exact same time that stupid hype about "harmful" 5G become widespread. Like a psyop to hide the real question about 5G.
Obviously there could be both kind of "bots" - those who upvote and those who downvote by reading the headline.
IDK, I don't really care about that karma/points stuff myself, but sometimes upvotes those who reply with some interesting point/argument regardless of my agreement with their point. Also I upvote interesting topics to have them in "Upvoted posts" list. Rarely downvote some really ignorant things.
Totally lost any interest when saw that picture in article - https://i0.wp.com/educate-yourself.org/cn/brainwavegraph.gif
That is not how amplitude modulation looks like. It is a very basic thing and such picture could be only an ignorance, not some occasional mistake.
Seriously, is it so hard to learn something about radiowaves before writing articles about radiowaves?
I'm not so doomy (does such word exists?) on that.
Humans are very adaptable creatures. All that technological pollutions are far lower than human adaptation levels. And we have no any really scientific data on many things we interfere with.
All that conclusions based on some statisitical observations are interesting, but really ungrounded and, as worst thing are uncheckable. Something is changing, but there are too many factors that could be a reason for changes and problems that every speculator could choose any reason he want to make his point of view and it will be even somehow backed with that statistical data. Look, you say that it is RF, but your opponent will say it is climate change or some other shit. And both of you will not able to provide any scientific proof, i.e. reproduceable experiment that prove that it is your thing is a reason for all that bad things.
I'm not really scared of RF, especially in >GHz bands because that frequencies have too low depth of penetration due to skin effect. I more prone to bet on medications, shitty food, psychological stress from all that money-making rush, even worsening relations between people as a reason for problems, than on some tech. But my point also have no any real proofs, just like yours. Jus some assumptions and some basic knowledge counterarguments from laws of physics to simple logic.
And that fearmongering narratives like all that 5G stuff does not help to find any truth in all that mess.
Taking that article - they mention SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) of 1.15 W/kg - that means each kilogram of organism should completely absorb 1.15W of RF energy every second. Even just termal effect of such level of power absorption will give unpredictable results, not necessary connected with RF itself, but with higher temperature. It is insane level you will not meet anywhere in regular life, unless you push your head to microwave oven or will sleep in radar dish. Your WiFi access point should work at 60Watts and all that power should be absorbed by your body, so you have to sit near that thing in some box with steel walls. Things gets more insane if you go for open air conditions. RF power fall proportionally to the square of distance. So, to reach that levels there should be insanely powerful base stations with kilowatts of power on antennas. Speaking of smartphone itself, you don't have such exposure too. And human body slightly larger than mouse - RF that could reach center of rat's brain will barely penetrate your skin and scull.
Funny, but RF energy often used as a treatment for some diseases as a way to warm up human flesh around ill lungs or other organs. Frequency, of course is lower than 5GHz band to provide better penetration. (27-150MHz at up to 150W for half an our or more) IDK about US, but in USSR/Russia so named UHF-therapy (Short wave therapy) is widely used to cure inflamations of different kind, mostly in breathing system and joints. I was often cured from colds by that devices in my childhood, as millions of Soviet children and adults without any side effects and I liked that UHF treatments much more than pills or shots - just a nice warm feeling right inside your body in the treated area, like somebody somehow put a pleasant warm heater right in troubling place inside.
So, you see, unnatural RF radiation didn't kill me even at very high levels, none of those who are so obsessed today with RF radiation ever could be exposed to. And I got nothing except positive outcomes in form of fast cured illness from that.
So, I have enough reasons to be sceptical and cautious with all that RF radiation hype articles.
In any case it will be more than reasonable to question everything, even things that seems to be against narratives.
WiFi 5GHz band works in range 5.1-5.9GHz, so should have exactly same effect.
So why 5G causes something, but somehow regular WiFi and other things that works in same 5GHz band, like FPV cameras or weather sensors and even IoT stuff is not?
That obsession with "obviously" "scary", "harmful" 5G is insane and do nothing except breaking validity of any serious questions about influence of high-frequency RF radiation we surrounded for a long time regardless of 5G availability.
Fuck, in the terms of interaction with human body that 5G is not differ from all other things that works in that bands nobody cares about.
