Perusing is not reading and reading is not necessarily understanding. Your take proves to me you merely perused if that and you don't belong in the conversation at that level. Sorry. Put on the big boy pants and try again. If you insist on denying points, be concise about what points exactly, and why and how they are wrong.
As another author you haven't read, Carl Jung would tell you, symbols are NOT 'just symbols' or your cross is to no effect as well.
As any history book will show, The Council at Nicea was about this very concept. The gnostic fathers posited that to divide God into 3 was indeed polytheistic hyperdispensation which did not exist, for which they were murdered as reward in opposition to the new Pax Romana being formed. This same argument was being fought over in the Judaic Wars and was the very cause, apart from other obvious political machinations. God as Three is Polytheism by definition. God is ONE is the tradition, not the exception that 3 was, and is.
I know a little something about the subject, as I encountered the same issue when the 'String Theory' was presented to me by the head of cognitive scientists who coined the theory/term 'String Theory'. . In conversation, I posited a change in the name to 'String, Drum or Magic theory, 'depending on your perspective' to show that it was exactly a matter OF perspective that divides cognition/reality/God into three, rather than seeing it as the ONE that it truly is. This was successful in that the name was changed. I utilized the Monochord used by Pythagorus to teach harmony to students, with a single string plucked at measured points providing insight to the nature of harmony and mathematics. Again two subjects by perspective, but one in reality. I knew that introducing the concept of Spirit as 'that which bring the 'two' together as ONE, not Three, would not be accepted by science, so I used the term 'magic' as it is invisible. This was accepted for a time as it corrected inconsistencies in the original String theory. But I waited to see if they would be able to see the three as ONE, and they failed. They now attempt to remove the spirit as 'M', but don't know how to remove the inconvenient truthbomb. I didn't have time to explain the 'magic' as spirit, or to show how it becomes its own polytheistic 'trinity' when divided and isn't reconsilable ultimately. This a rarified subject and one who can't reach the height of it will always attempt to cast down those who see it. Misery loves company and project iniquity onto its subject-victim.
God is ONE not three. Christos is an ancient Greek philosophical concept term, not a blasphemous hyperdispensational god-man of polytheism. This was the argument of the jews against their usurpers, and the gnostics against theirs. The 'winner' of this argument by the murderous slanderers at Nicea became the focal point of the Pax Romana and 'Christianity' then became a roman state religion of control through dogma. None of these points are opinions, and neither bad science, nor bad religion can replace its inconvenient truths.
Its no theory that tax collector Saul's father taught comparative religion at Tarsus and his son used his expertise in renting the fabric, then sewing it back together under the new Pax Romana. It's no theory that Saul said that a voice in the light TOLD HIM to join the community led by James. (see infiltration). It's no theory that James was murdered immediately thereafter with the alt 'Paul' taking his place like some huge coincidence. It's no theory that most any serious study of the era and the accompanying histories, including the ones of 'Roman' historian Josephus admit exactly that. It's revealing that you see everyone's nature as 'stupid and selfish' and think that is a defense of position or a point of discussion. He certainly infiltrated whether you 'still believe him' or NOT. Historic facts prove the so-called theory, but that doesn't deter the stupid or selfish.
Repent and turn to the ONE, TRUE God who Rome and cohorts blasphemed by stealing the prior greek concept of christos and made into a polytheistic fictional human character to rule in the Pax Romana. Those who accept myth in place of truth were called 'Seekers after smooth things' by the Essenes in their scriptural writings for reasons. They were then martyred/destroyed at Masada by those same cohorts in order to bring the ruse. People here are supposed to be research minded rather than simply accept what has been given by TPTB or popular 'history'. Josephus was a traitor historian journalist,for Rome, and Roman citizen Saul/Paul, called 'The Liar' was an inserted infiltrate who's purpose was to co-opt Judaic Christianity to solidify that same Pax Romana. That's exactly what did happen. Do the work.
The shadow of ideation is form.
