Who is at the top? Corbett Report Video
(podcasts.apple.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Well, kinda, but that's exactly why he can be considered a sort of "normie friendly" conspiracy theorist. Again, no normie will never ever listen to what the likes of Alex Jones has to say, but some normies might listen to what Corbett says. (As an aside note: I suspect that this is exactly why the character of Alex Jones exist. To invalidate any talking point in normie minds that TPTB deem unwelcome to be discussed. It goes like this: Normie listens to a snippet of AJ talking and normie will never again take that point seriously, even if it's true.)
I agree with first statement, but not quite with the second one. Yes, Corbett does not make shocking revelations, but do we actually need them? The whole point he reiterates repeatedly is that all the information you need is already available openly. It's not about shocking revelations of lizard people, aliens, or elite eating babies... It's about connecting the dots and understanding how the system works. How it takes and how it maintains power. Also, about how to resist it.
As for insights... Well, not in every video, but he does actually provide insights and new ways to think about things from time to time.
I can somewhat agree with this one. Yes, he has certain boundaries outside which he won't go. Then again, it's up to each one individually to find information form various sources and glue it all together. There is not one truthsayer out there who will give you everything on a plate.
Hmm, I got completely opposite impression. While he doesn't venture to some further out there theories (like the ones saying war doesn't exist or that it's fake etc), his analysis on basic facts is usually spot on. From the very start he has stated that this war is a building block for the NWO, that Multipolar World Order is the same NWO just in a different package and that basically the whole endeavour is totally engineered and planned. Also, that this is basically a war of governments on their own populations much more than a war against some outside enemy... Well, I don't know, but seems to me this is very different from what NYT and WaPo are saying...
All in all, it might sound like I'm totally defending him and agree with him on everything... That's not quite true either. The value of Corbett is his "down to earth" takes and interesting viewpoints to consider. Even if he is a controlled op, the likes of already mentioned AJ and all the other politically partisan pundits are much, much more harmful than Corbett will ever be.
As I have discovered it from personal research, the true (or at least far truer) state of affairs is quite shocking, so much so that few would have the capacity to even entertain the concepts.
The fatal problem is that it exists in a different paradigm than that discussed by Corbett or Jones or any other conspiracy researcher, whether authentic or disinfo. They will all just keep everyone running from pillar to post around the "mainstream conspiracy" paradigm while those "at the top" continue their work undiscovered and unstudied, and thus unmolested and unimpeded.
The reason I say the paradigm is different is because there is no accumulation or refinement of the sum of mainstream conspiracy research that will get you anywhere near the truth. They can even metaphorically stand right next it--in plain sight--yet never notice the crucial importance of it.
Virtually all of the evidence I draw on comes right from the normie mainstream. I just collect it up and arrange it artfully. I've often wondered why none of these other researchers--who seem to have dedicated their lives to it for far longer than me--have never noticed the same things I have.
I have come to no conclusion on that point. Certainly they could be paid and directed to notice and discuss other things, that's a simple enough explanation. But all of them? I'm left to speculate that it is not a matter of perception or analysis, but rather what level of truth one is willing to contemplate and accept.
See any of my numerous Salem Witch posts. Far more than what has already been documented is on the way. Find any connection to the work Corbett or Jones or any of the others has done. The work of Miles Mathis is connected, but I never miss an opportunity to highlight and specify how full of disinformation it really is.
Is the work all of them do harmful? I would let everyone judge for themselves but as I see it, one could spend a lifetime ingesting all their work product and die just as ignorant of the true state of affairs as at the beginning. Frankly, I believe that to be the point.
Well, of course if you get all your information from a single source and do not explore anything else outside it, you won't get anywhere far. I think multiple sources and critical thinking is the key here. Also, not believe in anything outright. You don't have to have an opinion or some definite belief about everything. There's a lot of stuff about which I simply do not have any strong opinion whatsoever.
Hmm, but you have to have at least some entrypoint... You can't simply dump a lot of info on a normie and expect them to believe it. Even if it's true and correct. You see, it's a dead end. The more out there the actual truth is the harder is to get someone to even contemplate it.
