People in the "conspiracy" sector tend to expose themselves to all sorts of theories about our root reality true nature, the accidental (or divinely ironic) state of our world.
If you wish to participate, i'd like to hear a recap of where (y)our minds are at. Probabilistically, i think the stage where there are 'certainties' has been mostly surpassed by most of the remaining crowd. But if you are 'certain' sure speak your mind.
As i opened this thread, i will start. Keep in mind my own thoughts aren't the subject i seek, i would like everyone to state their own and not a comment on my own as a main topic. Although comment are welcome. Saddened to even have to state it, i will ignore comments from known shills/antinazi faggots who make it their whole act.
I feel we are in a nested reality, and that 'the soul' and its dimension of being is the root of our own being.
I'm agnostic to a degree, with which i mean i do sense a 'source' or 'god' but i think i cannot sense it clearly and directly, but there is a nature inside and outside which i doubt a false god could create in its most basic elements and themes, therefore i prefer to disregard 'god' directly and instead try to listen to 'nature' as clearly as i can as it is my preferred way back to my own root. I feel if there is a god, and he hid his own being in the very rules of what i am and of what is around me, then i should listen to that and it is the surest path to him and my(true)self rather than any ideology or theology or dogma about the very idea of a source we emanate from.
I think we are clearly in a poisoned society, not even just detached but actively inverting the idea of what's good and bad.
I think that while jews are the closest ethnos to the culprits they are not the main source, just the middlemen between entities who prey on humans but cannot act directly. This is not an excuse for them, it's just that there is more. They accepted to hold the gate for gain, they are to be held guilty on an ethnos level. And while i think it is surely the first step i don't think it might be the last aswell.
I think Giordano Bruno was the greatest philosopher, in that he went beyond the rules of our own world and peeked further, and saw infinite worlds and infinite universes, all part of the same game, part of another game yet. He wasn't worried no longer about the rules of our passing life and universe, but only with those of his own soul or authentic being.
Those all might change tomorrow, but it's been a while i'm there, who knows what will change again.
Where is your mind at? What do you think/feel at large?
I conclude that the claim of 10 years is a rehash of scare figures that have no supporting graph to them that anyone is willing to put a name on, that has been circulating 8 years unchecked already, and that apply to the US only.
The long-awaited transition, millennial kingdom, and new heavens and earth.
Chabad.org: "A major difference exists between the traditional rabbinic date for the Destruction of the First Temple and the date given by secular historians. Traditional sources, based on the second-century rabbinic work Seder Olam, place the Destruction in the year 3338, or 422 BCE. Secular historians date this event as occurring in 587 BCE, or 165 years earlier than the rabbinic date .... Volumes have been written trying to solve this historical conundrum, but the rabbinic tradition is regarded as authentic."
Oh! So you’re
LITERALLY JUST DIRECTLY LYING IN YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT WHAT I SAID.
Cool, perfect. Thanks for clarifying and linking directly to something that disproved your claim.
Sometimes I round figures before looking them up. The more important question goes back to whether you believe the temple was actually destroyed ca. 422 BC instead of ca. 586 BC, or whether you recognize the year 6000 AM is earlier than you think. And that's a segment of my real interest, what you think the millennium is to be like. You almost moved into that message of hope that would rescue you from your dooming. But then it looks like you remembered the larp and went back to the doom cloud. Anytime you have
HOPE IN CHRIST
I'm there with you as a brother.
Such as when I suggest peak white population was no later than 2013, according to more accurate statistical evidence.
Hard to imagine anything worse than now. Are we already in it? What does the Bible say will be the effects? Is that allegorical or literal? Are the microplastics in entire world’s water supply “wormwood”?
I don’t go in for emotions. If you’re emotionally affected by facts I post, change reality such that they’re no longer fact. Whining about them and stamping your feet won’t change them.
You mean the new thing where you call God a liar and claim He faked the entire history of the Universe just to ‘dunk on’ nonbelievers?
The previous link covered my chronology part 9 on the millennium. Your questions relate to the tribulating in the seventieth seven, which is part 8 and which I take quite literally (all the parts are linked from part 9).
Exactly my point. I don't doom, or get affected by doom. But you doom, and you expressed hope like once or twice since I've known you, and then you pulled your cards back to your chest again.
Try to follow. By having your 6000 AM start in 2239 AD, you are calling the history of the universe a lie, at the part where the Persian empire is shortened by about 200 years from reality. I showed you that there are Chabad Jews who actually believe that and reject all historical dates prior to the Persian empire, so it's very close to the No Middle Ages theory. You're now acting like you can't believe I just proved you're doing this. If you go through the chronology links you find we're in the year 6018 AM, which is only 11 years less than Ussher's total. So I actually have
HOPE IN CHRIST
for the immediate present and the immediate future.
Add: Oh yeah, you were just saying something about my disproof of the billions of years being wrong, but you never made clear what dating system you went with, so I assumed it was on the range of the myriads that a lot of literalists feel comfortable pushing the Bible back to. That's one of your liabilities of rarely talking straight but only by implication: the benefit is you never have to make a point, and the liability is that you never do make a point. So I stepped in because you were acting like maybe you had hope for the year 2239 AD. But, now that you're not again, I'm not interested anymore.