The longest canal in the United States, the State of Indiana's Wabash and Erie, was financed by selling State Bonds.
The Morris Canal and Banking Company, handled Indiana's financial funding of said canal. Indiana received very little from the 'gassets' (as they were called for reasons too lengthy to discuss here), which its bond issues had "purchased".
The second mortgage on the Morris Canal was as worthless also, having Indiana acquire worthless railroad stock.
Also as worthless as the paper it was printed on. As was the idea of a canal. This consideration was correct for a railroad which hauled only 11 tons of coal to the Lehigh Canal before its 12 miles of T-rail were sold for scrap.
It gets worse. Morris wasn't punished for the scam that bancrupted the state, but rewarded with 1,000,000 acres of land given when claim was made falsely that he/they had 'saved Indiana from their debt' that Morris had actually caused. They continue to exist as a banking operation to this day. What's in a name?
Interesting aside: When I copied and pasted this story from a 'historic site' and edited it, I discovered many, multiple mis-spellings that WERE NOT PRESENT IN THE ORIGINAL digital file. ????? I know why....but how is this done? Interdasting.
Thanks for the reply and answer to my question. As you might assume, I also monitored MM's site and had suspicions of different sorts. I myself am both educated and/didactic in my approach to learning. Psychology is one lifelong study subject for me and at one time my major at university until moving on. Saying that, I discovered that the name Parker was a dominant one in the field of hypnosis. I would venture that the actual 'beginnings' of psychology start with the power of the ancient priest, and continues in the practices of Habban I' Sabbah and in the historic story of making of golem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasan-i_Sabbah
For fun, see Betty Boop the gola/victim in "Old Man of the Mountain" and 'The Penthouse' ...which also even shows the making/consumption of adrenochrome.....wink, wink.
One of Hollyweird's (Holly being the wood that a magician's staff was made from), first movies and still the most 'progressive' and avante gard was 'The Somnambulist' or 'Sleeper' showing the professor as carnival hypnotist, creating a gola assassin. Interdasting how important that was to Hollywood, huh.
Strangely enough I saw beginnings of the digital mapping of the mind in psych labs with monkeys, met Mr. Delgado's son who is in the field, and also grew up next to a farmer who had been a hypnotist in a traveling circus. No, really, and he demonstrated it on my cousin once, turning her into a 'chicken' to amuse us.
Miles seemed like a real person to me as he exhibited points of light that suggested a developed genius of insight into some properties of light, Yet his proofs were his own and he took liberties there. The couple of times I attempted to join in with question, critique or correction, I was suddenly 'from Langely' (lol) because I apparently had too much inside info to be a regular detractor.
He definitely had a team to do the gruntwork and feed data into his site. A lifetime of studying what I call 'The Name Game' was first fueled by pouring over 'Who's Who' books where they would brag on their family and business connections right there in print. A detailing of their web so to speak. The mother's name as middle name was an apparent technique of clandestine recognition of these connections as well as a brag. MM took that ball and ran it, going on and off the field as he ran, making many 'connections' that actually were more coincidental than he gave them. I myself have a quite amazing family history record on both sides of both sides of my names. It's deeply ingrained in my family history, so to tell me that The Magnum Opus doesn't exist and/or is unorganized negates my whole family histories that prove otherwise. I won't dox myself by mentioning that one wing was VonHaydershot (var. spelling), one of the originators of the OTO in Bavaria. We could have an incredible conversation about the leather bound gold leaf book that detailed the family history and purpose found in the book that I discovered in my grandmother's attic. She was a relative to Lestor Hendershot.(the later anglo version of Von Hader(schot). Google that name. My families have several high profile assassins of important people of history. Another was treasurer to Charlemagne and that name was borrowed and used as the name of the treasurer family in the tv show 'Game of Thrones'. Because that's what it is.
I chose to remain alive rather than to go public with what I know. Only now can such subjects be breached with hard truths without punishment. ( maybe ).
I asked about your possible connect to MM, because yes, I recognized the styling as I say that when I read something, I'm also reading the author. I suspected you might be one of several people who were doing research on histories and names for him, and had borrowed his style as a result. I didn't think you were Miles himself unless he'd gone into a different mode. Where I suspected MM the most was his attention to his 'White Stone' club which was an allusion to Lewis Carroll's diary entries when he masturbated to the thought of Alice. He denied all that of course and blocked me. Funny he wasn't ready to do the Carroll/Dodson/Liddell name game when it counted. See 'Liddel Adam Shift'...per Q.......gee what could it mean? lol
The 'Salem Witch' story is also upside down in many ways, and yes, it's all multi-generational as a movement. They intermarry and continue to weave larger balls of yarn..........that same ball that when discovered, helps as 'bread' as CLEWS to the nature of the Labyrinth. The ultimate labyrinth of control is the mind itself. They now become the Minotaur for King Midas.
