3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Obviously fake video, lol. We’re officially in the "Post Truth” era, where absolutely nothing can be trusted unless you see it yourself.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used that until it was obsoleted with the new way Safari handles extensions, moving to AdGuard around 2016. Never looked back. uBlock Origin has always been nice. I used it in Windows until this year (switching to AdGuard there, too). But if it no longer does the job you need, it’s time to switch.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

How?

Head to the settings for whichever browser extension you use, go to the tab in there that says “blocklists,” and hit refresh somewhere on that page.

And what do you even block?

You can’t do it manually here because Google throws up some code before the video player even loads. You have to just update the blocklist so that the adblocker itself can lie to Google about the flag it’s supposed to be seeing, whereupon YouTube will think everything’s hunky dory and the video will load.

Point is you will reach a zenith where they win the arms race. Trust me.

Been 30 years and they haven’t won yet.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

Just use a better ad blocker. AdGuard hasn’t thrown up this error for me in over a year.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

DOGE is supported directly by the CEO of Palantir. Anyone who falls for any aspect of the ZOG Emperor narrative on any date past the end of 2017 is beyond saving and is a direct enemy of the white race.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

YOU MADE UP EXACTLY WHAT THE OP SAYS

Just fuck off already.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the low, low cost of $30,000 added to the product!

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

who said it needs to drive the car directly instead of simply topping off a battery?

OP. It’s the crux of the thread. It’s why it exists.

you’re just inventing

It is physically impossible to do this. Fuck off, shill.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you know? Have you crunched the numbers?

Yep.

you're inventing a problem while at the same time explaining how the solution is small enough to fit into a hand crank

You can fit a voltage regulator capable of regulating 4 kW/h throughput into a hand crank?

the problem is already solved.

Other than the laws of physics explicitly stating it’s not possible, sure.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

That part doesn't have to be done wirelessly.

It… does. Otherwise the vehicle can’t "power itself from radio waves.” The receiver has to be in the car.

I don't think it would be with tiny amounts of energy you'd get from radio waves.

Correct, but with the scale of power output required to actually do what the post claims it can do, it would be on the order of what happens to commercial windmills when they don’t shut down in high winds.

Then it might be enough to at least use that as a hybrid source of energy, supplementing plugging into the grid.

Remember in the ‘80s when “microwave power stations in orbit beamed down to Earth” was The Future™? Turns out, with the surface area required by the receiver antenna, solar panels (even at the time) could produce about three times the power. It’s just not viable. There are some electric cars today with solar panel roofs (to do just what you’re suggesting), but even then it’s really, truly just a “top up” supplement, not anywhere near capable of powering it indefinitely.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are hand cranks for charging phones. That's hardly consistent but it still works.

There’s hardware in the device to convert the variable voltage of the cranking into a smoothed voltage in order to send it to the battery without the battery exploding. That’s my point; the hardware required to do this WIRELESSLY for a VEHICLE IN MOTION doesn’t exist.

As long as it can make a needle jump that power can be stored.

Oh boy, seven month charging times for 300 mile range!

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’ve posted no opinions, you fucking hack. You have NOTHING.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

negative position

You mean THE PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE US BELIEVE? What about it, you fucking piece of shit coward?

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is physically impossible to move the mass in question at the speed in question using nothing more than electromagnetism without causing radiative pressure sufficient to REDUCE THE OBJECTS BEING MOVED INTO SUBATOMIC PARTICLES. You are incapable of proving otherwise.

An electric car requires ~4 kilowatts to move one mile. A cell tower puts out TEN FUCKING WATTS, YOU SUBHUMAN PIECE OF SHIT. But that’s irrelevant, because that kind of signal IS NOT TRANSFERRABLE INTO POWER IN THE FIRST PLACE. So what’s the furthest distance anyone has ever transmitted electricity for power in a single test, completely outside of real-world circumstances? ONE FUCKING KILOMETER. And how much power was that? TWO KILOWATTS.

CAN’T POWER THE FUCKING CAR. IT’S A HOAX. EAT SHIT.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

When he said the car is powered by radio waves, you piece of shit.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never heard a bot use the 3rd person.

Translation: “NOOOOOOOOOO UUUUUUUUUUUUUU”

Funny how you, being a now admitted paid shill, replied when you were told to but without any content to your post. Isn’t that funny?

It's called a rectenna

Cute, we’re back to the initial point. It is physically impossible to move the mass in question at the speed in question using nothing more than electromagnetism without causing radiative pressure sufficient to REDUCE THE OBJECTS BEING MOVED INTO SUBATOMIC PARTICLES. You are incapable of proving otherwise.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAH THE BOT BROKE

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have admitted it is impossible to power a vehicle on radio waves. Reply again, paid shill.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

constantly recharged using radio waves.

And this is the bullshit part. Inductive charging? Sure. Wireless power transmission, even? Sure. For static objects.

I’m going to completely disregard the unholy engineering nightmare that is “creating a power receptacle capable of outputting constant current when provided with a perpetually and violently changing intensity of current as input” and focus entirely on the input itself. The inverse square law means that allowing a receiver to be at an arbitrary and ever-changing distance (such as a moving vehicle) requires a transmission source that puts out an absolute goddamned fuckton of power to ensure that, at said arbitrary distance, the target can still receive whatever the minimum power it needs to operate. So that’s just untenable.

And even then that’s not taking into consideration what that minimum power would have to be to push a car and its cargo while “remaining charged.”

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neat, you’re still wrong. It’s physically impossible to do what the post claims is possible.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

Thanks for refusing to answer the other questions, by the way. It is impossible to power a vehicle on radio waves. Period.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

misquote

Try again.

view more: Next ›