The Pyramid on Dollar Bill IS Tower of Babel, Constructed by Masons (72 Bricks = 72 Words of God)
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (31)
sorted by:
That means Nimrod was the first Freemason.
Hot take 🔥
The Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins.
Ninurta/Nimrod/Gilgamesh/Marduk was also the spiritual prototype of the antichrist.
First > free > mason. First implies all for each one within. Free implies freed from one another within all. Mason implies fitting together what all set apart from one another.
Aka NIM (to take) ROD (a unit of linear measure)...first all sets each unit (life) of linear (inception towards death) measure free from one another, then others suggest one to take measurements of one another. That's how free-masonry works.
Yes, Naram-Sin, builder of Etemenanki.
More like the 72 demons that King Solomon summoned or the 72 virgins of Al-lat/Allah/Apollo.
AH GOOD POINT
So if God intervened othe first tower but not this one... What's up with that..
God inter (inception) venes (life) outer (death)...vene/venire - "to come" implies coming into being (living) while getting taken out (dying); which represents Gods simultaneous work.
First God; then being; then a beings free will of choice to build a tower in-between above/below.
Look at the world right now and tell me that whatever was build up isn't also falling down? Like...as the tower of babel goes up in Europe; isn't Europe simultaneously going down?
Whatever goes up (life) goes down (inception towards death) aka as above/so below. It's the physical tower of babel (confusion of sound) and the mental tower of babble (utter words indistinctly) which distract from Gods work and ones position in-between.
The first tower was an example. Etemenanki was abandoned in 2336 BC and was the same year and height IMHO as the abandoned Pyramid of Menkaure. God made an example of the one for the sake of the other and all the rest to come. So "a wizard should know better."
What was the reason God stopped the initial building,?.... and if it was due to the motives behind it's construction....., what if that has since been rectified?
If the motive were rectified, no more such towers would be built.
Lol that is ridiculous.
Js take it as a war metaphor, blueprint for social/information enslavement, correction: it is A tower of babel
Makes sense to me, but if God didn't intervene this time,.... Why not?
A legit tower of Babel? That'd be pretty sick!!!
Tower of Babel is bad, m'kay..
God moves. Anything build within; God moves apart. A jew builds not/nothing/nihilo aka nihil-ism to tempt gentiles to deny being moved.
The longer you choose to hold onto nihilism (not); the more damage Gods motion does to you, while benefiting israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
The origin of nothing represents creatio ex nihilo...
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)." ~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Here's a jew selling "nothing" to gentiles aka "everybody does something; we do nothing"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
"Because it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness...nothingness without end". ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
HOW BOUT NO
A jew suggests metaphors to tempt gentiles to TAKE. Taking anything puts one into opposition of all given, and at war against one another.
The number 72 is linked to the Earth's precession of the equinoxes, where the Earth's axis wobbles at a rate of 1 degree every 72 years. Also the number is a large factoring component in Divine Geometry.
The scale factor of the pyramids is 600 x 72.
In Jewish mysticism, the 72-letter name of God represents the ultimate creative and redemptive power of the universe
Jesus sent out 72 disciples (recorded in Luke 10:1-12) to prepare towns for his arrival, heal the sick, and spread the message that the kingdom of God was near.
Esotericism: In Western occultism and Freemasonry, the number 72 acts as a bridge between the material realm and the divine, often represented geometrically by the compass set to 72 degrees.
Because it is easily divisible by many numbers (including 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36), 72 was revered by ancient mathematicians as a highly versatile and "perfect" foundation for building calendars and spiritual systems.
More on 72.
HUH INTERESTING THANKS, I THINK THEY PROBABLY MADE UP THE 1 DEGREE EVERY 72 YEAR THING THOUGH
It was based off the movements of 'heavenly bodies' against the 360 degree circle of the horizon.
1 degree is a unit of angle that was invented relatively recently, with invention of trigonometly with all that sin(), cos(), tg() stuff. In the distant past, people measured and accounted angles as elevation/offset on some length/distance. Like 1 inch per foot. It was much more practical and obvious for them. So, this "1 degree in 72 years" hardly could come to someone head at the time when all that babylonian things happened. Angle unit in itself was useless for them without trigonometric functions. It's today we could use angle to find out lengths, heights and widths of trinalge and other shapes using calculator, but babylonians hardly know what f.e. sin() is.
