He's c/conspiracies's resident deny-everything shill. I've tried having actual debates with him here until I noticed the pattern. In every single thread, he denies the conspiracy and/or just defends the mainstream. Browse through his profile as evidence.
Best to just downvote and ignore him. He adds zero substance to any legitimate discussion, diverts attention away from actual discussion, and actively tries to be as abrasive as possible to drive away legitimate users.
He's a fake populist, a controlled opposition "outsider" to reign in an neuter any resistance from people who've escaped the controlled right wing.
There is no nuance or discussion.
Yes, there has. There's been lots of it over the years, on this platform and others. It's just that many people get tired of repeating the same things over and over and over and over, year after year after year. This is why many people fall back to simplicity.
It reminds me of unhinged reddit.
Dude. You made a front page Reddit tier comment, here of all places, and never once retracted, explained it, or said it was sarcasm.
Its counter to the very purpose of the community.
Not necessarily. The pursuit of conspiracy theorists is with the truth. We see that official explanations don't make sense, that there are numerous holes, which we try to poke through, to see the truth. We try to find alternative explanations that better fit the evidence at hand. We theorize when we can't make definitive statements.
Many of us believe Q is a controlled opposition asset, meant to keep people complacent, because "the good guys are in charge, just wait 2 more weeks". That makes genuine Q supporters, depending on their interaction with the community, dangerous to said community, because they're espousing stuff from a controlled asset, meant to divert people away from the truth.
Known shooter was on a roof 150 yards away from Trump. 150 yards is an easy shot. 300 yards isn't too much more difficult, but you need some training, and some rifles won't be able to do it accurately.
Why is disliking Trump and Q embarrassing?
From what I've seen there are still Trump supporters here, although their numbers have dwindled with his handling of things like Covid, the vaccines, and J6, as well a the jewish question becoming more well known.
In general, though, I agree that I prefer conspiracy boards going deeper into subjects, especially stuff outside the political arena, as it can get tiring.
What's been working thus far? Honesty? The only honest politicians we've had thus far have been assassinated (JFK), had their families killed (Massie), or had their lives ruined (Nixon). And why would that kind of tactic continue, unchallenged? Because good men did nothing to stop it. We're rapidly approaching a point where that will no longer be an option.
We don't live in the world we live in because good people aren't better at utilizing the enemy's tactics. We live in this world because good people don't stop the enemy.
Ever since the "official" narrative of WW2 started being taught in school and media (in combo with slavery and the Civil War narrative) they began brainwashing White people that we can't collectivize, even in mutual defense, because that would be "literally Hitler" and "Nazism". Thus, we're left with the false option of trying to elect leaders, who are good, or we're merely told are good, to try and root out the systemic evil of government and all of civilization, by themselves. If they fail, by intention or lack of support, or are backstabbed, ruined, or killed, no one raises an army to punish the perpetrators. We expect individuals to do the work of armies. This is why individualism, by itself, is a self destructive philosophy, and why it's an obvious control mechanism pushed on the political right, which is almost entirely comprised of White people.
Unless you're inferring something else, in which case I would appreciate clarification.
He agreed to go there. He agreed to wear the tiny hat. He agreed to be photographed doing it. He could've said no.
A man of principle would say no. You don't beat subversives and liars by being more subversive and lying more than them. You beat them with the truth.
Butt hurt? No. It's predictable. A race traitor and jew worshipper isn't an ally, and if you think otherwise, you're the moron. Jews controlling both sides of politics is a really, really old conspiracy, with tons and tons of evidence. Do you even belong here?
So you shit on the board and spout Reddit tier takes. Out of curiosity, what made the board change 2 years ago?
Yep. He's who Trump picked.
Which made it hilariously sad reading the comments in TheDonald about this. Many, many people were rightfully criticizing this pick for VP, that this is the best we can hope for, but most still said "still voting for Trump". That is the exact mentality people have/had with the Republican party, which is one of the primary reasons most abandoned it for "MAGA", because they were tired of settling. And yet here they are again, settling. Why? Because they refuse to learn the correct lessons. They're still stuck inside the system, playing by its rules, and wondering why things keep going the way they are.
And he wouldn't have had kids with an Indian woman.
Uh huh, which is why you made the above comment, which would only belong in a front page Reddit thread, not on a conspiracy board, or on this site. Unless you were being incredibly sarcastic, and I just missed it?
I came across this thread on Gab, with some interesting info:
https://gab.com/JasperWoodcock/posts/112786642206409129
Both of Thomas Crooks parents are "behavioral counselors" and their license registration dates are just days apart. Odd. His parents have stink on them and are sheep-dipped if you ask me...Crooks classmates recount him being relentlessly bullied in school. Sounds like the perfect candidate.
In that thread, people post 2 pictures of Thomas Crooks wearing the tiny hat. The one I linked here, and this one:
On top of this, Thomas Crooks was also seen in a BlackRock ad:
There's no way in hell a genuine conspiracy theorist would believe what you just said, under any circumstance.
The supposed shooter took up position on a rooftop only 150 yards away from Trump. I've done a lot of shooting, and 150 yards is nothing. Even with a moderately built 5.56 AR-15, with a moderate scope, it's ridiculously easy, even for a layman, to make that shot. 5.56, in a moderately built AR-15, has 1-2 MOA, which means at 150 yards there's a 1.5 - 3 inch grouping. Furthermore, that round has so little drop at that distance, even in shorter barrel ARs, you can just aim center of the crosshair, without factoring in wind or bullet drop. The Marine Corps (at least it used to, not sure on current training) trains high school kids to make 500 yard shots with iron sites, where the front site post is bigger than the target itself.