Ideation not form, is the original word/meaning.
This is discussed in detail by Moses Maimonides in 'The Guide for the Perplexed'.
Misspellings are from the site provider to oppose cut-and-paste.
"Some have been of opinion that by the Hebrew z.elem, the shape and figure of a thing is to be understood, and this explanation led men to believe in the corporeality [of the Divine Being] : for they thought that the words " Let us make man in our zelem " (Gen.i. 26), implied that God had the form of a human being, i.e., that He had figure and shape, and that, consequently, He was corporeal. They adhered faithfully to this view, and thought that if they were to relinquish it they would eo ipso reject the truth of the Bible : and further, if they did not conceive God as having a body possessed of face and limbs, similar to their own in appearance, they would have to deny even the existence of God. The sole difference which they admitted, was that He excelled in greatness and splendour, and that His substance was not flesh and blood. Thus far went their conception of the greatness and glory of God. The incorporeality of the Divine Being, and His unity, in the true sense of the word — for there is no real unity without incorporeality — will be fully proved in the course of the present treatise. (Part n.,ch.i.) In this chapter it is our sole intention to explain the meaning of the words zelem and demut. I hold that the Hebrew equivalent of " form " in the ordinary acceptation of the word, viz., the figure and shape of a thing, is toar. Thus we find" [And Joseph was] beautiful in toar ('form'), and beautiful in appearance" (Gen. xxxix. 6): "What form {toar) is he of?" (i Sam. xxviii. 14) : " As the form {toar of the children of a king " (Judges viii. 18). It is also applied to form produced by human labour, as " He marketh its form {toar) with a line," " and he marketh its form {toar) with the compass " (Isa. xliv. 13). This term is not at all applicable to God. The term zelem, on the other hand, signifies the specific form, viz., that which constitutes t-x essence of a thing, whereby the thing is what it is ; the reality of a thing in so far as it is that particular being. In man the " form " is that constituent which gives him human perception : and on account of this intellectual perception the term z,elem is employed in the sentences " In the zelem of God he created him " (Gen. i. 27). It is therefore rightly said, " Thou despisest their zelem " (Ps. Ixiii. 20) ; the " contempt " can only concern the soul — the specific form of man, not the properties and shape of his body. I am also of opinion that the reason why this term is used for " idols " may be found in the circumstance that they are worshipped on account of some idea represented by them, not on account of their figure and shape. For the same reason the term is used in the expression, " the forms {zalem) of your emerods " (i Sam. vi. 5), for the chief object was the removal of the injury caused by the emerods, not a change of their shape. As, however, it must be admitted that the term z^lem is employed in these two cases, viz. " the images of the emerods " and " the idols " on account of the external shape, the term z:.elgm is either a homonym or a hybrid term, and would denote both the specific form and the outward shape, and similar properties relating to the dimensions and the shape of material bodies ; and in the phrase " Let us make man in our zeUm " (Gen. i. 26), the term signifies " the specific form " of man, viz., his intellectual perception, and does not refer to his " figure " or " shape." Thus we have shown the difference between zeUm and toar, and explained the meaning of zelem.
Demut is derived from the verb damah, " he is like." This term likewise denotes agreement with regard to some abstract relation : comp. " I am like a pelican of the wilderness " (Ps. cii. 7) ; the author does not compare himself to the pelican in point of wings and feathers, but in point of sadness. " Nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in beauty" (Ezek. xxxi. 8) ; the comparison refers to the idea of beauty. " Their poison is like the poison of a serpent " (Ps. Iviii. 5) ; " He is like unto a lion " (Ps. xvii. 1 2) ; the resemblance indicated in these passages does not refer to the figure and shape, but to some abstract idea. In the same manner is used " the likeness of the throne " (Ezek. i. 26); the comparison is made with regard to greatness and glory, not, as many believe, with regard to its square form, its breadth, or the length of its legs : this explanation applies also to the phrase " the likeness of the hayyot (" living creatures," Ezek. i. 13).
