People in the "conspiracy" sector tend to expose themselves to all sorts of theories about our root reality true nature, the accidental (or divinely ironic) state of our world.
If you wish to participate, i'd like to hear a recap of where (y)our minds are at. Probabilistically, i think the stage where there are 'certainties' has been mostly surpassed by most of the remaining crowd. But if you are 'certain' sure speak your mind.
As i opened this thread, i will start. Keep in mind my own thoughts aren't the subject i seek, i would like everyone to state their own and not a comment on my own as a main topic. Although comment are welcome. Saddened to even have to state it, i will ignore comments from known shills/antinazi faggots who make it their whole act.
I feel we are in a nested reality, and that 'the soul' and its dimension of being is the root of our own being.
I'm agnostic to a degree, with which i mean i do sense a 'source' or 'god' but i think i cannot sense it clearly and directly, but there is a nature inside and outside which i doubt a false god could create in its most basic elements and themes, therefore i prefer to disregard 'god' directly and instead try to listen to 'nature' as clearly as i can as it is my preferred way back to my own root. I feel if there is a god, and he hid his own being in the very rules of what i am and of what is around me, then i should listen to that and it is the surest path to him and my(true)self rather than any ideology or theology or dogma about the very idea of a source we emanate from.
I think we are clearly in a poisoned society, not even just detached but actively inverting the idea of what's good and bad.
I think that while jews are the closest ethnos to the culprits they are not the main source, just the middlemen between entities who prey on humans but cannot act directly. This is not an excuse for them, it's just that there is more. They accepted to hold the gate for gain, they are to be held guilty on an ethnos level. And while i think it is surely the first step i don't think it might be the last aswell.
I think Giordano Bruno was the greatest philosopher, in that he went beyond the rules of our own world and peeked further, and saw infinite worlds and infinite universes, all part of the same game, part of another game yet. He wasn't worried no longer about the rules of our passing life and universe, but only with those of his own soul or authentic being.
Those all might change tomorrow, but it's been a while i'm there, who knows what will change again.
Where is your mind at? What do you think/feel at large?
White genocide is already complete.
By 2100, there will be no widespread technology above that had in 1890.
September 29, 2239 AD. Year 6000 of the jewish calendar begins. The state of Israel encompasses the Middle East and now houses all but a handful of the jews on Earth, because the factories around the world need to be managed on-site since there isn’t anyone else left intelligent enough to do so. The Earth is otherwise a single communist nation, homogenous in genetics and culture, ruled over by the United Nations from Jerusalem. The practice of Christianity is illegal the world over. Fewer than 100,000 white people are left alive, scattered around the world in enclaves too small to draw notice but not large enough to protect their genetic diversity. Jews don’t bother hunting them down; they prefer to watch with amusement as the defects caused from inbreeding render ever more of the remaining whites infertile.
As night falls on the Global City of Jerusalem on September 29, 2239, a single trumpet sounds from the sky…
There’s nothing but certainties now. Lacking certainties is proof you’re not paying attention.
Is this gnosticism?
Oh, never mind. Sounds an awful lot like gnosticism to me.
But… whence comes nature?
Well, there’s that idea.
Tikkun Olam, yes.
A very concise explanation.
Disagree, there is still quite some room to change the final outcome of our era. It will obviously involve taking big risks collectively, and it's obvious the 'evil empire' isn't going down without a lethal fight.
I do not relate to their sophia's myth, or that the world is fundamentally a creation of an evil god. Quite the only idea i share with gnostics is that we are nested into a silly place that tryies to cut us off from larger reality.
About the jew part, i don't think they will take chances into let us grow back if we ever lose the political fight of this century. One of the two peoples is going out for good this time i believe. Few chances outside that
free-will-of-choice v2
I call out the misuse of the meaning of words far less often than he does. That’s his whole schtick.
Bible says the AI can stay afloat for 1000 years before Starlink falls from the sky.
The what.
The beast whose number is WWW will rule over the earth for 1000 years and then the Starlink will fall out of the sky and we'll have a new heaven and a new Jerusalem.
Isn't that what the kikes wrote? The same ones who are building it today?