There's no way in hell that the Secret Service would allow a rooftop only 150 yards away to be left unguarded or unwatched, unless they're ridiculously stupidly galaxybrain incompetent, or they're in on it.
Agreed. A few more important points to consider:
-
One of the easiest ways to control a populace is to give them the illusion of choice, where both sides are controlled by the same people. "Discourse" and politics is controlled through these entities, parties, and leaders, who curate the narratives the people in power want, keeping the people from straying out of bounds, where they'll realize what the actual solutions are.
-
Whenever a significant number of people begin to wake up and realize the charade, the establishment presents them "outsiders", who are just as controlled as the false left and false right, to reign the noticers back into the fold. The "outsiders" may, at first, present ideas, words, and actions which are agreeable to those who've woken up, but slowly, over time, the "outsiders" become more milquetoast, and adhere more and more to globohomo policy. This is exactly what happened with Occupy Wallstreet, the Tea Party, and now with MAGA, where all of them were co-opted, or controlled from the beginning, and brought back into the false choice fold. We can see this with MAGA, who now unironically support the entire spectrum of LGBTQ so long as it's wearing a MAGA hat, as well as our borders remaining open, mass non-white immigration continuing unabated, White people still being attacked and being denied basic human rights, and racism being decried as the worst evil imaginable (but only if White people do it). Trump also claimed to be going after the swamp in his first term, but selected all swamp creatures for his entire cabinet, who (big shocker), all undermined his supposed extreme positions.
-
Globohomo isn't monolithic. They're evil by nature, and will often betray each other at whim. Even though their hatred for us shared, there are numerous people and parties involved, and they sometimes have conflicting interests, agendas, and plans.
-
The mountain of propaganda arrayed against us produces mountains of useful idiots, who all parrot the exact same globohomo messaging as the people in power. At a certain point, it becomes impossible to determine if the people we're dealing with are merely useful idiots, or actually controlled. Pragmatically, it makes zero difference, and all should be rejected.
-
The mainstream right wing has been 1-5 decades behind the curve on every single issue and solution. Even "outsiders" like Trump, whether he's controlled or not, aren't good enough to actually fix our problems. This will become more apparent as time goes on, even to the most diehard Trump fan.
Nice find. This makes it pretty much an impossibility that this wasn't a staged op in one form or another.
I'm curious what kind of rifle and optic the shooter was using. Even a moderately built 5.56 AR15 with a moderately decent scope can easily make 1-2 MOA 200 yard shots (a 2-4 inch grouping).
If the rifle and scope were decent, the only explanations for missing is if the scope wasn't zeroed, it was ridiculously windy (it clearly wasn't, as evidence by the videos), the shooter was really nervous and shaking, or the shooting was false flagged somehow.
Oh, I agree. There are legitimate, genuine conspiracy theorists who will believe just about any theory imaginable, and have their reasons for it. It's up in the air whether the more "out there" theories were thought up by genuine people, or by subversives. In any case, it's obvious that the more out there theories are absolutely used to poison the well. But, you're right, we shouldn't necessarily acquiesce to how others feel about us or our beliefs. I was only pointing out how subversives use those more fringe theories to denigrate the entire community, to deflect away from the things they'd rather not discuss, and many subversives will keep a fire lit under those fringe theories (and push it themselves) as a means to further their goal to paint this sphere as "crazy", or any number of other ad hominems.
It would have to be specific particulates to do that, of which I'm not sure what could do that. What I do know is that smoke makes the sunlight appear reddish.
However, I also think the sunlight is slightly different this year. It's noticeably more intense, and we're not even in the worst part of summer yet. We are in a solar maximum, meaning there are more sun spots and more solar activity, which means the sun is putting off more light, which might explain a slight variance in the visible EMR spectrum the sun is giving off.
There will be overlap on certain issues where the shills on a conspiracy board, the ones who deny everything (as a means of being an annoying discordant troll to push genuine users away), meet with genuine users who only disbelieve certain conspiracies. It actually makes sense.
It's fine to not agree with all conspiracy theories.
Flat earth is one that has too many logical holes in it to be true, which is why I don't put any faith in it. The few times I've gotten into a debate with actual flat earthers, and asked them for explanations on the holes in the theory, they resorted to name calling and just telling me that I'm stupid.
There are obviously people within the conspiracy theory sphere that intentionally poison the well, by putting forth theories that are so insane as to put off normies, to make conspiracy theorists appear nutty, and make it easier for the establishment to make blanket labels against us, that we're crazy. Flat earth is probably one of those theories. You can even see it in the controlled, curated, and censored forums (like Reddit), whenever someone brings up a legitimate conspiracy, they're drowned out by the hive mind who bring up those well poisoned theories, to denigrate the entire conspiracy theory sphere.
Genuine conspiracy theorists usually don't believe in every single conspiracy, as there's a few that are beyond the pale, even for them, even though most of us are a lot more open to possibility than normies. You can usually tell when someone isn't a genuine conspiracy theorist when they deny all conspiracies wholecloth (like u/vpnsurfer), or when they try to appear as crazy as possible. It's also obvious by how they talk (very vitriolic) and how they argue (constant logical fallacies and ad hominems).
Who was dancing that day?
A profound and mocking laugh. What an absolutely astounding statement.
The NPC meme is real, and you're apparently one of them.
At the probable result of another laugh, why do you suggest this?