Didn't find any signs of weakening Earth magnetic field.
https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/auroral-activity/magnetometers.html
There is DIY Earth field magnetometers projects like http://avtanski.net/projects/magnetometer/design.html , pretty interesting thing to build, may be I will spend some weekend on it.
Even cheap triple-axis magnetometer ICs, like those used in some smartphones could give interesting data if you put them in stable temperature conditions. Lot of such modules on aliexpress for a buck, not very sensitive, but definitely enough to detect serious disturbances in Earth magnetic field.
Even if it will be investigated, does Australia have an entity able to judge and sentence for jail all who is guilty? Something tells me that it will be investigators who will have problems, not those who push coronahoax nonsense on Australian citizens.
The only thing I interested in that twitter shit is the full list of censored topics. Maybe, among obvious and well-known mostly political shit there could be something barely known but really important and extremely harmful for them.
It is very easy to check if islamists take over financial infrastructure. Islam prohibit usury. Does taken over financial infrastructure allow usury? If yes - there are no any takeover or that was not islamists.
There are no any blacklists.
No full list of shadowbanned accounts.
No full list of every employee who participated in it
No full list of topics that was deemed "inapropriate" by that employees.
And so on. Looks more like spectacle, not like real and honest data release.
You are trying to tell that jews or their shabbes goys was not involved into JFK assasination? How many CIA agents was circumcised in 1963?
Something tells me that it will be nearly any US files. :)
Exactly.
And you don't need any site to track planes over your home. Even cheap RTL-SDR dongle and simple 1090MHz antenna will give you info about all planes within up to 80 miles radius for planes on 30kft altitude. At least for ones that does not turn their ADS-B off.
If any social media want your phone number - avoid it. It is not social media, it is just another corporation farm where you are a commodity or a cattle, not a user or customer.
No any social meida really need your phone number to work.
Farting on Planes is a violation and needs depressurization.
AFAIK, ventilation in planes made to minimize all effects of farting. I flew only few times in planes where was something wrong with ventilation, one very old TU-134 and other was 737s. But that was rare cases.
I see much more troubles from fat people. They have to pay for double or business, especially in modern planes where seat rows placed with minimum possible distance.
IRA has bombed stuff Hezbollah. They bomb even more stuff if they had the planes.
But they don't. They definitely could do it, but prefer not to do it. Plane is not a best target. Even if you want to kill 200 random people, than there are tons of much easier ways to do it. In case of train, you don't even need an explosives.
Also, the idea of some "terrorist" that just want to kill 200 random people is carefully planted in your mind by those who actually perform all that false-flags. There is no any sense to do it. Rebels are not that stupid as they want you to think. They are limited in resources and under heavy pressure. They have to be as effective in their actions as possible. Imagine, that you are rebel and trying to somehow do maximum harm to your enemy with least possible resources. What would you choose - bombing a plane with random people that will give you nothing except hate to you and your organization, or destroying some enemy military/security/police facility?
Would you plan to bomb a passenger plane if you fight against CDC, f.e.? Or you will prefer to spent your efforts to achieve real result?
Nothing is getting together in all that stupid image of "terrorism" as they want us to think. None of "terror attacks" ever benefited those who was declared perpetuators, only governments always received huge profit.
Planes falling out the sky is a far worse scenario than cars crashing. Why. Cars use roads.
And still, you have much larger chances to die in car crash than in a plane crash. And take a look - now they want to control your car "because of safety". This is in a huge part a direct consequence of your consent with their "safety measures" for passenger planes. If at the time enough people said - no, we will not fly with your airlines with that humiliating searches and rules, than may be many things would have been completely different now.
Most people really don't want to work and want to have some income. Not a good thing, but that is how it is. So, they are glad to have money from government. That is what modern world teached them for a long time on the examples of elites or/and state officials.
Without total unbrainwashing (could I say so), all that people will be happy with UBI and will obey anything that government will tell them. Of course, some of them will become bored after some time and will try to get out from that vegetable existence, but I doubt it will be many.
And I even can't imagine how that unbrainwashing could be done on that scale for americans. There should be some basic American things (IDK, traditions, something cultural, religious - not an American, so can't tell) that could be a base for that repair, but what if that things are destroyed too?