I'll check them out. Do you have some definite post to recommend or maybe something like tldr intro?
Mathis is a strange one. He has opened my eyes on some things, but he's also sometimes very obviously full of shit. He calls literally anyone a disinfo agent, but he also might be one himself. Hmm.
I've not yet written a TL/DR for the Salem Witch thesis. The posts on them have evolved into basically a series of research notes just to get a bit of data organized and out there as I complete it.
I'm shooting for it, but the day will probably never come when I get around to collecting it all back up and organizing the material more formally. I've already written up probably 350 pages and that is--at a guess--just 5% of the evidence I've gathered and need to formally document.
The basic thesis, however, is simple: a small number of generational Satanist families have been manipulating history and dominating society for centuries. The evidence I have available begins with Europeans landing in North America. It involves primarily US history but tendrils lead farther afield.
How could one possibly demonstrate such a thing? Surprisingly, through genealogy. They "keep it in the family" so the same families pop up over and over and over. It turns out that a lot of those families--though there are some others that have turned up--participated in the artificially-manufactured and fake Salem Witch Trials. That provides a reliable touchstone.
One of my favorite posts which demonstrates the basic strategy of proof is:
Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)
One could consider that One Big Coincidence, but I've written up (I never count) maybe 60 other such Big Coincidences in numerous area of history and to the present day.
Roswell is just one nugget of gold among many that are lying around in the field, but I always liked it because so so so many disinfo agents and dupes run around basing their theses on it being real in some sense or another.
Because the analysis directly contradicts this and holds that both the "crash" and the "coverup" at Roswell were totally manufactured, you can instantly dispense with all that other material. You can even begin trying to figure out who was a dupe and who is deliberately lying.
And if you go back over that other Roswell material, there is zero way whatsoever you could get to the Salem Witches from it. That's why I consider it a new paradigm, and why "They" have been able to hide so successfully for so long.
Read that post. Yeah, that's some nice research. Somewhat similar to what Mathis does.
Well, yes, of course it's entirely possible that few spook families have been controlling the world for a while now. What I'm mostly interested is "how" and "why". How do they manipulate public perception and what exactly is the mechanism of power behind the scenes. Also, why do they do that, to which most simple answer is power and control... Of course, there may be other answers as well.
One other theory I'm currently interested in is the one about recurrent resets. In short: Our history might not even exist and our civilization could be deliberately reset at regular intervals of about 200-300 years. If it's true, then we are currently on the verge of next reset. Most likely reason is that TPTB can't hold control forever. Sooner or later masses do eventually wake up to how heavily they are being fucked by the system, so in order to keep their power and control, rulers orchestrate a reset after which everything starts anew. New lies, new control schemes and all the rest shitshow... However, their biggest mistake is assuming that this can keep going on forever. It can't. There will come a time when they no longer will be able to hold their power no matter what. Reset or no reset...
There are variations of that, of course. The intervals might be longer, our history might be only a partial lie and said resets might be of a softer kind. For example, WW1 and WW2 were most likely orchestrated deliberately. Maybe those can be considered sort of resets as well...
Do all the vegan activists eat children in the secret of the night, ofcourse not, sure. They believe.
Yet how do they end up taking up the mission of those who hate them?
You make them watch hundred of cartoons where the carnivore is the bad stupid guy who ends badly, while the herbivore (bipbip, bugsbunny, etc) is smart cute and winner. After creating this emotional pattern within them, you then release research results that validate that emotion and those people, while believing themselves very smart and good, will be your cultural minions until the end, without even seeing what happened.
That's pretty much it in all fields, i just took one i know well as example.
I've come to understand this as key. It holds true for virtually everyone, from CNN anchors to the Rothschilds to Redditors typing out walls of text. They absolutely believe they are on a crusade for "good". All who disagree with them must be wrong and bad, of course.
Nor will they ever question it because it is an assumption with which they begin. Damn few have the level of consciousness to ever wonder whether they've been the dummy and the dupe and wrong all along.
For those who wish to control and manipulate society, they need not crush opposition under a bootheel. They just get them pointed in a slightly wrong direction then tell them what a great job they're doing. Their ego then makes those people run away from the truth under their own power.