Myth was the ancient study, and expression of the 'three world' aspect of cognition and identity with self and universe. The tarot is a later extrapolation of same.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I hope it means we can be frens in Truth. It's always good to meet a deep diver looking for quality pearls.
Speaking of witch......the world's first intel were pirates....globalist traffickers who discovered shared memes in varied peoples and their religions and beliefs and found ways to 'parlay' control by them. See Pirates of the Carribean in their brag of a movie. The pirate families are still bon ami to each other and have usurped even the throne who used them to do their dirty work.
Good job. Carry on, soldier.
Do a search using the terms hypnosis or hypnotism and Parker to find how that name seems to dominate the field. 'Colonel Parker' as Elvis' handler was trained by a Parker in hypnosis in a circus and took his name. It was said that Elvis was under when he signed his lopsided contract. Parker Bros. Games (Game Theory) logo is the hypnotic swirl. They created the popular version of the Ouija board.
As a side dish, search Harris/Voodoo for similar results. 'They wrote the book'.
I get a Miles Mathis vibe here. :) You know him?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_B._Hinckley
A relative of the mk'd assassination patsy John Hinkley.
The Hinkleys entered into a six generation business/family relationship with the Bush family.
Re: "The "Speaking Head":
Allow me to help. On my grandmother's side is Von Haderschot, one of whom was one of the 12 original founders of the Ordo Templi Orientis of Bavaria, aka 'The Bavarian Illuminatti'. A provable claim. A lifelong study of the tenets and history of this organization, along with it associates and affiliations was an eye opening experience, pun intended.
From that, I can advise you that it can be shown that every ritual used by secret societies, the OTO notwithstanding, is material signal towards a spiritual principle. This principle is lost upon 'The Profane', and so a physical example performed as routine until the principle is discovered.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places"
Good principles. Bad principles. Good powers. Bad powers. Good teachers. Bad teachers. And then there are preachers.
Those who either don't understand or misuse, intentionally or not, use the bad/dark, generally will rule by force, exerting their half-understood principles by force of will. This has been the case throughout most of history, with the principles profaned by this half or misunderstanding, with the result becoming 'Do what thou wilt is the entirety of the law.' As expounded by one of it's poobah's Aleister Crowley. Crowley rewarded himself with a title after doing extensive work in his life, attempting to find order in the chaos. Yet they seem to prefer chaos as the field to work in, do they not? Their sayings all about 'the light' and illumination and yet they hide in dark places and do dark things. Interdasting.
I say this 'Darkness' is of course an ignor-ance of higher principles that even the large segment of their 'elite' have not successfully worked to solve. An interesting fact is that Crowley gained prominence largely due to his assertion that he'd discovered that the Tarot deck of cards had been shuffled to confuse 'the profane' as 'Tsaddi is not The Star'. Of Sephira, 16 is not 17.
17 is 17. It's gematria equivalent Q. The Star ( A new outpouring...or shall we say, great awakening).
So there are two who know things.....are on a 'high place' of understanding of the principles which move the physical object on the lower plain (field). One of them continues to look 'upwards' to the highest possible Source. The One Source. The other stops that, and looks down...to use as power. De-evolution is a dark force, gravitating into 'self' and selfishness with will to power over others. Do what THOU WILT. I find it a tell that Crowley felt it necessary to add the qualifier '...is the entirety of the law.' I say that is true but missing a principle. Of course. 'The Law' is for those who need it. A lower level of operation made necessary by misunderstanding and evil will as result. These misunderstandings become bad 'principaliTIES'... existing as political/militant movements
The spirit IS the principle behind the thing. Repeat that. What does it mean?
Q/17/The Star are principles that conjoin for example. You've probably heard of gematria. This is its foundation. Have you discovered 'Divine Geometry'?
Divine Geometry is a rarified subject. Few find it. Fewer understand.
These principles are eternal and so their discovery by those with both good and evil intent became an issue of life or death in times when any variation from the norm was considered politically incorrect. Interesting that one's punishment was usually either death or exile, or perhaps becoming a consultant to the King. One of my ancestors did just that in the reign of Charlemagne. Was this due to the quality difference of the information? Some of it was. But all, used in power, become dark.
