1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to think that with my free will of choice I can choose to not act on chemically driven instincts alone, and can rise above the temptations of revenge, anger or fear.

Sure, you are still into and conditioned by the bundle so far if you write this.

You know if you try to go without breathing by will you are just going to run into incredible pain and death, or you can't raise your body temp consciously (or to a limited degree).

Why would I hunt and kill an animal when I have food a plenty?

Because that's the food you are naturally optimized to eat and thrive on while all the rest is mostly fillers with toxic payloads (for humans). Man is apex regulator of animal life and made for it. Your biology is, by reflex, not designed to reward you for doing much else in terms of nutrition.

Does the predator empathize with the pain of their prey? Does the prey empathize with the hunger of the predator?

Game of life and nature's call. Different morals. Nature wouldn't make carnivores if herbivores didn't need to become regulated.

To deter a bear from attacking all one needs is a spritz of bear spray, not a retaliation against the bear's cubs.

Different in nature, different if you are a natural bear hunter.

Comparing human behavior to animals is pointless. We were given the capacity of free will of choice, and the ability to invent with our superior brains. Thus we have the ability to empathize and feel what another being, either animal or human is feeling. (atleast many of us do)

Evolution theories aside (alien intervention etc) man evolved into a humanoid from monkey exactly becoming a skilled hunter. evolving brain to hunt also means evolving stomach.

A man is the only predator that tends to animal needs and safety and grants a painless death as it can be and i think that is fair enough for now and there are worse problem to think about than that overall and the good people are going to need the health and strength from said consumption.

8
MysteriousFedKnight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Modernity is based on imitation of reality, and substitution of real with fake value. This is really the core concept.

Once rich people used to dress linen or silk, they are better for the skin -> real advantage. Now? Rich people buy overpriced branded cotton -> fake value.

Once generals used to eat meat and fruit, and slaves had potatoes and rice generating health problems (like scurvy on ships), real incentive to move up. Now? The poor eats better than the rich if he knows how. The rich is entangled often in a progressive ideology that won't let him eat naturally.

Once the rich used to invest their wealth into long lasting properties, like almost eternal furniture they could pass down 20 generations. Now they invest into fast-changing digital values that may crash and burn anyday, or in high tech that will be trash in some years.

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a really bad translation and infact unheard of.

Mangioni translates to really nothing, 'mangiare' is to eat. Mansion translates to 'Mansione' in italian.

Seems like a GTranslate blooper, unless there is some ancient etimology stuff going on.

EDIT: if i check with google without translate,

'mangioni etimology', i get correctly

'Mangione is an Italian surname meaning someone who eats a lot, from the Italian verb mangiare. The name is common in Italy, primarily in Apulia and Sicily.'

2
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

You totally miss the point.

An animal that doesn't retaliate is soon dead.

Other animals will see it as a lack of strength and disrespect him until it shows strength or dies.

You may be the highest soul ever, but here among animal thinking you are just going to be taken as weak and profitted on.

Vengeance solve the need to show others you can't be taken advantage of, which is how in nature we create a deterrent to be attacked over and over.

There is a reason it is in our instinct.

2
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you care about forgiveness, you can forgive those who retaliated on you then. No problem.

We'll talk when you are done with that. Otherwise, just forgive. That's your ultimate solution right?

2
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are levels we are different, and levels it doesn't matter.

I wouldn't retaliate on a head to head basis if i was leading a country hit not by a head to head basis.

We are part of groups, individually we can choose our way, but then there are incentives to group us together with others in other people judgement that are rooted in nature.

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't really referring to myself with that. No worries...

0
MysteriousFedKnight 0 points ago +1 / -1

While i tend to agree on the matter,

those paid grifters are paid because they influence opinions, and you will sometimes meet their victims online looking to understand better, and your attitude won't be too useful for that.

4
MysteriousFedKnight 4 points ago +4 / -0

The title is sort of clickbait. There's really little interview in there and is more of a doc.

But the comments were too funny not to post it.

Also, if whitewashed, some interesting details.

0
MysteriousFedKnight 0 points ago +1 / -1

He did tons of bs.

That's a reason, the other is he does a lot of bs and if he didn't do it for real then everyone is going to suspect he did thanks to him being a psycho dickhead.

And i think he might aswell have done it after what he did in the past.

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not in reality, but anything goes by appearance if it helps bring in that reality.

They love fake shows where they completely denature the meaning of something before using it as cover.

2
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

What, this mental retardation? And I’m supposed to give a shit what this spam says now?

Said the flat earther.

Since you evidently don't seem to grasp a simple fundamental difference between stating 'the earth is bigger than we think' with 'the earth is flat' and don't understand this make you one to spell it out clearly like to a complete retard, i guess you could have invested 2 minutes reading 2 adjectives, yeah.

3
MysteriousFedKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are conflating bigger earth theory with the dimensional controversies and they can be related but also separable. No reference was made in the video to anything flat. You do not benefit your cause when you make up fake points.

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing to add further, then.

May i ask how you come to learn it? (i do the same)

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

As it is a part i recently went deep into, do you do veggie or meat side?

1
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hate to be that guy, but did you atleast check it against AI... And it's also fakeable anyway. Just need 2 layers lol

2
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

The top of the top, i think, fully resides underground.

If they have more elohim blood their aspect may be enough different to notice it.

It seems to me the morlock/eloi story started long ago.

No hard data on that, but by crossing many references with logic i get this is likely the correct conclusion.

view more: Next ›