This theory that babylonians could assume that there are approx 360 days in a year and so circle could be divided into 360 sectors with 1 modern degree angle, ruins myth about high precision of ancient measurements. If babylonians couldn't properly measure duration of a year in days as 365, then there can't be talks about some precise ratios they probably knew, and 72 will be just 70 for them.
Not agruing against other number "72" history, you wrote, but exactly this case is highly doubtful.
My theory is much simpler and much more boring. "72" is not something mistique. "72" is just a half dozen of dozens. Many tribes used 12-based scale of notation at the time, so 72 is a "round" number in 12 base. It was just a "round" number for them. Exactly like number "50" for us, who use 10 base now. So, there are no any magic that 72 appear often in ancient texts and ratios. Just a "round" number of the time, same as "50" now.
You under estimate the genius of the past.
Discover Divine Geometry and a new appreciation.
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
On the opposite, I overestimate them here, closing my eyes on many inconsistencies and utter indifference of our ancestors to many interesting things around. If I began to dig into real, practical results of that ancient knowledge praised here, the picture will be much, much worse.
Very simple question - humanity know lenses and concave mirrors from a very ancient times. How comes, nobody of that ancient geniuses never tried to compbine few lenses and or concave mirrors to create a telescope, until Galileo times? If ancients was so interested in cosmology, who prevent them to try to use lenses/concave mirrors to look deeper into sky? Isn't that obvious to try to use well-known effect of lenses or concave mirrors to magnify objects in the sky if ancients was so interested in them. But somehow it took few millenias to finally do that.
So, don't even try to think that I underestimate ancients. I have a tons of questions like above about why they was so indifferent for studing the universe around, when many things to do was absolutely technically possible even at a very ancient times.
Just think, how our world could look like, if telescope was invented not by Galileo, but by Archimedes, f.e. And if you immidiately didn't come up with the question who prevented that, and how many similary simple things is not invented yet for that reason, you are not anywhere near anybody who could be called "conspiracy theorist".
The sky was more visible in the past, telescopes were eventually invented when technology and invention finally allowed. People aren't born with complete understanding, it takes a lifetime. There was no organized school system or tech teams other than what could be assembled by a person of means. Yet the stars and their motions were observed and recorded to great degree. Today, we have modern telescopes that can see far into space, yet the average person, even some astronomers are ignorant of many of the concepts that the ancients pulled from it. I just discussed Greek mythology and its influence on astronomy with an astro-physicist this afternoon. Also discussed was astro-archeology (aka acheo-astrology) and how it determined the placement of temples and other influencial buildings. Things lost to the majority of modern thinking/understanding.
Modern man, using both microscopes and telescopes continually discovers that nothing is new under the sun. In fact, they await the thread that binds both the micro and macro worlds that also has been discovered and expressed to little effect until that day of Great Awakening.
Actually, they knew math so well that they knew 360 would work in most cases and was easier to work with than say 365.2425 or something. The Bible indicates that God sets the irrational numbers precisely so that different similarities would be close enough to work with but still imperfect.
For instance, Book of Enoch points out that 360 is prevailing but 364 is closer and has more advantages and still can be worked with in the same general way.
Absolutely 72 was used as a round number due to these synchronies; which is why 360 or 2.5 gross was also used as a round number. It's probable that after generations the approximation 72*360=25920 would've been guessed (actual currently 25771.57534, which varies based on measurement specs and adjustment over time). The Bible also says Solomon built the temple laver just fine even though he used 3 as an approximation for pi.
You are right that many of these supposed connections are excrement. But often by reverting to your correct perspective about round numbers the actual math of the day can be recovered and the original claim somewhat vindicated even though it's expressed in different terms. This week I learned that Euclid discovered a working version of the law of cosines without ever inventing a cosine.
Moon calendar vs sun calendar. Discuss
See Book of Enoch again. Both are designed to round to 360 in months of 30. But the deficiency of about 11 days is designed to round to 1/3, 2/5, or 3/8 of a month per year (note anticipation of Fibonacci), with the out-of-phase cycle requiring people not to speak rashly but to recognize layering in the revelation.
The moon is also designed to round to 4 weeks and thus festivals are placed at the 4 quarters of the lunar cycle (weekly). This approximates Sabbath (though Sabbath is an inviolate weekly cycle and thus different from both). The 1/3 cycle is then reflected in tying feasts to the 10th of the month as well. In the pentecontad calendar, the 20th of the month was a festival for being the 50th of the previous month. People liked approximations and simple fractions that didn't have to be exact back then.