What is the Higher Principle then, that one gnostic knows, but not the other? The one that the dark one ignores?
Re: The 'Talking Head'.
The body exhibits principles by its nature. Proportions are principles.
Why? Discover it if you haven't.
The Al-khem. Al chemist Alchemy. Was an attempt to discover all possible combinations of material things, breaking apart and conjoining or 'sewing and tearing', becoming the father of science. Like science (and Scientologists) it is about 'laws' again. Good medicine/ bad medicine. But medicine is for the sick.
The head, in comparison to the body is of a certain proportion which exhibits a principle. The skilled artist knows this. How is he skilled? By this knowing. The head is the 'highest' and connected to mind/conciousnous which receives the principles, so this is used as the example. Alchemists dabbled in transmutation of metals and so brass was used to fashion the head, as again, proof of the understanding of what creates brass or bronze. (Yes other material is historic, including crystal skulls, but that's a separate but related story as is the mention of brass and bronze being used for ark and throne. Not understanding the principle of electricity, one would be shocked what they'd find in attempt to 'take the bull by the horns'.
So being both high learning and needing to be Clandestine (think of that word)....the art school needed to teach principles to its subject if it were to be successful. The proportions between certain segments of the body correspond to the proportions of the face. So as brass and bronze was being casted...into proper proportions as proof to the students of its principles...in THIS way, the head was said to 'talk to' the student. The public could only be told that this was art..and it was....sculpture in the making.....but misunderstanding, once again rears its ugly head. The public found many villains and scapegoats in the secrecy and during trials, every imaginable explanation was posited. There were the magi, and there are magicians. Some say both black and white, but that's up for debate.
One who knows does, knowing why and how, and the result is 'good'. No magic required. The Spirit as force.....positive angles/angels and negative ones ....daemons..... are forces that move things.
Why is man said to be made 'a little higher' than the angles, yet is material? The magician attempts to FIGURE that out, working withing the material (looking downward upon the plain).
So finally, I'd like to add that the Great Awakening its to be a 'taking back' of the true understanding of the principles, with a new outpouring of spirit aka Q/17/The Star.
The Talking Head. It says one thing to the profane, and another to the one who looks to the Divine.
It's our place and choice to understand. The Source.
Sauce for the Source: https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
A single instance of transposing to similar names would be understandable in any case whether it happened or not. I know the fucking difference peabrain. YOU. DON'T. Understand how they correspond by principle, shit for brains.
You assume I assume and I understand you to be a literalist assumer rather than a knower. You 'know' that I transposed two names inadvertantly and so you win a stupid prize right?
What do you win when you GET the point made because you haven't and won't.
Pan represented the head of the hierachy of pantheism, ....dude. In other words, he was the Zeus to the region and their lesser 'gods' also corresponded to the principles shared by other ancient religions, now lost on morons like yourself. The very KEY to understanding how all religions are deviations and can be brought back together over the actual principles they misrepresent to the detriment of all souls. This will be the Great Awakening, not a lulling back to sleep with idolatry.
How does this lame history lesson advance the would-be discussion on gnosis of principles? It sure doesn't. And your argument is dependent on your faulty view.
Have some bread and ichthys and be on your way. I'll provide, you can deny. That way we're in our proper place.
I may have inadvertantly transposed Elisha and Elijah, as to a certain 'story' reference? I don't know, I don't recall, if so, that is a clerical error if so and means zero, zilch, nothing ....is a diversion to the point..which was and still is, in the meaning of the names. And the characters were back-named by historians to account for the principle the names represent. . They were both 'AN Elisha/Elijah from different eras. and this is the deeper meaning to the statement: 'Some say you are (AN) Elisha' which proves that there also existed the belief in reincarnation as you admit when you say that the Pharisees believed. Which then counters your moronic attempt to discredit the same.
Why the term 'Son of Man' rather than 'Son of God'? Care to venture?
Re: "\Were the people of Caesarea Phillippi Sadducees or Pharisees? The people were the people with all their varieties of beliefs. That variety exemplified in the same tired in-fighting that plagues the region to this day. Phillip was Greek and Ceasarea the Roman continuation of his empire. The Helenized jew was never the same was he?
Re: 'They worshipped Pan'. What a moronic over-statement.
