Who is at the top? Corbett Report Video
(podcasts.apple.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Corbett is controlled opposition as are Broze and Robinson, although I don't know if that's exactly what you would call it.
All of them have egos too needy and too in control to slow down and consider whether they are off-target. All "They" need do is support and encourage them as they run farther off the track. Assuredly, none of them have the wit nor desire to figure out they're being manipulated.
Corbett has clearly asserted many times previously that no one is at the top. Frankly, he says it as his signal that he has exceeded nearly all conspiracy theorist peasantry. This is the capstone bullshit of his entire career.
If I was at the top, I would absolutely and unequivocally desire that everyone believes there is no one at the top, and to feel themselves superior for holding such a belief. What a laugh that would be.
At this point literally anyone could be controlled op. I do listen to Corbett from time to time, but do not take anything he (or anyone else, for that matter) says without some critical evaluation. I like that his takes often go into some surprising and unexpected directions. Also, he does not fall into stupid left/right paradigm and he's one of the few who says elections are a farce and a theater (which they are). Seriously, there are too many alternatives who still have their heads up in political ass so deep that they simply can't see anything outside their tiny constructed political bubble. Trump this, Trump that. Biden this, Biden that. Democrats, Republicans... It's all bullshit for the masses. We have to realize that. Until then nothing will change.
I consider Corbett being something like a bridge between normie world and conspiracy sphere. Let's be honest, you can't show average normie, for example, Alex Jones (who's definitely controlled op) and expect said normie to actually seriously listen and evaluate that. You can, however, do that with Corbett.
The way I came to think of Corbett was as a conspiracy "stenographer", I know that's not the correct word but I like it anyway.
Really, it's more akin to a high school student assigned to write an essay on, say, "Rockefeller medicine" or "the CFR". He gathers up a few conspiracy articles, construct an outline, and summarizes and rewrites what is already in those articles.
You'll never get anything novel out of such a process, no shocking revelations, no insight. It's literally all been said before. That's why it is--by definition--not a threat and never will be.
I mean, this is important material if you have no knowledge of the subject whatsoever. The problem--the fault which "They" are exploiting--is that Corbett presents himself as a careful scholar and the reader believes this is the ultimate extent of the research. It is, of course, merely a beginning, and perhaps corrupted and misleading in and of itself.
After listening to all his published audio since inception (a decade?), this realization came to me only after I heard his take on the Ukraine war in 2022. It sounded like he had ripped it right from the headlines of the NYT and WaPo. FFS, how could anyone freely agree with either of them without having some extreme reservations that they had taken a wrong turn somewhere along the line?
I suppose from my own experience that I came to the feel I should have some grace for anyone who doesn't see it this way. But you gotta call 'em as you see 'em.
Well, kinda, but that's exactly why he can be considered a sort of "normie friendly" conspiracy theorist. Again, no normie will never ever listen to what the likes of Alex Jones has to say, but some normies might listen to what Corbett says. (As an aside note: I suspect that this is exactly why the character of Alex Jones exist. To invalidate any talking point in normie minds that TPTB deem unwelcome to be discussed. It goes like this: Normie listens to a snippet of AJ talking and normie will never again take that point seriously, even if it's true.)
I agree with first statement, but not quite with the second one. Yes, Corbett does not make shocking revelations, but do we actually need them? The whole point he reiterates repeatedly is that all the information you need is already available openly. It's not about shocking revelations of lizard people, aliens, or elite eating babies... It's about connecting the dots and understanding how the system works. How it takes and how it maintains power. Also, about how to resist it.
As for insights... Well, not in every video, but he does actually provide insights and new ways to think about things from time to time.
I can somewhat agree with this one. Yes, he has certain boundaries outside which he won't go. Then again, it's up to each one individually to find information form various sources and glue it all together. There is not one truthsayer out there who will give you everything on a plate.
Hmm, I got completely opposite impression. While he doesn't venture to some further out there theories (like the ones saying war doesn't exist or that it's fake etc), his analysis on basic facts is usually spot on. From the very start he has stated that this war is a building block for the NWO, that Multipolar World Order is the same NWO just in a different package and that basically the whole endeavour is totally engineered and planned. Also, that this is basically a war of governments on their own populations much more than a war against some outside enemy... Well, I don't know, but seems to me this is very different from what NYT and WaPo are saying...
All in all, it might sound like I'm totally defending him and agree with him on everything... That's not quite true either. The value of Corbett is his "down to earth" takes and interesting viewpoints to consider. Even if he is a controlled op, the likes of already mentioned AJ and all the other politically partisan pundits are much, much more harmful than Corbett will ever be.