It's the source that warned me the vaccine sting will cause pain (Rev9:10)
No, John wrote, after he had been a Christian for 60 years, that Jesus would rule for a thousand years. WWW only gets 7 years of intense, chaotic rule. If you believe John, then believe Jesus. If you don't believe Jesus, tell him so on his own merits.
So we should be good then, as soon as this 7 years of Satan AI wraps up. Refreshing. I haven't read it in a while, should touch up and get some good news.
Indeed!
Your cliffhanger has suddenly interested me greatly, Skil. Then what? Every tear has been bottled, so we need a sequel.
Smart, considering your side's record of making real predictions is woeful.
It’s what you want, though. And you’ll be long dead, but our descendants will exist.
Where's the war with Iran? Any day now, right?
literally what
Your retarded side spent all of this year saying "war with Iran for Israel", and even said it after the Bondi shooting.
So...where is it? Come on, we're all dying to know.
The… thing that is already happening?
When I first met u/TallestSkil he was using a 10-year-old link that said that whites would be gone in 10 years. But he has some good insights at times too. Still looking for his prophecy for the Jewish year 6000, seems like he left it incomplete. (Hmm, he said 2339 AD, maybe he means 2340 AD, the end of Hillel year 6000; he may be making the same millennium error that TAFKAP did in the song "1999". But doesn't he know that 200+ years of Persian kings were omitted from this count and by my best guess we have just entered the year 6018 AM, counted from creation? He doesn't agree with Chabad when they disagree with all historians and put Nebuchadnezzar 200 years too late, does he?)
Literally what.
You, not being a Christian, would obviously not be acquainted with what happens afterward.
I used the start. As a jew, you’ll have to ask your rabbi to clarify which end of it marks the End End.
Is this more “the Middle Ages didn’t exist” narrative? Or is this more “the Earth is five seconds old” narrative?
I conclude that the claim of 10 years is a rehash of scare figures that have no supporting graph to them that anyone is willing to put a name on, that has been circulating 8 years unchecked already, and that apply to the US only.
The long-awaited transition, millennial kingdom, and new heavens and earth.
Chabad.org: "A major difference exists between the traditional rabbinic date for the Destruction of the First Temple and the date given by secular historians. Traditional sources, based on the second-century rabbinic work Seder Olam, place the Destruction in the year 3338, or 422 BCE. Secular historians date this event as occurring in 587 BCE, or 165 years earlier than the rabbinic date .... Volumes have been written trying to solve this historical conundrum, but the rabbinic tradition is regarded as authentic."
Oh! So you’re
LITERALLY JUST DIRECTLY LYING IN YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT WHAT I SAID.
Cool, perfect. Thanks for clarifying and linking directly to something that disproved your claim.
Sometimes I round figures before looking them up. The more important question goes back to whether you believe the temple was actually destroyed ca. 422 BC instead of ca. 586 BC, or whether you recognize the year 6000 AM is earlier than you think. And that's a segment of my real interest, what you think the millennium is to be like. You almost moved into that message of hope that would rescue you from your dooming. But then it looks like you remembered the larp and went back to the doom cloud. Anytime you have
HOPE IN CHRIST
I'm there with you as a brother.
Such as when I suggest peak white population was no later than 2013, according to more accurate statistical evidence.
Hard to imagine anything worse than now. Are we already in it? What does the Bible say will be the effects? Is that allegorical or literal? Are the microplastics in entire world’s water supply “wormwood”?
I don’t go in for emotions. If you’re emotionally affected by facts I post, change reality such that they’re no longer fact. Whining about them and stamping your feet won’t change them.
You mean the new thing where you call God a liar and claim He faked the entire history of the Universe just to ‘dunk on’ nonbelievers?
Meaning 2007, Obama election, was year 6000. Makes sense.
You got it! 2007-2008, the year that Obama literally went to the throne of satan and there called for and invoked a new spirit to infuse all mankind, and then was named to lead America while standing before a replica of said throne. That's the punchy headline version, let me know if you want the details dug up. I found that out after doing the calculation, of course. It wasn't a 16-year plan, it was a millennial plan.
I can't tell if this is parody or not.