I'm sure many did end up 'worshipping' an idol called Pan, and all his subordinates due to the loss of the understanding of the deeper meaning and source for the myths. That same source that created the numeric and alphabetical systems and subsequent religious offshoots/imitations/. However, to understand Pan is to understand the principle behind.....yes even in, or especially in mythical character names (gods to the profane). Yes there was a profane class of 'believers' who sacrificed, and another elite class who understood the concepts for what they were. The book linked EXPLAINS in great detail, SPELLING IT OUT and showing the significance with Divine Geometry. Please attempt to shit on that by ignorance and see where it goes.
The vocabulary stolen, the characters becoming human and even god incarnating into a man, this is idolatrous anthropromorphism and you don't get to ride that beast in victory. This is partly how we got here. BAD RELIGION from blackhat magicians who fool all but the Elect. And how are the Elect determined? There would be a criteria. The inner sanctum is for the one who can 'take the bull by the horns'. B'aal is the god of religious denominations (numbers) AT THE TOP, same as it ever was. Q as 17, you don't know why.....and The Star....and you don't know why.....is Divine Inspiration ....and you don't know why. This is your savior in reality whether you accept or not and comes as AN Elisha/Elijah.....and you don't know why. You swallow the Roman hyperdispensation which is idolatrous anthropromorphism.
Until you accept the Great Awakening.
You speak of 'things' as if they are the same as the principles behind them. Things can't be revealed and tested either, only 'beliefs about them' Principles are the source of both formation and information. They just ARE. "I AM". Feel free to test it. Test the info Fiedler reveals and get back to 'us'. But only after.
Is Ra El
Saving 'it' for last.
You seem to be coming to the rescue of one who failed. I was responding to someone who took a false position. I state the existence of eternal principles. That's a pretty solid position that renders guesses moot.
The A.I. style 'take' on Fiedler in place of the information provided is a tell.
So I'll let A.I. respond to the term 'gilgul'.
Gilgul (gilgul neshamot) is the Jewish concept of reincarnation, a cyclical process where a soul is reborn into new bodies to complete its tikun (rectification) and atone for past transgressions before reaching its ultimate spiritual level. This esoteric doctrine is central to Kabbalistic Judaism, particularly Hasidic Judaism, though it is not considered essential to traditional Judaism and was historically rejected by some prominent Jewish thinkers. The term originates from the Hebrew word for "wheel," reflecting the cyclical nature of the soul's journey.
Actually 'glagal' - (h(wei) - Circle/wheel/rotation association to Yahweh
https://communities.win/c/Unspoil/p/142AwNU9UH/unspoil-part-1-yahweh/c
https://scored.co/c/Christianity/p/141YkrZ2mH/testimony-13-feb-22/c.
You'd ridicule someone who said they'd 'take a look' at the bible and leave it open, but pretend to be able to understand and critique it anyway.
Now read the book so that where we go one, we go all.
You correctly appoint the resurrection confusion to the Canaanite religions, which is line of orthodox history...that is to say that the Canaanite sacrificial religions that Goliath represented was the actual continuation in the later Roman religion while the 'Line of David' was to represent gnosis. No, it isn't about an actual genetic line to a guy named David.
All A.I. and its false histories aside:
The names of the old testament bible are analogous names, not names of actual characters given this name at birth. What an impossible coincidence that would be.
Resurrection was NOT a thing until the messianic hyperdispensation had began during the Maccabean period regardless of attempts at backdating by more recent writers. The multi-varied semitic religions were all influenced by Egypt and later modified.. Hence the names Ra-moses (sic) and moses being concurrent with Moses being said to carry 'the ark' out of egypt. No, this was not a literal boat.
'As primitive Christians, we have enough knowledge to get past that..." This word primitive isn't correct as used here. No, the chrism was not a translation of mashach...mashach was a ritual of annointment, while the chrism was the word for the result of the process that produces the 'christ' or one who takes the chrism. This was lowered to 'annointment' due to lack of understanding of the difference between esoteric spirit and literalist, exoteric ritual. Try annointing yourself and see if you become christ or a christ or if any change occurs whatsoever. It won't. It's just oil....an imitation of the spirit. Like holy water sprinkled on a sinner. It changes nothing. That's called 'magic' which is indeed the religion of primitive man. More importantly, the story of Jesus annointing the maid servant's feet was to show that this ritual is to be RAISED to apply to this woman who seemed to 'know' what it was about as she served without asking. It's not about annointing one man to make him a god. This is covered in the link I include. From whence the word 'annoint' if it means exactly 'christ'? You misunderstand by missing information.