As man's distinction consists in a property which no other creature on earth possesses, viz., intellectual perception, in the exercise of which he does not employ his senses, nor move his hand or his foot, this perception has been compared — though only apparently, not in truth — to the Divine perception, which requires no corporeal organ. On this account, i.e., on account of the Divine intellect with which man has been endowed, he is said to have been made in the form and likeness of the Almighty, but far from it be the notion that the Supreme Being is corporeal, having a material form."
The best source is the principle itself. Judging the messenger often takes the place of accurate critique.
Rather than third dimension, perhaps third 'world' is more accurate as this world includes the third dimension as does the cube, the representation of the 3rd dimension by the second.
The bloodstain on the soccer ball was produced by a bloody hand.
Open hand as symbol includes the idea of 'open defiance' to a blackhat. Esoterically, the five fingers being E the fifth letter, and with the shape between the forefinger and the thumb, forming an L, the 12th. Together as EL, the ancient name of God. The sum being 17 - Q or Divine Inspiration by which all is interpreted and/or explained.
They (Luciferians) twist and turn upside-down all principles including 'As above, so below'.
The G is also an assimilation of the Fibbonacci curve, the gamel as vessel/vehicle and the number seven for reasons.
DIVINE geometry precedes physical geometry. Only the deepest dive finds the pearl.
Things to know:
The word used for 'image' in scripture was toar, meaning 'alike in kind, which is to say ideation, not in material form, which is a separate word and considered blasphemy by the learned. The gate is narrow indeed, and downvoters of this abhor he who speaks the truth.
Like everything else, blasphemy isn't what it used to be. The existence of a man as god was considered blasphemous polytheism, and the 'Second Coming' itself was considered blasphemy by both Rome and jews when it was first posited. Downdooting that fact will show hate for inconvenient truths.
What is 'longpork' to a pirate?
What's in a name?
John CABOT Lodge/ Henry CABOT Lodge
John Cabot (Giovanni Caboto) wasn't a pirate in the traditional sense but an Italian explorer sailing for England, famous for his 1497 voyage to North America (likely Newfoundland, Canada) seeking a route to Asia for King Henry VII, claiming the land for England and paving the way for British claims, though his later voyages ended mysteriously, possibly at sea.
Captain John Phillips, an 18th-century pirate known for his detailed ship's articles,
The Phillips pirate family produced John Phillips of the Bahamas, who created the 'Mamas and Papas' music group.......(Charles Manson: 'There are two kinds of people in the world. There are mamas and there are papas.") and to whom was given one of four 4-track recording machines to control the future music production industry. This machine went to Frank Zappa later.Others given to Bing Crosby and the Beatles. It was stolen tech from WW II Germany (Aphex Co.)
Pirates were the first globalist intelligence network. In their travels, they discovered the universal practice of cannibalism and continued it, combining with sacrifices in rituals in cases.
The cabal is generations deep and continues to this day.
See the psyop played with 'The Dread Pirate Roberts' with various players assuming that 'role' in the telltale movie 'Pirates of the Caribbean' where they brag on their history. No? See the 'pirate hunter' Salazar in the movie. Then note the name in Portugese history....and now Salazar as the point man in the Arizona National Guard as traffickers. Or congresswoman Salazar.
The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Ignorance will leave a person high and dry even when provided water.
Literalist interpretations are exoteric and childish in comparison to the more mature and complete esoteric understanding.
'Believers' are agnostic. (Believe it or not)
Gnosis is 'knowing'. When I was agnostic, I spake as a child.
Pope Pepe the First will right all wrongs as soon as he can find an actual definition for the word jew.
A creed of greed disguised as seperate, conjoining competing literalist religions that can't be defined rationally, historically or otherwise, and led by luciferian theosophists at its head. What could go wrong?
Reminds one of a story: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant
If discussed, it is lowered to the level of discussion. Nevertheless, when discussed between two who see it in agreement, God says 'There Am I'.