Walk down the aisle of your cubicle farm and find out in person.
Everything I say has seriousness in it, the presentation is often tongue in cheek. That data above though is deadly serious, that is literally exactly what happened. I finally completed my chronology of the world with creation in 3993 BC and then found that the year 6000 AM (2007-2008 AD) also had those very significant events in it. I might get to posting the links but it's a busy weekend.
None of these Nazi retards ever have something useful to say. They're just a good ad for MAID.
"White Genocide/Birth Crisis" is climate cultism 2.0.
I won't say anything with "certainty" because, while I think there is an ultimate Truth, I don't think it can be fully grasped within the physical universe.
But I do think we live in a uni-verse, for the simple reason that, barring evidence to the contrary, it's so astronomically unlikely that we exist that I think it's actually impossible for anything other than us to exist. We are the only life we know of as far as we can see and hear, in a nearly empty universe, which has operating parameters so finely tuned that the smallest shift in any of a dozen different factors would mean it would never have come in to being in the first place.
We not only live in the best possible world, but the only possible world.
That said, the only reason anything exists is due to a conscious, Good, creator; the chance that we should exist randomly makes the chance of finding a beach with the complete works of Shakespeare spelled out in crab claws seem certain by comparison.
Good, because the default state of everything is nothing; nihil. Matter is better than empty space, life is better than inanimate matter, complex life is better than basic life, and humans are better than animals. Matters move away from evil over time because there is a Plan.
Humans are special because we can understand Good and evil. Simpler life is created to fill a role and cannot deviate, but we can chose to force our will on physical reality, or not. Our natural, human, state is to move towards Good but we can knowingly reject that role.
I think the reason we do this is because we confuse the idea that we are part of a bigger Plan with the idea that the Plan is for us. I think this concept is build into consciousness itself; anything that can think can think of itself as being superior to everything else, and the more competent and the more power it has over physical reality, the more likely that will be. That's why Lucifer, an angel created by God, could turn against Him (and maybe even inevitably would).
This is the basis of Jewish belief; everything has been done for them. They are the end result and so not constrained by any sense of duty, or gratitude, or morality. This is "true" evil; the conscious decision to go against God's plan and, instead, exalt yourself.
By contrast, even though there must be a conscious effort on the part of humans, living a Good life significantly involves a certain "letting go" in order to let yourself fall in line with God's Plan, rather than trying to affect your imperfect will, no matter how well intentioned, on the world.
This i'm 50/50 on par.
On one side we are filled with false desires and false self images, on another our natural will should already be aligned with god plan for us if one there is.
I feel this kind of reasoning is a lot affected by our current dominant world view but i noticed within myself a lot of similar paradigms crashing down as i digested different ideas, usually much older than science or christianity.
This is a great start! I take it that by "basis of Jewish belief" you mean that ingrate nonconstraint is a lifestyle seen in practice of many Jews, as opposed to a specific published tenet of Judaism?
And I take it that you connect the dots that Jesus models how we are to be part of a Plan when He made Himself one with the Plan?
No, I'd say it's pretty explicit. The Talmud clearly assumes supremacy based on their "holy" lineage rather than anything they'd done to earn it.
I also wouldn't say Jesus "made Himself one with the Plan", rather He was always a part of it.
Well, whenever I look at Jesus's part in the plan it always seems like he's one with all of it. We just had a forum open up about The Way where I pointed out that even as we are all Anointed there is a sense in which the groom's "part" transcends the bride's "part".
And that's a fitting link for u/MysteriousFedKnight.
For the rest I'll leave it at the observation that unearned grace (including birth circumstance, I'm proud to be an American) is a pretty common idea around the world and doesn't seem to lead people automatically to nonrestraint rather than gratitude, not without some other corrupting factor.
a) Sector implies a division; exposure implies a unification...that's a contradiction held within self, which permits another to exploit one.
b) The words "people"; "themselves" and "conspiracy" imply plurality aka to unite with one another artificially, while ignoring to be divided from one another naturally.
c) Few tempt many together into plurality, which when used as a sector (section of a circle) can be cut into two opposing sides. The circle within self represents logic, which turns outwards into a conflict of reason against one another.