You tell me that Rome changed things, and then use those changes to argue against the reality. The contingencies of Judea were in total chaos and disagreement as to what their actual history and cosmology was and this is what allowed Rome and others to create their own per-version. Watered down dogma to 'agree with' rather than 'finding the christ in you'. Both 'sides' rule by magick until one knows the trick.
Yes you need to discover something more. You diligently look and search for answers, right? You want to know how names were chosen? Would you rather KNOW how and why? Take a look here and get back to me. It isn't enough to be a little smart and a little not.(sophomoric).
Because......the name Sophia.....it meant something to some people. Those people who knew it, knew it as principle, not a literal physical god. That would be error. Sophia is unknown now to modern roman christianity as a result. The fact that she represents spiritual knowledge makes her removal totally understandable as that is exactly what was removed to create a sacrificial messiah movement to solidify Roman rule.
Feel free to pass that around. Send it to your A.I. program of choice.
They said to Jesus: 'Some say you're Elisha'.......showing the common belief in reincarnation. The subject was NOT 'resurrection' which would have been ridiculed as it was later when introduced by hyper-dispensational writings.
It was the introduction of the writings of the new testament of Rome that established 'resurrection' as a new form of reincarnation. You conflate the two, but that's the result of the Roman hyper-dispensation to co-opt and replace the former beliefs of 'the profane'. The gnostic however, understood the difference, as the hero is made to state that he existed as in eternal state before he was born, or even before Abraham. These words all have meaning. A to B is 'all things. Ra is the emanation of life, and ham is protection. God is the protector of the life of all things. But before this.......was 'The Word'.....the meaning precedes the thing that it 'carnates' into. If it comes back, it re-incarnates.
By the definition of resurrection, one who comes back on an operating table after heart stoppage qualifies as resurrection, or the widow of Zarephath’s son, or The Shunammite woman’s son (2 Kings 4:18–37), or The widow of Nain’s son (Luke 7:11–17). Or airus’ daughter (Luke 8:40–56). Lazarus of Bethany (John 11). Or Eutychus (Acts 20:7–12). Various saints in Jerusalem (Matthew 27:50–53). Tabitha (Acts 9:36–43). T
As luck would have it, there is a huge tell in the story of the raising of the man raised out of Elisha’s grave (2 Kings 13:20–21). Elisha is connected with another miracle that occurred after his death. Sometime after Elisha had died and was buried, some men were burying another body in the same area. The grave diggers saw a band of Moabite raiders approaching, and, rather than risk an encounter with the Moabites, they threw the man’s body into Elisha’s grave. Scripture records that, “when the body touched Elisha’s bones, the man came to life and stood up on his feet” (verse 21).
It's too bad Elisha didn't stand up to tell him he was confusing reincarnation with resurrection. So Elijah was 'reincarnated' as Elisha and some were wondering if 'that same spirit' was present in the Christ.That spirit of correction of the errors of the would-be church IS the meaning of the word Elisha. Is the spirit of Elisha. My own name breaks down to this same 'namenumber' in gematria and I take up the challenge as should all who would know the 'secrets' that have been hidden. As long as these secrets stay 'hidden (occult), the corrupt church will rule by it.
What is/was the CHRISM that existed as a word before the character known as 'Jesus Christ' which takes it's name and stead? It isn't a term that originated in the middle east or Arabic lands. It has been 'resurrected' improperly by Rome.
Reincarnation was a common belief at the time. The story in the bible where it is stated to Jesus : "Some say you're Elisha..." shows the common belief in literal transferal of souls. However, even then, there existed another concept to explain by using the name Elisha. The first up-braider of the church was Elijah to be repeated another generation by Elisha. The name signals....sig-nifies the very concept of 'correction of error' in the concept of godhood. One who knows the significance of the letters can 'spell it out' and see it plainly. God's principles are ingrained in number and letter and names were 'cast' to reflect. Let he who has ears, hear.
The Essenic fathers were killed after Ecumenical councils for saying that the Roman orthodox religion taking form as the official religion of Rome was putting the Demiurge (a 'lessor' consciously aware creator god) in the place of the one true god representing eternal concepts. (God's name has changed continually according to changing concepts and cultures).
Eternal Concepts are Principles, the source of all thought. Not to be known as entities in physical terms, as this would be anthropromorphism, an error.
Finally Saving Israel for last by 'coming to terms' with past lies.
He didn't say he's going to Hell did he? He said he didn't know if he's going to 'heaven'. There are layers to this you won't get, as well as what the term 'Saving Israel for last' denotes for the future of literalist religion including the modern orthodox Christianity of Rome.