As I have discovered it from personal research, the true (or at least far truer) state of affairs is quite shocking, so much so that few would have the capacity to even entertain the concepts.
The fatal problem is that it exists in a different paradigm than that discussed by Corbett or Jones or any other conspiracy researcher, whether authentic or disinfo. They will all just keep everyone running from pillar to post around the "mainstream conspiracy" paradigm while those "at the top" continue their work undiscovered and unstudied, and thus unmolested and unimpeded.
The reason I say the paradigm is different is because there is no accumulation or refinement of the sum of mainstream conspiracy research that will get you anywhere near the truth. They can even metaphorically stand right next it--in plain sight--yet never notice the crucial importance of it.
Virtually all of the evidence I draw on comes right from the normie mainstream. I just collect it up and arrange it artfully. I've often wondered why none of these other researchers--who seem to have dedicated their lives to it for far longer than me--have never noticed the same things I have.
I have come to no conclusion on that point. Certainly they could be paid and directed to notice and discuss other things, that's a simple enough explanation. But all of them? I'm left to speculate that it is not a matter of perception or analysis, but rather what level of truth one is willing to contemplate and accept.
See any of my numerous Salem Witch posts. Far more than what has already been documented is on the way. Find any connection to the work Corbett or Jones or any of the others has done. The work of Miles Mathis is connected, but I never miss an opportunity to highlight and specify how full of disinformation it really is.
Is the work all of them do harmful? I would let everyone judge for themselves but as I see it, one could spend a lifetime ingesting all their work product and die just as ignorant of the true state of affairs as at the beginning. Frankly, I believe that to be the point.
Very good take, honestly. If this corbet was right, he'd been off'd like Bill Cooper. Not once has he talked about Christianity, like Bill. Yet, he continues to make videos of semi-serious topics, while this time he wants me to sign up for his video... Most peculiar...
The link is literally to podcasts.apple.com lmao. If you have not been kicked off of providers like Apple, you are not saying anything too controversial. Thus far, the only semi-normie company that seems to be somewhat permissive is Rumble. Other than that, you need to go to the darker corners of the net for anything interesting.
The fact that he is even asking this question explains why he is still on Apple. The answer is "jews." Anyone still unironically asking this question in late 2026, let alone not even answering it and appealing to "nonhuman entities" and "multi headed hydra" can just be assumed to be controlled oppo attempting to mislead.
Chuckles in Chinese
Then who do you think is at the top?
They all three have one thing right, that is if you replace one group another will take its place. “He who says organization says oligarchy.”
That said my problem with Corbett is from hinterlands of the safe ethnostate of Japan he goes on and advocates for retarded libertarian anarchism, policies that would 100% destroy the features he enjoys the most of in Japan. Policies that will never be implemented in Japan he wants put into place in the rest of the West.
It turns out be Satan, but there are a few advisories I would have to add as quickly as humanly possible:
(1) There is no one who realizes who actually Satan is, or was based on. Every conception is incomplete and distorted.
(2) Satan himself exists in a larger org chart, and understanding that context is a crucial part of the explanation for what's going on right now. So not technically "at the top".
(3) No one needs to have any knowledge of Satan or his plans to be in service to them. All that is necessary is for arrangements to be made so they have the proper incentives to advance the state of affairs. Those servants and any observers may fully and freely believe they are "at the top". That actually aids in the obfuscation.
This is why all the power centers anyone may point to come and go and are replaceable. Off goes one puppet and on goes another but the hand remains. How effective is that when jackasses are running around asserting there is no such thing as a puppeteer?
If you were wondering and so as not to be mysterious, Satan was one of the Anunnaki. That's a helluva long story, as you may imagine.
Satan as prince of this world is my best answer too.
It seems your opinion, i may be wrong, that satan is a title of Enki? Because Enki is usually the crossway between the religious 'satan' and a more historical one.
Or another case?
Not Enki, but his son Marduk.
The best and most explicit place to start is Isaiah 14:12. Everyone starts with this "son of the morning star" stuff in English and jumps off from there. You have to go to the original Hebrew and properly decode "helel ben shahar".
Long story short, you have to research who Shahar was in the Ugaritic pantheon. Then you can compare his immediate family to that of Enki and you come up with Marduk. If that verse isn't referring to Marduk, then it is all one hell of a coincidence.
Once you have "Marduk = Satan" as the thesis, a ton more evidence can finally be properly interpreted and will fall right into place. All of that evidence has to be unspun and descrustified because dumbass has had their shot at bending the evidence towards their desired conclusions over the last few centuries.
For example, Marduk was the tutelary deity of Babylon. Now you can clearly understand why Babylon was talked about so much in the Bible as being a not very good place at all.