Logic confines thinking, while reason exposes those self confined against one another.
Theory/theos (God) implies singularity; sorts (arranging in sequence) implies plurality. Few sor-ting many implies the use of sor-cery.
All doesn't sort together...all divides each one within from one another hence setting each one free (will of choice).
A state implies a potential during a process aka an internal division (divination) of ironic/eironikos (to dissemble) during accident/accidere (fall out).
Falling out (inception towards death) while being (life) dissembled from one another...
...then you ignore wishing (summoning) contradicts participating as a particle within whole. Wishing simply implies wanting more than needed...this generates the happy merchant of temptation selling whatever one wants more of, while exploiting the ignored need.
Here. At the center of motion...tempted by emotion into circumference. Right/reg - "to move in a straight line".
One ignores responding (re) to all (al) when holding onto the fictitious WE aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
Another fictitious distraction from reality... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilism aka seeking approval from one another, while ignoring self discernment.
Probability implies skepticism aka denying perceivable knowledge by seeking suggested understanding.
Nature moves, hence passing each being within in-between (above/below)...others tempt one to ignore that by tempting ones mind to ascertain aka to affix suggested information; beliefs; definitions; truth; names; dates; historical narratives; equations; laws etc.
Sound moves through mind/memory before one can choose to articulate spoken words into certainties to share with one another. Doing so implies "spell-craft"...
Only in-between start (inception) and finish (death) can there be will (life)..."we didn't start the fire; it was always burning".
That's the circular distortion of a mind thinking straight. Nature moves through each being...one cannot keep anything mentally or physically. One needs to let go, while resisting the wanted temptation to keep holding onto.
The more one resists, the more resistance grows, yet the more one falls for temptation, the less resistance one has to resist.
One cannot own what all gives each one for free...any claimed ownership tempts one another to reclaim.
Suggested information held within ones consenting mind represents the fictitious nest keeping one from flying as response (re) within all (al).
My one certainty is Reality: it is certain not because I accord it as such but because it establishes itself as such (IMHO). When we get to details, I find them all in Jesus, but that's building on the foundation you ask about.
That means that any "certainty" I experience is sufficient and imperfect even as my experience evidences that Reality makes itself certain, completely and perfectly. In practice I can't know everything but I can know anything.
If by Soul you mean Reality and by our being you mean nested reality, then I say "certainly".
Mindfulness (listening) to the Self-Other nature is "certainly" our path.
Poisons and predators and middlemen exist. I cannot judge an ethnos unless it has formally constituted itself as a corporate middleman, not just because it's close to guilt.
The math of universe to multiverse to multigame was also played by Georg Cantor, who famously said there's more than one kind of infinity. I think he was wrong, the infinity is the same but there's more than one way to look at it. What we perceive of as being "beyond" this universe is still only mediated by our perception in this universe, and thus any complex description of the beyond ends up being isomorphic with another if it stays consistent. This principle is more often abused than used (cf. poisons).
What I would draw from that is that, even as no ideology, theology, dogma can be complete in my mind, Reality itself does constitute its own ideology, theology, dogma in itself. The whole point of dogmatic proposition should be as hypothesis and not as absolute in itself. Hypotheses can be refined, absolutes cannot. Many here have come to reject the principle of dogma because of its abuse as if absolute; but the reality is that we all use the principle of proposition every time we listen to Self and Other in nature, and the issue is whether we treat our perceived propositions as absolute or whether we abandon them to the absolute being the transcendent and not any subset we can experience as a whole.
So all the propositions made by you or anyone here are proposed as sufficient but imperfect, falsifiable and in-progress. Over time some of them get familiar and dependable enough that we can raise them to an inspired level and call them statements of truth, but even then they are still only reflections of Reality. I encourage you to let this natural process bubble truths up for you as they can keep rising forever. I tell everyone simply to pursue Truth at all costs.
I think the mental illness of the Nazi faggots needs lethal intervention.
This really is you entire conception of reality, isn't it?
Sad.
Not as sad as TallestSkil and his weird ideology that seems solely to exist so he can justify lusting after his sister.